|
|
Paco
from Gothenburg (Sweden) on 2004-04-03 09:51 [#01131114]
Points: 2659 Status: Lurker
|
|
Jimi, made of small circles with a pencil.. I made him too fat.
|
| Attached picture |
|
|
|
Paco
from Gothenburg (Sweden) on 2004-04-03 09:53 [#01131117]
Points: 2659 Status: Lurker
|
|
my old Roland SH-5..
|
| Attached picture |
|
|
|
Paco
from Gothenburg (Sweden) on 2004-04-03 10:01 [#01131120]
Points: 2659 Status: Lurker
|
|
a statue dressed up by students..
|
| Attached picture |
|
|
|
Phobiazero
from the next Xltronic (Sweden) on 2004-04-03 10:18 [#01131147]
Points: 10507 Status: Webmaster | Show recordbag
|
|
it's a very fast lens :)
|
|
Zephyr Twin
from ΔΔΔ on 2004-04-03 11:01 [#01131197]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Show recordbag
|
|
I love that pic of your sh-5.... great perspective
|
|
Sido Dyas
from a computer on 2004-04-03 11:02 [#01131201]
Points: 8876 Status: Lurker
|
|
Yeah the SH-5 pic is very good indeed. =)
|
|
-crazone
from smashing acid over and over on 2004-04-03 11:03 [#01131202]
Points: 11234 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
i love jimmie
|
|
Zephyr Twin
from ΔΔΔ on 2004-04-03 11:14 [#01131213]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Followup to Paco: #01131117 | Show recordbag
|
|
are you 'in-love' with the sh-5? good oldschool synth?
|
|
Paco
from Gothenburg (Sweden) on 2004-04-03 11:46 [#01131255]
Points: 2659 Status: Lurker | Followup to Zephyr Twin: #01131213
|
|
It's does have great filters, (multimode VCF and a separate bandpass with its own resonance) but it has a thin sound compared to some other synths. I definately(sp?) recommend it, if you can find one.
Hey Phobia, did you receive your 17-40/4L yet?
|
|
Phobiazero
from the next Xltronic (Sweden) on 2004-04-03 11:51 [#01131262]
Points: 10507 Status: Webmaster | Followup to Paco: #01131255 | Show recordbag
|
|
yep - it's great. L-quality all over.
|
|
Phobiazero
from the next Xltronic (Sweden) on 2004-04-03 11:58 [#01131270]
Points: 10507 Status: Webmaster | Followup to Paco: #01131255 | Show recordbag
|
|
my next lens will prolly be one of canon 100/2.8 macro usm or the canon 100-400 L is usm.
two different lenses. one is pretty cheap, the other pretty expensive. two different fields of use... I think I'd use the 100-400 a bit more tho. although macro photography is interesting. hmmm....
|
|
virginpusher
from County Clare on 2004-04-03 12:07 [#01131283]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker | Followup to Paco: #01131117
|
|
to me, so much is said in that shot. It makes me feel good and i wanna make music.
|
|
Paco
from Gothenburg (Sweden) on 2004-04-03 12:12 [#01131288]
Points: 2659 Status: Lurker
|
|
I think I've got all the lenses I need now. I'm probably selling off the cheapo 75-300 after this summer. The 18-55 is pretty wide, but I'd love a Sigma 14/2.8 or maybe the Sigma 15/2.8 rectangular fisheye. Oh and I'll get the two Canon converters for my 70-200/2.8 (much later).
Crazy dog at my place..
|
| Attached picture |
|
|
|
Phobiazero
from the next Xltronic (Sweden) on 2004-04-30 00:39 [#01167897]
Points: 10507 Status: Webmaster | Followup to Paco: #01131288 | Show recordbag
|
|
Are you satisfied with your 70-200 so far, Paco? It's the non-IS version, right?
|
|
Messageboard index
|