|
|
AlbertoBalsalm
from ReykjavÃk (Iceland) on 2003-10-29 18:08 [#00924642]
Points: 9459 Status: Lurker
|
|
here
|
|
epohs
from )C: on 2003-10-29 18:10 [#00924644]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker
|
|
anyone installed winamp 5?
if so, how is it?
i use 2.91 and have no complaints. what are the reasons for upgrading?
|
|
fleetmouse
from Horny for Truth on 2003-10-29 18:11 [#00924645]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker
|
|
someday maybe it will be as good as 2.91
|
|
zaphod
from the metaverse on 2003-10-29 18:35 [#00924672]
Points: 4428 Status: Addict
|
|
itunes
|
|
BlatantEcho
from All over (United States) on 2003-10-29 19:03 [#00924708]
Points: 7210 Status: Lurker
|
|
i'm stuck on winamp 2, sorry 5
|
|
pyro5hit9rind
from Pickering (Canada) on 2003-10-29 19:08 [#00924711]
Points: 315 Status: Lurker
|
|
i got winamp five. so far no bugs. works w/ all my skins so far.
loads up a million times faster then ghey 3.0.
its basically 2.9 w/ 3.0 features. i like...
|
|
mappatazee
from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2003-10-29 19:27 [#00924725]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker
|
|
Yeah, it's good
|
|
drummond
from coffee, ahh, a burger, ahh on 2003-10-29 19:28 [#00924727]
Points: 1021 Status: Addict | Followup to fleetmouse: #00924645
|
|
im with you, and i doubt it
|
|
AlbertoBalsalm
from ReykjavÃk (Iceland) on 2003-10-29 20:42 [#00924798]
Points: 9459 Status: Lurker | Followup to drummond: #00924727
|
|
it's based on the 2.9x code, so it's basicly an updated 2.9x but with new features and wa3 skin support. also, the new default skin is very lovable
why don't you guys just try it?
|
|
epohs
from )C: on 2003-10-30 06:52 [#00925320]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker | Followup to AlbertoBalsalm: #00924798
|
|
ok, you talked me into it.
|
|
epohs
from )C: on 2003-10-30 07:20 [#00925340]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker
|
|
it's alright.
it does load a whole lot fater than 3 did. probably a little slower than 2.91, but hardly noticable on a 1.6ghz p4 / 512mb ram.
the fact that it asked me if i wanted an aol icon on my desktop sucked, and, it was checked by default!
the skins are ok i guess. moodlogic is pretty swell, but the default skin is too big.
my verdict: 100% better than 3, but after using it for 5 minutes, i can't see any compelling reason to upgrade from 2.91
|
|
nlogax
from oh, you must be the brains (Norway) on 2003-10-30 07:21 [#00925342]
Points: 4653 Status: Regular
|
|
When Winamp 5 goes final, it will kick the shit out of Winamp 2 (& 3 obviously...).
|
|
eXXailon
from purgatory on 2003-10-30 07:24 [#00925347]
Points: 6745 Status: Lurker
|
|
Is it even worth upgrading from winamp 5 beta 1?
|
|
nlogax
from oh, you must be the brains (Norway) on 2003-10-30 07:36 [#00925366]
Points: 4653 Status: Regular | Followup to eXXailon: #00925347
|
|
Yeah, I guess some bugs have been fixed, so it's probably more a more stable release
|
|
AlbertoBalsalm
from ReykjavÃk (Iceland) on 2003-10-30 09:23 [#00925512]
Points: 9459 Status: Lurker | Followup to eXXailon: #00925347
|
|
follow the link and you'll see a long list of fixed things
|
|
Jarworski
from The Grove (United Kingdom) on 2003-10-30 09:24 [#00925514]
Points: 10836 Status: Lurker
|
|
Can you use v3 skins with it? I couldn't with beta 1. Maybe I'm just a spaz.
|
|
AlbertoBalsalm
from ReykjavÃk (Iceland) on 2003-10-30 09:28 [#00925515]
Points: 9459 Status: Lurker | Followup to Jarworski: #00925514
|
|
i could. you should be able to use 'em
if you think wa5 is a little slower than wa2, then use the w2 skins. it'll be just as fast that way.
|
|
giginger
from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2003-10-30 10:27 [#00925570]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
I can't be arsed to upgrade.
|
|
Zephyr Twin
from ΔΔΔ on 2003-10-30 13:20 [#00925851]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Followup to AlbertoBalsalm: #00924642 | Show recordbag
|
|
hahahaha, dude i love your new avatar. thats gotta be the funniest thing ive ever seen.. for that alone I was inspire to try WA5... DLing now.
|
|
Messageboard index
|