|
|
Peloton
from London (United Kingdom) on 2003-06-23 14:42 [#00753816]
Points: 651 Status: Lurker
|
|
Aww man, I want... no... I need one of these!
G5
|
|
Anus_Presley
on 2003-06-23 14:44 [#00753822]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker
|
|
yes it would be nice
|
|
Zeus
from San Francisco (United States) on 2003-06-23 14:47 [#00753830]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker
|
|
*convulses and dies*
OMG
YOU CAN EVEN BUY IT WITH SURROUND SPEAKERS!
|
|
BlatantEcho
from All over (United States) on 2003-06-23 14:59 [#00753840]
Points: 7210 Status: Lurker
|
|
yeah, I want one SOOO bad
|
|
corticalstim
from Canada on 2003-06-23 15:33 [#00753873]
Points: 3885 Status: Regular
|
|
oh my fucking god
|
|
zaphod
from the metaverse on 2003-06-23 15:34 [#00753874]
Points: 4428 Status: Addict
|
|
starting at 2000?
damn
|
|
corticalstim
from Canada on 2003-06-23 15:43 [#00753881]
Points: 3885 Status: Regular
|
|
goddamn - i just pimped out one to the max - guess the price.
Subtotal $12,562.95
i wish i was rich.
|
|
corticalstim
from Canada on 2003-06-23 15:46 [#00753883]
Points: 3885 Status: Regular
|
|
i guess ill just throw in a decent powerbook.
Subtotal $17,317.95
please let me win the lottery. please god.
|
|
zaphod
from the metaverse on 2003-06-23 15:48 [#00753886]
Points: 4428 Status: Addict | Followup to corticalstim: #00753883
|
|
i just got a good powerbook for 2000 and now i see these things. bad timing.
|
|
Ceri JC
from Jefferson City (United States) on 2003-06-23 15:50 [#00753889]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to zaphod: #00753886 | Show recordbag
|
|
You should know the "computer buyers rule"- don't look at other systems after yoursis bought for 18 months- you'll only feel bitter... ;)
|
|
zaphod
from the metaverse on 2003-06-23 15:53 [#00753891]
Points: 4428 Status: Addict | Followup to Ceri JC: #00753889
|
|
yep....
|
|
ka
on 2003-06-23 16:20 [#00753936]
Points: 425 Status: Lurker
|
|
Did anyone know this was coming? It doesn't seem real for some reason. Can't explain it.
|
|
more10
from Lkpg (Sweden) on 2003-06-23 16:59 [#00754020]
Points: 321 Status: Lurker
|
|
I could use one fer sure...the old MP500 G4 I have needs a buddy!
|
|
Anus_Presley
on 2003-06-23 17:06 [#00754040]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker | Followup to ka: #00753936
|
|
i know what you mean
|
|
BlatantEcho
from All over (United States) on 2003-06-23 17:19 [#00754089]
Points: 7210 Status: Lurker | Followup to ka: #00753936
|
|
slashdot had an advance on it this weekend, but otherwise, even then people didn't believe it.
After 10 years or more of windows, you can bet my next PC will be just that, but in Mac form :)
|
|
Anus_Presley
on 2003-06-23 17:20 [#00754097]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker
|
|
get jobs you filthy animals, move in with ya mom and you can have one
|
|
hevquip
from megagram dusk sect (United States) on 2003-06-23 17:27 [#00754113]
Points: 3381 Status: Regular
|
|
stealing takes less effort...
|
|
Sanguine
from San Francisco (United States) on 2003-06-24 00:47 [#00754531]
Points: 859 Status: Lurker
|
|
The incredible jump the G5 will have on EVERY other desktop out there is amazing. PCI-X slots are HUGE, 64 bit processor finally in mainstream is HUGE, plus all the nice ammenities you'd expect from Apple... USB 2.0 introduced, Firewire 800, AGP 8X, and 8GB of RAM.
And for only 2K... good lord
Prepare for pricewars *helmet on*
|
|
alnuit
on 2003-06-24 01:18 [#00754539]
Points: 1113 Status: Lurker
|
|
Damn damn damn...with 8GB of RAM, 500GB of secondary storage, an ATI 9800Pro and the Klipsch system the whole thing costs a cool $8,700.
|
|
Ceri JC
from Jefferson City (United States) on 2003-06-24 02:04 [#00754556]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag
|
|
Anyone else notice that the comparison test PC machines (which it beat) were dual processor xeons? They're normally server grade processors and this desktop machine beats them!
|
|
ka
on 2003-06-24 02:45 [#00754562]
Points: 425 Status: Lurker
|
|
Looks like Apple hardware is on par with the fastest PC you could put together today. If you notice from the benchmarks on Apple's site, it beats the fastest P4 on some of the tests while it lags behind on others. But it's great that Apple has done some serious work to beef up their hardware. Competition in the computer industry always helps those who are making music/films/photos/design.
|
|
acidophilus
from the gates of dawn on 2003-06-24 03:00 [#00754566]
Points: 1151 Status: Lurker
|
|
i could use one or two of those G5's... nice design too, as always.
|
|
clone
from Johannesburg (South Africa) on 2003-06-24 03:33 [#00754576]
Points: 165 Status: Regular
|
|
Shitting crikey... I'm gonna need fresh underpants!!!
|
|
occfactor
from Helsinki (Finland) on 2003-06-24 04:09 [#00754609]
Points: 257 Status: Regular
|
|
I think you should take Apple's own benchmarks with a pinch of salt;)
Wait for some neutral benchmarks before spooging on yerself...
|
|
Peloton
from London (United Kingdom) on 2003-06-24 04:40 [#00754652]
Points: 651 Status: Lurker
|
|
Some things people have reported on osxaudio.com...
"I've seen Logic (6.2 build 678 or something, dunno, too much beer and wine) with about 30 Platverbs and a buttload of other stuff, approximately 70-100 plugs. Processor load on each was about 40%!!! No freezes."
"16 or 24 bit input and output output samplerate 32kHz, 44.1kHz, or 48kHz input samplerate - external clock mode: 32kHz, 44.1kHz, or 48kHz
input samplerate - internal clock mode: 16kHz- 96kHz The analog audio i/o is up to 48kHz and 16 or 24 bit as well!!"
"Damn 1000 stereo voices at once 1200 Fat Eqs from Logic at only 25% cpu laod on G5. This is serious stuff"
|
|
giginger
from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2003-06-24 05:45 [#00754704]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
Damn, I stand corrected on my previous Mac statements.
|
|
Ctrl Alt Del
from Ft. Worth (United States) on 2003-06-24 06:02 [#00754714]
Points: 2190 Status: Lurker | Followup to BlatantEcho: #00754089
|
|
actually, a few key apple developers (adobe being one) have already had a G5 for awhile now! apple shipped about 200 of them in G4 cases out to selected developers so they could port their products to them.
|
|
uzim
on 2003-06-24 06:57 [#00754767]
Points: 17716 Status: Lurker
|
|
the design is deceiving... it looks like a construction game brick : /
|
|
elusive
from detroit (United States) on 2003-06-24 07:06 [#00754773]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
the design is brilliant, you dont know shit about pc design.
although i'm pissed.
even though it is using AMD's hypertransport for the bus, they don't mention it.
neither the amd chipset for pci-x.
hmmm
and not a single mention of AMD or comparision benchmarks against the opteron or althon (which > p4 in those tests)
muhahuahua funnay
but looks o so perty
|
|
epohs
from )C: on 2003-06-24 07:12 [#00754780]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker
|
|
all that speed and only 9 internal fans!?
i do think it looks purdy though.
|
|
fleetmouse
from Horny for Truth on 2003-06-24 07:17 [#00754783]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker
|
|
hmmmmmm
|
|
uzim
on 2003-06-24 07:26 [#00754792]
Points: 17716 Status: Lurker
|
|
"the design is brilliant, you dont know shit about pc design."
> so for you design is a matter of knowledge rather than taste, dear?
|
|
Zeus
from San Francisco (United States) on 2003-06-24 07:27 [#00754795]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker
|
|
i guess he was talking about the actual design of the internal stuff, and the fans etc?
|
|
uzim
on 2003-06-24 07:32 [#00754802]
Points: 17716 Status: Lurker
|
|
ok, if it's the case...
i was talking about external design.
|
|
corticalstim
from Canada on 2003-06-24 07:48 [#00754814]
Points: 3885 Status: Regular | Followup to fleetmouse: #00754783
|
|
good article
|
|
ka
on 2003-06-24 16:12 [#00755536]
Points: 425 Status: Lurker | Followup to fleetmouse: #00754783
|
|
Yeah, that is a good article.
|
|
Sanguine
from San Francisco (United States) on 2003-06-24 18:58 [#00755704]
Points: 859 Status: Lurker
|
|
Here's the comparison you guys will understand...
5 plugins Logic Platinum
Could handle 116 tracks with no problem
ONE HUNDRED SIXTEEN TRACKS
|
|
Dael
from the low end (Australia) on 2003-06-24 22:17 [#00755854]
Points: 968 Status: Lurker
|
|
who the fuck needs 8 gigs of ram?
|
|
alnuit
on 2003-06-24 22:31 [#00755865]
Points: 1113 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #00754556
|
|
Also if you noticed this was a dual G5 configuration they tested it against. So the battle is quite fair. It still beats the crap out of the Xeon based server-stations though.
|
|
ecnadniarb
on 2003-06-24 22:33 [#00755868]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to Dael: #00755854 | Show recordbag
|
|
I need 8 gigs of ram...for without it many villagers will starve and we will have to sell the children in orde to be able to feed our children which would leave us in a troublesome situation and their would be no children to feed the food to and we would all have to eat the food then we will be obese and die of heart related problems.
Yeah, I agree 8 gig at the moment seems quite hefty.
|
|
Dael
from the low end (Australia) on 2003-06-24 22:39 [#00755873]
Points: 968 Status: Lurker | Followup to ecnadniarb: #00755868
|
|
heh heh heh, at least your thinking of the villagers ecnadniarb! ;)
|
|
alnuit
on 2003-06-24 22:44 [#00755877]
Points: 1113 Status: Lurker | Followup to ecnadniarb: #00755868
|
|
Maybe not today, I am sure someone will write something that will need it in the future. After all, 8 years ago we were of the opinion that 8MB was a plenty, and back in the day ('83-'84), people did not see the need for more than 64KB.
Nothing wrong in being future proof.
|
|
ecnadniarb
on 2003-06-24 22:47 [#00755878]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
That is why I said at the moment...and their are things now that could easily use those 8 gig, such as rendering and conversion of home made pornography into a digital format.
|
|
MrTenzin
from The Concrete Jungle (United States) on 2003-06-25 01:12 [#00755937]
Points: 1184 Status: Lurker
|
|
ooh la la 8)
|
|
E-man
from Rixensart (Belgium) on 2003-06-25 02:24 [#00755983]
Points: 3000 Status: Regular
|
|
pffff, i'm positive you can have a better pc for less than that:d
looks neat tho, apple is making big efforts, shame for not mentioning AMD tho, i support these guys so much...
|
|
Messageboard index
|