i dont have the time | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (4)
Hyperflake
dariusgriffin
EpicMegatrax
big
...and 109 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2615117
Today 19
Topics 127625
  
 
Messageboard index
i dont have the time
 

offline euphonicfilter from illadelphia (United States) on 2003-02-20 09:49 [#00563213]
Points: 2443 Status: Addict



a lot of people everywhere say "it grew on me" and i myself
have said the same in reference to albums i didnt like at
first .

yet recently it seems that if something doesnt grab me in
the first minute i dont bother - im becoming VERY hard on
music and most of it bores me lately - minus old stuff im
just realizing rocks the juice stand

anyone feel the same?


 

offline Asche XL on 2003-02-20 09:52 [#00563216]
Points: 4241 Status: Lurker



I can say the same.


 

offline Fernz from A Scottish Wanker (United Kingdom) on 2003-02-20 09:52 [#00563217]
Points: 1692 Status: Regular



Well until I find an album thats hard as fuck with beautiful
melodic tones I'll be happy. But yeah I agree. The last
album I TRULY loved to pieces was Revolver by The Beatles.
And that was ages ago... :)


 

offline CORTEX from Canada on 2003-02-20 09:53 [#00563219]
Points: 3346 Status: Regular



the american music industry finally got to you.

they brainwashed you with their disposable (sp?),
pre-fabricated and generic artists.

they got to you with the 'i now consume music as a product
not as an art' mentality.

therefore you transfered suck way of thinking to your music
listening.

well... maybe not... just a hypothesis.


 

offline Anus_Presley on 2003-02-20 09:53 [#00563221]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker | Followup to euphonicfilter: #00563213



yeah i know what you mean. especially with electrronic
music. i'm turrning to olderr bob dylan style music.


 

offline danbrusca from Derbyshire (United Kingdom) on 2003-02-20 09:54 [#00563223]
Points: 4570 Status: Lurker | Followup to euphonicfilter: #00563213



Yep, agree totally. It becomes worse if you buy more CDs all
the time because new stuff doesn't get listened to as much
as it perhaps otherwise would.


 

offline earthleakage from tell the world you're winning on 2003-02-20 09:54 [#00563224]
Points: 27799 Status: Regular



1966? yeah that IS a long time ago! j/k :)

yeah it happens to me too, i just go back to listening to
80s music and enjoying what used to be the latest sounds,
pop pickers!


 

offline mylittlesister from ...wherever (United Kingdom) on 2003-02-20 09:56 [#00563227]
Points: 8472 Status: Regular



lately I've been listening to some of my older albums, and
loving them even more now :-)

but yeah, loads of new stuff doesnt grab me. alright for
clubs, not good for listening



 

offline nacmat on 2003-02-20 09:56 [#00563229]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker



keep the faith


 

offline Anus_Presley on 2003-02-20 09:57 [#00563230]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker | Followup to earthleakage: #00563224



i was listening to a fav of mine today - Depeche Mode -
Songs of Faith And Devotion.


 

offline mylittlesister from ...wherever (United Kingdom) on 2003-02-20 09:57 [#00563232]
Points: 8472 Status: Regular | Followup to danbrusca: #00563223



I've been doing that lately :-/

when i pick a cd to play, i usually try and do it so that
I've listened to all my cds (that are worth listening to) an
equal number of times.......... *STRANGE!!*


 

offline euphonicfilter from illadelphia (United States) on 2003-02-20 09:59 [#00563236]
Points: 2443 Status: Addict



glad people are w/ me on this

its hard w/ electronic music cause at first it seems amazing
(ie solvent) and after a while i just tire of it - few
artists have lasting power

like when i throw on tri repetae for th 6,,000000,0000th
time and i hear new noises and melodies

that is music - there are WAY too many artists today

like most the stuff on tigerbeat and stuff like vsnares w/
all the messed up no-sense-of-timing-drums - gets so boring
on the second listen

we need more artists and fewer acts


 

offline earthleakage from tell the world you're winning on 2003-02-20 10:03 [#00563243]
Points: 27799 Status: Regular | Followup to Anus_Presley: #00563230



yay! i prefer the older stuff, people are people, master &
servant, shake the disease


 

offline virginpusher from County Clare on 2003-02-20 10:03 [#00563245]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker | Followup to euphonicfilter: #00563236



Ohhh now that is a very good point. I can't say that I
really dig that tigerbeat shit. I know where you are coming
from there.

Artists and acts are different. I only try to support
artists. Someone trying to get music out for the love of
music.

Not someone just putting out music because they want to be a
musician, talent you are born with. It's not something you
can engineer. You can see that all the time in the music
seen.

Real artists last the longest.


 

offline euphonicfilter from illadelphia (United States) on 2003-02-20 10:05 [#00563248]
Points: 2443 Status: Addict



not to sound cliched but like bogdan raczynski

very few people could make the jump he made and hold my
attention - the leap didnt sound contrived - it sounded
real

thats a HUGE rarety nowadays

well besides justin timberlake


 

offline euphonicfilter from illadelphia (United States) on 2003-02-20 10:05 [#00563249]
Points: 2443 Status: Addict



rarety = rarity


 


Messageboard index