 |
|
You are not logged in! F.A.Q Log in Register |
 |
|
 |
 (nobody)...and 103 guests Last 5 registered Oplandisks nothingstar N_loop yipe foxtrotromeo Browse members... |
 |
Members 8025Messages 2613457 Today 3 Topics 127500 |
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
...isn't as laborious as this: I have to write a program that calculates every legal chess move for all pieces- however, the language isn't particularly bright, so I have to manually type out all the possible co-ordinates manually... No thought involved, but I have to do it or I'll fail this module :( |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Can't you employ some valleys white trash nipper and pay 'em 50p an hour to do it for you? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
someone once told me that after nine moves on a chess board there are move possible positions than electrons in the universe |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
im here to hide from work. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Exactly, that's why it's taking so long to do... Jonesy: I would, but the proles around here haven't been influenced enough by our russian comrades to play chess yet, so they'd probably mess it up :) |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Quite. Catch you tomorrow. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Isn't the whole point of doing that to use mathmatical equations so you don't have to type all the coordinates? Just a thought, I can't program at all... |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Math is hard. I'm writing a term paper on Otto Von Bismarck and it's very upsetting. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
I know, in "normal" languages you could use a "FOR LOOP" to work out the various permeatations- however the language I have to do it in (PROLOG) doesn't support this! And this is the language used for most AI programming in games... |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Finally finished it! 273 lines of code in total, here are some choice Highlights: square(0,0). square(0,1). square(0,2). square(0,3). square(0,4). square(0,5). square(0,6). square(0,7). square(1,0). square(1,1). square(1,2). square(1,3). square(1,4). square(1,5). square(1,6). square(1,7). square(2,0). knightmove(X,Y,V,W) :- square(X,Y),square(V,W),is(V,+(X,1)),is(W,+(Y,2)). knightmove(X,Y,V,W) :- square(X,Y),square(V,W),is(V,+(X,1)),is(W,-(Y,2)). knightmove(X,Y,V,W) :- square(X,Y),square(V,W),is(V,+(X,2)),is(W,+(Y,1)). knightmove(X,Y,V,W) :- square(X,Y),square(V,W),is(V,+(X,2)),is(W,-(Y,1)). %Right rookmove(X,Y,V,W) :- square(X,Y),square(V,W),is(V,+(X,0)),is(W,+(Y,1)). rookmove(X,Y,V,W) :- square(X,Y),square(V,W),is(V,+(X,0)),is(W,+(Y,2)). rookmove(X,Y,V,W) :- square(X,Y),square(V,W),is(V,+(X,0)),is(W,+(Y,3)). rookmove(X,Y,V,W) :- square(X,Y),square(V,W),is(V,+(X,0)),is(W,+(Y,4)). rookmove(X,Y,V,W) :- square(X,Y),square(V,W),is(V,+(X,0)),is(W,+(Y,5)). rookmove(X,Y,V,W) :- square(X,Y),square(V,W),is(V,+(X,0)),is(W,+(Y,6)). rookmove(X,Y,V,W) :- square(X,Y),square(V,W),is(V,+(X,0)),is(W,+(Y,7)). %Moves for Queen /*I think that there may be a more efficient way of doing this, by checking if the move is either a valid rook or bishop move. This would eliminate duplication of code. As it is, I just copied and pasted the already tested Bishop and rook code and changed the names.*/ %Diagonally Up-Right queenmove(X,Y,V,W) :- square(X,Y),square(V,W),is(V,+(X,1)),is(W,+(Y,1)). queenmove(X,Y,V,W) :- square(X,Y),square(V,W),is(V,+(X,2)),is(W,+(Y,2)). queenmove(X,Y,V,W) :- square(X,Y),square(V,W),is(V,+(X,3)),is(W,+(Y,3)). queenmove(X,Y,V,W) :- square(X,Y),square(V,W),is(V,+(X,4)),is(W,+(Y,4)). queenmove(X,Y,V,W) :- square(X,Y),square(V,W),is(V,+(X,5)),is(W,+(Y,5)). queenmove(X,Y,V,W) :- square(X,Y),square(V,W),is(V,+(X,6)),is(W,+(Y,6)). queenmove(X,Y,V,W) :- square(X,Y),square(V,W),is(V,+(X,7)),is(W,+(Y,7)). ^Can you see what I meant ;) |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
NEERERRRRRRDDDSSSSS NERDS NERDS NERDS NERDS NERDS NERDS NERDS NERDS |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
I pity you. Software Development is the reason I didn't complete my degree. I'm not mathematically minded |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
than you should envy him, rather than pity him you mongoloid |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
stop flirting prettyboy and get some sun |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
LOL @ Loogie. Narkotic: I don't see how programming makes you a Nerd. That's a bit of a stereotype. Are you calling the admin here nerds? ;) |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Man, now I have to do a family tree program that given a list of people and their family calculates which people may marry... ...this is much harder. I'm tempte just to say they're all red necks/aristocracy/people from the valleys and hence marry anyone regardless of blood ties. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
I'd kill myself if I had to write code for a living :) I'd rather just design on computers. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Me too, I'm not a bad programmer by any means, and I can see the mathematical beauty of programming- it's just that I don't enjoy it the way some people seem to. Also I forsee the next generation of programming languages (that'll probably come out after the next big breakthrough in chips- and hence processing power) negating "conventional" coding. So I can't be bothered to spend hours learning to code at the moment. I just do the minimum to get by in programming for my degree- I far prefer creating something on a computer using existing programs like level designers, music software or 3d packages etc. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Writing code is fun (er for most languages, not COBOL for instance), but it takes a certain type, I can easily see how it could drive some people insane. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
Messageboard index
|
|||||||||
