Nihilism vs. Detachment | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
dariusgriffin
...and 570 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614124
Today 3
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
Nihilism vs. Detachment
 

offline aneurySm from Ypsilanti (United States) on 2002-04-29 04:12 [#00198856]
Points: 1701 Status: Lurker



me spimed abute a new avator so me spammsess abute a new
topic....

i figure there is an often blurred line between the two..
nihilism seems to be the belief of nothing
so i guess a true nihilist who happen to beleive in nothing
even themselves which could, I suppose, lead themselves to
being a rotten corpse sashed in a pool of their own vomits
under a row of urinals in a public restroom
correct me, please, if i;m wrong...

detachment seems to be the idea that the physical world
itself is an illusion; so sentimentally i dare say that this
internet thing is a massive construct of our cellective
conciousness of reality... ugg

this is not sounding the way i wanted

if you practice either or have a comment tell us


 

offline Zen Storm from St. Charles (United States) on 2002-04-29 04:19 [#00198871]
Points: 1044 Status: Lurker



nihilism is a beliefe detachment is an attitude, something
occuring. nihilism doesn't happen, it exists. detachment
does happen, and is often the result of nihilism


 

offline Zen Storm from St. Charles (United States) on 2002-04-29 04:39 [#00198890]
Points: 1044 Status: Lurker



who is the us you refer to in "tell us"?


 

offline Zen Storm from St. Charles (United States) on 2002-04-29 04:53 [#00198908]
Points: 1044 Status: Lurker



someone has to have something to add to this very
interesting thread


 

offline Ubik from United States on 2002-04-29 05:05 [#00198922]
Points: 662 Status: Lurker



i believe that i exist and the world exists, i just think
everybody overrates themselves and their place in the world,
people seem to creates and warp their view of reality to fit
what they want (not that i'm immune from that tendency, but
i try to step back very once in a while). so i do seem
detached from the world in a way, but that is an illusion...
conversation tends to seem so fake to me, its either banal
(to avoid thinking or approching subjects) or just a game of
lying or implying things that seems like a lie to me, just a
bunch of posturing and pretending, .... so am i
"nihilistic"... i am very detached, but then i still share
universal experience of human existance... what the fuck...
fuck everything... i dont care anyway...


 

offline Zen Storm from St. Charles (United States) on 2002-04-29 05:07 [#00198926]
Points: 1044 Status: Lurker



well i don't feel that people can take credit or
responsibility for what they think, who they are etc., as we
are products of society and circumstances. Therefore what i
think and what others think means nothing whatsoever


 

offline aneurySm from Ypsilanti (United States) on 2002-04-29 05:13 [#00198927]
Points: 1701 Status: Lurker



by us i figured there was more than just myself curious
about the subject

i think detachment has something to do with finding the
space below/beyond what is in front of us

so could we truly do such a thing without first
understanding our surroundings?

i mean you can;t just say fuck it and ignore everything,
that;s destructive but me supposes that loving everything
isn;t no piece od cake niether


 

offline Zen Storm from St. Charles (United States) on 2002-04-29 05:18 [#00198933]
Points: 1044 Status: Lurker



no one is ever truly unattached from society as the marks
and influences that society makes can never be truly erased.
As one choosing to be unattached to society, or saying fuck
everything, comes from societies influences to begin with.


 

offline Ubik from United States on 2002-04-29 05:34 [#00198941]
Points: 662 Status: Lurker



okay... i care that i wish that i had a really good reason
to care... i wish i could...

... and i've figured out my major dysfucktion... i can't or
won't create a reality view that is in sync with others...
nor is my personality strong enough or confident enough or
willing to force my view of reality on others... so i'm in
sort of a detached limbo... i can try to be as invisible as
possible... or assert myself into others reality by killing
them to show myself that i do exist... i don't like blood
thou.....
actually all relationships are about using somebody or being
used by somebody... i'm not very good at using and being
used under the normal rationaliztions, so i'm "detached"
from the system... well, now i've figured it out, i just
hope i die soon, i'm getting sick of waiting....


 

offline aneurySm from Ypsilanti (United States) on 2002-04-29 05:36 [#00198942]
Points: 1701 Status: Lurker



hmmm....

it would seem middle is the path

like water
or a chameleon


 

offline aneurySm from Ypsilanti (United States) on 2002-04-29 16:30 [#00199371]
Points: 1701 Status: Lurker



bump....


 

offline DirtyPriest from Copenhagen (Denmark) on 2002-04-29 18:47 [#00199479]
Points: 5499 Status: Lurker



I really cant express how happy i am to see this excellent
topic amongs so much bull!

Personally, i think detachment is the way to go, and yes,
i´ve been practising it for some years now.

Nihilism bites itself in the tail you see. If you are a
nihilist, you BELIVE! in nihilism!
A true nihilist, does not know he is it! and he would be
enlightened i guess!

Detachment is wery healthy, because it makes you happy.
Remember, detachment, is not saying no if someone offers you
a car. detachment is not feeling anything, when the car is
taken away from you again.

What made you ax such an intelligent question?

Please mail me, íf you want to hear some more about my wiew
of the world.=)

Zen story about detachment.

A Zen Master lived the simplest kind of life in a little hut
at the foot of a mountain. One evening, while he was away, a
thief sneaked into the hut only to find there was nothing in
it to steal. The Zen Master returned and found him. "You
have come a long way to visit me," he told the prowler, "and
you should not return empty handed. Please take my clothes
as a gift." The thief was bewildered, but he took the
clothes and ran away. The Master sat naked, watching the
moon. "Poor fellow," he mused, " I wish I could give him
this beautiful moon."

=)



 

offline Zen Storm from St. Charles (United States) on 2002-04-29 19:44 [#00199530]
Points: 1044 Status: Lurker



I think you some issues confused in regards to nihilism and
detachment Dirty Priest. The philosophy of nihilism doesn't
mean that you don't believe in anything, but rather it means
that one doesn't believe in anything that calls upon faith,
nor does one believe that there is any final purpose in
life. Nihilism wouldn't still be around, or discussed by so
many great thinkers if it could be proven wrong by just
saying if you believe in nihilism, you're not a true
nihilist.


 

offline Zen Storm from St. Charles (United States) on 2002-04-29 19:46 [#00199534]
Points: 1044 Status: Lurker



I have practiced zen for quite some time now, and I think
alluding it to detachment from society isn't the right
notion. one involved and practicing zen isn't detached from
society at all, they can still be quite active in society.
However, they're not detached but more unconcerned and
unbiased to the views held by society.


 

offline AMinal from Toronto (Canada) on 2002-04-29 21:08 [#00199667]
Points: 3476 Status: Regular



interesting stuff... great thread!

zen storm, i agree w/ everything uve said..

i guess i practice nihilsm..... seeing as how i dont believe
in the world, myself, life, etc..... well, i just try not to
believe in general

good point, too, on how we are nothing more than the
products of society and our enviroment

but i never knew what 'nihilsm' was until just now

can u recommend any reading on the subject?
where do i start?
thanks..


 

offline Zen Storm from St. Charles (United States) on 2002-04-29 22:25 [#00199821]
Points: 1044 Status: Lurker



A common misoncception is the nihilism is "believing in
nothing", while it is not truly this. A nihilist only
believes what is front of them, what is solid, and can be
proven. This is why nihilism clashes with many religions so
hard, as religion dominantly relies on "faith" as proof;
something a nihilist rejects. While much of philosophiy can
not be proven, and relies on logic and thinking as it's
proof, these are also rejected by the nihilist, which
doesn't leave much to believe besides what is here and now.
This is why many people assume that the nihilist believes in
nothing.

Here is a helpful link if you wish to know more in detail:
www.counterorder.com



 

offline Zen Storm from St. Charles (United States) on 2002-04-29 22:26 [#00199825]
Points: 1044 Status: Lurker



Another philosophy I find quite interesting is absurdism,
which is closely tied with the existential school of
thought. Absurdism discusses the nature of life, a life
that has no purpose or pre-determined meaning. People are
just randomly placed in and out of life, with no specific
relation to time, just thrown into the mix.


 

offline AMinal from Toronto (Canada) on 2002-04-29 22:30 [#00199839]
Points: 3476 Status: Regular | Followup to Zen Storm: #00199821



"A nihilist only believes what is front of them, what is
solid, and can be proven. "

...but nothing can be proven
believing in ANYTHING requires at least SOME faith...
...cus we dont truely experience anything purely
directly.....
.....know what i mean?


 

offline Zen Storm from St. Charles (United States) on 2002-04-29 22:32 [#00199845]
Points: 1044 Status: Lurker



Not really, since right now I know that I am typing on the
computer, I know I am listening to my music etc. Nihilist,
not that I am one, are limited to very factual and only
tangible realities, things that don't requie feelings, or
thinking. this is of course assuming that the arguments
that life could just be a dream etc. do not apply.


 

offline Zen Storm from St. Charles (United States) on 2002-04-29 22:48 [#00199870]
Points: 1044 Status: Lurker



Nihilism is against things that require rationalization,
thought, faith etc. Christianity calls upon faith to
explain miracles. But me believing in my ability to open a
box requires no faith, as it is based on experience;
something that doesn't use faith.


 

offline AMinal from Toronto (Canada) on 2002-04-29 23:05 [#00199893]
Points: 3476 Status: Regular | Followup to Zen Storm: #00199845



"this is of course assuming that the arguments that life
could just be a dream etc. do not apply. "

well thats the thing: who knows?
these things MIGHT apply

what u THINK u experience for real (u typing at ur
computer)..... is just ur brain making sense out of a bunch
of nerve signals.... (seeing the computer, feeling the
keyboard, etc).
but these signals do not originalte in the keyboard and go
directly to ur brain
pressure turns into electrical impulses, light bounces
throug air.... etc
i just mean that nothing is DIRECT

plus, by the time these signals reach you, they mean nothing
on their own... only in ur brian do u interpret them as a
computer, and u typing on it
so computers only exist in YOUR ideas of them..
..know what i mean?
so everything only exists as ur brain can percieve it

accepting anything as fact takes faith..
so, since u cant be ABSOLUTELY sure of anything... so
believing in anything, no matter how apparently obvious it
is, is still an irrational belief in itself...

who knows, u could be in a holodeck in star treck or
something ;)

i mean: people who are devote religiously just KNOW that
there is a god
they FEEL him, they think they can sense him dircetly
just as u are sure that u know ur computer


 

offline Zen Storm from St. Charles (United States) on 2002-04-29 23:36 [#00199933]
Points: 1044 Status: Lurker



As I mentioned before, I am not a nihilist. I am giving you
what i understand to be their view. This is what they
believe, and a basic assumption amoung all philosophies is
that the existence of a reality. You can disprove anything
by saying thing's are a dream and what not. I could by the
same token just argue that how you understand the brain,
something receiving signals, is part of a dream, and it
really doesn't work that way. These arguments are similar
one uses to explain conspiracies, all you have to say is
"well that's part of the conspiracy". This strikes at the
heart of nihilism, as they don't believe in things that are
merely rationalized, such as your argument about the brain
and interpretations. However there is a great deal of
evidence that proves that me typing and listening to music
is actually occuring.
Religions do not explain how miracles exists, or what's
behind them, the common explanation is faith. You only
"know" something exists because you think it does, or are
convinced is does. Just as you mentioned in your reply
"they just KNOW", see how there is no explanation, no
evidence, "they just KNOW" means that they only know due to
faith.


 

offline wayout from the street of crocodiles on 2002-04-30 01:31 [#00200023]
Points: 2849 Status: Lurker



its kinda like what the realist painter courbet said..."i
dont paint angels because ive never seen one...show me an
angel and i will paint it"
or something like that..


 

offline Ross from Canada on 2002-04-30 01:44 [#00200031]
Points: 366 Status: Lurker



While my opinion may not be very valid, i just wanted to say
how surprised i was to see so many people choose
detachment..out of curiousity, do you guys still care much
about the people around you that really warrant that care,
ie. your true good friends, etc...I do agree with some of
the points here though..


 

offline Ross from Canada on 2002-04-30 01:44 [#00200032]
Points: 366 Status: Lurker



i'm just not so understood about how you guys go about in
your detachment methods, how it works..


 

offline earthleakage from tell the world you're winning on 2002-04-30 01:45 [#00200036]
Points: 27795 Status: Regular



nothing to add (yet) apart from ive enjoyed reading what all
of you have typed. Nausea by JP Satre is interesting.


 

offline wayout from the street of crocodiles on 2002-04-30 02:00 [#00200062]
Points: 2849 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ross: #00200032



i dont think you really can become truley detached ...its
kinda like the movie 'its a wonderful life'...your
relationship with the world is probably greater than you
think
ive always though i was pretty detached from everything
else...but the more i thought of it, i realised i really
wasnt...
as long as youre alive, your a part of this world...even if
you leave and go out and live in the middle of
nowhere...there will still be people in society who at least
vaguely remember you...and you will still remember the
society you left
you would have to die along with everyone who has ever come
in contact with you to be truely detached from humanity


 

offline Zen Storm from St. Charles (United States) on 2002-04-30 02:02 [#00200065]
Points: 1044 Status: Lurker



Ross: detachment doesn't strictly mean that you no longer
care about things in your environment, I do not believe that
this could ever be accomplished thouroughly. Detachment can
be seperating yourself (as best as possible) from society,
it's views, and/or influences. This doesn't mean
nessecarily that you no longer care about people and what
not.


 

offline Ross from Canada on 2002-04-30 02:11 [#00200082]
Points: 366 Status: Lurker



thanks wayout and zen storm..zen- i agree that it's a good
thing then to detach yourself from societies views and
influences, at least to not be duped easily, and be aware of
everything..


 

offline Zen Storm from St. Charles (United States) on 2002-04-30 03:38 [#00200233]
Points: 1044 Status: Lurker



I just think that we can't take credit for what we think,
nor wil we be able to truly detach ourselves from society,
but the best we can do is to strive to be as open and unbias
as possible


 

offline Zen Storm from St. Charles (United States) on 2002-04-30 05:39 [#00200386]
Points: 1044 Status: Lurker



which is basically the thoughts of Zen


 

offline Ubik from United States on 2002-04-30 06:00 [#00200403]
Points: 662 Status: Lurker



what is faith? is it a lie that people tell themselves...
the leap from objective reality to the selfish delusion of
the subjective viewpoint... people don't really like the
implications of reality so they constantly try to rationize
opinions to try to create and reinforce their own view of
reality... so am i nihilistic? ... true detachment is
impossible unless you are omniscience, or at least
completely detached from yourself ... so if one could become
perfectly nihilistic, would that make you godlike? or just
dead.


 

offline Zen Storm from St. Charles (United States) on 2002-04-30 06:14 [#00200412]
Points: 1044 Status: Lurker



Not really, if you read the rest of the thread, I discussed
the differences between a true nihilist and one who i
disattached. A nihilist isn't the same as someone who is
unattached to society, I nihilist demands solid proof, and
doesn't believe in a destiny or final purpose, where as some
unattached doesn't care or isn't involved in it either way.
So not godlike, but merely suspicious.


 

offline LeCoeur from the outer edge of the universe (United States) on 2002-04-30 06:22 [#00200414]
Points: 8249 Status: Lurker



very interesting topic!! kudos

i agree with AMinal....no one can truly be 'detached' from
the world. every decision you make affects yourself and
those around you whether you think about them or not.

detaching yourself from some things is necessary, personal
example:
cadavars....when i had to dissect one...after a while i
didn't think of it as a human, it was an interesting phenom,
never thought i could get past it, but it was SURPRISINGLY
easy and very scary at the same time.

detaching yourself from feeling
things....love...hate...happiness...sadness
well that to me is NOT healthy at all. i mean whether you
realize it or not you are hurting yourself but not allowing
yourself to see both the beauty and ugliness in the world.
BOTH are necessary, in order to appreciate ONE, you must be
exposed to the other. FOCUSING on one or the other is NOT
good either, and i know there is a tendency for people to do
it.

myself, i tend to see the GOOD in the world, trying to
ignore the BAD. i know that is a bit like an ostrich
sticking it's head in the sand, believing nothing exists
other than what it see's, or chooses to see. but i realize
that i was fooling myself, and OPENED my eyes the world.

Nihilism....to me seems fruitless....i can't even begin to
understand that mindset, but i know i don't wanna be around
someone like this....i'd rather wash my hair or
something....ehehhehe

hope some of this makes sense, it does to me at the moment!!
=0)


 

offline aneurySm from Ypsilanti (United States) on 2002-04-30 06:22 [#00200415]
Points: 1701 Status: Lurker



i;m so glad to see this thread taking off
i was hoping to work to Old Daddy with it

but...

i figure detachment has alot to do with smashing the ego, er
dissolving it anywayz
but understanding ego is a rather insane task itself
thinking back to highschool psych and bill & ted;s freud is,
me thinx, totally misleading
i;ve developped some ideas about reality over the past few
years
that a reality is a container made of concious energy
the smallest being a single person or life form i suppose
sensory deprevation does crazy things to you
i never watch tv
and when i do it feels like i;m getting bludgeoned in the
heart
television is a strong distraction from any spirituality
it epitomizes the idea of a false utopia
i think with either, nihilism or detachment, a certain
humbleness is learned
modesty, i think, is very important and there is far too
little in this world
everyone always reaching for more
but where are we going?


 

offline aneurySm from Ypsilanti (United States) on 2002-04-30 06:29 [#00200416]
Points: 1701 Status: Lurker



i think the only true detachment would be leaving the body
for good
that;s death
at least in most;s mind
and you can argue feeling energy is just tricking yourself
into releasing endorphines
question
has anyone hear aver experienced raiki
it;s a japanese healing technique
i was dating a girl that was into it
she totally caught me off gaurd with it
it;s totally relaxing
and just pushing energy around

yeah
so detachment
LeCoeur
i think is not so much for feelings
but emotions which are feelings gone unchecked
in detachment i;ve always thought you were trying to forget
the barrier of the physical world
we;re all one and all that
that supposedly the physical world is only a mass dellusion
sentient minds
hmm..........


 

offline LeCoeur from the outer edge of the universe (United States) on 2002-04-30 06:44 [#00200422]
Points: 8249 Status: Lurker | Followup to aneurySm: #00200416



hummm

seems like an impossible scenario...forgetting the barriers
with the physical world?? what exactly do you mean?
i mean just if you stick with one of the constants in the
world...like say GRAVITY, which is impossible to
forget...brings you right back down to EARTH.....ehehhe

Mass delusion.....that also seems like an impossible
view.....i mean how is it possible that some experience the
same things and some don't? i mean if it's a mass delusion
don't well all have to experience the SAME delusion?

OR am i being to literal and not seeing what you mean?



 

offline Ubik from United States on 2002-04-30 06:55 [#00200426]
Points: 662 Status: Lurker



the physical world is sort of a mass delusion, but each
person has a different delusion, each person as their own
viewpoint of what is real, and each individuals reality is
different from each other... are view of the world is
subjective, because we are trapped in our bodies, our
individuality...


 

offline LeCoeur from the outer edge of the universe (United States) on 2002-04-30 07:04 [#00200428]
Points: 8249 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ubik: #00200426



i agree our view of EVERYTHING is subjective. i mean look
how we argue about MUSIC. ehhehe

however it doesn't explain how our OWN delusion contains the
some of the same people sometimes, and how according to
those people their delusion contains US.

i guess it can be explained that it's how we explain our own
delusion to ourselves?

it's an interesting view, however i don't agree with it =0)


 

offline aneurySm from Ypsilanti (United States) on 2002-04-30 07:09 [#00200432]
Points: 1701 Status: Lurker



maybe the literal thing

the mass delusion is that there is a physical world at all
i guess is what i was trying to say
and that would be the same delusion

shit, do you listen to tool?
the whole shpeal at the beginning of 'third eye'
something like matter is only the vibration of life slowed
down

but all that is way extreme things to truly understand and
'know'

so i guess we could settle for an understanding of
detachment where as health and conciousness should not be
forsaken for posessions

why do we go to work?
to make money
why do we need money?
to buy stuphe
why do we need to buy stuphe?
well food and shelter seem pretty important
but an SUV that never goes offroad or a big nice house that
has bookshelves filled with never read books as furniture?
these things are empty
a waste of resources
hmm....
i think i trailed from the path
i guess i;m confused myself
but lets say our earth/gaia, whether physical or not, is our
home
and the more detached a person is the less damaging actions
are comitted

did that make any sense?


 

offline Ubik from United States on 2002-04-30 07:19 [#00200434]
Points: 662 Status: Lurker



"and the more detached a person is the less damaging actions

are comitted" ...

actually, wouldn't those who view "nihilism" as a negative
thing, say that detachment gives one freedom from morality,
from good or bad(which i dont believe really exist except as
concepts), and that you could justify anything? Like Camus
character in "The Stranger" or Dostoyevsky's killer in
"Crime and Punishment"? Thou, to me, the more religious
view, the farther from reality, the easier to justify acts
that could well be described as "evil". to me, Christianity
and Islam are the closest things to there being evil in the
world.



 

offline LeCoeur from the outer edge of the universe (United States) on 2002-04-30 07:25 [#00200436]
Points: 8249 Status: Lurker | Followup to aneurySm: #00200432



hehehe

i have all of TOOL's CD's and the DVD....ehehhe

Third Eye is a favourite of mine, i'll listen to it with
these ideas in mind!

If it makes sense to you, thats all that matters because
everything SUBJECTIVE!!

ahahhah

btw.....for me this statement you made

"and the more detached a person is the less damaging actions
are comitted "

in my opinion....the more detached the person the more
DAMAGE they cause, because they don't acknowledge the
fallout from their actions. it seems like a MORE selfish
viewpoint from my point of view.....=0)



 

offline LeCoeur from the outer edge of the universe (United States) on 2002-04-30 07:28 [#00200437]
Points: 8249 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ubik: #00200434



MY POINT EXACTLY......great citations!!!

Esp Crime and Punishment.....ehehhe

oye......you're in my delusion....GET OUT!!

ahahahaa



 

offline aneurySm from Ypsilanti (United States) on 2002-04-30 07:28 [#00200439]
Points: 1701 Status: Lurker



well yeah
the crusades were a justified blood bath
detachment, i don;t think, is freedom from morality

i;m kinda stoned now from some resin hits and the Big
Lebowski is on my monitor so i;m having problems
concentrating right now

but

if detachment could possibly be a lack of the physical world
affecting you then why would you be free to do evil acts?
karma, as a concept, is still valid


 

offline aneurySm from Ypsilanti (United States) on 2002-04-30 07:34 [#00200440]
Points: 1701 Status: Lurker



nihilism, i would think, would be the freedom from morality
but ZenStorm has informed us that isn;t what nihilism is
about

but according to the Nihilist characters in the Big Lebowski
which is what my understanding of Nihilism is based on i;m
right


 

offline Zen Storm from St. Charles (United States) on 2002-04-30 17:16 [#00201096]
Points: 1044 Status: Lurker



i wouldn't base your nihilistic beliefs off of the big
labowski, but it can be applied in many different ways
depending on the person, and what they consider
evidence/proof and so on


 

offline DirtyPriest from Copenhagen (Denmark) on 2002-04-30 18:52 [#00201196]
Points: 5499 Status: Lurker



Sorry for misinterpreting nihilism!

I still dont like it, because, i believe life DOES have a
purpouse! i do not now it, but i just.... i just want to
live my life and love it! and you can do that, because you
create your own reality!!!!

I think you guys (girls?)might want to read "andrew cohen"
and Eckhart tolle.

They are really interesting, just check them out.!



 

offline Zen Storm from St. Charles (United States) on 2002-04-30 18:56 [#00201204]
Points: 1044 Status: Lurker



Well as I have said, I am not a nihilist, but rather I enjoy
exploring all philosophies.
DirtyPriest: you seem to be more of an existentialist, as
they believe there is no reality or purpose except for the
one each person creates.


 

offline DirtyPriest from Copenhagen (Denmark) on 2002-04-30 19:03 [#00201221]
Points: 5499 Status: Lurker



Nono, actaully, my "hunch", of the purpouse of life is that
the part that we as humans are sepperated are an illusion! i
think we are all the same thing when it comes down to it.
call it "god" i dont care. but i´m not religious!

No, i say live the life, because, i dont know what the
purpouse is, but i will take this life i have, and use it to
the max! because it seems logical!

I dont like christianity and buddhism for one thing. I think
they are anti Life, like life is just some kind of hell....
i dont agree. but jesus was ok.


 

offline aneurySm from Ypsilanti (United States) on 2002-05-01 08:02 [#00202212]
Points: 1701 Status: Lurker



i guess it just boils down to
i wanna be a good person
like
not all selfless
but cause no pain for others or myself
i figure as long as my actions don;t result with some form
of negetivity i;m doing good

hmmm...
so what the hell does that have to do with detachment
wait...
detachment from desire
detachment from expectations
hmm and nihilism
i don;t beleive in desire
i don;t believe in expectations

eh & heh


 


Messageboard index