This sickens Me. | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 330 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2613457
Today 3
Topics 127500
  
 
Messageboard index
This sickens Me.
 

offline REFLEX from Edmonton, Alberta (Canada) on 2002-04-27 23:58 [#00196956]
Points: 8864 Status: Regular



http://www.fredericksburg.com/News/FLS/2002/042002/04272002
/389998

Here

I read this, and iam absolutly fuckin sickened by some sorts
of people, this story just ruined my day.


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2002-04-28 00:01 [#00196962]
Points: 24578 Status: Lurker



interesting article - pictures coulda been better!


 

offline xlr from Boston (United States) on 2002-04-28 00:12 [#00196977]
Points: 4904 Status: Regular



That's very upsetting.


 

offline Zen Storm from St. Charles (United States) on 2002-04-28 00:13 [#00196981]
Points: 1044 Status: Lurker



what does that make you feel sickened?
Here's a very interesting and hard to find article in
regards to suicide:

http://members.tripod.com/~LifeGard/penacide.html


 

offline Zen Storm from St. Charles (United States) on 2002-04-28 00:14 [#00196982]
Points: 1044 Status: Lurker



Reflex, would you mind telling me what the code is to post
active links?


 

offline Laserbeak from Netherlands, The on 2002-04-28 00:14 [#00196984]
Points: 2670 Status: Lurker



Happens all the time. If it ruins your day you must be
having lots of bad days...


 

offline Inverted Whale from United States Minor Outlying Islands on 2002-04-28 00:15 [#00196987]
Points: 3301 Status: Lurker



Frankly, the callous nature of the bystanders upsets me more
than the suicide itself.


 

offline Phresch from fucking Trondheim (Norway) on 2002-04-28 00:17 [#00196990]
Points: 9989 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



"Dunham told other police officers that he was sickened to
hear at least a dozen people shout for her to jump as they
passed over the bridge."

crazy.



 

offline JivverDicker from my house on 2002-04-28 00:19 [#00196992]
Points: 12102 Status: Regular



What would you have done if you were there REFLEX?


 

offline Zen Storm from St. Charles (United States) on 2002-04-28 00:20 [#00196996]
Points: 1044 Status: Lurker



I don't think that it's really up to anyone to help her
choose, whether that be to die or to carry on. It's not
anyone's choice but hers, although I do feel people urging
her to jump of the bridge is careless and immature.


 

offline xlr from Boston (United States) on 2002-04-28 00:23 [#00197000]
Points: 4904 Status: Regular



yes, that's what makes it particularly sad.


 

offline xlr from Boston (United States) on 2002-04-28 00:31 [#00197017]
Points: 4904 Status: Regular



And the fact that they put up those photos is in poor taste.
Reminds me of the video footage of the people jumping to
their deaths at the WTC.


 

offline Zen Storm from St. Charles (United States) on 2002-04-28 00:33 [#00197027]
Points: 1044 Status: Lurker



yeah but everythign is exploited these days, not much
helping that


 

offline Winged Freak from Darkness (Kyrgyzstan) on 2002-04-28 00:48 [#00197043]
Points: 62 Status: Regular



Damn, you can even click on the pictures for a larger image
and email the picture to friends. That's pretty sick.


 

offline REFLEX from Edmonton, Alberta (Canada) on 2002-04-28 00:59 [#00197051]
Points: 8864 Status: Regular



Laserbeak: I think you should think past a grade 8 level
here and figure it out for yourself, this sort of thing does
not happen often, dozens of people yelling jump to her, and
if it did, then more the reason to be upset over it.

JivverDicker: I dont know what I would have done, but I
defenitly wouldnt have yelled jump.


 

offline Zen Storm from St. Charles (United States) on 2002-04-28 01:22 [#00197062]
Points: 1044 Status: Lurker



it's no one's business but hers, not even the police


 

offline Martytan from somewhere in upstate new york (United States) on 2002-04-28 01:23 [#00197063]
Points: 757 Status: Regular



that's very upsetting... it must be especially hard for her
family to see a picture of her leaping to her death....


 

offline Laserbeak from Netherlands, The on 2002-04-28 01:23 [#00197064]
Points: 2670 Status: Lurker



People being cheerful about another person's death or
suffering also happens all the time, they just don't care.
It's also not something new, think of the public executions
or gladiatorfights a long time ago. Think of all the
cheering people when the WTC tower collapsed. I have to
admit that maybe I'm getting a bit too numb about bad stuff
around me but I think if I get angry or depressed about
these things, my entire life would be miserable and that
won't help the situation get any better... I'm just trying
to live....


 

offline Ctrl Alt Del from Ft. Worth (United States) on 2002-04-28 01:42 [#00197072]
Points: 2190 Status: Lurker



That is a very sad thing. People these days exploit
everything. In particular the folks at rotten.com, twisted
freaks. They deserve whatever they get.


 

offline B3n from Manchester (United Kingdom) on 2002-04-28 01:43 [#00197073]
Points: 4700 Status: Lurker



You can't let every death that happens in the world affect
you. It sounds macabre, but people die all the tim and as
you say you've just got to get on with life and be pretty
machavellian (sp?) about it all.


 

offline Martytan from somewhere in upstate new york (United States) on 2002-04-28 01:58 [#00197087]
Points: 757 Status: Regular



yeah, you're prolly right, B3n...

two nights ago, the theatre director of my school died in
her sleep, which really gave me a shock.... she was the kind
of teacher whom everyone knew, or had at least spoken with
before...very strange..

she never showed up at school yesterday, so one of her
friends went to her house and found her dead.... that must
be terrible thing to experience....

so, life is full of surprises, good and bad.


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-04-28 02:03 [#00197092]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to Zen Storm: #00197062



Do you deny that other people's lives don't affect the
world? We're all in this together and every action rings
through all of our lives in subtle implicit ways as well as
explicit ways for those closest. There have been successful
attempts to change a person's mind about suicide as not
everyone that goes to take their life is %100 positive about
the decision they are considering. To deny the
encouragement to choose not to take one's life is to deny a
part of your own life, as eerything in this world is a part
of you.


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-04-28 02:05 [#00197097]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to B3n: #00197073



you can't let everyone's death affect you directly, but if
you're prompted to feel sad and mourn in even a mild manner
over a certain death, why deny those feelings?


 

offline Zen Storm from St. Charles (United States) on 2002-04-28 02:07 [#00197101]
Points: 1044 Status: Lurker



This kinda overlaps a previous post had going called "The
Nature of Death", nd basically we discussed the fact that
sadness associated with one dying is socially constructed,
not something that is natural. I good book to check out is
The Denial of Death by Becker


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-04-28 02:14 [#00197105]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to Zen Storm: #00197101



Society is not natural? I reckon a lot of the major
problems that keep us away from ;iving harmoniously with
eachother on the individual and national and religious level
take root in the denial of our feelings. Culture of society
is as natural as mushrooms on a log. It's unhealthy to deny
emotions. Denial doesn't make emotions go away, they only
become repressed and "spiritual wounds" so to speak.
Induling in emotions is healthy. That's what maked music so
powerful and healing, we get to indulge in the emotions
being conveyed.


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-04-28 02:16 [#00197107]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to jupitah: #00197105



And that is why art will and the increase of creative
expression will play a major part in the healing of the mass
wounds in humanity. Art is far more than mere diversion.


 

offline Zen Storm from St. Charles (United States) on 2002-04-28 02:17 [#00197109]
Points: 1044 Status: Lurker



I think you misread what I wrote jupitah. what I worte was
that feeling of sadness associated with death is not
completely natural. It is now natural due to the social
constructs of the world, but there was a time when someone
died they were merely just left on the ground. No sadness,
no burial etc. Death has now become what man will fear
most, it is at the heart of everything we do and feel,
whether we recognize it or not. Seeing someone die bring us
that much closer.


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-04-28 02:23 [#00197113]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker



it's evolution. things change and that is the nature of
nature. i'm not trying to argue with your point about the
sadness associated with death having developed along side
society, i'm just stating that humanity and society are
natural, completely.


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-04-28 02:26 [#00197115]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker



the point i was making is we shouldn't trivialize the
mourning process or death. so long as people feel they need
to concern theirselves with death they should be left to do
so. i don't know if you or anyone holds a different opinion
on this matter, i was just triggered to express this
thought.


 

offline Zen Storm from St. Charles (United States) on 2002-04-28 02:27 [#00197116]
Points: 1044 Status: Lurker



I agree with you somewhat. I would saythat intergrating
into a society feels natural to us because it is this action
that gives a species the best chances for survival, so it
often appears to be the "right" and only way. Some species
are born with the function of living and being a part of a
society within their genes. Our society however, was not a
product of genes, but rather of evolution and survival, imo
of course.


 

offline license from out of nowhere on 2002-04-28 02:29 [#00197118]
Points: 865 Status: Lurker



that looks like quite a pretty place to be committing
suicide in.
not to trivialise it...eep! just saying. it's a lot prettier
than my town. if I lived there I would go to that bridge all
the time just to think.


 

offline Ubik from United States on 2002-04-28 02:34 [#00197125]
Points: 662 Status: Lurker



life is vastly overrated... especially each individuals
opinion of themselves...

we need suicide booths, so people can end their lives with
dignity and end their useless lives when it is time...


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-04-28 02:36 [#00197127]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to license: #00197118



it does look nice.


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-04-28 02:38 [#00197134]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to Zen Storm: #00197116



right, but evolution is primarily about creation, or in the
case of biological evolution, reproduction, and survival is
only one of the factors aiding in reproductive success.


 

offline Zen Storm from St. Charles (United States) on 2002-04-28 02:45 [#00197143]
Points: 1044 Status: Lurker



Survival isn't part of reproductive success, reproductive
success is part of survival, because w/o rep. suc. there is
no survival. Evolution isn't linked with creation, because
creation must come before evolution. You need something
there first to evolve, not the other way around.


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-04-28 02:55 [#00197156]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker



you misunderstand... i'm not talking survuval of a species
as a whole, i'm talking about survuval of the individual. a
species does not evolve if its individuals have a high
survival rate but do not reproduce. reproduction is exactly
how natural selection works. species with high reproductive
success can evolve, but often the survival of a creature
allows for more reproduction. the "survuval of the fitest"
is a popular term that people who don't understand
biological evolution use. and creation of another life is
reproduction. chemical evolution has to do with self
replicating chemicals and this is what i mean by creation.


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-04-28 02:59 [#00197157]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker



For a generic example, consider a species with some
individuals that have a trait that allows it to reproduce a
lot but dies quicker than other individuals in the same
species that live long but reproduce little. The trait for
long life will grow less and less common in the population
and the trait for higher reproduction will become more
common.


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-04-28 03:05 [#00197160]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker



you must have misunderstood me, cause rereading what you
said, i think you are in agreement with me :)


 

offline Zen Storm from St. Charles (United States) on 2002-04-28 03:17 [#00197162]
Points: 1044 Status: Lurker



well I think it's a given that a species doesn't survive
without reproduction, there is no way it could be otherwise.
This is why I said reproduction is a part of survival, b/c
there is no survival without reproduction. However, my main
point is that emotions are a byproduct of evoltuion. When
what eventually became man as we now know it, was first
alive he didn't roam across the plain feeling in love, or
betrayed. he felt hunger, he felt cold. More complex
emotions came attached with or evolution, which was
compounded by a growing network of modern society.


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-04-28 03:26 [#00197165]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker



you know this? i bet emotions were around sonce the
creation of the universe. i bet the big bang was the
gloriest emotional expereicne of all time. when i make love
(not that i have in a while) i feel at climax that i am
reliving the creation of the universe. take that however
you will. I think that evolution may have brought on the
complexification of emotions, but they did not just "pop"
into existence at some magic spark of who knows what. tell
me the point at which emotions came to be? what caused it?
was there a magic number of brain cells? a specific divine
moment triggerd by a certain thought pattern? just think
about it. same goes for consciousness/self-awareness in
genreral. at which magic moment did the spark of
consciousness hit? we are merely a focal point of
consciousness, and the progression from the dawn of time to
this moment did was not "no consciousness, no
cousciousnesss, consoiusness," but rather it is a continuum.
everything is fluid like this, there aren't clear lines and
these are issues that are leading scientists to have to
consider more radical ideas of late. if you truly examine
existence with objectivity, you can not draw lines.


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-04-28 03:27 [#00197166]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker



...much like fractals. exactly like fractals. they are
more than just pretty pictures as math is more than
numerical computation.


 

offline xlr from Boston (United States) on 2002-04-28 03:44 [#00197170]
Points: 4904 Status: Regular



whatever. I just feel bad for that woman.


 

offline Zen Storm from St. Charles (United States) on 2002-04-28 03:54 [#00197173]
Points: 1044 Status: Lurker



I covered this in the other post Juiptah, I had learned that
in man's first existence, he was an animal just like any
other. He lived somewhat by himself/herself, exept for when
men would run ino others, and help each other out to make a
kill, and a mother withher child until it was strong enough
to be on it's own. Eventually, tribes began to form in
order to help the survival rate, but when people passed away
(this was my orginal point), there was no remorse. Those
dead were left whereever they happen to be killed or passed
out. It wasn't until hundreds of years later, when tribes
were very close knit, that the dead would be moved into a
burial place of sorts, and flowers began to be put on the
graves of those dead. This shows the evolution of emotions
that is a result of the formation of a society. Emotions
did not just "pop" into existence as you made my reply sound
like, but rathered more complex emotions came about with
more complex societies that brought fourth more complex
situations to cause these emotions.


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-04-28 03:56 [#00197175]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker



regarding not beling able to draw clear lines, my point was
that pre-modern man could have felt love just like we do and
love may in fact be the most primordial of all emotions. it
probably took a lot of love for something like existence
to... come into existence.

much love to that woman. it makes me sad, especially
imagining the cruel people yelling at her. i don't know
whether or not those pictures were so inappropriate. i
don't think i would have felt the sadness as intensely as i
did if i hadn't seen them. i don't think the online paper
displayed them as an exploitation. it made the story much
more personal, more than just another suicide. i saw her
face.


 

offline Zen Storm from St. Charles (United States) on 2002-04-28 04:00 [#00197176]
Points: 1044 Status: Lurker



I agree with the your second paragraph about personalizing
the suicide after reconsideration. There is no reason not
to show it, it happened, it was there for anyone to see, no
use not showing real life. You should check out that link I
posted in this thread Jupitah, seeing as you have proven
your great philisophical thinking skills, you might
appreciate it.


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-04-28 04:01 [#00197178]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to Zen Storm: #00197173



you right, i infered that you were of the "pop" assumption
cause i get that a lot. most people just don't think about
it. i still don't understand why you don't think early
humans or even prehumans didn't feel love. i think if
evolution involves the complexification of emotions through
time then love was the original simplest emotion. not just
love between the individual, but the universal love, what
drives us to go on.


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-04-28 04:01 [#00197179]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker



ill check that


 

offline Zen Storm from St. Charles (United States) on 2002-04-28 04:05 [#00197183]
Points: 1044 Status: Lurker



I don't it is love that drives us to go on because that
implies a certain sort of unity between a community that
early man did not have. It is survival and the fear of
death (the oldest and strongest emotion to date imo) that
drove humans to go in the beginning of things.


 

offline Zen Storm from St. Charles (United States) on 2002-04-28 04:06 [#00197184]
Points: 1044 Status: Lurker



Love is one of the most complex emotions there is. Think of
how many countless people have tried to explain it in poems,
songs, even damn Hallmark cards, but admit that there is no
true way to explain love, rather it needs to be experienced.
It is indeed a complex emotion, but fear on the other hand
is not.


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-04-28 04:31 [#00197208]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker



fear is very much related to love i think. facing ones
fears and overcoming them can lead to a new found love for
life, or this is my experince at least, and i have witnessed
friends overcome fears and watched their lives change, as
well as my own. the mystical spiritual experience that many
people have from all religious backgrounds, including
non-denominational spirituality, often involves oneness and
universal love. shamans interviewed by anthropolgists
express universal love for nature (doesn't have to involve
human communty, so community was not needed for love to
exist) and religion is belived to date extremely far back.
neanderthals are beleived to have religious practice by cave
art found. i don't think fear is so simple either. all
emotions are complex. all people, myself included, have
fears to face we don't even know about yet. right now there
is a general fear of change and the unknown that i see
throughout humanity. this is seen in the extreme reactions
rock music when it first started getting big. people
actually thought it was evil just because the music
expresses new emotions and youth who listened to early rock
music were acting out and expressing in ways more free than
their parents had. new emotions scare people.

then again, emotions are only complex when we try to
describe them away with logic when if they are just felt,
they make perfect sense. they just are.


 


Messageboard index