 |
|
You are not logged in! F.A.Q Log in Register |
 |
|
 |
 (nobody)...and 372 guests Last 5 registered Oplandisks nothingstar N_loop yipe foxtrotromeo Browse members... |
 |
Members 8025Messages 2613455 Today 1 Topics 127500 |
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
with project x will there still be custom remixes? that would be cool coz we could mix ae... boc... bola... that would be awesome |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
maybe i should have asked this when phob was even here... |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i'm not sure about that. let's see what happens. the labels are quite pissed off by the way... remixing their tracks without permission and all... :/ |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
fuck them, let'em sue you and then the shit will come down!!! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
really? thats not very cool... have they been harrassing you or something? :/ |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
as far as I'm considered, as long as these "remixes" are not commercially distributed, they can suck your dick, phobia. As long as they are free for download, you are as righteous as possible in my book. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
sort of ;) |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
well, i was under the impression it was legal as long as no $ were involved... hmm... like i go too the bjork remix web and theres over 1000 independant bjork remixes.. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
yeah, well, lets see what happens... :) it's not out of question for sure... |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i do think that phobia would have to get the artist's writen premission to publicly display "reconizable" samples of that artist work, and that would include remixes. personaly, i think that they should be cool about it since everything is credited properly, and remixes are exposure to their tracks. And no-one is making money off of it. on "project x" i can see a problem because there is talk about a members only set of privilages which would come from paying a certian ammount, which could be argued that they are in a way paying for the remixes. and that the webmasters are charging money for the distrubtion of copywrited material. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
cool :) |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
yeah, yeah, let's stir some shit. You could be a new case of questioning people's liberties regarding technology and art (not unlike napster), only this would be obviously something linked with creativity. BTW, if those people sample everyone and everything to make their music, they should consider it normal that fans want to reconstruct their music in a similar way... |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
a own produced track will be better i believe. sending around to the musicians, and lets see what happens ,)> |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
well that too, off course... |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
Messageboard index
|
|||||||||
