Phobez! messageboard suggestion | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 305 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2613454
Today 7
Topics 127500
  
 
Messageboard index
Phobez! messageboard suggestion
 

offline Junktion from Northern Jutland (Denmark) on 2002-04-06 00:57 [#00159888]
Points: 9713 Status: Lurker



it would be cool if you, every time you write a topic ,will
get 1 point for every 50 thread in the topic
in that way people will start to make more
intelligent/conversational topics.
And if you add a maximum self-posting per topic...example; 5
selfmade posts per 50 posts, you will block spammin
posts...

hope u get my point... ;)


 

offline Junktion from Northern Jutland (Denmark) on 2002-04-06 01:45 [#00159957]
Points: 9713 Status: Lurker



arh cmon....someone must have a oppinion?


 

offline AMinal from Toronto (Canada) on 2002-04-06 01:47 [#00159959]
Points: 3476 Status: Regular



well i think limiting the num. of posts the creater of a
thread can have within it would NOT be good...
if its a 120 post thread.. why couldn't u contribute more
than 5?(or any number!)

ESPECIALLY if u were discussing something and suddenly you
couldn't reply.. that would just suck


 

offline steve from chicago on 2002-04-06 01:53 [#00159962]
Points: 1156 Status: Lurker



I don't think most people care that much about points.

A suggestion i'd like to make is possibly adding an edit
feature. Being the flawed human beings we are, we are prone
to making typing errors. And I make plenty.


 

offline REFLEX from Edmonton, Alberta (Canada) on 2002-04-06 01:55 [#00159964]
Points: 8864 Status: Regular



Yeah Edit would be a cool one to have..limiting is just
wrong.... and most people dont care about points.


 

offline REFLEX from Edmonton, Alberta (Canada) on 2002-04-06 01:56 [#00159965]
Points: 8864 Status: Regular



Well I mean the pointsystem is GOOD and should be kept
ofcourse, I just mean no one goes out of their way to get
more or anything.


 

offline LeCoeur from the outer edge of the universe (United States) on 2002-04-06 02:04 [#00159975]
Points: 8249 Status: Lurker



i agree with most.....that people usually stop posting for
points fairly quickly, because there is only so much you can
say without really contributing. i do like the idea of more
intelligent/ good fun convo's tho!! i'm all for that =0)


 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2002-04-06 02:11 [#00159979]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



You'd think people would be motivated to make good topics
for the great CONVERSATIONS and EXCHANGE OF IDEAS.

If you're offering POINTS for people to do that, then
there's something wrong there...


 

offline AMinal from Toronto (Canada) on 2002-04-06 02:17 [#00159987]
Points: 3476 Status: Regular | Followup to Ophecks: #00159979



good point ophecks!

interesting conversation/discussion should be incentive
enough to post... if thats NOT your incentive than u
shouldn't be here

.. u here that ohpecks?!? GET OUT!!!!
haha j/k:)


 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2002-04-06 02:22 [#00159993]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



I made a topic about how big our dicks are, once... it got
over a hundred posts... should I get bonus points for such
an intelligent and well thought out topic? Probably not. :-)
Actually, I almost NEVER post new topics, for some reason...


Anyway, there'll always be good topics and good
conversation, and there will always be spam. And there will
always be assholes like me that just give three word replies
to get more points. ;-)



 

offline D-Hex from Blue Springs Missouri (United States) on 2002-04-06 02:24 [#00159995]
Points: 871 Status: Lurker



1. yeah 2. me 3. too.

hahahehe.

add me a point!


 

offline wayout from the street of crocodiles on 2002-04-06 02:28 [#00159998]
Points: 2849 Status: Lurker



i dont really care about points..

but ophecks made a good point..a thread's post number doesnt
necissarily indicate its quality...kara's 'i know aphex'
thread got like 400 posts in less thana day...and we all
know what came of that


 

offline D-Hex from Blue Springs Missouri (United States) on 2002-04-06 02:28 [#00159999]
Points: 871 Status: Lurker



i dont, what happened, and who is kara?


 

offline D-Hex from Blue Springs Missouri (United States) on 2002-04-06 03:59 [#00160054]
Points: 871 Status: Lurker



so what happened again?

ive heard this mentioned before, but what happened?


 

offline wayout from the street of crocodiles on 2002-04-06 05:34 [#00160138]
Points: 2849 Status: Lurker



someone named 'kara' came on claiming to know aphex
personally..said she would answer any question...allegedly
gave out one of his email addresses...annoyed many
people...amused others
turned out to be a fake...was banned by phob...


 

offline Zen Storm from St. Charles (United States) on 2002-04-06 06:44 [#00160166]
Points: 1044 Status: Lurker



well if you really wanted to limit the self-post (which i
don't agree with), you could structure it so that for every
50 replies the author of the post gets 5 self-posts


 

offline Junktion from Northern Jutland (Denmark) on 2002-04-06 08:57 [#00160198]
Points: 9713 Status: Lurker



i dont think it would limit anything i it's set
correctly...5 selfpost per 50 post sound fair. and the
selfposting-limit should only be there so people dont try to
earn points by overposting their own topic...

just think about the idea for a minute...


 

offline Junktion from Northern Jutland (Denmark) on 2002-04-06 09:04 [#00160202]
Points: 9713 Status: Lurker



how about 5 selfposting per 25 posts?...


 

offline Cheffe1979 from fuck (Austria) on 2002-04-06 09:05 [#00160203]
Points: 4630 Status: Lurker



is selfposting really a problem here? never saw anyone do
it..

take this topic, junktion: 17 posts 3 of you-> only two left
for you for the next 33 posts! so think twice about
replying! :-))


 

offline Junktion from Northern Jutland (Denmark) on 2002-04-06 11:41 [#00160232]
Points: 9713 Status: Lurker



no selfposting is not a problem. but it would be if you get
points for posts.
i know...thats why i think it should be 25 instead =)


 

offline Riccardo from somewhere beyond the ultraworl on 2002-04-06 16:20 [#00160312]
Points: 869 Status: Lurker



I don't care at all of the points,and I don't consider that
a topic is good only if it has 50 replies on it.what's
really important is the topic itself


 

offline chapman from United Kingdom on 2002-04-06 16:43 [#00160316]
Points: 1134 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



points are way overrated :)


 

offline Junktion from Northern Jutland (Denmark) on 2002-04-06 17:06 [#00160319]
Points: 9713 Status: Lurker



nevermind then...it seems noone understands what im trying
to suggest...fuck it


 

offline Phobiazero from the next Xltronic (Sweden) on 2002-04-06 17:31 [#00160322]
Points: 10507 Status: Webmaster | Show recordbag



I understand, but I don't support the idea. :-)


 

offline Junktion from Northern Jutland (Denmark) on 2002-04-06 17:38 [#00160328]
Points: 9713 Status: Lurker



ok...*heh*...thats all i wanted to know ;)


 


Messageboard index