300 | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (3)
big
recycle
belb
...and 533 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614087
Today 7
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
300
 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2007-03-07 19:01 [#02059574]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



What's XLT's take? I live under a rock so I just became
aware of this recently via a commerical. I don't generally
like the modern fantahistorical epics like Gladiator and
Troy, but it's hard to ignore the visual style here, CGI
that actually looks like it could be immersive.

But this is only based on the very little footage I've seen
via the ads, I don't really know anything about the movie,
though its getting fellated on IMDB. Hit or shit? Either way
I'll have to demonoid the graphic novel.


 

offline Indeksical from Phobiazero Damage Control (United Kingdom) on 2007-03-07 19:05 [#02059576]
Points: 10671 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



the graphic novel was nowhere near long enough to stretch
out into a full movie so i assume theyve added a lot of
stuff which will make or break it i think. visually it looks
stunning, very close to the graphic novel and very
homoerotic which is always a good thing in an action film.
ive got my fingers crossed.


 

offline mrgypsum on 2007-03-07 19:06 [#02059578]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker



its based on a frank miller graphic novel, the director
wanted it to be more about the frank miller novel than about
actual history

ps i am going to see it as soon as i can as i like the look
of it


 

offline jules from United States on 2007-03-07 19:12 [#02059581]
Points: 754 Status: Lurker



i've seen so many commercials for this, i feel like i have
already seen it....not a big fan of movies made entirely
from green screen stuff


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2007-03-07 19:16 [#02059586]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker



i was stoked for about 3 minutes after seeing the first
trailer, but now i think it's probly gonna be pretty but
lame.


 

offline mrgypsum on 2007-03-07 19:18 [#02059589]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker



i like millers stuff so i am keeping my hopes up - i just
read a little blirb on how they made it, and i like that it
is more about the novel than about trying to recreate
history - i am a scifi nerd like that


 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2007-03-07 19:45 [#02059613]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Followup to jules: #02059581 | Show recordbag



Neither am I, generally, but I make an exception for this.
Granted I've only seen the commerical a few times. Stop
watching it when it comes on!



 

offline OK on 2007-03-07 20:28 [#02059648]
Points: 4791 Status: Lurker



I bought the hype and read the comic, it's good but meh.

the movie

first trailer looked great second trailer looked awful.

so i think the movie is going to suck.


 

offline IronLung from the 91fwy in soCAL (United States) on 2007-03-07 22:18 [#02059670]
Points: 8032 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



Ill be there FRI afternoon...I am so excited to see this


 

offline LuminousAphid from home (United States) on 2007-03-07 22:23 [#02059671]
Points: 540 Status: Lurker



the videos they released on the xbox live marketplace
recently made me want to see it anymore, for no other reason
than that it looks insanely awesome in full motion HD

the story will probably be crap though, just set-up for
awesome action. but that's ok w/me


 

offline B123 from The wicked underbelly (Australia) on 2007-03-08 08:01 [#02059808]
Points: 1361 Status: Lurker



lord of the 300


 

offline giginger from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2007-03-08 08:44 [#02059819]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



They've taken a true story and turned it into something
that's more mythical.


 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2007-03-08 09:52 [#02059847]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Followup to LuminousAphid: #02059671 | Show recordbag



Yes, this looks like the movie HD was made for. It will be a
treat in 1080p.

It's strange that this movie and God of War 2 are arriving
at pretty much exactly the same time. It's going to be
violent mythical fantasy overload.


 

offline DeadEight from vancouver (Canada) on 2007-03-08 17:23 [#02059956]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular



now of all times, i mean fuck i don't imagine there is that
much to it, but of all the times to make a movie about
defeating evil persians and making democracy... that is one
lousy fucking coincidence (or not) if you ask me.


 

offline whoami from Dallas/Ft. Worth (United States) on 2007-03-09 13:52 [#02060365]
Points: 269 Status: Regular



just got back from seeing this and it was fucking epic as
hell. for all those worried that it would suck because it
dealt with more material than the graphic novel you dont
have to be worried. It's easily going to be one of the
greatest films of 2007.


 

offline vveerrgg from life (Canada) on 2007-03-09 14:58 [#02060380]
Points: 846 Status: Lurker



this is one of the few movies I've wanted to see in the
theater.

I'm hoping to see it in iMax next week. woot woot!

looks badass!



 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2007-03-09 15:20 [#02060393]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Followup to whoami: #02060365 | Show recordbag



Sounds swell. Although I've read some amusing criticisms,
apparently the men aren't hairy enough and that just isn't
realistic at all. Even so I'm psyched.


 

offline Ezkerraldean from the lowest common denominator (United Kingdom) on 2007-03-09 15:23 [#02060394]
Points: 5733 Status: Addict | Followup to B123: #02059808



i fail to understand the significance of the number three
hundred. is it the name of a film or something?


 

offline whoami from Dallas/Ft. Worth (United States) on 2007-03-09 16:20 [#02060417]
Points: 269 Status: Regular



Its the name of the film for one, and the significance of
the number is they send 300 elite trained spartans to fight
the war.


 

offline obara from Utrecht on 2007-03-10 06:47 [#02060580]
Points: 19377 Status: Regular



trailers look quite interesting interesting, e.g.

this one


 

offline obara from Utrecht on 2007-03-10 06:53 [#02060582]
Points: 19377 Status: Regular



lol


 

offline IronLung from the 91fwy in soCAL (United States) on 2007-03-10 12:06 [#02060652]
Points: 8032 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



It was absolutely amazing....

5 out of 5


 

offline thatne from United States on 2007-03-10 18:51 [#02060718]
Points: 3026 Status: Lurker



i dont think i could like something like
this. i used to could but not anymore.


 

offline Wolfslice from Bay Area, CA (United States) on 2007-03-10 21:01 [#02060737]
Points: 4909 Status: Regular



I liked it but I didnt think it was "amazing." Some
elements of the story went nowhere, and in my opinion the
movie failed to go "All Out" with the action. It never
really escalated into one difinitive battle... The ending
was rather weak.

Buuuut the individual action scenes were pretty bad ass, and
the cinematography was amazing to look at. Costumes were
seriously tight as well.

Strong action movie, but lacking in the "epic" quality I was
expecting. 4/5


 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2007-03-11 01:46 [#02060764]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Followup to Wolfslice: #02060737 | Show recordbag



I could tell you all how I felt after seeing this, but it
would more or less be a clone of Wolfslice's post so just go
ahead and reread that one. :P


 

offline DeLtoiD from Ontario on 2007-03-13 05:53 [#02061657]
Points: 2934 Status: Lurker



RACIST


 

offline Exaph from United Kingdom on 2007-03-13 06:10 [#02061659]
Points: 3718 Status: Lurker



looks pretty loyal to the novel in terms of cinematography
to me. looking forward to seeing it.


 

offline 1up from greater manchester (United Kingdom) on 2007-03-13 06:59 [#02061669]
Points: 2302 Status: Regular



looks good. i'll be going to see it.


 

offline EVOL from a long time ago on 2007-03-13 12:38 [#02061854]
Points: 4921 Status: Lurker



just saw it in imax yesterday afternoon. i usually hate
movies with all the hype 300 has been puttin out. but going
in expecting shit was probably the best way to win me over
and indeed it did just that. for starters, it's just a
fucking movie. but on that note it's a HIGHLY entertaining
movie. which is ultimately all a movie is, entertainment.
i dunno what else to say other than i enjoyed the experience
immensely. i was very into it. defintatley worth a go.


 

offline Ezkerraldean from the lowest common denominator (United Kingdom) on 2007-03-13 13:30 [#02061868]
Points: 5733 Status: Addict



apparently the iranis hate it because it vilifies the
persian empire.


 

offline EVOL from a long time ago on 2007-03-13 13:38 [#02061873]
Points: 4921 Status: Lurker



i heard they had to change the name of the persian king
because stupid idiots would take offence


 

offline mimi on 2007-03-13 14:09 [#02061893]
Points: 5721 Status: Regular | Followup to Ezkerraldean: #02061868



and gays and disabled people

but i haven't seen the movie


 

offline EVOL from a long time ago on 2007-03-13 14:17 [#02061894]
Points: 4921 Status: Lurker



not that i have to preach to you guys (and gals) but i
vaguely remember saying something about the fact that it's a
movie.


 

offline mimi on 2007-03-13 14:22 [#02061898]
Points: 5721 Status: Regular | Followup to EVOL: #02061894



what are you getting at?


 

offline EVOL from a long time ago on 2007-03-13 14:29 [#02061899]
Points: 4921 Status: Lurker | Followup to mimi: #02061898



i'm getting at the people who are offended by movies and the
fact that movies are not real life.

should i be offended if a movie about some myth that
supposedly happened thousands of years ago projects the
ideology that middle class suburban college students are a
buncha wankers, even if we are?


 

offline mimi on 2007-03-13 14:47 [#02061907]
Points: 5721 Status: Regular | Followup to EVOL: #02061899



well, only you can decide if you "should be offended" by
something someone else made. but do you think works of
fiction are beyond criticism?

in general, it seems to me that misogynist, homophobic and
racist artists make misogynist, homophobic and racist art.

on the other hand, if what you're saying is that you don't
think film-making is much of an artistic pursuit, i'm really
inclined to agree with you, save for some
few-and-far-between exceptions. but lots of people on this
board wouldn't, and so that's why you see people looking at
it analytically, which is fine by me.


 

offline DeadEight from vancouver (Canada) on 2007-03-13 15:33 [#02061930]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular



all the retroactively infused jibber jabber about reason and
democracy is offensive. if it's about fictitious bloodlust,
let it be about fictitious bloodlust and don't try to sneak
that fucking tripe past your audience.

the fact that at now of all times, when what the world
really needs is some semblance of exposure to Persian
culture, that this is, in all likeliness, what we are going
to get is fucking offensive to me as a human being. and i
acknowledge that that is in context and might not have
anything to do with the intentions of the filmmakers or the
movie in anyway.

if it's not about anything, then why superimpose a
historical backstory onto it? don't be daft.
obviously i don't think the film is inherently harmful, nor
do i think it will have an adverse effect on anyone who sees
it, but to deny that films have any sort of weight in real
life seems pretty ludicrous when one considers the fact that
they all too often come to us in precisely the same form
that "real things" like the news come to us in.
and at times they represent the sole view afforded to people
of certain cultures and times.
sure they don't matter... just like your dreams don't
matter. it all happens in a darkened room and you deposit
all the thoughts and feelings you had at the door. nothing
sticks.

no doubt the anxiety felt by Iranians is in part due to a
general will to antagonize and feel inagonized by American
culture, but to label it as utterly irrational... are you
quite sure? i'm not.



 

offline staz on 2007-03-14 06:06 [#02062080]
Points: 9844 Status: Regular



2x300


 

offline Indeksical from Phobiazero Damage Control (United Kingdom) on 2007-03-14 06:42 [#02062096]
Points: 10671 Status: Regular | Followup to DeadEight: #02061930 | Show recordbag



i cannot find inagonized in the dictionary. im seeing this
tomorrow, i really cant be arsed after reading this thread
though.


 

offline vveerrgg from life (Canada) on 2007-03-14 06:58 [#02062100]
Points: 846 Status: Lurker



saw it 2 times now..... seeing/hearing it on IMAX was
insane.

I like the sound of the picture... couple of spots I
would've done differently sound wise, but they did a great
job with it. Solid flick


 

offline DeadEight from vancouver (Canada) on 2007-03-14 10:05 [#02062187]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular | Followup to Indeksical: #02062096



haha. straight up spelling error there. that's just supposed
to be "antagonized" again.
i feel i should clarify that i don't think there's anything
wrong with anyone going to see this film, or enjoying it. it
simply makes me uneasy for reasons that can't be wished
away.


 

offline blaaard from Imatra (close to sky) (Finland) on 2007-04-07 11:54 [#02070215]
Points: 1207 Status: Addict



oh my, this was the chunkiest piece of shite i've seen at a
theatre in a long time. it tries to be oh so
one-dimensional, but it's not even THAT! WHAY! zero
entertainmenT!


 

offline Valor on 2007-04-07 13:48 [#02070239]
Points: 594 Status: Addict



i think people like the effects. they just dont like the
storyline. given its apparent similarities with the current
events in the middle east and western civilization.

NPR interview with Frank Miller (his take on politics)
LAZY_TITLE


 

offline goDel from ɐpʎǝx (Seychelles) on 2007-04-07 13:51 [#02070240]
Points: 10225 Status: Lurker



hang right politics? what the hell...


 

offline Valor on 2007-04-07 13:55 [#02070241]
Points: 594 Status: Addict | Followup to goDel: #02070240



npr isn't a conservative program (its an international radio
broadcasting program), but the interview was posted in this
conservative website because it shares (as you can obviously
tell) the same political values as Frank Miller's, at least
when it comes to foreign politics.


 

offline blaaard from Imatra (close to sky) (Finland) on 2007-04-07 13:59 [#02070243]
Points: 1207 Status: Addict



i hated the effects. i expected a shite action movie, but
this was worse. a monotoneous rush of brown (lots of it), a
lot of red... and a pile of black and white rubbish talk.
wow! 3d blood! i've never seen 3d blood before! the
homoerotic stuff was funny though.


 

offline Valor on 2007-04-07 15:11 [#02070260]
Points: 594 Status: Addict



on the other hand, if what you're saying is that you
don't think film-making is much of an artistic pursuit


i dont understand this statement, coming from someone who
takes photographs and considers that art.


 


Messageboard index