[needless spam] Own Brand | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
big
...and 412 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614125
Today 4
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
[needless spam] Own Brand
 

offline dog_belch from Netherlands, The on 2006-05-21 17:46 [#01904227]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Show recordbag



In my 20 year or so quest to re-write "Donna" by the Art of
Noise from their "Into Battle" mini-lp, well not re-write it
but think about it a lot whilst I make something, I feel I
am finally getting there. This is a small sample of the
track I am pouring beery sweat into, called "Own Brand".
It's fucking chockablock full of reverb, "bad" snares, and
it sounds muddy. Hmmm, yes, but after being encouraged by
Staz's kind words yesterday about some other new tracks I
went back to this for a bit of a gee up. And now I did want
to run it under your collective nose and see if I was A).
backing the wrong horse or B). Yeah, could be good if you
did this that and the other or C). you know, anything else.


Own Brand (demo)


 

offline i_x_ten from arsemuncher on 2006-05-21 17:49 [#01904229]
Points: 10031 Status: Regular



usual dog belch


 

offline dog_belch from Netherlands, The on 2006-05-21 17:50 [#01904230]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Followup to i_x_ten: #01904229 | Show recordbag



Thanks mate!


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-05-21 17:50 [#01904231]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



well, it seems you intend the drums to sound like this, but
other than the drums it's a great track imo!


 

offline dog_belch from Netherlands, The on 2006-05-21 17:54 [#01904232]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #01904231 | Show recordbag



I'd like nice drum sounds, to be fair, I like "cheesy" drums
but I also like "cool" drums, I think maybe I could mix
"cheesy" and "cool" drums, and by cool I mean, you know, not
obvious drum samples or different sounds for rhythmic
elements, shall we say. So yes, good point. Love you.


 

offline Aphexisatwin from your mom's room (United States) on 2006-05-21 18:04 [#01904234]
Points: 2777 Status: Regular



I dig I dig :D


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2006-05-21 18:08 [#01904238]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



bc kinda thing.


 

offline dog_belch from Netherlands, The on 2006-05-21 18:20 [#01904242]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Followup to tolstoyed: #01904238 | Show recordbag



What, jav?


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2006-05-21 18:27 [#01904244]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to dog_belch: #01904242



well, nothing really. option a was out of the question so i
picked options b and c. i think you caught the essence of
art of noise excellent there but to give a constructive
opinion i would have to hear the whole thing :) i
definitelly hope i'll hear it because i like this part a
lot.

i haven't downloaded it so i was wondering what quality you
got it ripped into?


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2006-05-21 18:30 [#01904248]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



oh, and i wouldn't change drums if i was you :D


 

offline dog_belch from Netherlands, The on 2006-05-21 18:32 [#01904249]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Followup to tolstoyed: #01904244 | Show recordbag



Oh, I see, I thought you were saying something ENTIRELY
different. Well, I made it into this mp3 and to me it sounds
the same as what it sounded like when it was parts on a
laptop. But, yes I'd like to develop it a bit more, but more
than that I'm ever so honoured your busy ears had time to
give it a listen, even in its current state.


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2006-05-21 18:35 [#01904250]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to dog_belch: #01904249



you know, i don't think i've heard your stuff before so i
thought i'd give it a chance. i've played it on repeat for a
while now..perhaps you could lengthen it simply by looping
it a few times :)


 

offline dog_belch from Netherlands, The on 2006-05-21 18:38 [#01904251]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Followup to tolstoyed: #01904250 | Show recordbag



Ha! This version is the same thing looped twice with a bit
of extra faffery in the second half, already. I think maybe
it just needs an intro, an outro, and a euro rap in the
middle.


 

offline scup_bucket from bloated exploding piss pockets on 2006-05-21 18:39 [#01904253]
Points: 4540 Status: Regular | Followup to dog_belch: #01904249



I love it, it's my favorite thingy from you. my cat likes
it too, we are dancing


 

offline dog_belch from Netherlands, The on 2006-05-21 18:42 [#01904254]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Followup to scup_bucket: #01904253 | Show recordbag



I love you AND your cat.

But you more.

That track you posted the other day of yours, you said it
was your last. I really liked it, Arden Fox? I played it on
Pomme's "The Cut" show, a lot of the stuff I playted that
night was rank, but yours was SHIT HOT.


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2006-05-21 18:44 [#01904255]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to dog_belch: #01904251



needs 6 minutes at least!


 

offline scup_bucket from bloated exploding piss pockets on 2006-05-21 18:58 [#01904262]
Points: 4540 Status: Regular



I agree, the quality/atmosphere of this song warrants 6 more
minutes at least.

and I'm flattered beyond words about that song, arden
fox...or whatever it may be called, it doesn't really have a
name


 

offline uviol from United States on 2006-05-21 19:29 [#01904279]
Points: 2496 Status: Lurker



It's fucking chockablock full of reverb, "bad"
snares


It was right up my alley. :)

Great track, I like the fact that not all the drums are
gated/filtered/what-have-you.. it retains interest alot
easier since the effects are applied somewhat
intermittently. Cool synths and atmosphere too.. but I'd
avoid the Euro rap :\

but to each his own (brand)..


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2006-05-21 19:32 [#01904281]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



It's nice. I'm not massively into it though.

The things you posted yesterday though, Star Burger in
particular, are fucking ace and need finishing. I have
listened to Star Burger about 50 times today.


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2006-05-21 19:33 [#01904282]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular



i'm totally not qualified to give an opinion on this given
my lack of knowledge about the art of noise (never got into
them). i'm not fond of the drum sound (i think i may have
used it myself in one fruityloops track too many). i think
it's quite nice otherwise - has that urban/industrial/80's
feel for sure, but it's also very warm. i'll borrow a
cliche and say flowers growing in cracked concrete.


 

offline i_x_ten from arsemuncher on 2006-05-21 19:54 [#01904292]
Points: 10031 Status: Regular



'i only like this because dog belch made it. if anyone else
did it, it would be crap'


 

offline scup_bucket from bloated exploding piss pockets on 2006-05-21 20:11 [#01904297]
Points: 4540 Status: Regular | Followup to i_x_ten: #01904292



I like your carrot avatar, but only because it's in a
dog_belch thread. If I had seen it in any other thread, it
would be crap.


 

offline DirtyPriest from Copenhagen (Denmark) on 2006-05-22 01:31 [#01904379]
Points: 5499 Status: Lurker



Honest oppinion: Not that great IMO. Not bad either. The
drums are really crappy! I know its your intention, but the
bottom line is it doesnt sound that good to me. I like the
chords in the background and that whispering voice. The
melody line is too samey. Gets old quick. Listened to it 3
times now, and i don't feel like listening to it again.
Youve posted much better stuff than this, so to answer your
question: A). backing the wrong horse, and at the same time
C). Evolve some of your other tracks, or make completely new
stuff.


 

offline giginger from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2006-05-22 01:35 [#01904381]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Followup to i_x_ten: #01904292 | Show recordbag



I only hate that post because you wrote it. If anyone else
did it it would be great.


 

offline obara from Utrecht on 2006-05-22 01:45 [#01904383]
Points: 19377 Status: Regular



i've played it twice now and tried to enjoy it. it's not bad
but it's not great either. I think I would come back to the
track and make it a bit longer, grander and worth tears.
Plus something tells me it needs female vocals, maybe by
Patsi Kensit ?


 

offline DirtyPriest from Copenhagen (Denmark) on 2006-05-22 01:56 [#01904386]
Points: 5499 Status: Lurker | Followup to dog_belch: #01904227



I guess you post your stuff to get some constructive
critisism, so here goes:

I'm listening to your other songs, and it seems like a
problem in all of them, that its the same thing over and
over again. Making repetitive music can be either
hypnotic/mantra like or just become boring, and to me, it
seems your music falls a bit into the boring category. You
have some nice ideas, but it seems like nothing happens in
the tracks. I dont feel motivated to listen to the tracks
over and over again.

Combined with the drum sounds you use, it makes your music
sound a bit like tracks from someone who got fruityloops a
month ago (wich i'm guessing is not the sound you are aiming
for). I need finished tracks dammit!!!

More specefic notes about your tracks:

Star Burger: Perhaps the best of the tracks you uploaded.
Has good mood to it. Good use of sounds. I thank the lord
that you didnt use those crappy snares in this one. but
again, 1:08??? I need more. I need more melody. I need
something that will actually make me feel like listening
again. It feels like something is building up, but then it
just ends instead.

Happy Shopper: Delete this track. It sucks, to be quite
honest. The drums sound extremely bad. Not promising in any
way. Nothing can save this track!!! It needs to die. You
tried to save it with some effects here and there... pah.
The snare drives me up the wall.

Track one (live): Shows some promise as well. I can actually
stand listening to this one. But same as the others, why
doesnt it evolve? Same little loop again and again. Its not
that brilliant that it deserves to be played again and again
endlessly with only a swooping sound to add variation.



 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2006-05-22 03:09 [#01904394]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



I can imagine this being used as the shop/garage or possibly
loading screen in a futuristic wipeout/f-zero style
videogame. In terms of "listening techno" though, it's a bit
too repetative, not really going anywhere. Although, I
suppose that's what makes me think it'd work so well as
looping music in a game.


 

offline edga on 2006-05-22 04:03 [#01904414]
Points: 363 Status: Lurker



the structure/the idea is pretty good (very ultradyne'ish),
i like it.
but the overall quality, the feeling is very amateurish.
like a movie filmed with a handycam, you know?


 

offline dog_belch from Netherlands, The on 2006-05-22 07:08 [#01904519]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Show recordbag



Last night I was listening to it thinking "Woooah, ok, could
finally be onto something", now I'm listening and it sounds
a bit threadbare. Hmmm, sometimes when you're in the middle
of doing things I think you fill in the gaps too much
mentally... but, yes, maybe you have to actually DO some of
those for the listener. But I will say, that these three
newer tracks aren't finished at all, and I shouldn't have
stuck them under your nose yet, wasting your time.

I appreciate everyone's ears, and in particular
DirtyPriest's (oh so dirty) comments. I honestly agree with
pretty much everything you say there, apart from saying
about the snare sounds, but I am going to give it a go
replacing all drum sounds with different things.

I'd say I try not to do the same thing over and over, but I
am aware it comes out like that. And it is Amateur, in small
flashing lights.

I agree that Happy Shopper one's not so hot, I have this
romantic idea about very old techno compilation tapes, but
again, these three newer ones are more "basic". I know
you've had more than a fucking enough of me by now but some
things I consider a lot better and a far more structured are
The Greatest Ape and Sea World from earlier this year.


 

offline DirtyPriest from Copenhagen (Denmark) on 2006-05-22 08:07 [#01904566]
Points: 5499 Status: Lurker | Followup to dog_belch: #01904519



Sea World is good! i remember listening to it a long time
ago actually. The thing about those damn snares is, i dont
think people appreciate the irony/romantic ideas or
whatever. It just doesnt sound that great, and thats the
bottom line. It pulls the whole thing down. You definatly
need some more interesting drum sounds. Looking forward to
listening to some more completed stuff :)

I'm also glad that my critique is appreciated, sometimes it
seems like an odd thing to do, to point out bad things about
someone elses work, that these people have spent their time
and effort on. I just remember that good constructive
critisism has been very helpful to me over the years, in
both music and art. Its really annoying as hell when you
hear it, and then you often realise its true, and you
evolve.

Also, you must know, i wouldnt bother with this, if i didnt
think there was a possibility for you to make some good
music in the future. If it was utter crap, i wouldnt go into
details like that.


 

offline dog_belch from Netherlands, The on 2006-05-22 08:21 [#01904573]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Followup to DirtyPriest: #01904566 | Show recordbag



I really appreciate you giving the time and honestly you've
picked up on some things that I do need to really look
seriously at if I am to "move on" and progress, let's say.
It's very helpful indeed, particularly things like how a
simply a bad snare can bring the whole lot down. I think,
yes, now I see one must be mindful of all the details if
you're to pull something together successfully, you can't
afford to be sloppy in that regard.

So yes, I really do appreciate everyone's input and it all
does help.


 

offline DirtyPriest from Copenhagen (Denmark) on 2006-05-22 08:27 [#01904575]
Points: 5499 Status: Lurker | Followup to dog_belch: #01904573



Thats cool. Ill probably upload some music soon, then you
can pick it apart, if you want to get back at me :)

I noticed an interesting thing about your tracks, that is
pretty neat actually. They almost always consist of small
"drones", like beats that are repeated again and again, and
then synth chords in the background that are constantly
changing. I like this concept, it works nicely in ambient
type music. But i think (i'm just rambling now, you dont
need to listen) you could have a really powerfull effect if
you at one point in a track like this changed the beat
completely. And not make it wilder, more distorted or
anything. On the contrary, it can get more intense, if you
make the beat simpler for a while, if you combine it with an
unexpected chord change or something. Or the introduction of
a new sound. Just thoughts.


 

offline dog_belch from Netherlands, The on 2006-05-22 08:47 [#01904586]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Followup to DirtyPriest: #01904575 | Show recordbag



I'm sold on that, yes, definitely. I'll give that a go as an
exercise. I think maybe we're looking at adding a bit more
light and shade, some depth, where at the moment it's a bit
of a static storm with just shades of grey. No, definitely,
like it, I like a challenge, godamnit! Thanks for your
thoughts, again, and look forward to hearing a bit of The
Priest.


 

offline uviol from United States on 2006-05-22 09:42 [#01904641]
Points: 2496 Status: Lurker



boy this is weird, for once I actually disagree completely
with DirtyPriest :).. and the other comments here.

I liked the tracks.. alot. Sure they're threadbare, but you
did maintain that these are simply sketches/first drafts. I
LOVED Happy Shopper.. it's got a very lovely, subtle
undertone gliding under that bassline - very hard to
describe but I think it can be exploited. Maybe add some
kind of swirling, phaser effect to that really quiet
two-note melody under the bassline to help add some nuance?
(I don't know, what I like about this track is hard to pin
down in words). It's sparse, yeah, but I guess I just like
the sense of variation-within-repetition, the occasional
mechanized drumfills peppering what's otherwise a very
repetetive track, is what keeps my interest while still
allowing me to get lost in the more samey synthy drones.

Unlike most people here, I thought Star Burger was boring..
almost cliche. I don't know why it was the fan favorite, but
I MUCH prefered Own Brand and Happy Shopper. Anyway, keep
'em coming.. :)


 

offline DirtyPriest from Copenhagen (Denmark) on 2006-05-22 09:51 [#01904652]
Points: 5499 Status: Lurker | Followup to uviol: #01904641



I can understand why you like it! with your preferences in
sounds and all.


 

offline dog_belch from Netherlands, The on 2006-05-22 09:59 [#01904661]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Followup to uviol: #01904641 | Show recordbag



It's a fine line one must traverse. I think you and I, as
far as I can tell, enjoy and pick up on certain similar
things in... certain types of music. But, I guess it's ...
broadening on that to let more people in on... the thing,
... without losing the first thing... entirely. One person's
reaction to a "cheap" snare might be associations of pop
music past, the un-written history of a billion bedroom
composers since year dot, some childhood imaging of the
future, some idealised past that one knows was never really
true but still fancies popping back there.. all sorts of
different things, and someone else will just think, no more
rightly or wrongly, "Cheap snare" and bring the whole lot
down.

So then the challenge is, I suppose, to make it work. I
think there's an art to putting in a cheap snare, it's got
to sound like it's meant to be there, not just
because it was the default. I know this is all obvious, but
I'm still. ... trying, godamnit.


 

offline redrum from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2006-05-22 10:08 [#01904666]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict



i came here looking for new cygnus beats and was thoroughly
disappointed

shame on you, "dan"


 

offline DirtyPriest from Copenhagen (Denmark) on 2006-05-22 10:09 [#01904668]
Points: 5499 Status: Lurker | Followup to dog_belch: #01904661



This is actually turning into a pretty interesting
discussion. Actually, i really like the sound of a tr808
(wich is what you used right?) But combined with other
elements, that clarifies that the music maker is aware that
he is using an overused song. Its sort of sound design post
modernism in a way. The thin line between making kitch and
making camp (not that any of you twos music is either one,
but its sort of the same thing)

I think, Dog_belch, that your music lacks some elements
before you are "allowed" to use sounds like that.


 

offline dog_belch from Netherlands, The on 2006-05-22 10:12 [#01904670]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Followup to redrum: #01904666 | Show recordbag



Haha, sorry old boy, I left out all the beats and just stuck
to mad melodeez.

I just have to say, again, that uviol's Stephanie Tanner
Suprise always succeeds where I fail, everytime I listen to
"Nothing can stop me today", for example, I just shake my
head, knowing I will never get it as right as that goddman
track, just incredible. I must get the bloody album I
suppose.

And I am just getting into Warhawk Tanzania as well.


 

offline staz on 2006-05-22 10:13 [#01904673]
Points: 9844 Status: Regular



this thread is GIGANTIC. i'm gonna listen soon, if falito
allows it.


 

offline dog_belch from Netherlands, The on 2006-05-22 10:14 [#01904674]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Followup to DirtyPriest: #01904668 | Show recordbag



I think, Dog_belch, that your music lacks some elements
before you are "allowed" to use sounds like that.


Exactly right, on the money. I am just, via this very
thread, coming to realise this.


 

offline DirtyPriest from Copenhagen (Denmark) on 2006-05-22 10:16 [#01904676]
Points: 5499 Status: Lurker | Followup to DirtyPriest: #01904668



used an overused SOUND, i meant to say


 

offline uviol from United States on 2006-05-22 11:40 [#01904729]
Points: 2496 Status: Lurker



As Dirty pointed out, this is an interesting
discussion.. actually a subject I've been thinking alot
about.

Indeed, it is a very fine line. As you were saying,
dog_belch, we do share certain affinities for these kinds of
sound palattes.. but as Dirty mentioned, there must be
enough in the mix to set them off.. to throw them into
relief I suppose. It's a very tough call because as you
both have already said, this kind of thing is very easily
misinterpreted. What are intended as references to dated
sound archetypes will sound, to many people, like presetty,
amateuish wank. In some cases it might be that.. Still,
it's tough to know how much to assume the listener will
'get' and how much to spell it out. It also assumes that
there is something to 'get' in the first place.

That said, thank you again dan for your comments on and
support of sts.. you are way too kind :) I appreciate your
time and careful listening more than it is easy to express
in text. And yeah.. warhawk's a very different animal but I
hope you enjoy that too!


 

offline DirtyPriest from Copenhagen (Denmark) on 2006-05-22 11:43 [#01904732]
Points: 5499 Status: Lurker | Followup to uviol: #01904729



Word


 

offline staz on 2006-05-24 17:05 [#01906418]
Points: 9844 Status: Regular



too short this track (as always), but it's still lovely for
its soundscapes, and it's quite daring in comparison to a
lot of the music i hear online and offline. you always have
the musical balls to take stuff far out like this, i love
it. no shyness, just full on with bizarre synthlines, snare
reverb and openhats floating on the right.

oh, and i wanna do a collaborative "EP" or something. that
would be fucking awesome.


 

offline obara from Utrecht on 2006-05-24 17:08 [#01906419]
Points: 19377 Status: Regular | Followup to staz: #01906418



you're talking about the Own Brand themo mp3 ?


 

offline staz on 2006-05-24 17:09 [#01906420]
Points: 9844 Status: Regular | Followup to obara: #01906419



what else


 

offline dog_belch from Netherlands, The on 2006-05-24 17:59 [#01906430]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Show recordbag



I so love Staz, in as much as one man can love another
without becoming "a gay", and even then... but, I know Staz
does some of the most awesome tracks around, offline online
signed unsigned wherever. What's his greatest gift though?
His wonderful ears, this lad can listen, truly hear, and I
think that helps him make Top Music, I believe. Obvious,
really, I guess. And even when what he's listening to is
ropey old tolsh, like my old chuff, he can still hear
through the poor production, the frankly piss poor use of
volume, fx, dog bollock melody... to .. the intention, the
aim, the whatever. And I am sure this gift will serve him
well in the future.

I know I've lost what few people held me in any regard with
these last half baked spams, I've attempted to make ammends
with the faux acid muscular workout that is Own Brand (Acid Washout),
but, I suspect, not only is the jury out, they've long since
fucked off. And I don't blame them.


 

offline i_x_ten from arsemuncher on 2006-05-24 18:03 [#01906431]
Points: 10031 Status: Regular



wankshot


 

offline staz on 2006-05-24 18:09 [#01906434]
Points: 9844 Status: Regular | Followup to dog_belch: #01906430



hahaha, it sounds like grindcore


 


Messageboard index