Ableton Live "too easy"? | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 664 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614128
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
Ableton Live "too easy"?
 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2006-04-25 03:14 [#01886537]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



A lot has been said about Ableton Live here, ranging from
"the only sequencer worth paying for" right through to
"djing for people with no skill". It has also become a bit
of an icon for piss taking, in the same way that powerbooks
were a couple of years back; a real cliche of an IDM set...

So, imagine my suprise when I saw this.

Not Pendulum "Live" or Pendulum "DJing", but Pendulum
"Ableton Set". Are they sponsored by Ableton? Or as I
suspect, are they too ashamed to call selecting pre rendered
loops in Ableton "Playing Live" or even DJing? Who knows?

Incidentally, I hope they don't have that mincer of a dancer
like last time I saw them. Real "break someone's face" evil
dnb, with the total juxtaposition of a skinny aussie
chav-looking bloke bobbing up and down out of time to the
music, with camp arm movements.


Attached picture

 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-04-25 03:20 [#01886539]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



Nottingham's First Indoor Festival

first, should that apostrophe be there and second.. the
first indoor festival in Nottingham ever?! What's up with
Nottingham?


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-04-25 03:23 [#01886540]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



search here and find.


Attached picture

 

offline i_x_ten from arsemuncher on 2006-04-25 03:36 [#01886544]
Points: 10031 Status: Regular | Followup to Ceri JC: #01886537



i've been messing around with the demo. it looks okay
(should get a lite version today when UPS turns up with my
MicroKontrol - yessss). i thought one of the main benifits
of Live was being able to edit live, so if someone where
improvising with Live live, for example, that would surely
require more skill. but i see what you mean. i guess people
are treating it as a glorified version of dance ejay. i
can't really comment too much as i'm not familliar with the
software.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2006-04-25 03:47 [#01886549]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to i_x_ten: #01886544 | Show recordbag



Yes. Don't get me wrong, I think it's a cracking bit of
software and very clever indeed. I just can't help but feel
that I'm "cheating" when using it, it's that easy. I know
quotes like, "I just can't help but feel that I'm "cheating"
when using it, it's that easy." are the sort of thing
marketing men lap up and plaster all over adverts, but for
me it's not really a good thing. It just feels a bit
empty/soulless. An analogy would be sticking something in a
CAM lathe and hitting go on the computer and have it cut out
your design as you specified, rather than you doing it by
hand on a normal lathe.

You can certainly do some clever improv with Live and it's
extremely versatile (you can play live with it, DJ with
nothing other than a copy of it, use it as a sampler, etc.),
however, and this is probably why it's become a bit of a
target for piss taking, is that an awful lot of artists just
prerecord loops, arrange the bulk of the track in the
arrangement view (the one that looks/acts like ejay) and
then just click to trigger a few samples/drum fills on the
session view.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2006-04-25 03:48 [#01886550]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #01886539 | Show recordbag



The ad is probably correct on both accounts. The festival
belongs to Nottingham, hence the apostraphe. Also, I can
well believe that they've not had an "indoor" (or for that
matter, outdoor) festival.


 

offline giginger from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2006-04-25 03:50 [#01886552]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



Ableton Live is fucking easy to mix with. It leaves you more
time for audio fuckery though I suppose. Listen to zilty
radio set to hear some of it. It's just an extension of
mixing. What I'd really like is to hook it up to some decks
and loop shit as it comes in and apply the effects and just
fuck with the audio hardcore style.


 

offline zero-cool on 2006-04-25 03:54 [#01886554]
Points: 2720 Status: Lurker



abelton is fucked i can't figure out how the fuck to keep
the tempo at what i want for created loops.

can somebody tell me how they create drums loops or melody
loops etc before they load it into abelton as a wav loop?


 

offline stilaktive from a place on 2006-04-25 03:57 [#01886556]
Points: 3162 Status: Lurker



i make a loop. then export it.


 

offline i_x_ten from arsemuncher on 2006-04-25 04:14 [#01886560]
Points: 10031 Status: Regular | Followup to Ceri JC: #01886549



yeah i hear you totally. i'm hoping with my microkontrol
i'll be able to improv/jam along to whatevers going on and
make/record beats on the fly. i've seen quite a few live
acts that are just push button artists and its not very
inspiring, regardless of the music itself. i dont mean to
blow my own trumpet but i guess it helps that i can actually
play an instrument. i'm keen to find out its possibilities
cos i really wanna start doing some live music. and by live
i mean 'live'. live music has soul and feeling. who knows i
might even do a live version of what the beat......



 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-04-25 04:48 [#01886567]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01886550 | Show recordbag



I thought it was Nottinghams when it was something that
belonged to Nottingham while Nottingham's would be something
like "Nottingham is [...]"?

however, I am norwegian.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2006-04-25 04:55 [#01886570]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #01886567 | Show recordbag



It's both.

For example; "Nottingham's shit." (meaning "Nottingham is
shit")and "Nottingham's inhabitants don't have one brain
cell between them."

It would be "Nottinghams" if there were several different
places called Nottingham and you were refering to the them
collectively.

If something belongs to all of the several places called
Nottingham, it'd be Nottinghams' or, if you follow the
different (to my mind, more clumsy) style, Nottinghams's is
also technically correct. You even get some people who use
"Nottinghamses" for that, but even if that's not wrong
(which personally, I reckon it is), it's arguably a lot less
elegant than Nottinghams'. Here ends the grammar lesson.

Hope this helps.



 

offline Netlon Sentinel from eDe (Netherlands, The) on 2006-04-25 05:33 [#01886590]
Points: 4736 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01886537



I read an interview with Monolake (co-founder of Ableton)
once in which he said there were plans to have artists
include the word Ableton on their CDs if they used the
programmme.

I don't know if that actually happened, but it obviously did
in this case. It seems silly... Then again, I've seen many
bands 'thank' the manufacturers of their gear (guitars,
drums etc) in the liner notes. I bet they get paid for that
as well.

Laughing stock? Ableton is used by lots and lots of
respected musicians, as far as I know...


 

offline Dannn_ from United Kingdom on 2006-04-25 07:53 [#01886645]
Points: 7877 Status: Lurker



I think its great in principle, in practice for dance music
I tend to find Ableton sets to be consistently less
enjoyable than DJing or Traktor sets. I dont see the problem
with saying 'Ableton set' on the flyer because its just
being honest, I think calling it 'live' is probably a bit of
stretch for most Ableton performers. I've fiddled with it
but I don't know how to use it really, hopefully I'll get
round to it soon because it looks like a lot of fun.


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2006-04-25 07:57 [#01886654]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



I think when I get my stuff together, and play live, I'll be
using ableton. I'd probably take all my tracks that I've
written, export each seperate track as audio, and cut them
up into loops, so I can do real time remixing and
arrangements, live. I think that would be ideal.

As far as composing with it, I'm not really interested.


 

offline Taffmonster from dog_belch (Japan) on 2006-04-25 08:05 [#01886663]
Points: 6196 Status: Lurker



never got on with ableton theres just something irritating
about it.


 

offline thecrimsonguard from ∞ (United States) on 2006-04-25 08:18 [#01886668]
Points: 1801 Status: Lurker



ableton is a great program, i'm just starting to use it now
and i'm learning about all of the little tricks etc, but i
think the 'too easy' part is the best part of the program.
Its very straight to the point & easy to use...and if you
don't think that an 'ableton live set' doesn't sound as good
as a tracktor or dj set, maybe the act you're listening to
is just learning it and doesn't know the full potential they
have with it..

for me the program works so well so your not sitting there
glued to the monitor you can map anything to a midi
controller and actually play your parts live etc. i'm
really diggin the real-time aspect of it...its just as
immediate as playing live music with a guitar in a band
which is what i'm use to...only know i'm the band :)


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2006-04-25 08:23 [#01886670]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to thecrimsonguard: #01886668 | Show recordbag



I'm not for one moment suggesting Live sounds worse than
Traktor/DJing. It usually sounds better because you'd
actually have to be trying to get Live to fall out of synch
with itself, whereas even good people make the odd mistake
with Traktor/DJing.

In terms of actually going to see an act I'd prefer to watch
someone use Ableton rather than DJing (unless it was
turntabilism). For the audience, it's great. I just meant
that for myself, when I'm making it, it's somehow
unfullfiling. I do really like the immediacy of it and the
way you can record and sequence midi and audio so
seamlessly.


 

offline Dannn_ from United Kingdom on 2006-04-25 08:26 [#01886672]
Points: 7877 Status: Lurker



it could be that, but its more that I think though real time
arranging sounds like a good idea, most people end up making
tracks that lack structure


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2006-04-25 08:55 [#01886694]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



It's the endless cycle of the musical herd. Everyone jumps
on a bandwagon until it's too popular and generic, then
someone else finds another way and the herd decides that's
the exciting new thing.

The artists who stand out will be the ones not using
Ableton. Same goes with every other fad. Oops, I can smell
another one that just went stale. Are we all tired of acid
tinged neo-electro-techno yet? I know I am.

I think ix_ten is onto something with his big beat. Let's do
that until it gets too popular again.

What the beat. What-what the beat.



 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2006-04-25 08:59 [#01886697]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to fleetmouse: #01886694 | Show recordbag



Funny you say that, because I was actually thinking of doing
some big beat earlier today...


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2006-04-25 09:40 [#01886732]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01886697



I've been doing all this micro sampled stuff recently trying
to bite the jelinek style. Need a change of pace. Big beat
it is.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2006-04-25 10:01 [#01886753]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to fleetmouse: #01886732 | Show recordbag



"Fleetmouse and Ceri JC; defining the new direction of
excellent electronic music"


 

offline redrum from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2006-04-25 10:17 [#01886773]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #01886567



what you said there applies to "its" and "it's"... not to
proper nouns though.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-04-25 10:18 [#01886774]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to redrum: #01886773 | Show recordbag



hmm.. good to know.


 

offline brokephones from Londontario on 2006-04-25 10:18 [#01886776]
Points: 6113 Status: Lurker



Live makes looping easier, but doesnt make your songs good
or bad, the artist does.

I really like using the mix view for sequencing tracks. You
dont have to look at that goddamn timeline.



 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-04-25 10:20 [#01886779]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to fleetmouse: #01886732 | Show recordbag



I think I may have said that I want to hear your stuff
before, but I'm saying it again

I wanna hear your stuff.


 

offline Clic on 2006-04-25 10:46 [#01886800]
Points: 5232 Status: Regular



Pendulum's garbage anyway.


 

offline i_x_ten from arsemuncher on 2006-04-25 11:00 [#01886808]
Points: 10031 Status: Regular



the big beat renaissance is here...



 

offline Quoth from Sweden on 2006-04-25 11:38 [#01886832]
Points: 3840 Status: Lurker



yes, i would agree ableton is easy... but it's easy in the
fact that you have a generic layout of of how you input the
music you want to output.

ideas used in Live can be manipulated know one would have
ever dreamed of before... this is why i choose to use it as
a piece of my musical puzzle.

ideas sprawl from the actual synths and drum machines and my
voice and then i manipulate it, rerun it through to a cd
recorder and then load it into a sampler, chop it up again
and again and again, load it into MOTU Digital Performer and
chop it up in there and then finally, maybe reroute some
parts of the audio to my nord modular g2 and then play the
stuff as a synth in the end.

ableton is nice for me because it's a way to route my music
through my computer and be able to bend the sound any which
way i see fit.

COMPLETE HEAD FUCKERY.


 

offline warpphex from lurkston, ziltyland. (United Kingdom) on 2006-04-25 11:41 [#01886834]
Points: 1372 Status: Lurker



I only have the demo version which i mess with sometimes.
i recorded a few bits to MD one night because of the lack of
save and export WARNING they are blatent early autechre rips
(in style not quality :)

LAZY_JAM1

LAZY_JAM2


 

offline oscillik from the fires of orc on 2006-04-25 13:33 [#01886890]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular



an example of Ableton being used by a "major artist" is
Trent Reznor. he's openly said that he used Ableton Live
quite a bit during the making of WITH_TEETH. that album,
compared to his earlier stuff is shit (imo).

i personally don't like working with loop samples, as i feel
that there's not enough control over everything. that's why
i love MIDI (and yes i know that Ableton Live now handles
MIDI sequencing).

i'm determined to get my head around Notator for the Atari.
i think i've gotten the jist of it, i just need to put it
into practice now.


 

offline roygbivcore from Joyrex.com, of course! on 2006-04-25 14:05 [#01886899]
Points: 22557 Status: Lurker



i like abelton cause i can have a whole set done before i
even go on stage and just hit play and look like i'm doing
stuff


 

offline somejerk from south florida, US (United States) on 2006-04-28 23:09 [#01889148]
Points: 1441 Status: Lurker



live is a tool just like any other software or instrument.
the results will speak for themselves. someone arguing that
a tool is making things to easy is a bit silly. if pendulum
plays a good set, they play a good set, no matter what they
use.

i think that if things are made "easier" than perhaps new
results will yielded, as this may cause the artform to
become more approachable. much in the same way that having
the ability to use personal computers with software made
making electronic music more accessable compared to having
to have access to hardware. on one end, this may dilute the
quality of a genre as a whole. however, i still believe that
giving more people access to music will yield more music for
more perspectives, generating new music.



 

offline vlari from beyond the valley of the LOLs on 2006-04-29 09:45 [#01889327]
Points: 13915 Status: Regular



I would like to hear DJ Ableton's thoughts about it


 

offline evolume from seattle (United States) on 2006-04-29 10:40 [#01889366]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular



like any piece of software, you get out of it what you are
willing to put into it. I've used it for DJing, Laptop
Battling, and Composing. This is what i love about Live, it
is so versatile and, I think, user friendly.



 


Messageboard index