 |
|
You are not logged in! F.A.Q Log in Register |
 |
|
 |
 Now online (1)DADONCK ...and 281 guests Last 5 registered Oplandisks nothingstar N_loop yipe foxtrotromeo Browse members... |
 |
Members 8025Messages 2614128 Today 0 Topics 127542 |
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
...well, the entry at least. It seems as soon as you satisfy one power crazed lunatic that, no it's not a joke and shouldn't be deleted, another one appears and you have to defend it all over again. It seems that a combination of: Them having not heard of it, It having a funny/rude title, and Retards who don't even read the whole article and just suggest it should be deleted on the grounds that "The band BIYC are not notable" after skim reading it. Justify it being deleted. We don't think so. If Merck and Mego are allowed pages there after they've folded, why can't BIYC? I mean, even WATMM has an entry... So, we're asking that if you have enjoyed the releases of BIYC and want to see the project continue and hopefully reach a wider audience, please could you exercise your right to edit wikipedia entries and add some information the BIYC wikipedia page and/or justification as to why it should stay, in the . Please, please, please bear the following in mind; * Only add accurate, grammatically correct information to the site; a load of poorly written sentence fragments of nonsense will only add to the case for deletion. * Don't make your arguments in the case for deletion thread personal. Keep them factual and ideally quote wiki's own policy at them. * If you're one of the artists on the label, a brief bio, with a link or two to your site would be great. If you're involved with another project that already has a wikipedia page, an internal link to that would be excellent. * If you could put links to BIYC in pertinent places on wikipedia (IE electronic music, IDM, netlabels, etc) to get the number of internal referals up, that'd be superb. Again, only where it's relevant and not crude. Many thanks in advance. Remember, we're |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i will do anything soonish, But Not Tonight. peace and fingers crossed. and good luck, Chris. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i was gonna try to defend the article but who ever BIYC is did a ridiculously good job of it |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
I would remove this 'point of interest': "One of the early releases, on pioneering purple 7" mp3, was limited to 100 copies and has since sold out. Original copies have been seen on Ebay for large amounts of money. Bootlegs can be found floating around on Soulseek too." that alone gives the Meanies enough ammo to take it down. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
where in the world am I supposed to write? I've never used the discussions on wikipedia before... |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
I mean, do I write in "discussion," or do I click edit on that page you linked? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
qrter: Good point. If we save it then we can put it back later :D roygbivcore: That would be Ceri. drunken mastah: fuck knows. I don't really understand it. I just like the idea of a Wikipedia Entry :D |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
I'll just click edit and add my thing somewhere. (no, not that thing you naughty little monkey you!) |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
I hope I didn't write that in the wrong place... |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i dont quite get whats going on |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
ok i really might have messed that up but i tried |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
I can see stuff added. I'm happy :D |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||
| Attached picture | |||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
I think it's very good, but I can see a few things that I'd say "Hmmm, no, i can't imagine anyone at Wiki being overly thrilled about that...". I'm not saying anything but I'd keep it .. at least faux factual and maybe trim some of the more scurrilous claims. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
it needs to be npov, just summing up the crazy facts would still be fun i guess they'll keep watching |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
The Knight Foundation is on our side |
||||||||
| Attached picture | |||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Ceri is trained for this type of thing! After the dust settles all the interesting stuff can be added, I think it's Pietrobot to be honest, I wouldn't trust him as far as I could jizz. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
It is written in a pretty daft way |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
fuck that's an amazing gif |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
shit I could watch that for hours.. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
just over the knuckles.. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
well, exactly - keep it quite factual for now, then introduce the fun stuff/bullshit later on. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
dog_belch: Good point. I'll remove the points of interest or reword it for now. big: Also true vlari: Not quite yet but he's coming ;) JivverDicker: I've heard you shoot like Peter North. Dannn_: That's the general idea behind BIYC! qrter: On the case! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i'll think of smth clever to write there |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
suggestion: change to "bam in your kunt" or "bam in your c*nt" |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Agreed, I think a stripping back to irrefutable fact and bios, perhaps a release catalogue, for now, whilst it's up for debate whether to keep it or not, would be a good idea. Once the heat has died down, people have accepted that the wiki entry is here to stay and the size of the entry and factual information has grown, we can put a few of the more entertaining "facts" back in. Phobs: I originally had it as "Bam in your C**t", but someone has changed it. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
some wanker just added a speedy delete request. also for an encyclopedia to actually censor naughty words has to be the silliest thing I ever heard of! Cunt has its own entry in wikipedia, so I don't see why they should consider deleting it because of naughty language, and if it is the name of what is being referred to, censoring it could lead to confusion, and then people would start to think it was really called "BAM in your C*nt" or something, which would be incorrect information, and thus more eligible for deletion. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
I like this "battle" :D It's fun. Phobs: I can't change the name. It's part of the stupidity. Are you miffed that WATMM has an entry whereas xltronic doesn't? Not that I want to mention the fact that xltronic has had many people DJ for it who're notable... |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
+ it would be like the cheapest sell-out ever. change the name to get on wiki, no way man |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Garth Knight agrees |
||||||||
| Attached picture | |||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
and rolf |
||||||||
| Attached picture | |||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
wikipedia contradicts itself if this is deleted |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Everyone applaud Ceri for his awesome argument skills. Check out the page to see what I mean. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Look at the latest debating smackdown I served up in that discussion on deletion... Have a look at the profile of the most recent detractor AmiDaniel (WTF sort of name is that?). Someone else has noticed that the user is "self contradicting". Drunken Mastah: I completely agree. Looking at it completely dispassionately, the only possible reason for it being deleted that I have seen (and it has only been mentioned once rather than half a dozen like most of the completely irrelevant ones) that I have seen is that it is "not a notable record-label". Even if it's not notable (which is itself open for debate), wikipedias guidelines state that that alone is not grounds for deletion; more merely something that would lend extra weight to an existing, legitimate argument for deletion (which of course, does not exist, or if it does has not been posted). |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
yes.. also, my deviously constructed logical argument (I didn't bother checking the logical structure of it, but maybe I should?) also proves that not only deletion of this article is against what an encyclopedia is all about, but that wikipedia, if the article is deleted, is no more an encyclopedia, or full of misinformation about what an encyclopedia is. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
I kind of wish people who wanted things deleted would actually give reasons and arguments... |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
That's part of why it's fun. They've clearly taken offense at the name and want to delete it. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
why is anyone bothered if you're on their or not? its like saying join my gang. if they want to be a bunch of snobby pricks, let them |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
they edited it to BIYF it appears? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
hahah, who the fuck added the tridenti things? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
haha wtf |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
It's probably a desperate attempt to make it appear that all the arguments for keeping it originate from "unsigned accounts". The inherent failing in it is that regardless of who made those arguments, they are irrefutable. PWNED! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
hahaha, this is as much fun as doing the "label" |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
I think that was because WATMM has brought out a record and Zilty hasn't, something silly like that. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
What if we say Zilty is a record label and the slipmats are the first release, or "XLT001" as some might have it? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
if you really really really really really really really really REALLY want to be on wikipedia, you could try it. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Wikipedia is just a playground fo cock gobblers. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
the word "cunt" has been substituted with "fanny" why? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
fanny means pussy or cunt in england but in the states it means arse and as most yank males are shirt lifting shit stabbers they would rather be bammed there. it's also more politically correct. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
but still the debate is over whether or not cunt is offensive and not important to the factual nature of the article, and since the label is called bam in your cunt and not bam in your fanny, I'd say cunt is as important as anything else whilefanny is misleading information i'm drunk, though |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
Messageboard index
|
|||||||||
