some questions.. | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (2)
big
recycle
...and 515 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614124
Today 3
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
some questions..
 

offline chaosmachine from Ottawa (Canada) on 2006-02-11 22:45 [#01839302]
Points: 2330 Status: Lurker



would you say an angry person has a temper, or has lost
their temper?

when your contract is up, is it better to resign or resign?

why is it that some projects fail due to a lack of
oversight, while others fail due to a huge oversight?

if you find a $20 bill in your mailbox, should you pay it or
spend it?

why is it that when you get a strike in baseball it's
because you didn't strike the baseball?

when overlooking your results, how can you be sure you
didn't overlook anything?

just wondering..


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2006-02-11 22:53 [#01839303]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



english..this happens when you have one word to describe 20
things.


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2006-02-11 23:02 [#01839304]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to chaosmachine: #01839302



did you find a My First Big Book of Riddles or something?


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2006-02-11 23:06 [#01839305]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular



you know, they call them Grape Nuts, but there are no grapes
and no nuts! what is the deeeal with that?!


 

offline chaosmachine from Ottawa (Canada) on 2006-02-11 23:16 [#01839306]
Points: 2330 Status: Lurker | Followup to r40f: #01839305



actually, i was reading some mutual fund reports, and i kept
coming up to the word 'oversight'.. which made me start
thinking about other words with two opposite meanings..

and so i came up with this quasi-yogi/carlin/seinfield
attempt at humor/wit.


 

offline Dannn_ from United Kingdom on 2006-02-12 04:03 [#01839336]
Points: 7877 Status: Lurker



the overlook and oversight ones don't work by my
understanding of those words, they only have one use


 

offline uzim on 2006-02-12 06:42 [#01839429]
Points: 17716 Status: Lurker | Followup to tolstoyed: #01839303



i still wonder how come people don't mix up pepper,
pepper and pepper in english...

but english is a great language. not full of aberrations,
rules that make no sense, millions of exceptions that make
even less sense etc like... well, every other language i
know of!


 

offline hanal from k_maty only (United Kingdom) on 2006-02-12 06:47 [#01839436]
Points: 13379 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



the answer


Attached picture

 

offline redrum from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2006-02-12 06:51 [#01839438]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict



would you say an angry person has a temper, or has lost
their temper?


an angry person has a temper.
a person in a rage has lost their temper.

when your contract is up, is it better to resign or
resign?


Hello American English - this is why it pisses me off.
Resign has only one meaning and once it's done, you've
resigned from your job.

You can't resign a piece of paper, a contract, a document, a
cheque. You sign it again.

why is it that some projects fail due to a lack of
oversight, while others fail due to a huge oversight?

Isn't it that some projects fail due to lack of oversight,
and some others due to a huge overhead?

I don't know, I'm not too up on the meaning of the words..

if you find a $20 bill in your mailbox, should you pay it
or
spend it?

Really don't see what the problem here is -

you spend money, whereas you pay somebody money.

they're two totally different verbs, one is a transitive,
one is a ditransitive.

why is it that when you get a strike in baseball it's
because you didn't strike the baseball?


Ask an American. Probably because it's an abbreviation for
being "struck out".

when overlooking your results, how can you be sure you
didn't overlook anything?


Hello American English again. More misuse of a word that
distorts intended meaning -

If you've overlooked your results, then you certainly can be
sure you overlooked something (your results).

If you've looked over your results, then it's a
different story. Different usage of the verb, different
meaning.

Does this clear everything up?


 

offline redrum from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2006-02-12 06:53 [#01839439]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict | Followup to redrum: #01839438



fuck, messed up the formatting..

would you say an angry person has a temper, or has lost
their temper?

an angry person has a temper.
a person in a rage has lost their temper.

when your contract is up, is it better to resign or
resign?

Hello American English - this is why it pisses me off.
Resign has only one meaning and once it's done, you've
resigned from your job.

You can't resign a piece of paper, a contract, a document,
a
cheque. You sign it again.

why is it that some projects fail due to a lack of
oversight, while others fail due to a huge oversight?

Isn't it that some projects fail due to lack of oversight,
and some others due to a huge overhead?

I don't know, I'm not too up on the meaning of the words..

if you find a $20 bill in your mailbox, should you pay it or
spend it?

Really don't see what the problem here is -

you spend money, whereas you pay somebody money.

they're two totally different verbs, one is a transitive,
one is a ditransitive.

why is it that when you get a strike in baseball it's
because you didn't strike the baseball?

Ask an American. Probably because it's an abbreviation for
being "struck out".

when overlooking your results, how can you be sure you
didn't overlook anything?

Hello American English again. More misuse of a word that
distorts intended meaning -

If you've overlooked your results, then you certainly can
be
sure you overlooked something (your results).

If you've looked over your results, then it's a
different story. Different usage of the verb, different
meaning.

Does this clear everything up?


 

offline redrum from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2006-02-12 06:59 [#01839445]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict | Followup to redrum: #01839439



On second thoughts about the resign/resign thing, it could
actually be easily distinguishable in speech..

Resign (pronounced with an 's' - risaI∫) - to sign a
something again

Resign (pronounced with a 'z' sound - rizaI∫) - to
resign from a job


 

offline Dannn_ from United Kingdom on 2006-02-12 07:17 [#01839457]
Points: 7877 Status: Lurker



let me be the first to say, real people don't know / care
what a ditransitive verb is, and plus the word in question
there (bill) is a noun right?



 

offline redrum from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2006-02-12 07:22 [#01839460]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict | Followup to Dannn_: #01839457



yeah, well you can always ask or go find out.

i missed the fact that the example was focusing on the
ambiguity of the word 'bill' - i thought it was looking at
pay/spend.

In that case, "a twenty dollar bill" is different to "a bill
for twenty dollars" and that's how the two meanings are
differentiated.


 

offline Dannn_ from United Kingdom on 2006-02-12 07:26 [#01839462]
Points: 7877 Status: Lurker



thanks for clearing that up, I was going out of my head here


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2006-02-12 07:27 [#01839463]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



A contact is never resigned (for continuation) it is
renewed. Plus you can't resign (termination) upon the
expiration of a contact as you haven't anything to resign
from.


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2006-02-12 07:34 [#01839469]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



Lack of oversight implies that there has been poor
supervision of a project. Huge oversight means that there
has been a major (unintended) omission or mistake.

Strike, in baseball terms, is the reduction of the phrase
"to pitch a strike" in that the pitcher offers the batsman
the opportunity to strike the ball. If the batsman fails to
hit the ball within that allowed number of pitches they are
"struck out".


 

offline uzim on 2006-02-12 07:36 [#01839475]
Points: 17716 Status: Lurker



i'm having a question about a particular sentence in a
text...:

« And since my mother's death, which was six months
before we lay by the eel traps under the stars, my father's
yen for the dark, his nocturnal restlessness had grown more
besetting. »


what i don't get is "lay".
present?
what's the meaning here?
(if someone had asked me whether this was gramatically
correct or not, i would have said it was not...)


 

online big from lsg on 2006-02-12 07:39 [#01839477]
Points: 23729 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



if you find a $20 bill in your mailbox, should you pay it
or
spend it?

is a joke about the fact you can call paper money a bill,
redrum


 

offline xceque on 2006-02-12 07:40 [#01839478]
Points: 5888 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



Context chaps, context. Ignore the context at your peril. If
you are too stupid to work it out in its proper context
you're too stupid to be speaking the langauge.

ner.


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2006-02-12 07:44 [#01839481]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to uzim: #01839475 | Show recordbag



lay is a stupid word. lay in this case is a verb rather
than the past tense lie (as in lie down). It was heavily
used in nautical terminology and that seemed to make the
leap to mainstream English. In the context of your sentence
it means 'situated ourselves'.


 

offline redrum from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2006-02-12 08:05 [#01839493]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict | Followup to big: #01839477



yeah, i know, i corrected myself.

ecnadniarb: i don't know about that..

would one lie beneath the stars, or situate themselves
beneath the stars?


 

offline redrum from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2006-02-12 08:07 [#01839494]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict | Followup to uzim: #01839475



i think "lay" in that case is just the past-tense of the
verb "to lie down"


 

online big from lsg on 2006-02-12 08:12 [#01839497]
Points: 23729 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



yea that's okay


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2006-02-12 08:15 [#01839500]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



to lay would be to position themselves.
"lay up" when a ship was in for repairs, possibly the origin
of the phrase "laid up with (an illness etc.)".
"lay by" remaining stationary while heading into wind, used
now as a term for a road side area to stop in.

But there are tons more uses of the word...like "lay into"
meaning beat the shit out of someone.


 

offline uzim on 2006-02-12 08:28 [#01839504]
Points: 17716 Status: Lurker



i thought the past tense of "lay" was either "laid" or
"lain"...
my mistake : X


 

offline redrum from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2006-02-12 08:32 [#01839505]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict | Followup to ecnadniarb: #01839500



And since my mother's death, which was six months
before we lay by the eel traps under the stars, my father's
yen for the dark, his nocturnal restlessness had grown more
besetting.


The whole sentence is in the past-tense.

"Since my mother's death", "was", "six months before", "we
lay", "his resltlessness had grown"...

Presuming an "eel trap" is some kind of fishing
vessel which can have the action of "lay by"
performed on it, "lay" would have to be put into the past
tense.

Since the vessel is the object of this strange nautical
maneuver, the sentence would be written as:

...we layed/laid by the eel traps under the stars...

just like one could say, "he was laid to rest" or "i laid
the flowers on the table" - once "lay" is taking a direct
object, its past tense changes to "laid".

Here, the sentence is in the past tense, but the verbform
doesn't change, indicating that there is no direct object
and that the meaning of the sentence is simply that "we"
(whoever that is) used to lie on the ground by the eel
traps, under the stars.


 

offline hanal from k_maty only (United Kingdom) on 2006-02-12 08:32 [#01839506]
Points: 13379 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



Get laid.
to put ones wee wee inside a ninny


 

offline redrum from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2006-02-12 08:33 [#01839508]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict | Followup to uzim: #01839504



It depends, as i outlined in my previous post:

I lie on the bed.
I am lying on the bed.

I lay down on the bed.

I laid the flowers on the table.


 

offline Dannn_ from United Kingdom on 2006-02-12 08:35 [#01839510]
Points: 7877 Status: Lurker | Followup to hanal: #01839506



shh this is serious now dave


 

offline hanal from k_maty only (United Kingdom) on 2006-02-12 08:37 [#01839511]
Points: 13379 Status: Lurker | Followup to Dannn_: #01839510 | Show recordbag



sorry,i do get carried away


 

offline uzim on 2006-02-12 08:39 [#01839513]
Points: 17716 Status: Lurker



thanks


 

offline giginger from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2006-02-12 08:39 [#01839514]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



1. An angry person has a temper. When they're actually being
angry they've lost their temper.

2. You can only resign if the company wants you. Resigning
from a contract is a different thing.

3. The lack of oversight is poor planning and means they
didn't plan ahead. The huge oversight means they put too
much faith into the success.

4. That's just stupid. They're two different things.

5. Also stupid.


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2006-02-12 08:50 [#01839516]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to redrum: #01839505 | Show recordbag



And since my mother's death, which was six months
before we lay by the eel traps under the stars, my father's
yen for the dark, his nocturnal restlessness had grown more
besetting.


I read it as though it was setting a scene. They are
currently situated under the stars by the eel traps and the
references to the past are providing a background. You
could be right though, it depends on what preceded and
follows this sentence.



 

offline Dannn_ from United Kingdom on 2006-02-12 09:41 [#01839556]
Points: 7877 Status: Lurker



I think some people are not getting it; he's not genuinely
confused about the meaning of the word, he is just pointing
out that there is a large scope for confusion in the english
language, which non native speakers have agreed about


 

offline redrum from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2006-02-12 09:45 [#01839560]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict | Followup to Dannn_: #01839556



from your post:

he's not genuinely confused about the meaning of the
word


from uzim's original post:

what i don't get is "lay".
present?
what's the meaning here?


 

offline uzim on 2006-02-12 09:53 [#01839577]
Points: 17716 Status: Lurker | Followup to redrum: #01839560



i knew the meaning of the verb, i just thought it was
the present tense instead of the past tense and wondered
what was the meaning conveyed by what i had wrongly
identified as present...


 

offline chaosmachine from Ottawa (Canada) on 2006-02-12 10:34 [#01839642]
Points: 2330 Status: Lurker | Followup to Dannn_: #01839336



from the dictionary..

overlook:
tr.v., -looked, -look·ing, -looks.

a)
1. To fail to notice or consider; miss.
2. To ignore deliberately or indulgently; disregard.

b) To look over; examine.

basically, the word is it's own opposite.. same thing for
oversight.


 

offline chaosmachine from Ottawa (Canada) on 2006-02-12 10:36 [#01839645]
Points: 2330 Status: Lurker | Followup to giginger: #01839514



ok.. when someone has lost their temper, do they still have
a temper?


 

offline hanal from k_maty only (United Kingdom) on 2006-02-12 10:37 [#01839650]
Points: 13379 Status: Lurker | Followup to chaosmachine: #01839645 | Show recordbag



no,because they cant find it


 

offline redrum from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2006-02-12 10:38 [#01839652]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict | Followup to chaosmachine: #01839645



it's a saying, an idiom. don't take it so literally. that's
not how language, especially in the case of an idiom, is
used.

as for your definition of "overlook", how's about you look
in a proper dictionary, and NOT Webster's.


 

offline giginger from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2006-02-12 10:39 [#01839653]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Followup to chaosmachine: #01839645 | Show recordbag



It's the evolution of poor english.

What should really be said is that they've lost control of
their temper.


 

offline chaosmachine from Ottawa (Canada) on 2006-02-12 10:54 [#01839665]
Points: 2330 Status: Lurker



show me a dictionary that doesn't have both definitions.


 

offline redrum from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2006-02-12 10:56 [#01839666]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict | Followup to chaosmachine: #01839665



i don't imagine the oxford english dictionary has both.

that misusage of "overlook" is an americanism. it's not
found in british english.. at least i've never come across
it.

i'd be very, very surprised if both definitions were in the
OED.


 

offline i_x_ten from arsemuncher on 2006-02-12 11:05 [#01839672]
Points: 10031 Status: Regular | Followup to redrum: #01839666



yes but you're irish and they make up words which aren't in
the OED.


 

offline chaosmachine from Ottawa (Canada) on 2006-02-12 11:08 [#01839673]
Points: 2330 Status: Lurker



the 'compact' online oxford dictionary says..

overlook

• verb 1 fail to notice. 2 ignore or disregard. 3 have a
view of from above.

• noun N. Amer. a commanding position or view.



 

offline redrum from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2006-02-12 11:17 [#01839677]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict | Followup to chaosmachine: #01839673



well, there you have it.


 

offline Rostasky from United States on 2006-02-12 11:21 [#01839679]
Points: 1572 Status: Lurker



Of course english looks poor on paper. But it all works out
well in practice.


 


Messageboard index