Does Communism deserve another chance? | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (2)
big
recycle
...and 615 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614121
Today 4
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
Does Communism deserve another chance?
 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2006-01-12 04:30 [#01816835]
Points: 11010 Status: Lurker



I say YES!


 

offline staz on 2006-01-12 04:31 [#01816838]
Points: 9844 Status: Regular



I say no.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-01-12 04:33 [#01816839]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



VIM


 

online big from lsg on 2006-01-12 04:34 [#01816840]
Points: 23729 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



of course not


 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2006-01-12 04:38 [#01816843]
Points: 11010 Status: Lurker | Followup to big: #01816840



Why not you fascist pig?


 

offline unabomber from Palma de Mallorca (Spain) on 2006-01-12 04:38 [#01816844]
Points: 3756 Status: Regular



It has never had a chance.


 

offline chambre noire from Iceland on 2006-01-12 04:39 [#01816845]
Points: 2515 Status: Lurker



have you ever heard of the political term "divide and
conquer"?

left or right is a false paradigm to divide the people and
play them against each other. don't be fooled!


 

offline chambre noire from Iceland on 2006-01-12 04:45 [#01816848]
Points: 2515 Status: Lurker



monoid, you seem to be a rather unstable kind of guy in
general, so i'm not surprised you're for communism.

you should have lived in the soviet union during the cold
war, that would probably have changed your mind...

i'm sick and tired of these kids going around with Che
t-shirts and red star t-shirts not knowing what the hell
they are talking about. Mao, Lenin, Stalin, Castro, etc
killed more people than any fascist/nazi leader did during
the 20th century. i'm NOT defending the nazi creeps.

please do your homework before uttering such idiotic
statements!


 

offline nacmat on 2006-01-12 04:47 [#01816849]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker



I think it deserves another chance, but is gonna be
difficult

in chile comunism won in democrazy once, but USA managed to
stop that and Allende was killed finally

the problem is its hard for a country to be comunist
alone... I think its needed a group of countries to make it
work, cos if not, how cana comunist country grow its
economy against all capitalist countries?

on the other hand, democrazy is not really prepared for
this:
imagine england turns comunist now, because a comunist party
wins the elections... so they have to change all the
economic-social structures of the country... and what if
they lose the elections after 4 years? england has to change
all its structures again??
sounds difficult


 

offline unabomber from Palma de Mallorca (Spain) on 2006-01-12 04:48 [#01816850]
Points: 3756 Status: Regular



I for one believe Che should not be in the same statement
you put Mao, Lenin, Stalin...


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2006-01-12 04:50 [#01816851]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



It always descends into state sponsored capitalism and the
common man is worse off than in a capitalistic democracy.

The nearest we have to a true communistic society is cuba,
where, as per usual, they actually run it more like a police
state than the alleged 'fascistic/imperialistic/insert
derogatory exaggeration here' western countries like
Britain/America.

We were having a debate about this down the pub a few weeks
back and my mate made the (pretty much irrefutable)argument;
"For communism to work and even begin to approach "fairness"
(even if you turn a blind eye to the immoral nature of
errosion of the worth of an individual) it needs to be
policed so extensively and strictly that it is: a) Oppresive
and b) Extremely beauracratic and expensive to administer.
It only needs a few bad apples to cock it up. I'm a cunt, I
don't care about other people; I won't work if I get an
equivalent quality of life without working. Similarly, I
won't work harder/longer if I'm not rewarded. There are
enough people like me that large scale communism won't
work."

Anyone who disagrees should read some books on economics
(try Freakanomics) and realise that human beings are,
without being generally willing to do "wrong" according to
their moral code, suprise suprise, fundamentally selfish.
Even if only 25% were selfish (which they are), it wouldn't
work.

People who cite the kibbutz and other communes as working
examples are missing a few key points. A) They exist within
liberal, generally capitalistic, democracies and the people
who join them all choose to, so they're likely to believe in
the ideal/pull their weight. B) Small scale communes work
because the people around them are directly hurt by/benefit
from a person's indolence, or hard work. As such, it's self
policing as people will rip into anyone lying around doing
bugger all. When it's the state they're ripping off through
doing nothing, the net result to the people around them is
at most a 2/3p, they won't mention it.


 

offline nacmat on 2006-01-12 04:54 [#01816852]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker



funny how capitalism managed to make us all think that there
is no other possible way... suspicious


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2006-01-12 04:58 [#01816853]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to chambre noire: #01816848 | Show recordbag



Bang on. I'm matey with a chap who's a maths professor from
the former USSR. He's now a British citizen. Unsuprisingly,
he finds it amusing/offensive in equal measure when his
students (usually upper middle class kids who've not even
had a summer job) wear communistic clothing/images. As if
they'd know. Oh and for the record he says living under a
capitalistic society is better, even for those at the
bottom, than a communistic one.

If you really believe in communism, go and live in a commune
(and be grateful that your capitalistic liberal democracy
allows you to), or apply to be a citizen in Cuba. Lee Harvey
Oswold thought he was a commie. He went to Russia for a bit,
to be a "worker". Unsuprisingly 12 hour shifts of mind
numbing, back breaking work in a factory, for a pittance,
didn't appeal to him and after a while, came back to America
because it offered him a better quality of life.



 

offline glasseater from Switzerland on 2006-01-12 05:02 [#01816856]
Points: 531 Status: Regular



no, all my bets on another eon of sweet american capitalism
please


 

offline obara from Utrecht on 2006-01-12 05:03 [#01816858]
Points: 19377 Status: Regular



then go and live in China for a year, stoopid kid.


 

offline staz on 2006-01-12 05:05 [#01816860]
Points: 9844 Status: Regular | Followup to Ceri JC: #01816853



thread over.


 

offline glasseater from Switzerland on 2006-01-12 05:06 [#01816861]
Points: 531 Status: Regular



oh yeah "american" was not necessary i admit, was a reflex
sorry


 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2006-01-12 05:07 [#01816862]
Points: 11010 Status: Lurker | Followup to chambre noire: #01816848



No, it will never work because of passive agressive WORKERS
like you.


 

offline nacmat on 2006-01-12 05:08 [#01816864]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01816853



have you been to cuba?

the problem with cuba is the same problem as with all the
comunism till now, its handled by a dictator... I would like
to see a comunist party win in a democratic country, as I
said it happened inn chile, but america didnt seem to like
that and changed it quickly

anyway I have been to cuba and I was impressed byt the
people, and many things of the system seemed quite good to
me... the problem is they really live in poverty, but I
guess the boycot has a lot to do with that too

anyway I think castro is a dictator and should be changed...
dont get me wrong


 

offline glasseater from Switzerland on 2006-01-12 05:11 [#01816865]
Points: 531 Status: Regular



"the problem with cuba is the same problem as with all the
comunism till now, its handled by a dictator... I would like

to see a comunist party win in a democratic country"
Woha thats nonsense to the extreme


 

offline hanal from k_maty only (United Kingdom) on 2006-01-12 05:12 [#01816866]
Points: 13379 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



oh boy,monoid reels you lot in like a king fisherman


 

online big from lsg on 2006-01-12 05:12 [#01816867]
Points: 23729 Status: Lurker | Followup to Monoid: #01816843 | Show recordbag



well it's not just that it failed and produced some
proto-fascist states but also it just doesn't work like
that, but organise a world wide vote by all means if you
want


 

offline nacmat on 2006-01-12 05:14 [#01816868]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker | Followup to glasseater: #01816865



in what way is it nonsense?


 

offline staz on 2006-01-12 05:16 [#01816870]
Points: 9844 Status: Regular | Followup to nacmat: #01816864



that will never happen because very few will volunteerily
give up their country to communists!


 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2006-01-12 05:19 [#01816873]
Points: 11010 Status: Lurker | Followup to staz: #01816870



I WOULD!


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2006-01-12 05:21 [#01816875]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker



Most of the people who drop the term comunist are the same
people that when asked to back it up always say "It looks
good on paper, they have just done it with the wrong people"
and "your just taught to think that way". Which are both
true. But I would rather they not test it out again on the
massive scale again. Its totally egotistical and misguided
to think that your system might be the best one, thereby
forcing it upon large groups of people.

The thing that works about capitalism as opposed to
communism, is it allows its population the choice what they
want, and it will evolve baised upon demands. Communism is
rigid, and will generally take a reactionary approach when
challenged.

And, like Ceri JC said, it requires whole support from every
member of its community. If even a couple people choose to
work as little as possible in a community where there are no
real rewards, it will reduce the moral of the whole group,
and lower productivity. You either need to be able to muster
enough charisma to have everybody in the palm of your
hand, or you have to eliminate the weaker members of that
community. The human tenancy is to choose the easier route.


 

offline nacmat on 2006-01-12 05:21 [#01816876]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker | Followup to hanal: #01816866



hahahaha true


 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2006-01-12 05:21 [#01816877]
Points: 11010 Status: Lurker



Wacht auf, Verdammte dieser Erde,
die stets man noch zum Hungern zwingt!
Das Recht wie Glut im Kraterherde
nun mit Macht zum Durchbruch dringt.
Reinen Tisch macht mit den Bedrängern!
Heer der Sklaven, wache auf!
Ein Nichts zu sein, tragt es nicht länger
Alles zu werden, strömt zuhauf!

Völker, hört die Signale!
Auf zum letzten Gefecht!
Die Internationale
erkämpft das Menschenrecht.

Es rettet uns kein höh'res Wesen,
kein Gott, kein Kaiser, noch Tribun
Uns aus dem Elend zu erlösen
können wir nur selber tun!
Leeres Wort: des Armen Rechte,
Leeres Wort: des Reichen Pflicht!
Unmündig nennt man uns und Knechte,
duldet die Schmach nun länger nicht!

Völker, hört die Signale!
Auf zum letzten Gefecht!
Die Internationale
erkämpft das Menschenrecht.

Gewölbe, stark und fest bewehret
die bergen, was man dir entzog.
Dort liegt das Gut, das dir gehöret
und um das man dich betrog.
Ausgebeutet bist du worden!
ausgesogen bis aufs Mark!
Auf Erden rings, in Süd und Norden,
das Recht ist schwach, die Willkür stark!

Völker, hört die Signale!
Auf zum letzten Gefecht!
Die Internationale
erkämpft das Menschenrecht.

Abscheulich blähn sich diese Götzen,
die Herrn von Schacht und Eisenbahn.
Sie machten unser Blut zu Schätzen,
sie haben unser Gut vertan.
In Stahltresoren liegt's vergraben.
Wann machen wir die Rechnung glatt?
Das Volk will ja nur wiederhaben,
was man dem Volk gestohlen hat.

Völker, hört die Signale!
Auf zum letzten Gefecht!
Die Internationale
erkämpft das Menschenrecht.

Die Herrscher machten uns betrunken.
Der Zauber muss zu Ende sein.
Drum werft ins Heer der Freiheit Funken!
Dann schlägt es mit dem Kolben drein.
Wenn sie uns zwingen, die Barbaren,
Soldat zu spielen noch einmal,
wir werden unsre Kugeln sparen
für unsren eignen General.

Völker, hört die Signale!
Auf zum letzten Gefecht!
Die Internationale
erkämpft das Menschenrecht.

In Stadt und Land, ihr Arbeitsleute,
wir sind die stärks


 

offline obara from Utrecht on 2006-01-12 05:21 [#01816878]
Points: 19377 Status: Regular | Followup to hanal: #01816866



shit, i always forget !

sorry Monoid, i don't really think you're stupid.


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2006-01-12 05:24 [#01816879]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker | Followup to nacmat: #01816849



the problem is its hard for a country to be comunist
alone... I think its needed a group of countries to make it

work, cos if not, how cana comunist country grow its
economy against all capitalist countries?


Wasn't that what the USSR was?


 

online big from lsg on 2006-01-12 05:26 [#01816883]
Points: 23729 Status: Lurker | Followup to nacmat: #01816868 | Show recordbag



it's not like football, communism mainly killed itself and
not the west, starting out with a great team of
democratically elected communists will deteriorate into shit
anyway
you can't make the conditions perfect to have a communist
experiment country succeed
the truth is in the middle, vote for the labour party if you
want to move your country to the left a bit. communism
required a revolution apparantly and that always brings
brings crap which you'd only want if things were way worse
before


 

offline unabomber from Palma de Mallorca (Spain) on 2006-01-12 05:28 [#01816889]
Points: 3756 Status: Regular



"The thing that works about capitalism as opposed to
communism, is it allows its population the choice what they

want"

LOL


 

online big from lsg on 2006-01-12 05:30 [#01816892]
Points: 23729 Status: Lurker | Followup to big: #01816883 | Show recordbag



there's bound to be some useless african country laying
around where we can have this experiment


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2006-01-12 05:31 [#01816894]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker | Followup to unabomber: #01816889



I know that sounds funny, but if people don't want
something, it doesn't sell, and it will eventually fall out
of production. The misconception of people who have unique
tastes, is that they seem to think that everybody wants what
they want.


 

offline unabomber from Palma de Mallorca (Spain) on 2006-01-12 05:33 [#01816897]
Points: 3756 Status: Regular



So Freedom means Freedom to buy what you want...?


 

online big from lsg on 2006-01-12 05:34 [#01816898]
Points: 23729 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



"The thing that works about capitalism as opposed to
communism, is it allows its population the choice what they

want"

LOL

is completely true and why communism fails and we'll have to
do with however imperfect, democratic regimes


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2006-01-12 05:36 [#01816903]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker | Followup to Taxidermist: #01816894



Additionally, if everything is state sponsored, it reduces
competition. When companies compete, they are
(theoretically) going to make an effort to produce higher
quality products, with increasingly efficient techniques.
What occures here is two fold.

1-quality of life improves 2-technological advances occur


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2006-01-12 05:41 [#01816905]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker | Followup to unabomber: #01816897



No. Were not talking freedom here. We are talking economics.
As long as there is any kind of economics, capitolist or
communist, there is not going to be freedom.

But look at what generally happens in communism. Everybody
lives in a state of poverty, including scientists, laborors,
doctors, store clerks and teachers (minus the politicians
who live in a state of wealth). In capitalism, at least
there is a free market, where people are given the choice to
compete for higher paying jobs.


 

offline unabomber from Palma de Mallorca (Spain) on 2006-01-12 05:41 [#01816906]
Points: 3756 Status: Regular



Better living through competition?

My way is "better living through collaboration".


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2006-01-12 05:49 [#01816912]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker | Followup to unabomber: #01816906



Yes. Well, we do have the choice to set up small communities
that sustain themselves on their own. In canada, you can buy
a 'lot' of land for two dollars, given that you use only the
wood from the land to build your house (you can use metal
machinery and electronics from off site, but the wood must
be from your land). That land is tax free, and as long as
you abide by the laws, you are free to do whatever you want
with that land. You do not need to be a canadian resident to
do this.


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2006-01-12 05:54 [#01816918]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker | Followup to unabomber: #01816906



And who says anybody is free in communism. They are usually
told what job they are supposed to do, and are punished if
they don't do it. If everybody got to do what they wanted,
then there wouldn't be very many ditch diggers and sewage
workers. How would you feel if at the age of 12 your were
told that the state determined that you would best be suited
cleaning sewage pipes for the rest of your life, and were
then trained to do that and only that.


 

offline hma from real life on 2006-01-12 05:57 [#01816920]
Points: 528 Status: Lurker



comunism is one huge vodka drinking party.


 

offline unabomber from Palma de Mallorca (Spain) on 2006-01-12 05:58 [#01816921]
Points: 3756 Status: Regular



I 'm not comunist.
Not capitalist.

I'm the unabomber.


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2006-01-12 06:01 [#01816922]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker | Followup to unabomber: #01816921



Yeah. I like a nice middle ground too. Canada is a
capitolist country with socialist tenancies. The taxes are
higher, but everybody gets medical coverage (free if you
make under $26k anually) and there is welfare if you become
unemployed.

It seems to work.

But this thread is likely to start more arguments. I feel
like a douchebag for going on that little 'rant'.

10-8 communist thread.


 

offline Ezkerraldean from the lowest common denominator (United Kingdom) on 2006-01-12 06:08 [#01816924]
Points: 5733 Status: Addict



communism rox. shame it doesnt work. the soviet union was so
cool


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-01-12 06:10 [#01816928]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



let's turn this thread onto more important issues

OMG!!!!!!!!


 

offline unabomber from Palma de Mallorca (Spain) on 2006-01-12 06:11 [#01816930]
Points: 3756 Status: Regular



In 1972 a crack commando unit was sent to prison by a
military court, for a crime they didn't commit. These men
promptly escaped a maximum security stockade to the Los
Angeles underground. Today, still wanted by the government,
they survive as soldiers of fortune. If you have a problem,
if no one else can help, and if you can find them, maybe you
can hire the A-Team.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2006-01-12 06:13 [#01816932]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



du-du-dudu... du-du-duuuuu
dududu-du-dudu.. dudu-du-du--duuuu


 

offline unabomber from Palma de Mallorca (Spain) on 2006-01-12 06:14 [#01816933]
Points: 3756 Status: Regular



we missed the ra-ta-ta-ta-ta in between!!!


 

offline hma from real life on 2006-01-12 06:15 [#01816935]
Points: 528 Status: Lurker



can somebody tell me what is "futurama". is it any funny?
something like simpsons?


 


Messageboard index