|
|
Zephyr Twin
from ΔΔΔ on 2005-12-23 22:41 [#01806091]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Show recordbag
|
|
...just why, oh why, did it have to be so-ridiculously-much better than the rest of the analord series? Don't get me wrong, I'm completely grateful that RDJ released some of the most brilliant music he has in years, but it set my hopes up for a gangbang without lube.
your answers in 3 words or less:
|
|
axion
from planet rock (Sweden) on 2005-12-23 22:46 [#01806093]
Points: 3114 Status: Addict
|
|
couse it is
|
|
S M Pennyworth
from East Timor on 2005-12-23 22:55 [#01806098]
Points: 2196 Status: Lurker
|
|
initial release clever
|
|
sneakattack
on 2005-12-23 23:05 [#01806101]
Points: 6049 Status: Lurker
|
|
redlof pitcard bwoon
|
|
S M Pennyworth
from East Timor on 2005-12-23 23:11 [#01806102]
Points: 2196 Status: Lurker
|
|
lots of othersaswell
|
|
sneakattack
on 2005-12-23 23:12 [#01806103]
Points: 6049 Status: Lurker | Followup to S M Pennyworth: #01806102
|
|
3 best imho
|
|
Zephyr Twin
from ΔΔΔ on 2005-12-23 23:49 [#01806105]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Show recordbag
|
|
ok, you may now expand your answers to any number of words.
|
|
Quoth
from Sweden on 2005-12-23 23:50 [#01806107]
Points: 3840 Status: Lurker
|
|
richard penis insertion
|
|
mappatazee
from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2005-12-24 00:27 [#01806122]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker
|
|
he wanted to make it worth the $80 I guess
|
|
goDel
from ɐpʎǝx (Seychelles) on 2005-12-24 02:12 [#01806143]
Points: 10225 Status: Lurker
|
|
analord analord analord
|
|
hanal
from k_maty only (United Kingdom) on 2005-12-24 02:19 [#01806144]
Points: 13379 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
dry anal bad
|
|
Archrival
on 2005-12-24 03:12 [#01806158]
Points: 4265 Status: Lurker
|
|
yeah why!?!?!?!? analord 10 was easily the best! and I was freaking out and thought that "wow this will be legendary and Aphex best release ever if hes going to release 10 ep with quality material like this!!!" but then he released vol 1 and was like WTF!! ;)
|
|
pigster
from melbs on 2005-12-24 03:16 [#01806161]
Points: 4480 Status: Lurker | Followup to mappatazee: #01806122
|
|
yep. if you're gonna spend insane amounts of money on analord, youd want it to be 10.
Rock over London! Rock on Chicago, Pepsi uh huh!
|
|
impakt
from where we do not speak of! on 2005-12-24 03:21 [#01806164]
Points: 5764 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
Fenix Funk 5
|
|
tridenti
from Milano (Italy) on 2005-12-24 03:23 [#01806166]
Points: 14653 Status: Lurker | Followup to impakt: #01806164
|
|
Well, exactly.
|
|
_gvarek_
from next to you (Poland) on 2005-12-24 05:04 [#01806208]
Points: 4882 Status: Lurker
|
|
I think that Lisbon Acid, Pwsteal.Bancos.Q, W32.Mydoom.AU@mm and VBS.Redlof.B together would make a much better release than the 10th part alone. If on one volume of course. Having listened to Fenix Funk for the 436583215 time I don't find it the best Analord track any more, the same with Xmd5a.
|
|
big
from lsg on 2005-12-24 05:19 [#01806212]
Points: 23729 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
it's not, the style's idm and the rest is acidhouse
|
|
hellinterface
on 2005-12-24 05:33 [#01806216]
Points: 187 Status: Lurker
|
|
all 11 parts pwn imo
|
|
impakt
from where we do not speak of! on 2005-12-24 05:36 [#01806218]
Points: 5764 Status: Lurker | Followup to big: #01806212 | Show recordbag
|
|
The rest is pretty far from acidhouse.
|
|
oyvinto
on 2005-12-24 05:37 [#01806219]
Points: 8197 Status: Lurker | Followup to Zephyr Twin: #01806091 | Show recordbag
|
|
so that you would buy the rest of the series, thinking it was as good as the first (tenth)
|
|
big
from lsg on 2005-12-24 05:44 [#01806222]
Points: 23729 Status: Lurker | Followup to impakt: #01806218 | Show recordbag
|
|
but 10 is more idm?
|
|
impakt
from where we do not speak of! on 2005-12-24 05:46 [#01806224]
Points: 5764 Status: Lurker | Followup to big: #01806222 | Show recordbag
|
|
10 is closer to the "idm" structure than the rest I guess, but still pretty far from it. That's why it's so good.
|
|
dog_belch
from Netherlands, The on 2005-12-24 05:51 [#01806225]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Show recordbag
|
|
I'm still getting into them really, after the overload. I listened to 8,10 and 11 the most before... but now I really like 9.
God that just all sounds so fucking stupid.
|
|
goDel
from ɐpʎǝx (Seychelles) on 2005-12-24 05:55 [#01806226]
Points: 10225 Status: Lurker | Followup to impakt: #01806224
|
|
and naturally, the following question should be "and what is the idm structure?"...is there any?
please don't answer. some people like anal10 more than the rest, so be it.
(i do agree with big on some of the acidhousish tendencies on some of the analords though)
|
|
_gvarek_
from next to you (Poland) on 2005-12-24 05:58 [#01806228]
Points: 4882 Status: Lurker
|
|
I must admit that I like the Analords.
|
|
impakt
from where we do not speak of! on 2005-12-24 06:12 [#01806234]
Points: 5764 Status: Lurker | Followup to goDel: #01806226 | Show recordbag
|
|
IMO the only thing they have in common with acidhouse is some of the machines he supposedly used making it. Some tracks however are pretty close to the old "experimental house" styles were the producers started using more synths for pads, strings and different leads.
I'd say a lot of the old ceephax stuff is close to acidhouse, but still different.
JACK JACK JACK JACK
|
|
Brisk
from selling smack at the orphanage on 2005-12-24 06:27 [#01806240]
Points: 4667 Status: Lurker
|
|
10 isn't the best. 2 is. You heard it here first folks.
|
|
geraldine
on 2005-12-24 07:04 [#01806254]
Points: 164 Status: Regular
|
|
analord 10 gets old quickly
|
|
uzim
on 2005-12-24 07:27 [#01806258]
Points: 17716 Status: Lurker | Followup to Zephyr Twin: #01806091
|
|
not that good...
|
|
pigster
from melbs on 2005-12-24 07:49 [#01806264]
Points: 4480 Status: Lurker
|
|
more people like idm than acidhouse. therefore, i guess it only makes since if analord 10 is... idm
|
|
ToXikFB
on 2005-12-24 07:53 [#01806265]
Points: 4414 Status: Lurker | Followup to impakt: #01806234
|
|
analord 10 is not idm, and the rest are not acid house
|
|
ToXikFB
on 2005-12-24 07:54 [#01806266]
Points: 4414 Status: Lurker | Followup to ToXikFB: #01806265
|
|
oops, not supposed to be a followup
:> DJAX-UP-BEATS
|
|
impakt
from where we do not speak of! on 2005-12-24 07:55 [#01806267]
Points: 5764 Status: Lurker | Followup to ToXikFB: #01806265 | Show recordbag
|
|
Yes, I know that. It's what I've been trying to say for the last few posts :p
(I suspect you replied to the wrong person)
|
|
elusive
from detroit (United States) on 2005-12-24 08:07 [#01806277]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
analord nine track too
|
|
NannouV4
from United States on 2005-12-24 10:27 [#01806398]
Points: 86 Status: Lurker
|
|
i used to think 10 was the best, now I think 5 is.
tomorrow it will probably be 2.
|
|
thecurbcreeper
from United States on 2005-12-24 11:04 [#01806409]
Points: 6045 Status: Lurker
|
|
to sell others
|
|
swift_jams
from big sky on 2005-12-24 11:08 [#01806410]
Points: 7577 Status: Lurker
|
|
about 13" long
|
|
Zephyr Twin
from ΔΔΔ on 2005-12-24 23:02 [#01806606]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Followup to uzim: #01806258 | Show recordbag
|
|
yes, that good.
|
|
cygnus
from nowhere and everyplace on 2005-12-25 00:46 [#01806609]
Points: 11920 Status: Regular
|
|
second bad vilbel
|
|
Ezkerraldean
from the lowest common denominator (United Kingdom) on 2005-12-25 08:09 [#01806691]
Points: 5733 Status: Addict
|
|
whats going on?
|
|
Archrival
on 2005-12-25 09:41 [#01806721]
Points: 4265 Status: Lurker
|
|
not to say that the rest of the analords was anyway weak...they blew away most of the other releases this year but I just think 10 was outstanding. All the others are still ver very nice.
|
|
Exaph
from United Kingdom on 2005-12-26 04:25 [#01806831]
Points: 3718 Status: Lurker
|
|
Aphex > AFX
|
|
Dannn_
from United Kingdom on 2005-12-26 04:38 [#01806833]
Points: 7877 Status: Lurker
|
|
theres only a couple of acid tracks on the analords I reckon. I think Analord 10 goes down so well because its more like what we know of Aphex. Its a likkle bit like an analogue drukqs.
|
|
pf
from Finland on 2005-12-26 04:40 [#01806834]
Points: 3316 Status: Lurker | Followup to Exaph: #01806831
|
|
Really?
|
|
Raz0rBlade_uk
on 2005-12-26 06:19 [#01806843]
Points: 12540 Status: Addict | Show recordbag
|
|
false fake corrupt
|
|
Exaph
from United Kingdom on 2005-12-26 06:31 [#01806847]
Points: 3718 Status: Lurker
|
|
Analord 10 is by Aphex Twin and 1 - 9, 11, 12 are by AFX right? I do love AFX but do generally prefer Aphex's output.
|
|
swears
from junk sleep on 2005-12-26 06:48 [#01806851]
Points: 6474 Status: Lurker
|
|
Right, the others are done on old hardware, which I like. 10 is does on software, which I also like. I think it's all pretty fresh sounding, he's twisted a lot of the old analog equipment cliches.
|
|
pigster
from melbs on 2005-12-26 06:57 [#01806854]
Points: 4480 Status: Lurker
|
|
you dont know for sure its on software. hmm. if he did, im sure theres still more analogue stuff in it.
or something.
|
|
swears
from junk sleep on 2005-12-26 08:05 [#01806865]
Points: 6474 Status: Lurker | Followup to pigster: #01806854
|
|
It sounds more like that to me. Fenix Funk 5 wasn't done on on old-school analog hardware.
|
|
melack
from barcielwave on 2005-12-26 08:58 [#01806873]
Points: 9099 Status: Regular
|
|
https://loginnet.passport.com/ppsecure/md5auth.srf?l c=
|
|
Messageboard index
|