why did analord 10 have to be so good?

�

You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in
Register

�

Now online (2)
belb
big
...and 315 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...

Members 8025
Messages 2615846
Today 50
Topics 127670

Messageboard index
why did analord 10 have to be so good? \|« « 1 2

melack from barcielwave on 2005-12-26 09:00 [#01806875]
Points: 9099 Status: Regular | Followup to melack: #01806873

well, i was just checking mails and browsing xlt and this
thread, and i found that in the url... funny or.. curious or
something.

Dannn_ from United Kingdom on 2005-12-26 09:03 [#01806877]
Points: 7877 Status: Lurker | Followup to swears: #01806865

What makes you say that its on software?

staz on 2005-12-26 15:09 [#01806969]
Points: 9844 Status: Regular

i know for a fact that it was made on all analogue hardware
so shut up about that because i shall not be disputed

dog_belch from Netherlands, The on 2005-12-26 16:28 [#01806986]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Followup to Dannn_: #01806877 | Show recordbag

Shhssh, he's Afex

Dannn_ from United Kingdom on 2005-12-26 16:38 [#01806990]
Points: 7877 Status: Lurker

no, hes chevy chase. easy mistake to make

nacmat on 2005-12-26 17:28 [#01806995]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker

I much more prefer analord 1,2 5 and 11 over 10

tolstoyed from the ocean on 2005-12-30 04:32 [#01808628]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator

xmd5a is one of best songs ever without a doubt.

tridenti from Milano (Italy) on 2005-12-30 04:39 [#01808632]
Points: 14653 Status: Lurker | Followup to dog_belch: #01806986

Afex Tuin!

Messageboard index