evolution genetic, or other | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (2)
big
dariusgriffin
...and 603 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614123
Today 2
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
evolution genetic, or other
 

offline diemax from somewhere in tennessee :( (United States) on 2005-06-21 18:26 [#01640146]
Points: 2040 Status: Lurker



we have evolved
because of a fundamental belief in the equality in all
members of our species we have evolved ourselves into a rut
as medicine, surgery and dentistry began to help see that as
many as possible of our children would grow to be adults
we began to stop evolving in the common sense of the word
because there ceased to be such a small and seperated gene
pool which required that a being be lucky and strong, and in
harmony with its surroundings
a greater percentage of the weird random traits that
surfaced survived and were passed on in our huge cities,
with our overprotective schools we try to shelter the next
generation regardless of how odd it might be
on the internet millions of freaks who would probably never
manage to have relationships find love in yahoo or msn or
aol and then produce more children with even odder genetic
and behavioral traits
but there is no goal
there is no future battle
there is no competition
if we want to
we can overflow the planet
there is nothing to stop us
what are we still fighting for?



 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2005-06-21 18:29 [#01640147]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular



are these TOOL lyrics?


 

offline JivverDicker from my house on 2005-06-21 18:29 [#01640148]
Points: 12102 Status: Regular | Followup to diemax: #01640146



That's evoloution you nob end.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2005-06-21 18:30 [#01640149]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to r40f: #01640147



Ha ha!


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2005-06-21 18:30 [#01640151]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker



our right to party.


 

offline virginpusher from County Clare on 2005-06-21 18:31 [#01640152]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker | Followup to epohs: #01640151



Fight for that right brother! The beasties said so!


 

offline diemax from somewhere in tennessee :( (United States) on 2005-06-21 18:33 [#01640153]
Points: 2040 Status: Lurker



in order of reception
hell no, but tool is cool
actually (you idiot) go to dictionary.com like i just did
and suck a railroad spike (and wtf is a nob end anyways?)

ha ha indeed

and i guess we gotta fight for that...


 

offline b6662966 from ? on 2005-06-21 18:34 [#01640157]
Points: 1110 Status: Lurker



the answer is simple...were fighting the RIAA!


 

offline diemax from somewhere in tennessee :( (United States) on 2005-06-21 18:35 [#01640159]
Points: 2040 Status: Lurker



ooh and apparently 'envolvement' is also a word...
i hate it when there are 14 words that all mean the same
thing and all came from the same latin word...
god shoulda put more work into the language barrier he set
up after toppling the stairway to heaven...


 

offline diemax from somewhere in tennessee :( (United States) on 2005-06-21 18:36 [#01640160]
Points: 2040 Status: Lurker



*evolvement

/me feels stupid

wtf is the riaa to a producer who isn't signed? like i give
a fuck about them raping my fellow sell out artists...


 

offline dog_belch from Netherlands, The on 2005-06-21 18:54 [#01640172]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Show recordbag



You won't find an entry for "nob end" at dictionary.com but
it is the glans, the bell-end, the helmet, the herman
gelmet, the lid, the Bobby split head, the end of your nob.
There are other terms.


 

offline diemax from somewhere in tennessee :( (United States) on 2005-06-21 18:58 [#01640176]
Points: 2040 Status: Lurker



glans would have sufficed i know my member like the back
no wait
the palm (hehe)
of my hand

and i actually kind of figured that out but i don't see how
calling someone that would be taken...
i mean, was it an attempt at pointing out that i've no hair
on my head, and instead of facial features there's just a
tiny slit at the top that's dripping procreative juices all
over my brand new suit jacket? c'mon you hosers, i've got a
mirror, i know these things


 

offline b6662966 from ? on 2005-06-21 19:08 [#01640178]
Points: 1110 Status: Lurker



you fudgepacker


 

offline DeadEight from vancouver (Canada) on 2005-06-21 20:52 [#01640196]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular



i don't think evolution has much to do with morality.


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2005-06-21 21:04 [#01640198]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular



ha

g


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2005-06-21 21:08 [#01640199]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular



ha

g


 

offline diemax from somewhere in tennessee :( (United States) on 2005-06-21 21:33 [#01640202]
Points: 2040 Status: Lurker



who said anything about morality?
i'm thinking strictly in terms of 'progress' as the
republicans put it, and trying to point out that peace is as
bad for human culture as war is- if not worse
the arts florish in times of global turmoil
and i imagine they'd diminish significantly if we were to
transform this hole into heaven on earth


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2005-06-21 21:49 [#01640206]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to diemax: #01640202



True. In times of peace one doesn't often find work of
this calibre.


 

offline DeadEight from vancouver (Canada) on 2005-06-21 21:54 [#01640207]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular | Followup to diemax: #01640202



okay well i'm failing to see what your question at the end
is...

DDDDDDDDDDDDEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEETTTTTTTTTTTTTTRRRRRRRRRRROO
in other news OOOOOOOOOIIiiiiiiiiiiiiTTTTTTTTTTT


 

offline diemax from somewhere in tennessee :( (United States) on 2005-06-21 22:13 [#01640209]
Points: 2040 Status: Lurker



i guess i mean, that if we really want to keep moving
forward until we fall off the proverbial side of the earth,
which is basically the republican credo or whatever
we should STOP fighting, and just keep making babies 'til we
overpopulate ourselves and die out for mysterious reasons,
like a comet or something


 

offline diemax from somewhere in tennessee :( (United States) on 2005-06-21 22:14 [#01640210]
Points: 2040 Status: Lurker



as opposed to vaporizing the whole planet in a large scale
wmd arms war


 

offline diemax from somewhere in tennessee :( (United States) on 2005-06-21 22:15 [#01640211]
Points: 2040 Status: Lurker



you can't hug your children with nuclear arms


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2005-06-22 00:08 [#01640229]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker | Followup to diemax: #01640211



*in deaths garb, reaches over and touches diemax in the
elbow, rendering him dead*


 

offline evolume from seattle (United States) on 2005-06-22 15:05 [#01641181]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular



i think the answer lies in prion disease.

human hosts will become a larger and larger percentage of
the total biomass of earth, a huge untapped potential pool
for clever new diseases to exploit. when that virus, prion
vector, bacteria etc. arises, it will quickly spread through
the densley populated areas of the human biomass. cities
will lay vicitm to this new plague infecting mankind, wiping
out all but those with natural genetic resistances, should
any exist.

no species has persisted for the whole 5 billion years of
our planet's existence. even dinosaurs that roamed these
lands far longer than modern man, dinosaurs that never
dreamed of extinction, could not adapt as fast as this
constantly changing planet required.


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2005-06-22 15:10 [#01641188]
Points: 21454 Status: Regular | Followup to Taxidermist: #01640229



mmm baby, gimme some of that.


 

offline cuntychuck from Copenhagen (Denmark) on 2005-06-22 15:17 [#01641198]
Points: 8603 Status: Lurker | Followup to diemax: #01640211



YOU SUCK CHUCK


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2005-06-22 15:19 [#01641204]
Points: 21454 Status: Regular | Followup to cuntychuck: #01641198



that sounds like a command given from a chinese person.


 

offline 010101 from Vancouver (Canada) on 2005-06-22 15:42 [#01641234]
Points: 7669 Status: Regular



The way I see it working, is that people who grow up in
hardship will become stronger and more intelligent than
those growing up in safer environments.

The reprocusions of our stirle safe environments is already
evident, in that, peoples bodies are fighting harmless
substances (allergies etc.). Nature has a way of leveling
the playing field and I can for see that in the future
people with close liniage to the third world will be better
equiped mentaly and physically than those in the developed
world.


 

offline diemax from somewhere in tennessee :( (United States) on 2005-06-22 20:10 [#01641525]
Points: 2040 Status: Lurker



hehe yeah, only he's not chinese, he's a danish

anyways yeah... i'm sure viruses like AIDS and THE BLACK
FUCKING PLAGUE would easily wipe out large amounts of us,
but we could easily regroup and reproduce quickly enough to
fill the leftover void, and even if we couldn't genetic
science is getting close to setting it up so we wouldn't
really have to
imagine that
having kids without all the trouble of having sex
the future is not a place


 

offline diemax from somewhere in tennessee :( (United States) on 2005-06-22 20:12 [#01641529]
Points: 2040 Status: Lurker | Followup to 010101: #01641234



sterile environments... hell yeah
imagine that people living without any real fears except
monetary ones... people so bored they had social lives
devoted around electronics ...
jesus christ... wtf is god thinking
this CAN'T be his plan
this CAN'T be progress...


 

offline mylittlesister from ...wherever (United Kingdom) on 2005-06-22 20:22 [#01641538]
Points: 8472 Status: Regular | Followup to diemax: #01641529



we seem to be evolving through advances in technology,
rather than through survival of the fittest.


 

offline diemax from somewhere in tennessee :( (United States) on 2005-06-22 20:26 [#01641540]
Points: 2040 Status: Lurker | Followup to mylittlesister: #01641538



actually
if we're gonna say behavioral evolution instead of genetic
evolution
whynot just admit it
we're evolving in terms of the clothes we wear, the drugs we
do, and the television shows we watch, the technology is
really just a side trip if you take into account how much
effort we put into the three afformentioned things

think about how people define generations, hmmm...?


 

offline diemax from somewhere in tennessee :( (United States) on 2005-06-22 20:28 [#01641541]
Points: 2040 Status: Lurker | Followup to diemax: #01641540



either way, we're definately no longer evolving in the sense
refering to good ol' darwin's
origin of species
survival of the fittest
i mean look at america
we're so great
we've got our oil
and um...
our mtv


 

offline mylittlesister from ...wherever (United Kingdom) on 2005-06-22 20:34 [#01641547]
Points: 8472 Status: Regular | Followup to diemax: #01641541



this is because we have technology to fix all our genetic
defects, so whereas only the healthy humans would survive,
now the sick humans survive and pass on their genes. In
effect cheat death, and later generations pay the price.

well, not quite as straight forward as that.


 

offline mylittlesister from ...wherever (United Kingdom) on 2005-06-22 20:35 [#01641549]
Points: 8472 Status: Regular | Followup to mylittlesister: #01641547



i mean science, not technology - technology is applied
science.


 

offline diemax from somewhere in tennessee :( (United States) on 2005-06-22 20:37 [#01641551]
Points: 2040 Status: Lurker | Followup to mylittlesister: #01641547



are you quoting me?


 

offline mylittlesister from ...wherever (United Kingdom) on 2005-06-22 20:46 [#01641556]
Points: 8472 Status: Regular | Followup to diemax: #01641551



Not intentionally :D I'm just babbling, trying to tie in
science - as it is infact taking over. Terminator is more
than just a film!!!!!!


 

offline mylittlesister from ...wherever (United Kingdom) on 2005-06-22 20:47 [#01641557]
Points: 8472 Status: Regular



equality, the death of evolution. who would've thought?


 

offline Mertens from Motor City (United States) on 2005-06-22 21:01 [#01641559]
Points: 2064 Status: Lurker



You want progress? I'LL GIVE YOU PROGRESS!


 


Messageboard index