pureness of sounds | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (2)
big
recycle
...and 616 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614121
Today 4
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
pureness of sounds
 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2005-06-21 15:57 [#01639952]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



we had a nice lecture and an open discusion afterwards
earlier this evening. it was focused on electronic music as
it's the genere without a history in a way and you can't put
most of it in some social context as opposed to most other
genres. we came to conclusion that it's impossible to create
a pure sound..it's a totally subjective perception that
makes it impossible to define..perhaps the closest thing
would be if it was mathematically generated, or perhaps if
someone made a machine (btw, i think it was done, so in case
someone knows by who please let me know :) that would put
out random sounds..without any patterns..you'd just fill it
with samples and it would randomly play..but then again,
samples aren't pure sound, no matter whether they're made
from old recordings or field recordings..

what do you find to be the purest sound in context of music
ofcourse? :)

oh, and im not sure i explained this too well..i hope some
of you get at least some idea of what im trying to say :)


 

offline _gvarek_ from next to you (Poland) on 2005-06-21 15:58 [#01639954]
Points: 4882 Status: Lurker



a tubular bell, pure and powerfull


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2005-06-21 16:00 [#01639955]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular



i don't understand what a pure sound is.


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2005-06-21 16:01 [#01639956]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular



are you talking about influence and the derivativeness of
music? or actual sound waves?


 

offline hobbes from age on 2005-06-21 16:05 [#01639958]
Points: 8168 Status: Lurker



Maybe a stone hitting the water, or an ass being severely
pounded, crying, or bread being toasted.


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2005-06-21 16:08 [#01639959]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to hobbes: #01639958



OHH LOOK!!

welcome back hobbes!!

r40f, well about the sound in context of electronic music if
that makes any sense :)


 

offline CS2x from London (United Kingdom) on 2005-06-21 16:10 [#01639963]
Points: 5079 Status: Lurker



I know what you mean, and I've been thinking about how you
could create a completely "new" or "pure" sound for a
while.

I guess the only way is through new technology dedicated to
producing sounds that are completely and utterly new
waveforms.


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2005-06-21 16:10 [#01639964]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to hobbes: #01639958



hi hobbes! that's a good point. i guess sounds that would
naturally occur because they have no inherent context in
relation to art or music. i'm still not sure i'm answering
the right question, though.


 

offline Raz0rBlade_uk on 2005-06-21 16:14 [#01639970]
Points: 12540 Status: Addict | Show recordbag



the splash of a water droplet


 

offline CS2x from London (United Kingdom) on 2005-06-21 16:15 [#01639973]
Points: 5079 Status: Lurker | Followup to Raz0rBlade_uk: #01639970



Hey, that's my favorite sample to use in my stuff. :)

You can do endless stuff with pitching water droplet sounds,
reversing them, mapping them to drum machine pads and
banging them out live, etc...

Great.


 

offline hobbes from age on 2005-06-21 16:15 [#01639974]
Points: 8168 Status: Lurker | Followup to tolstoyed: #01639959



I was just making my post count more even, and getting rid
of this horrid "addict" status i had even after not posting
for months.


 

offline hobbes from age on 2005-06-21 16:16 [#01639976]
Points: 8168 Status: Lurker | Followup to CS2x: #01639973



God you're still here. Hasn't mappatazee briefed you or
something?


 

offline CS2x from London (United Kingdom) on 2005-06-21 16:18 [#01639978]
Points: 5079 Status: Lurker | Followup to hobbes: #01639976



I am still here. And no, he hasn't.


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2005-06-21 16:19 [#01639980]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to hobbes: #01639974



haha in no time you'll be an addict again..excellent!


 

offline hobbes from age on 2005-06-21 16:22 [#01639986]
Points: 8168 Status: Lurker | Followup to tolstoyed: #01639980



What i was trying to say is that i never left my addict
status, wich pissed me off.


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2005-06-21 16:25 [#01639988]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to hobbes: #01639986



yes, but posting at this rate you'll become an addict very
soon again <3


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2005-06-21 16:29 [#01639993]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



btw, is there a chance i could get a few more pics of
albert? he's awesome on that pic with the bell around his
neck :)

in the meanwhile here's a recent pic of toro.


Attached picture

 

offline sean qunt from BELFAST on 2005-06-21 16:33 [#01640001]
Points: 497 Status: Lurker | Followup to tolstoyed: #01639952



what are you talking about?, sine waves as in test tones?


 

offline obara from Utrecht on 2005-06-21 16:41 [#01640017]
Points: 19377 Status: Regular



i just want to say it's great that hobbes is back

and all the sounds i have in my soul are pure. especially
now.


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2005-06-21 16:44 [#01640024]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to sean qunt: #01640001



i don't know really..we didn't come down to technicalities
really..perhaps that would give us an answer, but i don't
think any of us would be able to analyse it in that
way..perhaps that's why we weren't able to get an answer.


 

offline obara from Utrecht on 2005-06-21 16:47 [#01640033]
Points: 19377 Status: Regular



oh, and i've really read the first post two times, Tolst.

it's all just sounds. and music.

*launches ipacial section*


 

offline b6662966 from ? on 2005-06-21 16:49 [#01640038]
Points: 1110 Status: Lurker



a 17th century german organ


 

offline AlbertoBalsalm from Reykjavík (Iceland) on 2005-06-21 17:02 [#01640057]
Points: 9459 Status: Lurker | Followup to tolstoyed: #01639952



can you give me an example of music that isn't "pure"?
because i don't understand what you are trying to get an
answer to.

perhaps you are reading to deep into it?


 

offline AlbertoBalsalm from Reykjavík (Iceland) on 2005-06-21 17:03 [#01640058]
Points: 9459 Status: Lurker | Followup to AlbertoBalsalm: #01640057



it being music


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2005-06-21 17:04 [#01640060]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to AlbertoBalsalm: #01640057



all music? :)


 

offline AlbertoBalsalm from Reykjavík (Iceland) on 2005-06-21 17:07 [#01640064]
Points: 9459 Status: Lurker | Followup to tolstoyed: #01640060



why?

because it's calculated? if it weren't, it wouldn't be
music.


 

offline CS2x from London (United Kingdom) on 2005-06-21 17:08 [#01640067]
Points: 5079 Status: Lurker



Once, I made a sound.


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2005-06-21 17:10 [#01640068]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to AlbertoBalsalm: #01640064



well, there's improvisation music which comes quite close to
that definition..although there's still the the author
influence factor involved :D


 

offline AlbertoBalsalm from Reykjavík (Iceland) on 2005-06-21 17:10 [#01640069]
Points: 9459 Status: Lurker | Followup to CS2x: #01640067



was it a pure fart sound?


 

offline CS2x from London (United Kingdom) on 2005-06-21 17:11 [#01640070]
Points: 5079 Status: Lurker | Followup to AlbertoBalsalm: #01640069



Yes, and it was deep, yo.


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2005-06-21 17:13 [#01640075]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



japanese artists come quite close to it as well..perhaps
the
closest. they just make a sound, nothing behind it, they
just make it because they can :)


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2005-06-21 17:16 [#01640076]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator



I still have no idea what you mean with a 'pure sound',
Goran.


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2005-06-21 17:21 [#01640082]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to qrter: #01640076



ah i don't either..

just sound..when the sound alone fascinates you..when you
don't immediately start to think where does it come from,
when you don't start putting it into some context right
away..hmm, perhaps i'll explain it better in the morning :)


 

offline DeadEight from vancouver (Canada) on 2005-06-21 21:26 [#01640201]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular



this sounds like a very interesting conversation you were
having... i'm not understanding how electronic music is not
historical, though...


 

offline thecurbcreeper from United States on 2005-06-21 22:10 [#01640208]
Points: 6045 Status: Lurker



i think if i didn't know hecker was a computer/noise artist
i'd be completely baffled at where these sounds came from

even so, i don't know how he makes them

this question, like everyone said, is quite confusing

were you stoned at the time, tolstoyed?


 

offline diemax from somewhere in tennessee :( (United States) on 2005-06-21 22:22 [#01640213]
Points: 2040 Status: Lurker



the sound of one hand clapping?


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2005-06-22 00:02 [#01640228]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker



In electronic music... pure sound? Honestly, I would
challenge that with any other kind of music. I can't really
think of many musics nowadays that rely upon a pure,
unaltered sound. Although, if you look at the symphony for
dot matrix printers by the user, all the sounds are
generated by printers that are sequenced by various text
files that are all sent to print at the same time. If I
understand what you mean by pure sound, that would be an
example of pure sound in electronic music. No editing... the
sounds are made and recorded into one source, as opposed to
a multitrack, and no effects are added.


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2005-06-22 01:58 [#01640258]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to Taxidermist: #01640228



yes, that is a very good example..for someone not familliar
with printers :)


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2005-06-22 01:59 [#01640259]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



"were you stoned at the time, tolstoyed?"

not at all, i don't think any of us was..


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2005-06-22 02:02 [#01640263]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker



If thats a cut at my understanding of printers, I do know
the sound is mechanical and not produced electronically,
therefore "pure". At least, as far as I can see it. Water
dropping is pure, and the ocean waves are pure, and a tree
falling in the woods is pure if it is actually heard, and so
on. Those are all mechanical processes.

Birds chirping are not pure, because those sounds were made
with a design and communication in mind.



 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2005-06-22 02:06 [#01640266]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to Taxidermist: #01640263



oh no..it was meant strickly from the point of view that it
would be fascinating for someone who hasn't heard the sound
of a printer before. the rest of us would immediately think
it was a printer sound so that would perhaps take a bit of
our attention off of the sound itself :)


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2005-06-22 02:07 [#01640269]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker



So, by pure sound do you mean a sound that has no point of
reference to the listener?


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2005-06-22 02:09 [#01640270]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



that's just one of the many aspects, yeah..


 

offline Opto on 2005-06-22 02:12 [#01640271]
Points: 1016 Status: Addict | Followup to tolstoyed: #01639952



jesus you must have really boring job and loads of spare
time man


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2005-06-22 02:17 [#01640276]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to Opto: #01640271



well, my job is extremly boring yes, that's why i need some
excitement in my 'spare' time :)


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2005-06-22 02:21 [#01640286]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker | Followup to tolstoyed: #01640276



Once again, I don't buy this definition. For things to be
such an extreme, they cannot be so complicated, expecially
for the purpose of discussion. Discussions like this are
meant to be loaded.


 

offline DeadEight from vancouver (Canada) on 2005-06-22 02:25 [#01640297]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular



"it was focused on electronic music as
it's the genere without a history in a way and you can't put

most of it in some social context as opposed to most other
genres."

i'd like to hear more about why this conclusion was reached
cause i don't buy it (and i think it would be interesting to
discuss).


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2005-06-22 02:29 [#01640305]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker | Followup to DeadEight: #01640297



Yeah, actually, it pre-dates punk and hiphop and practically
all other popular microgenres out nowadays.

It kind of sounds like something that really closed minded
people would say when they are trying to analyze something
that they don't have an appreciation for...


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2005-06-22 02:53 [#01640334]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to Taxidermist: #01640286



well we were discussing different point of views on
this..but in the end that was sort of what we left it at..it
just can't be defined.

deadeight, that was just a remark by the guy who led the
discussion, we didn't really talk about that. sure it has
its history although compared to other genres it's
relatively new. there were guys; nordheim,
stockhousen,..experimenting, but the genre is pretty new -
i'd say it started somewhere in 84, 85..hip hop started
before that, and so did punk..


 

offline DeadEight from vancouver (Canada) on 2005-06-22 03:03 [#01640349]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular | Followup to tolstoyed: #01640334



hmm... i dunno, i think there's a fair amount of electronic
music that existed before that... but in any event i was
kind of interpreting the remark differently... it seemed
like this fellow was trying to say that electronic music
isn't connected to social history the way other genres
are...


 


Messageboard index