|
|
phaelam
from the stoods on 2005-06-02 16:27 [#01620849]
Points: 34 Status: Regular
|
|
i cant listen to any vocals vocoded anymore due to that bitch. does anyone else have the feelings? death to contemporary radio!
|
|
Raz0rBlade_uk
on 2005-06-02 16:28 [#01620852]
Points: 12540 Status: Addict | Show recordbag
|
|
Erm. Not for me I don't think. If it's like an actual voice singing maybe yes but when it comes to analord/daft punk I'd say no.
|
|
J198
from Maastricht (Netherlands, The) on 2005-06-02 16:28 [#01620853]
Points: 7342 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
yes she really fucking raped that effect.
then madonna (die another day etc)
|
|
isnieZot
from pooptown (Belgium) on 2005-06-02 16:32 [#01620859]
Points: 4949 Status: Lurker
|
|
it's not a vocoder. it's an "extreme" application of Autotuning.
it's used to correct singers when they sing out of key without needing to record the whole singing again.
|
|
isnieZot
from pooptown (Belgium) on 2005-06-02 16:33 [#01620860]
Points: 4949 Status: Lurker | Followup to isnieZot: #01620859
|
|
although I think madonna used a vocoder in die another day. but Cher used autotune I believe.
|
|
giginger
from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2005-06-02 16:41 [#01620869]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Followup to isnieZot: #01620859 | Show recordbag
|
|
And to create that robotic effect which pisses me off.
I hate Cher.
|
|
dog_belch
from Netherlands, The on 2005-06-02 16:45 [#01620872]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Show recordbag
|
|
It wasn't Cher's idea though, really, it was the very young producer, whos name I don't know, but I remember him on a interview on TV saying how he tried it out when they were recording the song and they liked it and went with it. I don't know how it worked but the voice would reach certain levels and kick off the effect, or something.
I quite like that song anyway.
|
|
Taxidermist
from Black Grass on 2005-06-02 17:09 [#01620881]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker | Followup to dog_belch: #01620872
|
|
What you can do is program it to redirect frequencies when certain other frequencies have been reached, so say someone is singing in a c note, 6th octave, as soon as that singer hits a csharp, then the autotuner automatically redirects the frequency to a fourth octave, giving the effect of a immediate change that isn't humanized at all. When you use a lower frequency for the pitch resynthesis, it sounds granulated or computer generated. You can also use variables, so that in the first bar it will redirect that note to the fourth octave, but in the second bar, if the same process is repeated, then it will redirect to maybe the third octave for a note, and then redirect back to the sixth octave.
As well, you can use it to filter out certain notes according to different harmonic scales, so that if you are playing it according to, say the enigmatic scale, then whenever you sing or play a d it will automatically resynthesize that note as an e or d sharp, depending on which frequency is closer.
|
|
Taxidermist
from Black Grass on 2005-06-02 17:10 [#01620882]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker
|
|
Sorry;
resynthesize that note as an e or c sharp, depending on which frequency is closer.
|
|
vacant
from NYC (United States) on 2005-06-02 17:11 [#01620883]
Points: 365 Status: Regular
|
|
i heard it has to do with the singer actually being able to sing (since the feature is intended for people who are slightly off). sing correctly into it and you get the robot effect. too bad the mental associations are crap, it could have been put to some good use by someone maybe
|
|
vacant
from NYC (United States) on 2005-06-02 17:12 [#01620884]
Points: 365 Status: Regular
|
|
late! and wrong.
|
|
Taxidermist
from Black Grass on 2005-06-02 17:15 [#01620887]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker | Followup to vacant: #01620883
|
|
Well, that is what its intended for... but it also can be use quite easily to wrong things just as much as it is to right things.
The right producer can use this technique on a mediocre singer, and make her sound like a great singer, without anyone being able to tell the difference.
|
|
thecurbcreeper
from United States on 2005-06-02 17:25 [#01620889]
Points: 6045 Status: Lurker
|
|
the vocoder always kind of sucked.
i think cher just brought it's sucky-ness out in the open
|
|
cie jiks mawp
from motion to descend (Australia) on 2005-06-02 17:39 [#01620899]
Points: 1171 Status: Lurker
|
|
these guys restored my faith in the vocoder.
|
|
Aesthetics
from the IDM Kiosk on 2005-06-04 04:30 [#01622323]
Points: 6796 Status: Lurker
|
|
I wish it would have been the other way around.
Did the vocoder kill Cher?
|
|
DeleriousWeasel
from Guam on 2005-06-04 04:33 [#01622325]
Points: 2953 Status: Regular
|
|
I got into vocoding and trance after hearing that song O_O
|
|
Skink
from A cesspool in eden on 2005-06-04 06:41 [#01622358]
Points: 7483 Status: Lurker
|
|
No you killed the vocoder.
|
|
avart
from nomo' on 2005-06-04 07:00 [#01622361]
Points: 1764 Status: Lurker
|
|
...as mentioned it´s no vocoder and vocoders suck (they are so overused!) anyway so it really doesn´t matter...
|
|
stilaktive
from a place on 2005-06-04 07:08 [#01622366]
Points: 3162 Status: Lurker
|
|
LAZY_REAL_WAY_THE_GUY_DID_IT
|
|
thatne
from United States on 2005-06-04 07:14 [#01622372]
Points: 3026 Status: Lurker
|
|
personally, i like a vocoder, but i rate better an heil talkbox, as popularised by flaxen-haired peter frampton, or roger troutman from 70s funk sensation, zapp.
|
|
melack
from barcielwave on 2005-06-04 07:24 [#01622381]
Points: 9099 Status: Regular
|
|
i also HATE that FUCKING STUPID track!!! i HAD a neighbour who could pass a whole evening listening to that track repeatedly...
i just couldnt not study, i couldnt even think... i could kill tho.
|
| Attached picture |
|
|
|
isnieZot
from pooptown (Belgium) on 2005-06-04 08:13 [#01622402]
Points: 4949 Status: Lurker | Followup to stilaktive: #01622366
|
|
hmm appearantly it's a vocoder...I was wrong....OH THE HORROR!!!
|
|
fleetmouse
from Horny for Truth on 2005-06-04 08:41 [#01622427]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker
|
|
I lvoe Cher and I love that song.
|
|
stilaktive
from a place on 2005-06-04 09:03 [#01622464]
Points: 3162 Status: Lurker
|
|
lvoe Cher HAahhnahahAGKHAFKUAWBF WAEF AFAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAA!
|
|
OK
on 2005-06-04 11:34 [#01622580]
Points: 4791 Status: Lurker
|
|
it's actually subtle use of it compared to what others do.
|
|
Xeron
from London (United Kingdom) on 2005-06-04 11:43 [#01622585]
Points: 2638 Status: Regular
|
|
personally i don't y see why a bad song would kill off an excellent piece of equipment. It wasn't such a bad song and she's an eccentric woman, you can't hate eccentricity because when you become old you'll most likely be considered eccentric yourself.
|
|
Messageboard index
|