[spam] pictures | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
big
...and 402 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614130
Today 2
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
[spam] pictures
 

offline nobsmuggler from silly mid-off on 2005-04-24 15:22 [#01575514]
Points: 6265 Status: Addict



1


Attached picture

 

offline nobsmuggler from silly mid-off on 2005-04-24 15:22 [#01575517]
Points: 6265 Status: Addict



2


Attached picture

 

offline nobsmuggler from silly mid-off on 2005-04-24 15:24 [#01575518]
Points: 6265 Status: Addict



3


Attached picture

 

offline nobsmuggler from silly mid-off on 2005-04-24 15:25 [#01575519]
Points: 6265 Status: Addict



4


Attached picture

 

offline nobsmuggler from silly mid-off on 2005-04-24 15:25 [#01575520]
Points: 6265 Status: Addict



5


Attached picture

 

offline nobsmuggler from silly mid-off on 2005-04-24 15:26 [#01575521]
Points: 6265 Status: Addict



6


Attached picture

 

offline nobsmuggler from silly mid-off on 2005-04-24 15:26 [#01575522]
Points: 6265 Status: Addict



and one of me :)


Attached picture

 

offline tridenti from Milano (Italy) on 2005-04-24 15:27 [#01575523]
Points: 14653 Status: Lurker



good!


 

offline J198 from Maastricht (Netherlands, The) on 2005-04-24 15:27 [#01575524]
Points: 7342 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



are you expecting any feedback or something?


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2005-04-24 16:04 [#01575544]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular



the flower pics are cool, but they're tiny!


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2005-04-24 16:08 [#01575547]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular



duck duck goose


 

offline J198 from Maastricht (Netherlands, The) on 2005-04-24 16:08 [#01575548]
Points: 7342 Status: Lurker | Followup to r40f: #01575544 | Show recordbag



what do you find cool about them i'm interested to know..

the last pic is the only interesting one imo.


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2005-04-24 16:20 [#01575554]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to J198: #01575548



well, i didn't say they're "interesting"... i just think
they're nice aesthetically. they look like pretty good
close-ups of flowers and i think that's nice to look at?
that's about all.


 

offline J198 from Maastricht (Netherlands, The) on 2005-04-24 16:37 [#01575563]
Points: 7342 Status: Lurker | Followup to r40f: #01575554 | Show recordbag



okay look i really dont mean to start shit or anything but
have you ever held a camera in your hands?

the guy apparently stuck his camera cellphone/webcam in a
bunch of flowers and pressed a button.. they're out of focus
(all of them), there is no composition or any particular
interesting angle.

i'm not one to say all pictures should be perfect or
anything, since mine are pretty bad, but i can easily tell
when someone hasn't the faintest idea about taking pictures,
or not wanting to put ANY effort into it.

hence my question to nobsmuggler: 'are you expecting
feedback?' because i don't understand this thread.


 

offline Anus_Presley on 2005-04-24 16:41 [#01575564]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker | Followup to J198: #01575563



that does seem a little mean


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2005-04-24 16:43 [#01575566]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to J198: #01575563



yes, i've used a camera before. i couldn't tell they were
out of focus because the images are too small.

so they're not mindblowing - no one said they were. relax,
buddy. no reason to be mean about it. who cares?


 

offline J198 from Maastricht (Netherlands, The) on 2005-04-24 16:53 [#01575573]
Points: 7342 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



i'm only making an observation here. i'm not mad because he
posted these pics, i just don't understand his motivation.

i didnt think i was being mean. sorry anyway. really, i feel
bad now :(


 

offline swift_jams from big sky on 2005-04-24 16:58 [#01575577]
Points: 7577 Status: Lurker



nice work knobby


 

offline i_x_ten from arsemuncher on 2005-04-24 17:07 [#01575580]
Points: 10031 Status: Regular | Followup to corrupted-girl: #01575547



run!


 

offline nobsmuggler from silly mid-off on 2005-04-24 17:46 [#01575630]
Points: 6265 Status: Addict



J198 i was expecting feedback, i was bored but to say the
pictures are out of focus is wrong. Picture 2 is crystal
clear and with picture 5, altough it doesnt work so well
being small, the focus in the picture is on the one pink
flower in middle

bigger versions


 

offline pomme de terre from obscure body in the SK System on 2005-04-24 17:46 [#01575632]
Points: 11941 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



it's gary!1


 

offline nobsmuggler from silly mid-off on 2005-04-24 17:50 [#01575633]
Points: 6265 Status: Addict | Followup to pomme de terre: #01575632



tips hat

"thank you ma'am"


Attached picture

 

offline deepspace9mm from filth on 2005-04-24 17:53 [#01575637]
Points: 6846 Status: Addict



I quite like number 5. I could just be projecting, but
there's something a bit menacing and odd about it, something
about the composition.

Who set the rule that every image has to be in crystal sharp
focus anyway? It's that kind of over-technically minded
attitude that pisses me off. Mildly, anyway.


 

offline J198 from Maastricht (Netherlands, The) on 2005-04-25 02:00 [#01575955]
Points: 7342 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



over technically? i never said all pics have to be 100%
focused, but these pics dont exactly look like they were
made out of focus intentionally either. i can definitely
appreciate a blurry pic, as long as there is something worth
looking at.

nob: i don't know what kind of camera you're using, but the
pink flower is not in focus, just because it's less blurry
than the rest..

on a more positive note: i'm really interested to know what
that thing on pic 6 is, and if you have a bigger version of
that with the entire thing on it?


 

offline pOgO from behind your belly button fluff on 2005-04-25 02:10 [#01575958]
Points: 12687 Status: Lurker



3


 

offline denniscpearce from Canada on 2005-04-25 02:11 [#01575959]
Points: 1562 Status: Regular



i went through a period of taking rolls and rolls of film
intentionally out of focus.
never found what i was looking for though.
on a compleatly unrelated note.
i just gathered these together for something


 

offline -crazone from smashing acid over and over on 2005-04-25 02:14 [#01575961]
Points: 11234 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



do you expect any feedback on this?


 

offline J198 from Maastricht (Netherlands, The) on 2005-04-25 02:15 [#01575962]
Points: 7342 Status: Lurker | Followup to denniscpearce: #01575959 | Show recordbag



nice series. the last shot is great!


 

offline denniscpearce from Canada on 2005-04-25 02:19 [#01575969]
Points: 1562 Status: Regular



nice series. the last shot is great!
eh... well... yeah i dont know about 'series'. just a
mottled collection of stuff i though might work for
something.
and it just happens that they are mostly all of people and a
bunch of one of my friends in particular.
thanks though.


 

offline nobsmuggler from silly mid-off on 2005-04-25 02:40 [#01575977]
Points: 6265 Status: Addict | Followup to J198: #01575955



email my profile addy and ill send a proper size version


 


Messageboard index