salvia | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 198 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614087
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
salvia
 

offline big from lsg on 2005-04-18 12:48 [#01569413]
Points: 23727 Status: Regular | Followup to epohs: #01569366 | Show recordbag



aha, it should be in that cat topic


 

offline eager bereaver on 2005-04-18 14:18 [#01569548]
Points: 7 Status: Regular



Salvia is not drug but a KEY, a living, growing
conciousness, that went ingested, communicates with us to
show us realities and sensations that defy comprehension,
allows us to access to answers we are not yet capable of
understanding.

I firmly believe that one full on experience with this
plant/entheogen holds more spiritual manna than a lifetime
of church going, (or your local alternative).

I tried it at Christmas 'piggy backed' with E, 'phets,
absolut vodka, weed and about 60 magic mushrooms. Then we
smoked some Sally. It was frankly amazing, imagine reality
being squashed between 2 panes of glass then the panes of
glass moving about slowly, spreading the reality onto the 2
panes. Well by that time there were multiple realities, all
very real, all very 'museum tour' like. As if we were on a
guided tour of the cosmos.

Me and fellow cosmonaut for the evening came to the
conclusion that 'this' reality the one we are in right now,
is not the only one there is, there are many other and in
actual fact this 'life' as we call it is merely a
distraction, a sideshow to the main event. All very
comforting and warm to be honest.

I would recommend it to anyone who has had good
hallucinogenic experiences in the past and can handle sudden
reality shifts, cause thats what you'll get.


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2005-04-18 14:21 [#01569551]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker | Followup to eager bereaver: #01569548



What the fuck are you talking about you fucking gleet face.


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2005-04-18 14:24 [#01569559]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker



i got so fucking fucked up the other day taht i almost
understood reality.


 

offline J198 from Maastricht (Netherlands, The) on 2005-04-18 14:32 [#01569576]
Points: 7342 Status: Lurker | Followup to eager bereaver: #01569548 | Show recordbag



good story. i'm very curious, but i'll try salvia when i
feel the time is right. i think i should experience a level
5 mushroom trip first..

lots of people will give you crap for saying that, but i
know why you refer to this plant as a key and not as a
'drug'. referring to magic mushrooms as drugs feels just as
wrong to me.


 

offline deepspace9mm from filth on 2005-04-18 14:36 [#01569584]
Points: 6846 Status: Addict



ha ha ha ha

It's just the drugs. If you're looking for that kind of
"woah, we are all one with the cosmos, reality is but
an illusion, woah" thing when you're tripping then i guess
you're more predisposed to "find" it on salvia. It doesn't
mean there really is a secret reality than only you
cosmonauts know about.

I repeat: it's just the drugs.


 

offline -crazone from smashing acid over and over on 2005-04-18 14:47 [#01569598]
Points: 11234 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



hahahahahaha..I"ll never use this..and i've used a
lot


 

offline eager bereaver on 2005-04-18 14:57 [#01569614]
Points: 7 Status: Regular



The thing about a lot of Salvia experiences is that al lot
of them have VERY similar, if not identical, themes and
descriptions. I find it hard to believe that people from
all over the world can unite and have such similar
experiences to one another, disregarding background,
lifestyle, surroundings, personality, etc etc. Salvia cuts
through this, with a definitive edge.

And yes you are right it is the drug/key/plant affecting my
brain, but the effects are quite simply too real, too
plausible, too perfect, repeatable, friendly warm and
welcoming to be anything but an alternate reality. After
all we are capable of so much more in the brain department,
we just have to push the right buttons..

Sometimes it is better NOT to try and understand, to be
controlled by our relentless ego, but to let go and allow
ourselves to become part of something bigger, infinitely
more ancient and esatblished than any of us, as single
entity could ever hope to surpass.


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2005-04-18 15:00 [#01569617]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker



';'


 

offline Anus_Presley on 2005-04-18 15:00 [#01569620]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker | Followup to eager bereaver: #01569614



What the fuck arre you talking about you fucking gleet face.


 

offline deepspace9mm from filth on 2005-04-18 15:11 [#01569631]
Points: 6846 Status: Addict | Followup to eager bereaver: #01569614



That's true from what i've read on people's experience with
the stuff, they often are quite similar. I know every time
i've smoked salvia at high concentrations, the effects have
definitely been quite similar to what you describe.

Could it be possible this is because people are using the
same drug
with it's own ways of interacting with the
brain? And often a standardized extract? Maybe. Could it be
there really are alternate realities that only
hallucinogen-users can find? Maybe, but i think i know which
one i believe.

After all, just because you see your hand turn into a beef
steak on acid, doesn't mean it's really happening. I find it
a bit silly to believe that the strange things you
experience after you've taken a load of psychedelics are a
"hidden reality". It's not fighting the "flow" or whatever,
it's just common sense.

Maaaan.


 

offline eager bereaver on 2005-04-18 15:20 [#01569636]
Points: 7 Status: Regular



true, everyone is entitled to their own opinions maaaaan,
but booze effects people quite differently, as does ganj,
the effects of salvia are much more refined and direct.

However when Death extends its boney digit, it will feel
familiar and i definitely do not fear it. and im saying
this, not on salvia


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2005-04-18 15:28 [#01569641]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to eager bereaver: #01569636



this you can only truly know when you do feel "the boney
digit", to propose it now has little value.


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2005-04-18 15:30 [#01569644]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to eager bereaver: #01569614



as deepspace says, it could also just be a very specific
drug, hitting specific parts of the brain and therefore
creating the same experiences.


 

offline clint from Silencio... (United Kingdom) on 2005-04-18 15:33 [#01569647]
Points: 3447 Status: Lurker



I like what you're saying. I am in between camps. One one
hand I think a large majority of spiritual experiences with
drugs are fairly chemically based, whereas on the other I
like to think that some substances have the potential to
unlock parts of our conciousness that we don't use in normal
life. After all, we only use something like 25% of our
brainpower don't we? I think its perfectly plausible that
revelations can occur when untapped parts of the brain are
stimulated. The whole religious/spiritual thing I'm more
skeptical about.


 

offline -crazone from smashing acid over and over on 2005-04-18 15:37 [#01569650]
Points: 11234 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



have you made your avatar using salvia? that would be great


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2005-04-18 15:38 [#01569651]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to clint: #01569647



"After all, we only use something like 25% of our
brainpower don't we?"


no, this is popular myth - but myth nonetheless.

long, long ago when I used to study psychology this was one
of the fun little facts that was first to be debunked. :)

you use quite a lot of your brain and the rest seems to be
there on stand-by - when your speechcentre fails, another
part of your brain will adapt and become a new speechcentre
(or something that comes close to it..).


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2005-04-18 15:40 [#01569653]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to qrter: #01569651



the speechcentre thing is an example, I'm not saying I
prophesise clint's speechcentre to fail in the nearby
future.


 

offline deepspace9mm from filth on 2005-04-18 15:44 [#01569660]
Points: 6846 Status: Addict



I don't disagree that drugs (and especially hallucinogens)
can give you some quite powerful revelations, but i don't
think it's due to "untapped areas" of the brain being
brought into play. I think mushrooms, lsd and mdma (plus
quite a few more) affect the same receptor in the brain,
just in different ways. Although to be fair, the receptor
that salvia affects is quite poorly understood at the moment
as i understand it.

I could be wrong i suppose. It'd be interesting to see how
different areas of the brain are affected on psychedelics
under a cat scan or something. I'm sure somebody must've
done that.


 

offline plaidzebra from so long, xlt on 2005-04-18 15:48 [#01569663]
Points: 5678 Status: Lurker | Followup to qrter: #01569641



i can appreciate why some individuals would opt for a model
which views human beings as electrochemical machines
operating in a four dimensional reality. the drug
experience, then, is seen as essentially a machine
malfunction resulting from the transitory presence of the
drug. it's a very popular model.

however, there is plenty of reason to believe that reality
is not limited to four dimensions, and that what we know as
reality is far larger and incomprehensible than our little
models of it. there is also a vast history of spirituality
which is not dependent on drug experiences.

i'm not saying that anyone's right or wrong, as everyone is
responsible for their own experience and their own models,
they do as they will.

to suggest that there's no point in discussing these issues
because no one "knows" the truth is a disappointing cop
out.

to blindly dismiss these experiences as meaningless seems as
misguided as assuming that they are necessarily meaningful.
arrogance isn't much better than naivete...



 

offline plaidzebra from so long, xlt on 2005-04-18 15:50 [#01569666]
Points: 5678 Status: Lurker



oops, i wasn't necessarily addressing qrter entirely...


 

offline J198 from Maastricht (Netherlands, The) on 2005-04-18 15:59 [#01569676]
Points: 7342 Status: Lurker | Followup to plaidzebra: #01569663 | Show recordbag



well that sums it up pretty well. i wish we could all agree
that this is the end of this thread. well spoken,
plaidzebra.


 

offline clint from Silencio... (United Kingdom) on 2005-04-18 16:06 [#01569680]
Points: 3447 Status: Lurker | Followup to qrter: #01569651



No way, I have bin using that one in conversation ever since
a school trip on which the strange geek kid told the dorm
that if he could utilise the full power of his brain he
could stab everyone by willing a knife with his mind!


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2005-04-18 16:24 [#01569692]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to plaidzebra: #01569663



most drugs replicate possible natural chemical reactions in
the brain, though - which would explain the "there is also a
vast history of spirituality which is not dependent on drug
experiences" point, perhaps.

an example - studies have shown that people who are dying
and don't get enough oxygen to the brain, suddenly release a
large amount of endorphins, which creates the experience of
seeing a seering white light and a feeling of great
happiness. this could be an explanation for near-death
experiences.

and I don't agree on the idea that the drug would cause the
machine to malfunction - just to function differently.
however - because this only happens when taking drugs
(leaving the natural experiencing of spiritual thingies for
a moment) I wouldn't take it for the gospel. when you have
the flu and hallucinate because of it, you do not tend to
see these hallucinations as anything but just that.

however - although you weren't strictly "follow-upping" to
me - I wasn't saying these experiences therefore have to be
seen as not being meaningful - in fact, I didn't even hint
at it!

how you interpret these chemical reactions is up to you -
I'm aware this might sound pedantic, but I really don't mean
it that way.

I think we are basically lots of shifting neurological
connections and nothing more - that said, this system of
neurological connections is so incredibly complex and
intricate, this of itself is amazing enough for me.


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2005-04-18 16:46 [#01569706]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular



hahah

hm

um..


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2005-04-18 16:49 [#01569708]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular



what the fuck.. those videos are gay. that dude probably
smokes crack or something.


 

offline plaidzebra from so long, xlt on 2005-04-18 17:41 [#01569777]
Points: 5678 Status: Lurker | Followup to qrter: #01569692



i'm not out to persuade anyone of anything, just to put in
my two cents...

by malfunction i meant to reflect that many who question the
validity of so called "drug experiences" are biased to see
"different function" as "malfunction." it's not easy
producing a reader's digest version of a complicated, messy
idea.

there's no question that i've gone down a path that i can't
back out of, but that is flexible and unpredictable. i
spent a lot of energy trying to hold on to an agnostic but
fundamentally scientific materialist viewpoint. to be
honest with myself, i had to abandon that model. and along
with that i had to learn that our collective situation is
such that no words on my part will ever suffice to persuade
or change anyone's mind about who they are or why they
exist, except to offer encouragement and ideas for those who
are facing a similar situation, or to offer an alternative
to those who are operating self-destructive beliefs.

qrter, i think there's a lot to discuss in your post, and
much i would like to address, but there just isn't time and
an xltronic reader's digest version will not do...

a message board can a great tool for practicing winnowing
ideas down the absolute minimum essence, though...


 

offline thatne from United States on 2005-04-20 01:23 [#01571321]
Points: 3026 Status: Lurker



i got some pretty good effects from a cigarette of salvia
leaves with 10x extract on there. none of my trials have
resulted in as profound an experience as some i've heard
recalled, though. mostly i got perceived entity contact,
some time distortion, flowing-type visuals in woodgrain, and
general change in consciousness. it's kinda tight but i
probably won't do it much anymore except as a booster.


 

offline BoxBob-K23 from Finland on 2005-04-20 04:38 [#01571379]
Points: 2440 Status: Regular



this is a fascinating topic.

I have a (sort of) salvia experience from two years back,
but that was barely interesting. I didn't take enough to get
anywhere. I have friends who've done it, and their (rather
unsettling) experiences have postponed my interests in
taking it anytime in the near future. I personally have had
little doings with substances of this sort, ever. Some
lovely experiences with cannabis constitute the extent of my
"in the know"-ness.

As far as "it's just the drugs" vs. "a different reality"
topic is concerned, I see why plaidzebra would want to argue
vehemently against the oft-repeated scientific arguments
like the ones that are popular amongst neuropsychologists
and all sorts of neo-freudians.

Firstly, the neuroscientists see patterns of activity in
brain-scans and claim to see it as "fully operational". This
apparent "refutation" of the "myth" of undeveloped human
potential is just another myth, a second-order myth, because
it's based on superficial analyses of stripes of colour on
computer screens. That said, there's no point in giving
percentages here: 5%, 22%, 98%, 100%... I mean, we're using
100% in a way ALL THE TIME, but that 100% CAN be pretty
fucking miserably spent.

Secondly, the (neo-)freudians and other boring exponents of
"normalcy" are just working against all deviation from their
concepts of what constitutes healthy living. This includes
their denial of the reality of all sorts of mental states
currently denigrated as "schizophrenic", "paranoiac",
"psychotic", "neurotic" etc.

Both of these groups are outdated and boring; Well,
Freudians more outdated and mainstream neuroscientists
rather boring. I see much of this as symptoms of
post-Christian nihilistic ethos.

Anybody who has any concept of a "will" should know that
CHOOSING the most uplifting course of action is a deed left
to the individual: That's why I applaud any "-nauts" who
venture on where few have gone before (whether psychonauts,
astronauts or arsonauts <-- that m


 

offline BoxBob-K23 from Finland on 2005-04-20 04:40 [#01571382]
Points: 2440 Status: Regular



*krhm* I was saying:
"... arsonauts <-- that means ART-exploring, you dumbass)"


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2005-04-20 06:45 [#01571476]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular | Followup to BoxBob-K23: #01571382



haha


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2005-04-20 06:49 [#01571483]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker



arsestronauts?


 

offline plaidzebra from so long, xlt on 2005-04-20 06:58 [#01571501]
Points: 5678 Status: Lurker | Followup to epohs: #01571483



it was already funny at arsonaut...


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2005-04-20 07:20 [#01571528]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker



yeah, i kinda fzcked that one up didn't i? sorry guys..


 


Messageboard index