|
|
Exaph
from United Kingdom on 2005-01-24 04:43 [#01473876]
Points: 3718 Status: Lurker
|
|
please could u post links here? i never seem to be able to find any! :( phanks..
|
|
CS2x
from London (United Kingdom) on 2005-01-24 04:45 [#01473880]
Points: 5079 Status: Lurker
|
|
It sounds like urine.
|
|
Archrival
on 2005-01-24 04:47 [#01473883]
Points: 4265 Status: Lurker
|
|
its nice
Analord 10 is the best then Analord 2 then Analord 1 :)
its nice tho, its worth it.
|
|
Quino Strider
from Buenaventura on 2005-01-24 04:49 [#01473890]
Points: 335 Status: Lurker | Followup to Archrival: #01473883
|
|
how can you say it's the best when the remaining a-lords have not been released yet?
|
|
Exaph
from United Kingdom on 2005-01-24 04:53 [#01473894]
Points: 3718 Status: Lurker
|
|
i have heard them myself. i meant external reviews! like how long does allmusic need?
|
|
Archrival
on 2005-01-24 04:55 [#01473896]
Points: 4265 Status: Lurker
|
|
Quino Strider: U know what I mean ;)
Of those released so far, ofcourse. Havent heard 3-9.
|
|
CS2x
from London (United Kingdom) on 2005-01-24 04:56 [#01473897]
Points: 5079 Status: Lurker
|
|
I also like hearing reviews from sites like allmusic.com even if I have heard the record myself.
But Analord sounds like errection.
|
|
Quino Strider
from Buenaventura on 2005-01-24 05:11 [#01473919]
Points: 335 Status: Lurker | Followup to Archrival: #01473896
|
|
no i don't... .)
you should have said analord 10 is the best from the 3 releases so far.
you know what i mean ;)
|
|
Phobiazero
from the next Xltronic (Sweden) on 2005-01-24 05:19 [#01473926]
Points: 10507 Status: Webmaster | Show recordbag
|
|
who cares about reviews anyway? why are you interested in ONE person's opinion on a release - which he/she is more or less forced to do?
|
|
Exaph
from United Kingdom on 2005-01-24 05:24 [#01473933]
Points: 3718 Status: Lurker
|
|
im not bothered about reviews usually but with aphex it fascinates me to know what 'outsiders' think if you know what i mean? kinda like an unbiased opinion.
|
|
JAroen
from the pineal gland on 2005-01-24 05:25 [#01473935]
Points: 16065 Status: Regular
|
|
10: awesome stuff, druqks gone analog. 01/02: mediocre acid.
|
|
Exaph
from United Kingdom on 2005-01-24 05:51 [#01473952]
Points: 3718 Status: Lurker
|
|
why is acid so called to describe that kind of music?
|
|
JAroen
from the pineal gland on 2005-01-24 05:56 [#01473959]
Points: 16065 Status: Regular
|
|
because someone used a 303 in a track and tought it sounded acidy?
|
|
bogala
from NYC (United States) on 2005-01-24 06:10 [#01473978]
Points: 5125 Status: Regular
|
|
You never took acid have you?
|
|
Exaph
from United Kingdom on 2005-01-24 06:13 [#01473983]
Points: 3718 Status: Lurker
|
|
No, I sometimes drink tea though; you know like how the hand claps sound?
|
|
Archrival
on 2005-01-24 06:14 [#01473984]
Points: 4265 Status: Lurker | Followup to JAroen: #01473935
|
|
kind of
|
|
Vin3islih
from United Kingdom on 2005-01-24 09:11 [#01474154]
Points: 1066 Status: Regular
|
|
Few websites or magazines will have reviews of it because there are hardly any copies of Analord 10, and I doubt the 12" Analord 1&2 went out as promo's...so basically they are releases for the hard core because no one else fucking knows about them!
|
|
Vin3islih
from United Kingdom on 2005-01-24 09:13 [#01474157]
Points: 1066 Status: Regular | Followup to Quino Strider: #01473919
|
|
Does he have to spell out what he means? I knew what he meant, I am not an idiot.
|
|
elusive
from detroit (United States) on 2005-01-24 09:37 [#01474171]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
I like reading reviews because of the language used.
I love reading how people describe autechre tracks (confield/draft reviews).
I find they have a much better vocabulary than I do when it comes to the said music.
|
|
Quino Strider
from Buenaventura on 2005-01-24 10:05 [#01474207]
Points: 335 Status: Lurker | Followup to Vin3islih: #01474157
|
|
you don't get it, but never mind.
.)
|
|
Messageboard index
|