Firefox 1.0 | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in
Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
DADONCK
...and 349 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614128
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
Firefox 1.0
 

offline pf from Finland on 2004-09-14 13:45 [#01334770]
Points: 3316 Status: Lurker



Help them get 1 million downloads in 10days

 

offline evolume from seattle (United States) on 2004-09-14 13:46 [#01334772]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular



i use it.
its dope.

 

offline epohs from )C: on 2004-09-14 13:46 [#01334773]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker



it ain't quite there yet.

 

offline oscillik from the fires of orc on 2004-09-14 13:46 [#01334775]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular



i'm gonna try this again, and hope that they've fixed the
stupid widget problem in Mac OS X

if not, it shall be deleted instantly

 

offline epohs from )C: on 2004-09-14 13:49 [#01334780]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker



although, i've been using the Preview Release, (or whatever
they're calling it), and it is just as stable as teh fox
ever was.

it's been my primary browser for knocking on two years now i
guess.

1.0 looks to me like it's going to be a very solid debut
too. the improved popup bar, ctrl+f, and plugin handling
are really slick. it absolutely destroys the competition
imo.


 

offline pf from Finland on 2004-09-14 13:51 [#01334783]
Points: 3316 Status: Lurker



yeah, and much more secure than.. ehm.. the rest..

and its just fast, and i love the tabs

 

offline epohs from )C: on 2004-09-14 13:52 [#01334784]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker | Followup to oscillik: #01334775



beware, this is not actually a 1.0 release.

it's 1.0 PR (Preview Release).

there are still bugs that they know of, that will be fixed
before 1.0.


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2004-09-14 13:53 [#01334786]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker | Followup to pf: #01334783



i'm significantly impressed with the improvements since 0.9.

 

offline oscillik from the fires of orc on 2004-09-14 13:55 [#01334790]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular



no they haven't fixed it

top picture is how it looks in FireFox running under OS X
(with incorrect widgets)

bottom pic is how it looks in Safari running under OS X
(with correct widgets)


Attached picture

 

offline epohs from )C: on 2004-09-14 13:57 [#01334793]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker | Followup to oscillik: #01334790



are you sure that's a bug?

i think it may be that gecko is letting the xltronic CSS
override the default widgets... which, i believe, is the
correct behavior.


 

offline rogu rarebit from beggin' for leggings on 2004-09-14 13:57 [#01334794]
Points: 2164 Status: Regular



Thanks, I downloaded it.

 

offline epohs from )C: on 2004-09-14 13:58 [#01334795]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker | Followup to epohs: #01334793



this may be a case of safari strong arming w3c standards.

i could very well be wrong though.

 

offline oscillik from the fires of orc on 2004-09-14 13:59 [#01334796]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular | Followup to epohs: #01334793



nope, it is a bug:
Attached picture

 

offline oscillik from the fires of orc on 2004-09-14 14:00 [#01334799]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular | Followup to epohs: #01334795



no, it's a case of FireFox not adhering to the Mac OS X GUI
standards: all widgets should have the Aqua interface


 

offline oscillik from the fires of orc on 2004-09-14 14:02 [#01334802]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular | Followup to epohs: #01334795



it's the same when running under a certain window manager in
*NIX / Linux

regardless of the CSS, the widgets should be the same as the
widgets in the rest of the GUI

that's why in Konquerer the widgets will reflect whatever
theme you have installed


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2004-09-14 14:04 [#01334803]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker | Followup to oscillik: #01334799



i mean, the w3c standard allows for CSS to define how
buttons look.

it seems to me that if safari overrides the CSS, then it is
taking control away from what the designer intended... but,
that's just the way i see it.


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2004-09-14 14:05 [#01334806]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker | Followup to oscillik: #01334802



Konquerer and safari both share the same rendering engine
(khtml) more or less... so, it goes to reason that they'd
render pages similarly.


 

offline oscillik from the fires of orc on 2004-09-14 14:06 [#01334807]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular | Followup to epohs: #01334803



it's not safari, because it works correctly in any other
browser for Mac OS X

i only have the problem with FireFox

 

offline vlari from beyond the valley of the LOLs on 2004-09-14 15:12 [#01334851]
Points: 13915 Status: Regular | Followup to oscillik: #01334807



wierd. i tried to replicate your bug, but all i got was a
normal reply box and buttons. i won't be changing browser
though, firefox looks crap compared to the lovelyness of
safari.
beats me what is wrong in your case.
Attached picture

 

offline oscillik from the fires of orc on 2004-09-14 15:56 [#01334898]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular | Followup to vlari: #01334851



that IS the bug i have!!

the buttons that you have in your screenshot shouldn't be
showing in the Mac OS X version of FireFox, because the GUI
.

it's either a bug, or FireFox is intentionally using
non-standard widgets under OS X. and until it's sorted out,
i refuse to use it. i'm using OS X because i don't wanna
have to look at windows style widgets


 

offline dariusgriffin from cool on 2004-09-14 16:01 [#01334906]
Points: 12426 Status: Regular | Followup to oscillik: #01334898



You're damn right, that is truly revolting.

 

offline pf from Finland on 2004-09-14 16:02 [#01334908]
Points: 3316 Status: Lurker | Followup to dariusgriffin: #01334906



lol..


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2004-09-14 16:03 [#01334910]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator



I might download this to stick it right up my ASS.

 

offline rogu rarebit from beggin' for leggings on 2004-09-14 16:10 [#01334915]
Points: 2164 Status: Regular | Followup to qrter: #01334910



What browser do you use?

 

offline giginger from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2004-09-14 16:41 [#01334936]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



OMG! A browser that displays things the same on BOTH MAC AND
PC?!?!?!?!?

DELETE THIS FROM THE INTERNET NOW!

 

offline tunemx from Budapest (Hungary) on 2004-09-15 02:09 [#01335218]
Points: 2144 Status: Webmaster | Show recordbag



hmm the find as you type text disappeared? If I type slash
first it works, but i really liked to use for finding links,
now that's not working crap.


 

offline horsefactory from 💠 (United Kingdom) on 2004-09-15 02:10 [#01335219]
Points: 14867 Status: Regular



It's still there but you have to ctrl-F first.


 

offline Neodoxy from Sydney on 2004-09-15 02:52 [#01335224]
Points: 50 Status: Lurker



*waves at some people*
Opera is the only way, if all you sinners repent now and see
the light you might still get into heaven (maybe)...


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2004-09-15 03:34 [#01335259]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to Neodoxy: #01335224



hee-hee!! nice League of Gentlemen avatar!

 

offline giginger from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2004-09-15 04:11 [#01335280]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Followup to Neodoxy: #01335224 | Show recordbag



My new favourite avatar!

 

offline pOgO from behind your belly button fluff on 2004-09-15 04:16 [#01335282]
Points: 12687 Status: Lurker | Followup to vlari: #01334851



and the aphex logo is squiffy

 

Messageboard index