Firewall question | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
recycle
...and 453 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614110
Today 7
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
Firewall question
 

offline giginger from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2004-06-13 07:14 [#01237816]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



I'm getting a motherboard with this chipset.

What I was wondering is if anyone knoew how good the onboard
firewall is?


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2004-06-13 07:27 [#01237831]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



Sounds toopid. Running a firewall at the level of your
computer, whether on a chip or as a piece of software, is
wrong. You want to block access BEFORE it gets to your
system, with say a Linksys router which is cheap and
effective. That way you can share system resources with
other computers on the lan without worrying about sharing /
not sharing them with the rest of the world.

:: waits for elusive to show up and call me names ::


 

offline giginger from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2004-06-13 07:31 [#01237832]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



Well I don't have a router at the moment. I'm networking my
house up later in the year so will have on then :) But your
words have been useful :)


 

offline sneakattack on 2004-06-13 07:38 [#01237834]
Points: 6049 Status: Lurker | Followup to fleetmouse: #01237831



I thought you used linux off and on?

firewall on your PC is fine, especially if you're too lazy
to have other devices; sometimes you don't have the luxury
of having a nice filter. Usually I use a cheap box (last
one was a p100 I picked up), but at the moment, in my small
apartment, I just use software firewalls on the my
laptop--better than nothing, and also nice because they can
adapt to whatever the laptop wants and sees at the moment.


 

offline pOgO from behind your belly button fluff on 2004-06-13 07:39 [#01237835]
Points: 12687 Status: Lurker | Followup to fleetmouse: #01237831



I can call you names untill he shows if you like? =o)


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2004-06-13 07:51 [#01237844]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to sneakattack: #01237834



Feh, you lunix zealots would rather spend days pissing
around with command line equations instead of just buying a
cheap router and spending your spare time golfing. :D

pOgO, insult mister nerd here instead.


 

offline sneakattack on 2004-06-13 07:54 [#01237848]
Points: 6049 Status: Lurker | Followup to fleetmouse: #01237844



it's definitely sensible to just by a router for <$100 which
gives wireless access, filters, etc etc; I didn't disagree
with your point, merely with some of the comments used when
substantiating it.

don't call me a linux zealot, I'll start thinking I've
really lost it


 

offline pOgO from behind your belly button fluff on 2004-06-13 07:57 [#01237850]
Points: 12687 Status: Lurker | Followup to sneakattack: #01237848



Your avatar looks like an algae's vagina



 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2004-06-13 08:00 [#01237856]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to sneakattack: #01237848



The thing I prefer about hardware firewalls is they require
no thinking by the user, so they're safer. And if the user
wants to change something he's 100% more likely to read the
manual, whereas with software he'll just click things and
mess it up. Plus many routers have extra ports in case
someone wants to bring over a laptop.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-06-13 08:07 [#01237862]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



Just got back from finishing off my home network (hence
having been offline a couple of days). I changed over which
machine was the firewall one and got "Sassered" :-(

All fixed now though!


 

offline giginger from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2004-06-13 08:09 [#01237863]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01237862 | Show recordbag



excuses excuses :P


 

offline sneakattack on 2004-06-13 08:09 [#01237865]
Points: 6049 Status: Lurker | Followup to fleetmouse: #01237856



I agree with your sensible point--the only thing I contested
was the implied 'never ever ever depend on firewalling only
at the level of the target machine'.

pOgO: who's the algae?


 

offline tlink from sofla (United States) on 2004-06-13 08:14 [#01237871]
Points: 403 Status: Regular



make sure its fire resistant


 

offline sneakattack on 2004-06-13 08:20 [#01237881]
Points: 6049 Status: Lurker | Followup to tlink: #01237871



only needed if it houses some sort of on-line community


 

offline nobsmuggler from silly mid-off on 2004-06-13 08:28 [#01237907]
Points: 6265 Status: Addict



a slight thread hijack my father-in-law has trouble with
slsk
when he searches he gets no results yet he can d/l straight
from me through slsk

could this be due to his firewall?

*note i havnt checked his pc setup yet


 

offline pOgO from behind your belly button fluff on 2004-06-13 08:29 [#01237909]
Points: 12687 Status: Lurker | Followup to sneakattack: #01237865



yo momma >=oD


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2004-06-13 09:36 [#01237996]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



fleetmouse,

but you forget maybe...just what happened with the latest
exploits of so called "cheap linksys routers".

hah, !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

onboard hardware is better than software, indeed.



 

offline xf from Australia on 2004-06-13 12:03 [#01238138]
Points: 2952 Status: Lurker



it wouldn't surprise me if that onboard 'firewall' was
actually a cpu in itself running a version of embedded
linux. the 'wizard' in windows simply interfaces to it to
add rules.

all sorts of wierd shit is coming out these days.

fyi, proper linux firewalling absolutely fucking pisses on
these cheap-firewalling-only-via-nat devices. it's got
nothing do with being a zealot, it's called actually having
more power over things. of course, i could point out that
most the devices actually do run, shock, embedded linux
anyway :-)


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2004-06-13 12:38 [#01238197]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to elusive: #01237996



What, the DHCP/BOOTP exploit? Fixed.


 

offline xf from Australia on 2004-06-13 13:01 [#01238231]
Points: 2952 Status: Lurker



no, the backdoor username/password.

their 'fix' was to change the username/password. yeah, real
faith in their products now.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2004-06-13 13:07 [#01238235]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to xf: #01238231



No, you're thinking of Netgear. Linksys did have a problem
on one of their wireless routers where remote admin was
always on even if you turned it off. The solution is easy -
change the password!


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2004-06-13 13:32 [#01238256]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to xf: #01238231



Oh duh, you are talking about Linksys - but come on,
changing the password from the default is something that
should be done on every piece of gear you buy.


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2004-06-13 13:41 [#01238283]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



the solution was NOT easy.

as it was exploited and took quite a while before a solution
was in place.

Bah, I don't discuss weak SOHO eq. ne ways.

H8


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2004-06-13 13:44 [#01238287]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



but yeah, fleet is on the right track,

having the public IP on an interface OTHER than your actual
computer is 1 step in the right direction.

But still, the onboard firewall is another great step in
home security.



 

offline giginger from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2004-06-13 16:00 [#01238490]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



thanks for the help people :D

You've also helped me know what wireless companies to ignore
:)


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2004-06-13 16:52 [#01238572]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



?


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2004-06-13 17:31 [#01238606]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



I sewed a buffalo pussy to my lips to show you what not to
do.


 

offline xf from Australia on 2004-06-13 23:37 [#01238923]
Points: 2952 Status: Lurker | Followup to fleetmouse: #01238256



backdoor password. you can't change it; it's seperate from
the admin password.


 

offline thecurbcreeper from United States on 2004-06-13 23:40 [#01238924]
Points: 6045 Status: Lurker



here's a not very funny picture relating to the topic:


Attached picture

 


Messageboard index