|
|
marlowe
from Antarctica on 2004-05-31 16:02 [#01216741]
Points: 24588 Status: Lurker
|
|
Hi - Cort just told me on SLSK that brian eno created the microsoft sound effects... is this, in fact, the truth? And what kind of fee system was employed if this IS fact?
|
|
oscillik
from the fires of orc on 2004-05-31 16:05 [#01216745]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular | Followup to marlowe: #01216741
|
|
if it is true, i think he would have been given a one off commission payment. Microsoft would not fall victim of the arse reaming that they gave IBM
|
|
nacmat
on 2004-05-31 16:07 [#01216748]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker
|
|
why isnt cort here?
|
|
corticalstim
from Canada on 2004-05-31 16:09 [#01216751]
Points: 3885 Status: Regular | Followup to nacmat: #01216748
|
|
i am - but there isnt much i can add to this thread.
|
|
aquinas
on 2004-05-31 16:10 [#01216752]
Points: 106 Status: Lurker
|
|
he created the opening sound when windows 95 started up. not sure how the royalties issue works.. all i know is he did it.
|
|
oscillik
from the fires of orc on 2004-05-31 16:15 [#01216757]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular | Followup to aquinas: #01216752
|
|
honestly, it wouldn't have been a one off payment - Microsoft got IBM to sign a legally binding contract so that Microsoft received a certain amount of money for every PC that IBM shipped with their Microsoft Basic.
They got millions from IBM, and i don't think IBM were very happy. Microsoft would be smarter than to pay someone a royalty for every copy of Windows 95 (or whatever Microsoft OS) sold. If there was a royalty for every copy sold, the guy who made the sound(s) would be able to retire his grandkids before they were born!
|
|
oscillik
from the fires of orc on 2004-05-31 16:15 [#01216758]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular | Followup to oscillik: #01216757
|
|
"honestly, it wouldn't have been a one off payment"
that should say it WOULD have been
|
|
clint
from Silencio... (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-31 16:22 [#01216769]
Points: 3447 Status: Lurker
|
|
I read that he was paid $1million to make the apple chime, that seems unlikely if he did the microsoft one...
|
|
Key_Secret
from Sverige (Sweden) on 2004-05-31 16:40 [#01216789]
Points: 9325 Status: Regular | Followup to aquinas: #01216752
|
|
yep that's also what I've heard.
|
|
SPD
from United States on 2004-05-31 17:02 [#01216831]
Points: 1090 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag
|
|
yeah i only ever heard he did the start-up sound for Win '95.
|
|
Key_Secret
from Sverige (Sweden) on 2004-05-31 17:05 [#01216836]
Points: 9325 Status: Regular | Followup to SPD: #01216831
|
|
you are defineatly not seen here very ofthen.. I didn't even know you were a mod! where's your avatar man!
|
|
fleetmouse
from Horny for Truth on 2004-05-31 17:21 [#01216869]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker
|
|
I expect that would have been done under a work-for-hire contract.
BTW, IBM's big mistake was not to pay Microsoft a fee for each unit sold - their mistake was to allow Microsoft to license Dos to other computer hardware manufacturers. At the time, no one else was making compatible PCs, and I guess IBM couldn't foresee that someone would reverse-engineer their BIOS and start making clones.
Sheez, Microsoft didn't even write Dos - they bought it from someone in Seattle. It was originally called Qdos. Talk about buy low-sell high.
|
|
oscillik
from the fires of orc on 2004-05-31 17:32 [#01216887]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular | Followup to fleetmouse: #01216869
|
|
yeh but the thing that kick started it all was back in the days of Basic, when IBM did pay Microsoft for every unit sold
:)
yep, Quick and Dirty Operating System was not coded by M$
:)
|
|
marlowe
from Antarctica on 2004-05-31 17:32 [#01216888]
Points: 24588 Status: Lurker | Followup to fleetmouse: #01216869
|
|
I remember Qdos! It was awesome!
|
|
oscillik
from the fires of orc on 2004-05-31 17:35 [#01216891]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular
|
|
i always wanted to get my hands on a copy of 4DOS
i could never find it though :(
|
|
sons of august
from the sacred cycles on 2004-05-31 17:36 [#01216895]
Points: 308 Status: Regular
|
|
the secret of success is constancy to purpose
|
|
fleetmouse
from Horny for Truth on 2004-05-31 17:38 [#01216898]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to marlowe: #01216888
|
|
Oh, you're pulling my tail, good sir.
|
|
ecnadniarb
on 2004-05-31 17:38 [#01216899]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to oscillik: #01216887 | Show recordbag
|
|
That was IBM's fault...Bill Gates wanted to sell the rights to IBM and IBM refused stating that they beleived there was no market for home computers...so they suggested that it be done on a license based agreement. Obviously they didn't enter into an exclusive licensing agreement because they didn't find the home market important. The rest is history.
|
|
marlowe
from Antarctica on 2004-05-31 17:42 [#01216904]
Points: 24588 Status: Lurker | Followup to fleetmouse: #01216898
|
|
I am NOT! I used to write in ... oh wait! I was thinking of QBASIC! How embarassing!
|
|
fleetmouse
from Horny for Truth on 2004-05-31 17:43 [#01216906]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to marlowe: #01216904
|
|
I used to play that game in qbasic, the one with the big monkey.
|
|
oscillik
from the fires of orc on 2004-05-31 17:47 [#01216913]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular | Followup to ecnadniarb: #01216899
|
|
oh right..........
yeh that'd make sense, because at the time IBM were primarily a mainframe producer, and as you rightfully said, were not that interested in the home computing market
:) thanks
|
|
Messageboard index
|