White With Dreadlocks | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
goDel
...and 130 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614635
Today 0
Topics 127575
  
 
Messageboard index
White With Dreadlocks
 

offline DeadEight from vancouver (Canada) on 2004-04-20 16:05 [#01152987]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular



i bet if you asked most devout rastafarians they wouldn't
give a rat's ass... people can do whatever the fuck they
please until it starts to significantly harm others... and
this, my friends, is not such an example...


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2004-04-20 16:13 [#01153002]
Points: 24600 Status: Regular | Followup to DeadEight: #01152987



I didn't say a law should be brought in, banning Whiteys
from having Dreadlocks ... I feel Whiteys should have some
respect for this Religion, and not turn something sacred
into one more lousy western soulless piece of shit fucking
cuntraggedy showy gauchy meaningless tripe
fashion/"lifestyle" drivel, that's all. not much to ask...
whites have their own stuff, like... umm .... something, I'm
sure ...


 

offline DeadEight from vancouver (Canada) on 2004-04-20 16:20 [#01153020]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular



if you dig deep enough... you could probably find something
highly offensive about just about anyone's attire... i fail
to see the point... no one has a fucking clue what they
represent, and frankly they shouldn't have to...
representation is bunk to begin with


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2004-04-20 16:24 [#01153037]
Points: 24600 Status: Regular | Followup to DeadEight: #01153020



That's mere presumption. And it's also false.


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2004-04-20 17:01 [#01153105]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker



ah yes, but the rastafarian religion is sufficiently obscure
as to warrant respect from the more cultured members of our
society.

 

if you happen to be a cretin with popular beliefs your
opinions are meaningless, and you are a sheep.


 

offline big from lsg on 2004-04-20 17:39 [#01153161]
Points: 23781 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



pff


 

offline Skink from A cesspool in eden on 2004-04-20 17:42 [#01153169]
Points: 7483 Status: Lurker



I know alot of people who have dreads, i can pretty much
safely assume that most of them are aware of the Rastafari
culture.

I also think that paul is just picking holes because he is
bored
but it actually is a fair point.

: )


 

offline bogala from NYC (United States) on 2004-04-20 18:43 [#01153264]
Points: 5125 Status: Regular



I offened at people being offended.


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2004-04-20 18:52 [#01153272]
Points: 14295 Status: Lurker | Followup to marlowe: #01152694



Marlowe is completely wrong on this one.


 

offline bogala from NYC (United States) on 2004-04-20 18:57 [#01153276]
Points: 5125 Status: Regular



"offened".put(5,"d");


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2004-04-20 18:58 [#01153278]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker | Followup to bogala: #01153276



yourpost._sweet = true;


 

offline bogala from NYC (United States) on 2004-04-20 19:02 [#01153280]
Points: 5125 Status: Regular



All because you are white means you can't practise
Rastafarianism?
Should not bathing be included in this religious
proclamation?


 

offline grinningcat from london (United Kingdom) on 2004-04-20 19:11 [#01153288]
Points: 1073 Status: Lurker



rastas smoke loads of dope anyway, they're too stoned to
care about such trivial things....


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2004-04-20 19:15 [#01153291]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to bogala: #01153280



no, Paul doesn't say you can't practice rastafarianism, but
how many white people with dreadlocks do you know who
actually practice aforementioned rastafarianism?

in other words, it has become a crass fashionstatement,
nothing more.


 

offline deepspace9mm from filth on 2004-04-20 19:20 [#01153294]
Points: 6846 Status: Addict



Hegemony, people. Unavoidable. Kinda like T-Shirts bearing
Che Guevara. Just accept it.

Personally i find it odd that any religion finds an aspect
of appearance sacred, but that might be just me.


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2004-04-20 19:26 [#01153300]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to deepspace9mm: #01153294



religion is not known for it's sense of logic.

but I do see Paul's point. it's the endless pillaging of
other cultures for something "new" and "cool", using it
without any idea what it stands for, etc. it's pretty empty.


 

offline deepspace9mm from filth on 2004-04-20 19:32 [#01153307]
Points: 6846 Status: Addict | Followup to qrter: #01153300



To: qrter
Re: your message

I concur.

Love,
me.

By the way, do you realize that MY NAME IS ALSO ALEX? I
shall grow dreadlocks and wear a turban to celebrate.


 

offline sneakattack on 2004-04-20 19:35 [#01153311]
Points: 6049 Status: Lurker



It's part of my religion to have a head on my shoulders.
please go cut yours off, fucking vagrants.


 

offline pomme de terre from obscure body in the SK System on 2004-04-20 19:36 [#01153312]
Points: 11941 Status: Moderator | Followup to qrter: #01153300 | Show recordbag



I agree with what you (and Paul F. Savage) are getting at. I
just can't see how we can keep it from happening.


 

offline DoctorMO from London (United Kingdom) on 2004-04-20 19:55 [#01153329]
Points: 99 Status: Regular



personally I don't care, it's all so fake and vain.

Oh and religion makes about as much sense as Netsky_B ;-)

-- DoctorMO --


 

offline roygbivcore from Joyrex.com, of course! on 2004-04-20 20:20 [#01153346]
Points: 22557 Status: Lurker



Did you know that in one of the books of the Bible (i think
it may be Genesis but i'm not sure at all) it states that it
is a sin to wear clothing made of more than one material?


 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2004-04-20 20:23 [#01153349]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



I'm pretty indifferent to the whole religious debate here,
for better or worse. I'm a Christian to the bone, but I
don't care about traditions and the like. I respect
religious practices even though I don't really partake in
(many of) them, and I think nobody has a monopoly on a
hairstyle, or a food, or a deity, or anything. If it's holy
to you, do it. Leave it at that. If Nigel wants to lower his
potent handsomeness by equipping himself with them, I don't
have any qualms. And if a Rastafarian does, well, as far as
I'm concerned, that's tough. That's my way of believing in
religion, it's entirely personal. I couldn't care less if I
see an obviously Godless heathen walking down the street
with a cross around her neck. We didn't invent the cross,
and as long as it means something to ME, that's all that
matters.

I like V's mullet idea, though.


 

offline DoctorMO from London (United Kingdom) on 2004-04-20 20:24 [#01153351]
Points: 99 Status: Regular



Pah, it's says in the Bible that helping people who are a
bit lame in one leg is wrong because they are unclean! in
fact when me and Cali ripped that section of the big book I
got the impression it was more of a 1,400 year old health
and safety pamphlet.



 

offline epohs from )C: on 2004-04-20 21:20 [#01153384]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker



this all kinda reminds me of back in the day when everyone
wanted to have the baddest pair of shoes that nobody else
had. when someone else bought the same pair you had it
didn't make your shoes less comfortable or anything.. but it
did make you less unique.

uniqueness is [arguably] a valuable thing when making an
artistic statement, but it's hardly valuable when taking a
moral stance, or deciding on a faith.

imo at least, some atheist guy having dreds doesn't in the
slightest way invalidate the rastafarian religion. and, if
it bothers a rastafarian, that illustrates a flaw in their
belief structure, not the person imitating them.


 

offline DeadEight from vancouver (Canada) on 2004-04-20 22:12 [#01153393]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular



first of all there's no way to prove that the first person
who ever sported dreadlocks was of the rastafarian religion
(or rather, this protorastafarianism that has been spoken
of... and why is it that rastafarianians are allowed to
coempt it but i am not?)... furthermore, i reject the idea
that someone can have control over what a signifier
signifies... (not that i even have dreads... nor would i
because my head is too small...)

but i'm not responding to this thread again... cause i feel
a little silly about defending this point (because marlowe
may very well have a point...)


 

offline bogala from NYC (United States) on 2004-04-20 23:09 [#01153410]
Points: 5125 Status: Regular



You know, Burkas are kinda cool looking. hmm..


 

offline DeadEight from vancouver (Canada) on 2004-04-20 23:13 [#01153413]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular



if anyone should be upset IT'S THE JAINISTS!


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2004-04-21 03:47 [#01153620]
Points: 24600 Status: Regular | Followup to deepspace9mm: #01153294



I will never accept T-Shirts bearing Che's image ... it's
disgusting to the core ... part of the very thing he was
fighting against, and now he's dead, he's being used against
himself ... nauseating to the max ... and bozoes like you
say "just accept it". Sounds like a slogan that one - go
preach it to the masses, or would that just be preaching to
the converted?


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2004-04-21 03:51 [#01153623]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to marlowe: #01153620



many wear those shirts cuz they're trendy. i don't.


 

offline JAroen from the pineal gland on 2004-04-21 03:55 [#01153626]
Points: 16065 Status: Regular



hehehe you can always count on marlowe to make a
controversial thread


 

offline Quernstone from Padova (Italy) on 2004-04-21 04:09 [#01153672]
Points: 1826 Status: Regular



Some people wear polo shirts and don't even play the game.
Suckers. I'm rich, I play, so I can wear one with pride off
the pitch.

Geddit?


 

offline Skink from A cesspool in eden on 2004-04-21 04:12 [#01153677]
Points: 7483 Status: Lurker | Followup to Quernstone: #01153672



Religion and polo are very different.

You can also blame ralph lauren for polo shirt popularity.


 

offline Quernstone from Padova (Italy) on 2004-04-21 04:16 [#01153681]
Points: 1826 Status: Regular



Indeed they are different.

My point is that fashion appropriates styles with boundless
facility. Shit, that is what makes it such a liquid art
form.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-04-21 04:29 [#01153700]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Ophecks: #01153349 | Show recordbag



I couldn't care less if I
see an obviously Godless heathen walking down the street
with a cross around her neck. We didn't invent the cross,
and as long as it means something to ME, that's all that
matters.


Spot on. Christians didn't invent the (Roman) cross and
there are plenty of other sorts of crosses (like those
Egyptian ones that look like "T"s). The significance
attached to it is part of my religion, not the cross itself.
The only reason things like people defacing the cross is
offensive to me is that they are obviously defacing the
significance Christians attach to it.
As some people have already pointed out, dreadlocks were
around before the Rastafarian religion and it's the
significance attached to them that makes them "holy" in
their eyes.

It's also worth pointing out that there are plenty of black
people who are not Rastafarians who wear dreadlocks (two
black friends of mine who are Christians have dreadlocks).


 

offline Quernstone from Padova (Italy) on 2004-04-21 04:34 [#01153710]
Points: 1826 Status: Regular | Followup to Ceri JC: #01153700



I'll second that. Whilst at secondary school my mate (black)
had dreads and he was a christian. He has subsequently had
his head shaved....


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2004-04-21 05:11 [#01153740]
Points: 24600 Status: Regular | Followup to Ceri JC: #01153700



Yes, but Christianity is a whore's religion, isn't it? It's
meaningless - the original Christians were Jewish. It wasn't
until the Roman Empire realised that Christianity was gonna
topple them, that they defeated it by claiming it for its
own, promoting "Jesus Christ" to being the Messiah, and
cobbling together The New Testement, using scrolls and
"books" that suited them, and damning the rest as being
False. It's a load of shit, and everytime I see a non-white
Christian, I feel like crying.

Dreadlock wearing predates Rastafarianism, in a Religious
Context. Those two uncle toms of yours, Ceri, are just as
bad as a Whitey with Dreadlocks, a sorry fact.

And before you jump on me, no I'm not saying all Black
people should worship Rocks...


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-04-21 05:47 [#01153774]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to marlowe: #01153740 | Show recordbag



Surely the fact that early Christians were Jewish shows that
it's not a "white man's religion"? I know their skin tone is
similar, but (ethnically) Jewish people are different to
Caucasians. Or are you conveniantlly grouping light skinned
races together? (which is a bit like saying, "these darkies
are all alike" refering to black people, dark skinned
eastern indians, etc.)


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2004-04-21 05:51 [#01153780]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker | Followup to marlowe: #01153620



Yeah, but Che is a flawed hero anyway. He failed to
recognise the working class as the agent of revolution.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-04-21 05:52 [#01153785]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to jonesy: #01153780 | Show recordbag



Speak of the deviland he shall appear, eh Marlowe?


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2004-04-21 05:52 [#01153786]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker



Whites with dreadlocks look dumb. Not because it should be
the preserve of black for cultural reasons; it just doesn't
look good with non-black hair.


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2004-04-21 05:53 [#01153788]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01153785



Get back to the books Ceri. You have your finals coming up.
?Where will your Xltronic friends be when you stand there
with your slip of paper that reads 2:2!


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-04-21 05:55 [#01153790]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to jonesy: #01153788 | Show recordbag



"Whites with dreadlocks look dumb. Not because it should
be
the preserve of black for cultural reasons; it just doesn't

look good with non-black hair. "
Agreed.

Fair one! Must... finish... law essay...


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2004-04-21 06:00 [#01153797]
Points: 24600 Status: Regular | Followup to Ceri JC: #01153774



I don't have a beef with early Christians, Ceri, so what are
you going on about the colour of Jewish skin for! :D
Christianity is NOW a white man's religion, because it was
hi-jacked, as i've noted before on this here MB.
Christianity after the foundation of the Holy Roman Church
is entirely different to Christianity as it was before the
Holy Roman Church.


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2004-04-21 06:07 [#01153805]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker



so it all boils down to religious eliteism eh?

 

that seems to be a widespread problem in the world today.


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2004-04-21 06:12 [#01153809]
Points: 24600 Status: Regular | Followup to epohs: #01153805



not eliteism, no. one person's respect for something
considered sacred to another, rather than using it as a
shallow fashion statement. I think that is what it boils
down to.


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2004-04-21 06:20 [#01153825]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker



well then, i believe we'll just have to agree to disagree
then. i don't believe that anyone else's religious belief
structure should be able to dictate my actions.

but, i would call it eliteism in this case, because you
don't think christianities quarky beliefs should affect what
you do, however, because you respect the rastas you think
that their quarky beliefs should affect me.


 

offline pomme de terre from obscure body in the SK System on 2004-04-21 06:27 [#01153840]
Points: 11941 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



Guys,


Attached picture

 

offline Quernstone from Padova (Italy) on 2004-04-21 07:10 [#01153948]
Points: 1826 Status: Regular | Followup to marlowe: #01153809



I don't believe it is a 'fashion statement'. It is just
fashion.


 

offline Ganymede from Tlön, Uqbar, Orbis Tertius on 2004-04-21 21:08 [#01155184]
Points: 1045 Status: Lurker



Embrace all religion

Be free from all religion

Open to life and light and truth and love.


 

offline roygbivcore from Joyrex.com, of course! on 2004-04-21 21:29 [#01155190]
Points: 22557 Status: Lurker



is that from "Bad Dudes"?

"THE PRESIDENT HAS BEEN KIDNAPPED BY NINJAS ARE YOU A BAD
ENOUGH DUDE TO RESCUE HIM?"


 


Messageboard index