Spain's Election Today | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (2)
big
dariusgriffin
...and 398 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614082
Today 2
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
Spain's Election Today
 

offline Xanatos from New York City (United States) on 2004-03-14 12:06 [#01107548]
Points: 3316 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



This is a fucking historic moment.
This might be a people standing up to their leader and
saying:
"Your policy brought terrorism upon us, not vice versa"
And use their vote to change that leader and policy.
It may also be a day to say:
"It's time to stand up to terrorism"
In solidarity with Bush, Blair and the reigning right.

Bush Blair, Aznar, Rajoy, etc. want this attack to be Al
Qaeda. Imagine what would happen if the people took
responsibility for a terrorists attack, and began fighting
terror at home, rather than through never ending warfare.
If the socialistas win, this could change the tone of the
whole world.



 

offline Jazembo from The Earth ball on 2004-03-14 12:10 [#01107553]
Points: 2788 Status: Regular | Followup to Xanatos: #01107548



No matter who you vote for, there will always be a
government.


 

offline promo from United Kingdom on 2004-03-14 12:16 [#01107559]
Points: 4227 Status: Addict



I disagree.

You want to know something? I recall watching a documentary
the other day and only reason this muslim extremist
terrorist guy gave for being anti-west is that we're light
on homosexuality. My view is that although you might not
like think so we do basically live in a pretty liberal
democracy. Also compared to a lot of Muslim states we do
basically have a lot of rights which often people choose to
be ignorant of. Now if you can't recognise that then I'm at
a loss. Fact is for these terrorists its a religious thing
so you can't appeal to them on intellectual level. I have no
idea what their motivation is. I honestly don't know but one
thing is for sure for all the West's supposed ills; we don't
even begin to touch some of the attrociates of other
countries/states.


 

offline promo from United Kingdom on 2004-03-14 12:18 [#01107561]
Points: 4227 Status: Addict



Jazembo,

Post was directed at Xanatos by the way.


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2004-03-14 12:18 [#01107562]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



infact aznar is trying to blame eta for the attacks...i
wouldn't be surprised if his popular party would win the
election - people can be really silly sometimes, especially
elder ppl


 

offline promo from United Kingdom on 2004-03-14 12:19 [#01107564]
Points: 4227 Status: Addict | Followup to tolstoyed: #01107562



Well someone has done it. Put it this way its pretty
unlikely it was the IRA. Lol.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-03-14 12:23 [#01107568]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



I disagree. Had the reverse occured; that is, it had Eta
been responsible and Al Qaeda were blamed, people would of
still been up in arms. They would claim that the government
knew it was Eta, yet blamed Al Qaeda to further justify the
war in Iraq. When the problem was really "at home"...

Sadly, in a situation like this there are no "winners". If
it weren't such a painful subject, I'd find it laughable
that the government are being made out to be the bad guys,
when it's quite obviously the terrorists who are in the
wrong.


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2004-03-14 12:26 [#01107572]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to Ceri JC: #01107568



well, wrong policy can lead to terrorism imo.


 

offline promo from United Kingdom on 2004-03-14 12:30 [#01107577]
Points: 4227 Status: Addict | Followup to Ceri JC: #01107568



We're in mutual agreement as usual.


 

offline promo from United Kingdom on 2004-03-14 12:34 [#01107584]
Points: 4227 Status: Addict | Followup to tolstoyed: #01107572



What have these terrorists got to gain? I just don't get
their agenda. They're trying to forcefully push their
agenda/will upon Western societies. Thing is I don't mind if
a people's chose is to vote in or support loonies but at
least give them the choice in the first place. A lot of
these countries/states never got that option.



 

offline Xanatos from New York City (United States) on 2004-03-14 12:44 [#01107592]
Points: 3316 Status: Moderator | Followup to promo: #01107584 | Show recordbag



You don't think were trying to forcefully push our
agenda/will upon their societies?


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2004-03-14 12:51 [#01107599]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



"They're trying to forcefully push their agenda/will upon
Western societies"

i thought that is what western society is doing to them...

ofcourse these attacks are terrible and people who are
behind them should be punished, but maybe western
politicians could prevent these attacks in the first place.

"Thing is I don't mind if
a people's chose is to vote in or support loonies but at
least give them the choice in the first place"

im not sure if i understand this right - you're saying
there's no democracy in this countries, like iraq - ofcourse
there were many people against the regim of husein, but
there were also a lot of people supporting him, at least
that is what i've read from people that were living in iraq.
what they say on bbc and cnn it isn't always the whole
story, they just show what they are allowed to show...


 

offline Xanatos from New York City (United States) on 2004-03-14 12:57 [#01107602]
Points: 3316 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



Without turning this into a political debate about terrorism
I hope nacmat or any others in spain will bring this back on
topic and let us know if they voted and for whom and why.


 

offline promo from United Kingdom on 2004-03-14 12:59 [#01107604]
Points: 4227 Status: Addict



Well look I think its pretty fare to say that if any leader
starts to wipe his opponents and people in his country for
political ends then he can expect in due course to be dealt
with by Western powers.

Now I don't really follow your argument. You're not really
suggesting that because Saddam Hussein had supporters (who
no doubt were corrupted by money, other means or were most
likely from the same tribe) that he should have remained in
power or that by having supporters somehow excuses his
actions (those being the quite obvious and servere abuse of
human rights).


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2004-03-14 13:03 [#01107610]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



thing about elections is that people who would be capable of
runing a country are all sucessful in what they do, so they
don't want to get involved in politics...that is why
elections are crap, you can only pick among no good people
imo. (i don't kno what is it like in all the other
countries, but i know that's a fact in my country)


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2004-03-14 13:07 [#01107614]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to promo: #01107604



ofcourse it's a good thing hussein was removed, all i was
trying to say is that he probably had as many supporters as
enemies among his people.


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2004-03-14 13:07 [#01107617]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



but terrorists have nothing to do with iraq...11.09 occured
before the iraq war


 

offline promo from United Kingdom on 2004-03-14 13:08 [#01107619]
Points: 4227 Status: Addict | Followup to tolstoyed: #01107610



Come on Tolstoyed :-), I think you're asking for perfection.
Fact is you can vote in someone (if they're available) who
broadly speaking represents your views. No single party will
exactly fit every individual's views. Now how bad can that
really be? In every country there are usually 2/3 big
parties that just the way it is.


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2004-03-14 13:10 [#01107622]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to promo: #01107619



yeah, that's just the way it is...that is also way i haven't
voted for any of them in my whole life, and apparently i'll
continue to do so


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2004-03-14 13:11 [#01107624]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



way=why


 

offline promo from United Kingdom on 2004-03-14 13:13 [#01107626]
Points: 4227 Status: Addict | Followup to tolstoyed: #01107617



Iraq was unfinished business. And in my view 9/11 was never
relevant. I felt very uncomfortable with something not being
done.

A lot of Iraqis pre the war were frightened that the
American's would just leave them like last time and that
revenge would be sought and thats why a lot of Iraqis didn't
want to get involved or seemed very aloof. You gotta
appreciate you're dealing with an environment of total fear,
total oppression. One just can't imagine what that does to
people.


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2004-03-14 13:16 [#01107630]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to promo: #01107626



is there any particular reason why you think all that? how
come you're so certain about it? i mean, do you really
belive everything that is being put to you by media? cuz i
sure don't


 

offline promo from United Kingdom on 2004-03-14 13:21 [#01107637]
Points: 4227 Status: Addict



The media isn't relevant to this. Its a question of
deduction based on human nature and other circumstance. I
just can't understand why you wouldn't support the obvious
arguments for going to war and dealing with 'Saddam'. The
humantarian issue is just so obvious and clear as a bell.
Sorry I'm just completely lost.


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2004-03-14 13:24 [#01107639]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



cuz maybe it could be dealt with in a more peaceful way?


 

offline promo from United Kingdom on 2004-03-14 13:30 [#01107654]
Points: 4227 Status: Addict | Followup to tolstoyed: #01107630



On the media issue. We have free media in this country (UK).
They're not the Government's voice if thats what you're
suggesting. You need only to have heard of the ongoing spat
between the Government and the BBC over the '45 minute
dossier'. Individual journalists and editors make their
choices as to how to represent the issues. The media as a
whole tend to only report disasters, murders and other bad
news. The media diet is one of constant deaths, murders and
attrociaties - this is not reality. And isn't uplifting but
its what they choose to feed us.

Usually the media, certainly locally, will broadly speaking
support the voice of the people but they do that because it
is in their interest to sell papers not because they choose
to.


 

offline nacmat on 2004-03-14 13:31 [#01107656]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker



I voted of course

for PSOE



 

offline DeadEight from vancouver (Canada) on 2004-03-14 13:32 [#01107659]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular



the aim of terrorist sure as hell isn't to push their
religious views on us... the vast majority of them (though
perhaps not all... because people are fucked up) are merely
reacting to desperate situations that they and their
countrymen have been forced into in their own homelands by
western powers... it's not about whether or not certain
governments are good or bad... it's incredibly dangerous to
just allow Western powers to just intervene in any affairs
that they see fit (and let's face it, in a whole lot of
these situations, there is more to be gained by the west
than just knowing that there's one more liberal democracy in
the world...)... large portions of the world reject the
ideological practices of the west and, for many, it must
seem like the only way they can have any chance of affecting
their future... that said, i definitely think they are
horribly misguided... by attacking civilians, they are only
hardening the world against their causes, when if there's
anyone they should be trying to sway, it's the civilian
populous of the world, whom, in many western democracies,
are more aware than ever of the crimes that their countries
have committed against some of these
less-than-self-determining nations...


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2004-03-14 13:39 [#01107666]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to promo: #01107654



yes, oficially all the media is free, not related to any
party...but im affraid it isn't so in many cases. sometimes
(especially during the war in iraq) i've read many sites and
they all differ to what was written in one of our papers,
who im almost certain has no party influence at all...i know
all the other media in my country is crap tho, so i don't
really take to seriously what's in the papers or
internet...i like to hear people who are involved with it
and know the situation, what they have to say and i noticed
many times that it is totally different to what media have
to say...


 

offline promo from United Kingdom on 2004-03-14 13:45 [#01107675]
Points: 4227 Status: Addict | Followup to tolstoyed: #01107639



How? The US/UK gave Saddam Hussein plenty of opportunity to
leave the country before they went to war with him or did
you forget that? They put as much pressure on Hussein and
his followers to leave as they possible could before even
setting foot on Iraq. Now if thats not peaceful then please
tell me what is. The very fact that Saddam didn't budge was
because he probably felt the American's/NATO ultimately
wouldn't have the balls to go in (they'd been weak and
uneffective in the past afterall) but more importantly than
that he didn't want to loose power. You've got understand a
man like this, Saddam Hussein wasn't going to give up power
certainly not without significant pressure in the first
place.

That pressure didn't work so we were left with little
choice. Can't you understand that? What good is it
pressurising someone, peacefully I might add, and then when
they still refuse to leave peacefully not actually taking
any action? We bent over backwards to give Saddam a way out
more than he ever ever deserved.

People in power always want to hold on to it for as long as
they can and screw the consequences. And dictators are a
seriously extreme version of this is the kinda of
individual. This is just human nature afterall whether this
be at a national, local, company, social or any other level.
I just can't understand while you're not able to understand
this.


 

offline promo from United Kingdom on 2004-03-14 13:51 [#01107682]
Points: 4227 Status: Addict | Followup to DeadEight: #01107659



What cause? What abject poverty, tribal warfare, religious
tirrany? I have no idea what their beef is with the West.
They fucking blame us for their own problems it makes me
sick. These countries create they're own problems often the
West have little or no involvement in these countries
whatsoever anyway. And their leaders basically loot and
pluder what they can from their people's and kill and mame
just to stay in power. The whole lot of it makes me puke.
Now how the fuck is that our fault?


 

offline DeadEight from vancouver (Canada) on 2004-03-14 13:55 [#01107687]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular



okay man, you have to read up on the last 50 years worth of
imperialism... do you know how many dictators have gained
power because they were co-operative with western regimes...
do you know how many millions of civilians have
suffered/died so that a handful of countries could bolster
their profits? ever heard of Pinochet? ever heard of the
Shah? ever heard of Saddam Hussein (yes that's right)? i
could go on and on and on... but i think you should take the
time to find out for yourself from sources more reputable
than my recollection...


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2004-03-14 13:59 [#01107691]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to promo: #01107675



so he was offered to leave the country peacefuly?
us/uk were pissed of cuz of 9/11 and they wanted to show of
with their military power - what better than to attack the
devastated iraq, and blame the terrorism for it...the un
inspectors were working on it as far as i know. but after
the threats from us where getting bigger, iraq sent them out
of the country...



 

offline promo from United Kingdom on 2004-03-14 14:04 [#01107696]
Points: 4227 Status: Addict | Followup to DeadEight: #01107687



I've been over this ground a billion times. And my short
answer for you is I entirely disagree.

Anyway thats it for me 'cause these threads end up going on
forever.


 

offline DeadEight from vancouver (Canada) on 2004-03-14 14:08 [#01107699]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular



what do you mean? you disagree with history? these are
hardly speculations we are talking about here...


 

offline promo from United Kingdom on 2004-03-14 14:10 [#01107702]
Points: 4227 Status: Addict | Followup to tolstoyed: #01107691



Ok lets forget this. I genuinely give up. For some reason
you wanted to leave Saddam in power and let him continue to
fuck his people up. I've already stated that this was for me
always a Humantarian issue but you keep going back to 9/11.
So lets leave it 'cause quite frankly I've had enough.


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2004-03-14 14:17 [#01107705]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to promo: #01107702



hmm, i can't leave it when you make a comment like this for
the end :)
"Humantarian issue"
it's quite clear that they weren't in for the humanitarian
reasons, but for the money and power...you probably know
that to send and equipt such arm isn't cheap - the fact is
they (the us and uk governament) rather spend this money to
help the iraqi people, instead of helping their own
citizens...im sure you know a large part of population is us
is living in poverty and many of those are homeless - now
what kind of life is that, and on the other hand this sam
country is spending bilions for making a war (helping some
other nation). it was all about the money. and once again,
it was right to put away hussein, but it could be done
different, that is all im saying.


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2004-03-14 14:17 [#01107706]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



arm=army


 

offline promo from United Kingdom on 2004-03-14 14:20 [#01107707]
Points: 4227 Status: Addict



:-)


 

offline Xanatos from New York City (United States) on 2004-03-14 15:19 [#01107754]
Points: 3316 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



THE PSOE WON!!!!


 

offline DeadEight from vancouver (Canada) on 2004-03-14 15:22 [#01107756]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular



P(Socialista?)OE


 

offline pantalaimon from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2004-03-14 15:23 [#01107757]
Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



in my opinion the Iraq war is the beggining of a downard
spiral for this planet. Unless there is a massive change in
US foreign policy or human nature, neither will happen soon.


 

offline DeadEight from vancouver (Canada) on 2004-03-14 15:31 [#01107765]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular | Followup to pantalaimon: #01107757



i'd say it started before iraq... but yes, everything that
happens in the next little while is of the utmost
importance... we're running very very close to destroying
ourselves, and the ideals we pretend to live for...


 

offline nacmat on 2004-03-14 17:29 [#01107908]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker | Followup to Xanatos: #01107754



happy

sad still for the victims


 

offline deepspace9mm from filth on 2004-03-14 17:34 [#01107915]
Points: 6846 Status: Addict



This is a good thing... sending a signal to the warmongers.
Byebye aznar, you fucking tool.


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2004-03-14 17:38 [#01107920]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



nice to see spanish people oposing their old governament...
i sure hope we won't need terrible events like spain has
been through, to vote for a better party (but there isn't a
good one insight unfortunately...)


 

offline Xanatos from New York City (United States) on 2004-03-14 21:06 [#01108147]
Points: 3316 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



Can you imagine the American people responding to a
terrorist attack by blaming Bush or his policies?

We would be bombarded with propoganda and people would just
run around foaming at the mouth so they could 'bring the
terrorists' to justice.


 


Messageboard index