A review that sums Lost in Translation up perfectly | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
big
...and 625 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614121
Today 4
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
A review that sums Lost in Translation up perfectly
 

offline explodingplasti on 2004-02-29 20:57 [#01094223]
Points: 6 Status: Lurker



http://www.yaledailynews.com/article.asp?AID=23435

Perfect really. First review yet that has really paralled my
feeling for this movie. A dreadful film that is only worth
watching for the "train-wreck" appeal.


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2004-02-29 21:12 [#01094227]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator



hello.


 

offline Gwely Mernans from 23rd century entertainment (Canada) on 2004-02-29 21:23 [#01094234]
Points: 9856 Status: Lurker



i cant wait to see it


 

offline Xanatos from New York City (United States) on 2004-02-29 21:31 [#01094235]
Points: 3316 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



I agree mostly with this review. I didn't like the film
mostly because the characters were just empty shells of
human beings. I actively disliked them, and felt that they
were just as shitty characters as the people they surrounded
themselves with, (the blonde actress, the hip hop guy, the
wife on the phone, etc.) Johanson is a yale philosophy
graduate who doesn't have the slightest interest in a
buddhist temple and its practices?


 

offline Xanatos from New York City (United States) on 2004-02-29 21:32 [#01094236]
Points: 3316 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



really not worth the hype,

When I read:
In America's current movie environment, "Lost in
Translation" might be the best thing out there, despite its
flaws. This reveals its most important function -- as an
alarm that our film artists need to try harder and that
audiences need to demand more.

I would say go out and see Return of the King again, or the
Battle of Algiers, that was fucking spectacular.


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2004-02-29 21:35 [#01094237]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator



Sofia Copolla just won the oscar for best screenplay.


 

offline bogala from NYC (United States) on 2004-02-29 22:04 [#01094270]
Points: 5125 Status: Regular



Interesting that this was written by someone at Yale. The
mecca of privilage.


 

offline kc from Vancouver (Canada) on 2004-02-29 22:55 [#01094298]
Points: 335 Status: Regular



"It would have nice to see how Murray dealt with ..."

Not privileged enough to have an editor, by the looks of it.


 

offline optimus prime on 2004-02-29 22:59 [#01094299]
Points: 6447 Status: Lurker



i've come to accept that this movie sucks. BUT i still enjoy
it for a lot of the cinematography.


 

offline uviol from United States on 2004-02-29 23:19 [#01094301]
Points: 2496 Status: Lurker



Um no.
So she's priveliged.. therefore movie = bad. That's the
worst logic I've ever heard.
The film was great. It moved me more than any other movie
last year. Fuck the critics.


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2004-02-29 23:20 [#01094303]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to uviol: #01094301



most critics are pretty happy to ecstatic with it.


 

offline DeadEight from vancouver (Canada) on 2004-03-01 00:16 [#01094311]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular



it wasn't a fan-fucking-tastic movie... but i don't buy most
of the criticisms leveled against it here... the alienation
from a lot of hollywood standards that the critic seems to
feel here are intentional... and make up the bulk of what is
trying to be expressed in lost in translation... your life
doesn't have a tight-fitting plot arc... not everyone has
flings on their holidays (in fact most people keep to
themselves for the most part... so in some ways the
interactions of the quasi-lover should be eventful enough in
themselves...)
-the movie certainly runs the risk of convincing the viewers
that the japanese culture is silly and absurd... but the
real point is that these kind of constructs are present
everywhere... murray can't relate with his business
associates, his wife, or the vast majority of the people he
encounters in japan... but there are times where the
characters do transcend the formal rigidity of societal
structures and get to know each other on some level, despite
the language barrier (the karaoke scene comes to mind)... in
fact i'd say that music is a tool used in the film to
transcend the symbolic barriers of language that we have
thrown up between cultures and individuals...

that said, it was a nice small film and not much more...
fuck this terrible year for movies...


 

offline bogala from NYC (United States) on 2004-03-01 01:22 [#01094336]
Points: 5125 Status: Regular



I met an awesome girl on the train from Boston to New
York...We sucked face the entire time. It was amazing.


 

offline pantalaimon from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2004-03-01 03:16 [#01094358]
Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



i agree with most reviews... that it's awesome. It really is
one of the best films i've seen in recent years and easily
in my top 10.

Strange that you feel the need to go out of your way to find
a review to support the fact that you don't like it.


 

offline pantalaimon from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2004-03-01 03:19 [#01094359]
Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



"that said, it was a nice small film and not much more...
fuck this terrible year for movies..."

not at all, I thought it's the best year for a wile:

Big Fish
Lost In Translation
Spirited Away
Dark Water
Kill Bill
Dogville


 

offline pantalaimon from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2004-03-01 03:24 [#01094360]
Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag




"how did Johansson's character graduate from Yale while
living in Los Angeles with her photographer husband at the
same time?"

shit yeah, I was thinking about that all through the movie!

I tried reading all of that review but it's so off the mark
its unbelievable, "visual interpretation is drab and flat"??
haha how can he be taken seriously?


 

offline pantalaimon from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2004-03-01 03:28 [#01094361]
Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Followup to uviol: #01094301 | Show recordbag



"So she's priveliged.. therefore movie = bad. That's the
worst logic I've ever heard."

read the whole review and you'll find more than just that


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2004-03-01 04:15 [#01094377]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



haha, people who wrote that review totally missed the point
of the film...


 

offline mc_303_beatz from Glasgow, Scotland on 2004-03-01 04:23 [#01094379]
Points: 3386 Status: Regular



That is probably the most spasticated review I have ever had
the misfortune of reading. It's obvious this reviewers idea
of subtlety is having a concrete slab dropped on your head.

It would have nice to see how Murray dealt with getting
rid of the unwanted lounge singer in his bedroom, or to see
how she got there in the first place.


Isn't that fuckin obvious?

Deary me. Some people are just born back to front or
something.

My opinion of course ;-)


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2004-03-01 04:25 [#01094380]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to mc_303_beatz: #01094379



hehe, that would certanly make a film much clearer.


 

offline horsefactory from 💠 (United Kingdom) on 2004-03-01 04:36 [#01094381]
Points: 14867 Status: Regular



What a stupid idiot.


 

offline DJ Xammax from not America on 2004-03-01 05:20 [#01094400]
Points: 11512 Status: Lurker



Well I liked it.

So fuck him.


 

offline pOgO from behind your belly button fluff on 2004-03-01 05:31 [#01094414]
Points: 12687 Status: Lurker



I disagree with the most of that review.

I can see how some people find it boring cause the most of
it is left up to your own imagineation, wich some people
don;t like to use when watching a film (You usually find
that these people very rarley take the time to read a book)

It was quite a slow film and there were parts I feel could
have been beefed out a bit (The mentioned bit with the
lounge singer in his room) But all in all I thought it was a
very moving, beatifull peice of work

The "Branding" on it has got nothing to do with it. I'm a
total dunce when it comes to names, of actors as well as
directors, so this movie could be made by Peter Andre for
all I knew, and I couldent name you one movie by Francis
Ford without having to google him (Although I've probably
seen a few)


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2004-03-01 06:15 [#01094470]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



"Sofia Coppola is the privileged daughter of Hollywood. " -
I agree, that gives it all away in the first line. The
reviewers are flagellating themselves by proxy for the sin
of being privileged, and for seeing themselves in
Charlotte's character.

Tamas Toro is on the Yale rowing team.

Look how Elizabeth Deters yaps that her easy life
isn't easy enough.


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2004-03-01 06:27 [#01094481]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker



"The characters are hollow, the plot is shapeless, and the
visual interpretation is drab and flat."

You can tell the reviewer is clueless by his/her prose. What
a fuckin balloon-head.


 

offline euphonicfilter from illadelphia (United States) on 2004-03-01 06:46 [#01094493]
Points: 2443 Status: Addict



i think a lot of people severely misunderstood the movie

when she attends the temple she is realizing that nothing
means anything to her - she's bored with life

im not gonna sit here and explain the whole movie - if you
didnt get it you didnt get it

however i think on a scale from 1 to 10 its an 8


 

offline Jarworski from The Grove (United Kingdom) on 2004-03-01 06:47 [#01094494]
Points: 10836 Status: Lurker



It needed some fucking wizards goddamit!


 

offline DeadEight from vancouver (Canada) on 2004-03-01 08:19 [#01094612]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular | Followup to pantalaimon: #01094359



well, i haven't seen big fish yet, to be fair... but, imo,
this year pales in comparison to past years... Kill Bill was
definitely good, but not up to snuff with his best... same
can be said for the Coen brothers film... last year had
Punch Drunk Love, and Spider, and the Pianist... the year
before had the Royal Tenenbaums (probably the best film i've
seen since the beginning of this decade), and Mullholland
Drive, and No Man's Land... George Washington is better than
this year's offering All the Real Girls (although, that was
pretty darn good, in spite of its flaws)... etc, etc, etc...


 

offline horsefactory from 💠 (United Kingdom) on 2004-03-01 08:21 [#01094613]
Points: 14867 Status: Regular | Followup to euphonicfilter: #01094493



Man, everyone in this thread was disagreeing with the
review. I think we all "got" the film, you pretentious fool.



 

offline evolume from seattle (United States) on 2004-03-01 10:10 [#01094702]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular



i love this film.


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2004-03-01 10:10 [#01094706]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



except for explodingplasti ofcourse...but he doesn't count


 

offline evolume from seattle (United States) on 2004-03-01 10:13 [#01094713]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular



wow, i totally disagree with virtually everything in that
review.

but that's the beauty of cinimatic art. each person has
their own interpretation i guess.


 

offline acrid milk hall from United Kingdom on 2004-03-01 10:47 [#01094760]
Points: 2916 Status: Lurker



that review is wrong.
on every level.

and, yes, i do realise that this is just my opinion.
but it's a fact.
it is the truth.
m'kay?


 

offline DeLtoiD from Ontario on 2004-03-01 10:47 [#01094761]
Points: 2934 Status: Lurker



i watched this movie last weekend. i liked it, but thats
about it...

i smiled and thought "isn't that pretty" but nothing more, i
didn't take it as some inoovative, new, breaking-barriers
kind of film.

i guess the building of a relationship between strangers in
a strange land seems incredible to some people.

sometimes, people are just lonely. i'm sure anyone would do
the same thing, but yeah, i'd prolly end up banging the
chick in the end


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2004-03-01 10:49 [#01094762]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to DeLtoiD: #01094761



"i
didn't take it as some inoovative, new, breaking-barriers
kind of film.
"

when was the last time you saw something like this?

and btw, i doubt sofia wanted her film to be any of that...


 

offline acrid milk hall from United Kingdom on 2004-03-01 10:51 [#01094763]
Points: 2916 Status: Lurker



in a year of big, dramatic films - it was nice to see
something which reflects the fact that the most affecting
things in life are the subtleties.


 

offline aphextriplet from your mothers bedroom (United Kingdom) on 2004-03-01 10:53 [#01094764]
Points: 4731 Status: Lurker



i fucking LOVE this film. That review is a bag of cacky cack
pants. The whole point of the film is that it doesnt have a
big movie climax, or a big soppy ending like all other
romantic films, which just live in the fantasy world that is
hollywood. Its such a pretty film too. Man, that reviewer
needs to get a new job.


 

offline virginpusher from County Clare on 2004-03-01 10:55 [#01094765]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker | Followup to euphonicfilter: #01094493



yup.

I'm not even going to read that review though. Some one
quoted something from it where it made reference to how the
lounge singer got there and how she left.

I am curious as to how that would have improved the movie in
any logical sense. It's like explaining to a child the
developments in a movie geared towards adults.

As to how she got there in the first place... they were
sharing drinks and being social. This happens on a day to
day basis all over the world. Some guy gets drunk and takes
a girl home and doesnt remember. Did you see murrays
reaction when he noticed someone else was there?

I think its better off that they left that crap out.

Just my opinion and thoughts thus far.


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2004-03-01 10:56 [#01094766]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



it apperantly took two great minds to write that review :)


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2004-03-01 10:58 [#01094768]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to virginpusher: #01094765



"I am curious as to how that would have improved the movie
in
any logical sense"

hahaha, it would probably win it an oscar


 

offline virginpusher from County Clare on 2004-03-01 11:01 [#01094773]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker | Followup to Xanatos: #01094235



I didn't like the film mostly because the characters
were just empty shells of
human beings.


I can completely respect your opinion but i would like to
mention that i disagree.
I like how they are empty. It really gives a certain realism
to the film. There is a percentage of people out there in
the world that probably feel like they do. From Murray who
seems to feel like he should be doing something else in life
(ie. making movies or doing broadway) to the girl who on the
phone mentioned to another character that she felt like she
married the wrong person. (if i remember correctly)

There's a world of people that are just out there wandering
around with absolutely no direction whatsoever. Taking it
day by day and trying to make sense of what their lives have
become.

The girl spent a lot of that time in the movie trying to
figure out her lack of spirituality.

I feel like i had more to say but i just had a brain fart!
:D!!


 

offline DeLtoiD from Ontario on 2004-03-01 11:02 [#01094774]
Points: 2934 Status: Lurker | Followup to tolstoyed: #01094762



communication, temptation, love, the paradox of an outside
environment... the meeting of two people among a strange
land : these are common themes found in film, almost to the
point of exhaustion IMO.



 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2004-03-01 11:04 [#01094777]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to virginpusher: #01094773



I can smell it. oh my.


 

offline DeLtoiD from Ontario on 2004-03-01 11:05 [#01094779]
Points: 2934 Status: Lurker | Followup to DeLtoiD: #01094774



I guess it's all about presentation of these themes, don't
get me wrong, i liked the fucking movie

:þ


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2004-03-01 11:06 [#01094781]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to DeLtoiD: #01094774



hmm, i guess i didn't put it right...
you said you didn't take it as some inoovative, new,
breaking-barriers
kind of film - so i replied sofia probably didnt intend to
make this film to be inovative or breaking barriers kind fo
film.

i also asked what was the last inovative breaking barriers
kind of film? cuz personally i think there isn't much more
inovativity that film makers could put in a film, tho i'd
love to see it happen...



 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2004-03-01 11:07 [#01094782]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator



RIGHT!! THAT'S IT!!

I'm going next saturday and THAT'S THE END OF IT!!


 

offline evolume from seattle (United States) on 2004-03-01 11:09 [#01094783]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular | Followup to virginpusher: #01094773



The characters were anything but "empty shells." The entire
movie is focused on developing the characters and it is this
familiarity that makes their relationship so interesting.

It's almost as if the reviewer didn't even watch the same
movie.


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2004-03-01 11:11 [#01094785]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to qrter: #01094782



to tokyo?


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2004-03-01 11:14 [#01094786]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to tolstoyed: #01094785



NO !

to your house.


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2004-03-01 11:15 [#01094789]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to qrter: #01094786



cool
any special requests?


 


Messageboard index