drugs - legal ??? | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 411 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614083
Today 3
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
drugs - legal ???
 

offline epohs from )C: on 2004-01-23 10:07 [#01045851]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01045844



there have been lots of studies that have concluded nicotine
is just as addictive, if not moreso than heroin


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-01-23 10:08 [#01045852]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to hyakusen: #01045803 | Show recordbag



People get fired as addicts not on principle, but because
they become unreliable, don't turn up to work or do their
work poorly because they're getting high at lunch time.

Subsequently the economy grinds to a halt and we all starve.
Myopia is a wonderful thing.


 

offline AlbertoBalsalm from Reykjavík (Iceland) on 2004-01-23 10:08 [#01045853]
Points: 9459 Status: Lurker



"when someone is taking drugs he hurts only
himself."

not really. his addiction effects everyone around him. not
only is he hurting himself, he's also hurting his family,
friends.


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2004-01-23 10:10 [#01045856]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01045852



and i don't do enough work because i'm busy surfing internet
messageboards. but, i don't think dubya should make them
illegal.

i should just be fired for not working.

:)


 

offline hyakusen from 8=============> on 2004-01-23 10:10 [#01045857]
Points: 7021 Status: Addict



no im not into drugs, im not high now, i smoke weed very
very rarely, like 1/half year.
and its shame that i dont know english to talk to you im MY
way

anyway, its just an opinion. there is many thing for/against
legal drugs



 

offline teapot from Paddington (Australia) on 2004-01-23 10:11 [#01045859]
Points: 5739 Status: Regular



lastly, it is morally wrong to profit from the sufferring of
an individual, i know the government do it in less blatent
cases but its just fucking wrong.


 

offline hyakusen from 8=============> on 2004-01-23 10:12 [#01045860]
Points: 7021 Status: Addict



Ceri, Alberto : youre too smart to talk here. please leave
my thread


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2004-01-23 10:12 [#01045862]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker



the bottom line, and the point i'm trying to make is that
the war on drugs is not reducing drug use at all. it is
only making criminals out of the people who do use, and
focusing the government's attention & money on the wrong
things.


 

offline hyakusen from 8=============> on 2004-01-23 10:12 [#01045863]
Points: 7021 Status: Addict



it is morally wrong to profit from the sufferring of
an individual


so why alcohol/fags are legal ?


 

offline AlbertoBalsalm from Reykjavík (Iceland) on 2004-01-23 10:13 [#01045864]
Points: 9459 Status: Lurker



the goverment is one big fucking hypocrite that's what it is


 

offline teapot from Paddington (Australia) on 2004-01-23 10:14 [#01045866]
Points: 5739 Status: Regular | Followup to hyakusen: #01045863



i know the government do it in less blatent cases


 

offline Jedi Chris on 2004-01-23 10:16 [#01045868]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker



Is it the general opinion here, that the health service does
enough for addicts?


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2004-01-23 10:17 [#01045870]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



hard drugs should be kept ilegall, but what's the point in
keeping soft drugs ilegall?


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2004-01-23 10:18 [#01045873]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker | Followup to Jedi Chris: #01045868



my problem is more with the educational system.


 

offline Skink from A cesspool in eden on 2004-01-23 10:18 [#01045874]
Points: 7483 Status: Lurker



I personally see no problems with some stuff being
legalised.

Cannabis and mushrooms are very good drugs and i can see
that some people would benefit from them.

But i don't think Heroin and crack should be made available
to the masses.

How many of you have tried either crack or heroin?



 

offline teapot from Paddington (Australia) on 2004-01-23 10:20 [#01045878]
Points: 5739 Status: Regular



ill agree that pot should be legalised... its not at all
dangerous and its a calming drug...


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-01-23 10:21 [#01045879]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to tolstoyed: #01045870 | Show recordbag



Where do you want to draw the line? You reckon just keep
coke and H illegal, but legalise everything else? Maybe just
legalise pills and grass?

The government do recognise that weed isn't as serious as
heroin, that's why the different categories of drug carry
different legal implications.


 

offline AlbertoBalsalm from Reykjavík (Iceland) on 2004-01-23 10:21 [#01045881]
Points: 9459 Status: Lurker | Followup to tolstoyed: #01045870



i agree. i don't get why cannabis is illegal. alcahol fucks
you up way more, and causes more violent and chaos than
cannbis ever will. and don't get me started on cigarettes,
the dumbest drug there is.


 

offline AlbertoBalsalm from Reykjavík (Iceland) on 2004-01-23 10:22 [#01045882]
Points: 9459 Status: Lurker | Followup to AlbertoBalsalm: #01045881



violent = violence


 

offline Skink from A cesspool in eden on 2004-01-23 10:23 [#01045884]
Points: 7483 Status: Lurker | Followup to AlbertoBalsalm: #01045881



I agree with you there.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-01-23 10:23 [#01045886]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Skink: #01045874 | Show recordbag



Yeah, the guy who invented ecstacy still maintains that when
it is made correctly the risks are minute and the benefits
are huge.

I have to agree, pills are the one thing that if people are
on them, them effects permeate through the crowd and improve
the mood for everyone. You never see fights at raves.


 

offline teapot from Paddington (Australia) on 2004-01-23 10:24 [#01045887]
Points: 5739 Status: Regular



if your walking down an alleyway and theres a bunch of guys
coming in the opposite way, would you rather them be :

a) drunkards
b) stoned potheads


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-01-23 10:26 [#01045889]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to teapot: #01045887 | Show recordbag



if your walking down an alleyway and theres a bunch of guys

coming in the opposite way, would you rather them be :

a) drunkards
b) Crack heads or townies on amphetamines.

;)


 

offline teapot from Paddington (Australia) on 2004-01-23 10:26 [#01045890]
Points: 5739 Status: Regular | Followup to Ceri JC: #01045886



i might have to disagree, although i may be wrong here, but
there is a lot of drugs coming in and out of where i work
especially on weekend nights, there is a lot of violence and
just... very horrible behavior, and these people are on
something and its not usually alcohol...


 

offline teapot from Paddington (Australia) on 2004-01-23 10:29 [#01045893]
Points: 5739 Status: Regular



if your walking down an alleyway and theres a bunch of guys
coming in the opposite way, would you rather them be :

a) drunkards
b) see picture


Attached picture

 

offline Jedi Chris on 2004-01-23 10:30 [#01045895]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker





if your walking down an alleyway and theres a bunch of guys


coming in the opposite way, would you rather them be :

a) drunkards
b) IDM fans

[A] - definately I think



 

offline teapot from Paddington (Australia) on 2004-01-23 10:30 [#01045896]
Points: 5739 Status: Regular



babies with man-bodies!


 

offline Jedi Chris on 2004-01-23 10:30 [#01045898]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker | Followup to teapot: #01045893



Hehehehhe


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2004-01-23 10:31 [#01045901]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to Ceri JC: #01045879



im not really an expert, so i can't say where's the line.
all i know is cannabis derivates aren't addictive and that
is good enough for me. i don't know about other drugs but
surely there are people who could determin what drugs are
considered not-dangerous/addictive.
i don't think many "new" people would use it if it was
legalized cuz there's so much of it now and it is so easilly
accesible everyone can get it as it is.


 

offline Skink from A cesspool in eden on 2004-01-23 10:33 [#01045903]
Points: 7483 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01045886



It depends how good they are really but yes i think the same
thing and it's true, when we at the warp party the only bit
of trouble i saw was over somebody picking up the wrong
beer.


 

offline plaidzebra from so long, xlt on 2004-01-23 10:38 [#01045908]
Points: 5678 Status: Lurker



some thoughts:

the word "drugs" is a mostly meaningless abstraction used to
prejudiciously label all illicit substances. all "drugs"
are not created equal.

the self-destructive behavior associated with some drug use,
particularly alcohol, cocaine, crystal meth, heroin, certain
painkillers, etc, is not caused by the drug. the drug is
used to make manifest, to facilitate self-destructive
impulses. for example, some individuals are attracted to
tobacco use because the health risks are so frequently
reinforced.

i think unrefined substances in the form of plants and
simple extracts should be legal for licensed adults;
ephedra, coca leaves, cannabis, coffee beans, tobacco,
psychoactive mushrooms.

chemically refined and synthetic substances that are harmful
to the mind and body and physically addictive should remain
illegal, eg crystal meth, cocaine and crack, pcp, etc.
manufacturers should be dealt with in the penal system;
users should receive mandatory addiction treatment and
counseling to address their self-destructive impulses.

chemically refined and synthetic substances that are not
physically addictive but when used in excess are harmful to
the body and mind should be allowed to be distributed to
licensed adults, with stiff penalties for distributing these
substances to minors. examples would be lsd, dmt,
ketamine.

psychological dependence and addiction are an individual's
responsibility.

you can't make human beings safe and secure by making all
risky behavior illegal. there is a price to be paid for
your freedom, and part of that is abuse of freedom.

making murder illegal hasn't stopped murder. you cannot
save every body from their own beliefs and choices, and you
cannot make yourself immune to the effects of their choices.





 

offline Jedi Chris on 2004-01-23 10:40 [#01045913]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker | Followup to plaidzebra: #01045908



Agreed.


 

offline plaidzebra from so long, xlt on 2004-01-23 10:41 [#01045914]
Points: 5678 Status: Lurker



what i mean to say is that human law will never provide the
solution to our problems.


 

offline Labium Sweat from United States on 2004-01-23 10:42 [#01045917]
Points: 922 Status: Regular | Followup to hyakusen: #01045779



Here is the problem, when people are on certain drugs, and
they don't have money to get them, they will start robbing
and or killing people to get the money they need for their
drugs.

How would you feel if you came home to find out that your
mom or sister was killed by a crack head for 20 bucks in her
purse?


 

offline Skink from A cesspool in eden on 2004-01-23 10:44 [#01045922]
Points: 7483 Status: Lurker | Followup to plaidzebra: #01045908



I agree with that essentially but i still think (debatbly)
that ecstasy should be legal.


 

offline plaidzebra from so long, xlt on 2004-01-23 10:59 [#01045952]
Points: 5678 Status: Lurker



mdma would fall into this category:

"chemically refined and synthetic substances that are not
physically addictive but when used in excess are harmful to
the body and mind should be allowed to be distributed to
licensed adults, with stiff penalties for distributing these
substances to minors."

there are a lot of complexities attached to this discussion
that obviously can't be addressed fully in a forum like
this...


 

offline horsefactory from 💠 (United Kingdom) on 2004-01-23 11:26 [#01046004]
Points: 14867 Status: Regular



I am a drug face


 

offline horsefactory from 💠 (United Kingdom) on 2004-01-23 11:27 [#01046005]
Points: 14867 Status: Regular | Followup to plaidzebra: #01045952



Shut up you pretentious artfag


 

offline giginger from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2004-01-23 11:28 [#01046006]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



can't be bothered.


 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2004-01-23 11:52 [#01046028]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



I have the opinion that there are some drugs that should be
legal, and others that never should be.

Legal List:
Weed

Illegal List:
Everything else

The farthest I would go is to say that hard drugs should be
legal in the privacy of the home, but I know that not
everyone is going to stay home after hitting the crack pipe.
People get bored/hungry and want to go out, and that's where
the problems arise. Very rarely are people caught with drugs
in the privacy of their own homes (except in the case of a
raid, obviously).This is not to say that I have not drank
before, or done shrooms or... wait that's the extent of my
drug use. I have never tried any "hard" drugs like heroin,
morphine, coke, crack, meth etc, and I never plan to. It
seems to me that the only real reason weed isn't illegal in
the states is because there's a chance it would put the
tobacco companies out of business, and the government makes
so much from the tobacco industry they wouldn't want their
profits to slide any.. I guess the hardcore tobacco addicts
probably wouldnt quit, but if I were addicted to cigs and
they made weed legal, given that it is only psychologically
addictive, I would say my chances are at least slightly
better with weed. But that's probably just me, because I'm
the type who doesn't like to feel like other things are in
control of his life. I don't understand the whole "18 age
limit" that hyakusen is suggesting, either. When i turned 18
(11 months ago), I felt no different than when I was 17, and
no different than when I was 16. Maturity/adulthood comes at
different times for everyone. I didn't wake up on my 18th
birthday and think "well, there is no nothing that can harm
me anymore because I'm an ADULT!" The choices one has to
make in the environment they are in determines how fast one
matures, IMO. In the end, there are probably just too many
differing, unchangeable views on this subject for things to
ever be any different than they are now, but who knows?


 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2004-01-23 11:54 [#01046031]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Followup to epohs: #01045827 | Show recordbag



I agree with everything you said in this post.


 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2004-01-23 11:59 [#01046038]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Followup to Zephyr Twin: #01046028 | Show recordbag



"there is now* nothing"


 

offline scup_bucket from bloated exploding piss pockets on 2004-01-23 12:20 [#01046056]
Points: 4540 Status: Regular



laws that are put in place in order to prevent other
unlawful conduct is redundant, unnecessary, and can become
oppressive. such laws include aformentioned drug laws, a
foray of murder laws (murder is murder, there is no need for
a law against, e.g., killing of abortion clinic staff).



 

offline scup_bucket from bloated exploding piss pockets on 2004-01-23 12:21 [#01046058]
Points: 4540 Status: Regular



...and many more


 

offline J Swift from United Kingdom on 2004-01-23 12:33 [#01046081]
Points: 650 Status: Regular | Followup to Skink: #01045874



I've tried crack - Never again though! Made me act like a
total prick - Never had a drug change my personality like
that before... A lot of my friends have done heroin - And
quite a few are still addicts, or on/off users...

Alcohol and cigarretts are actually responsible for
infinitely more deaths and health problems though... Talking
100's of thousands a year in the UK alone...

The problem with drinking & smoking is that it's so socially
acceptable in the UK, that you never even think about the
health consiquenses until it's too late.

There's actually a whole tonne of legal drugs in the UK,
many much more wierd & warped than marijuana & ecstasy, but
no one bothers using them!

Basically, I think it's a big waste of tax payers money for
the police to go chasing after people who want to dance all
night at a club, on e, or sit around and chill out smoking
weed...

Sending someone to prison for using heroin or crack doesn't
make much sense either... It costs something like
£30,000+/year to keep them there, and it's easier to score
those drugs on the inside anyway! Doesn't work as a good
deterent either cos most ppl assume they won't get caught.


 


Messageboard index