|
|
promo
from United Kingdom on 2004-01-07 12:53 [#01022077]
Points: 4227 Status: Addict
|
|
This is a really deep jungle slammer.
The Bro - Amen Praise the Lord (v2)
|
|
plaidzebra
from so long, xlt on 2004-01-07 12:59 [#01022085]
Points: 5678 Status: Lurker
|
|
i'll try to get connected at a faster speed to d/l.
|
|
promo
from United Kingdom on 2004-01-07 13:09 [#01022097]
Points: 4227 Status: Addict
|
|
:-)
|
|
Ceri JC
from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-01-07 13:16 [#01022106]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag
|
|
I'm not too keen on the reverb on the main percussion in the intro- makes it sound a bit too murky (although I imagine it'd sound sharper in CD quality).
I like the constant quiet bass tone that runs through the intro before the bassline comes in. This track could be improved with a fatter more "sub" bass (you're getting there at around 5.25) and a slight hike in sound quality all round. I don't really like the high synth in it (I tend not to like any high synths in dnb/jungle really). Still, good programming skills.
BTW your spacecadet remix really cheered me up yesterday after what was a rather gash day. It's what I'd call "dawn music" music that makes you think of getting into bed as the sun is coming up after having been up all night and are greatful for sleep.
|
|
plaidzebra
from so long, xlt on 2004-01-07 14:04 [#01022193]
Points: 5678 Status: Lurker
|
|
maybe it's the contrast with the seefeel i just listened to, maybe i'm a little cranky from my cold, or maybe this just isn't a style that i appreciate. it reminds me of µ-ziq... the sing-songy high synth melodic motifs didn't do anything for me, and the pitch shift percussion biz is a personal pet peeve. there is a rhythmic variety and overall the track is cohesive, nicely structured. i wish i could offer more constructive commentary but this just wasn't my cup of tea...
|
|
promo
from United Kingdom on 2004-01-07 14:27 [#01022238]
Points: 4227 Status: Addict
|
|
No probs, plaidzebra. As you say not your cup of tea.
Ceri JC, thanks for your views also.
|
|
promo
from United Kingdom on 2004-01-07 15:05 [#01022298]
Points: 4227 Status: Addict
|
|
Bump? Its a good track, least thats what I reckon. :-(
|
|
staplemouth
on 2004-01-07 15:12 [#01022307]
Points: 556 Status: Lurker
|
|
the high synth isnt really my thing, but i love the drums at the start with the drony bass. Actually, in general i like the drums a lot, id just pump them a bit harder somehow, but thats just me :p
good stuff :)
|
|
promo
from United Kingdom on 2004-01-07 15:14 [#01022310]
Points: 4227 Status: Addict
|
|
Cheers.
|
|
ecnadniarb
on 2004-01-07 15:25 [#01022323]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
I didn't like it. The drums while decently programmed lacked punch, and there was too much reverb. The high pitch synth wasn't really good and the melody was weak. I liked 10 seconds around the 4 minute mark nefore the synth came back in...it started to annoy me by this stage. Sorry.
|
|
promo
from United Kingdom on 2004-01-07 15:31 [#01022327]
Points: 4227 Status: Addict
|
|
Interesting. You know I'd never thought too much about the reverb on this track. I'll be first to agree that drowning drum tracks in reverb ruins them and I've heard some productions where it does exactly that.
|
|
ecnadniarb
on 2004-01-07 15:32 [#01022329]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to promo: #01022327 | Show recordbag
|
|
If you haven't added reverb the original sample must have been drowned in it...I also think this is probably why the drums lack punch as well.
|
|
promo
from United Kingdom on 2004-01-07 15:38 [#01022332]
Points: 4227 Status: Addict
|
|
Well I did work hard to try and resolve the hardness of the drums in this track. I think the original sample was really arse kicking and I thought I just need to start a track with it. I believe the original sample had quite a lot of reverb, I can't recall whether I added any extra. Yeah I did struggle to get the phatness and beefiness into the drums. Its my own fault in a way because I was working with some low volume mono samples. Since this track I've used higher quality samples so I don't have to fuck around try to increase the volume artificially and the net result is it sounds a bit thin.
|
|
promo
from United Kingdom on 2004-01-07 16:57 [#01022436]
Points: 4227 Status: Addict
|
|
A bit more bumpage? :-(
|
|
promo
from United Kingdom on 2004-01-08 10:55 [#01023418]
Points: 4227 Status: Addict
|
|
A titchy bit more?
|
|
marlowe
from Antarctica on 2004-03-29 06:31 [#01123588]
Points: 24588 Status: Lurker
|
|
Not my cup of tea - I'm not the world's biggest fan of breakbeat, as has been documented in my book, "Breakbeat? No thanks, break bones!" published in 34/55 aspect. I'll stop this one now, so I can get onto your next one before I have to leave for work :D
|
|
Phobiazero
from the next Xltronic (Sweden) on 2004-03-29 06:33 [#01123589]
Points: 10507 Status: Webmaster | Show recordbag
|
|
too many "My %number% ever track online!" topics...
|
|
ziggomatic
from ??....uv ajed...deja vu....?? on 2004-03-29 07:06 [#01123613]
Points: 2523 Status: Lurker | Followup to Phobiazero: #01123589
|
|
really....
can't you justs say "Promo's tracks online!".....and post everyone as you go....?? ...this could lead to "promo's 69th ever track online", which would cause my head to implode and then Phobia wouldn't be happy. :)
|
|
Messageboard index
|