|
|
AlbertoBalsalm
from ReykjavÃk (Iceland) on 2003-12-17 10:24 [#00995532]
Points: 9459 Status: Lurker
|
|
www.winamp.com
|
|
Hetzel
from Montreal (Canada) on 2003-12-17 10:25 [#00995534]
Points: 551 Status: Regular
|
|
3...... to 5 !
Where's the 4 ?
|
|
tolstoyed
from the ocean on 2003-12-17 10:26 [#00995536]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator
|
|
on my comp!?
|
|
epohs
from )C: on 2003-12-17 10:26 [#00995538]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker
|
|
version 5 is the good things from version 2, plus the good things from version 3.
2+3=5
|
|
jand
from Braintree (United Kingdom) on 2003-12-17 12:44 [#00995711]
Points: 5975 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag
|
|
Sure is....Forget 3 ever existed; 5 pisses all over it and not far off the speed space of 2.8x ...
I'm well taken with the music library - that's been getting better & better in each beta - and I think they've got it about right now....Worth upgrading for that alone, I reckon...
The default Modern skin is better than I expected, especially with the diff colours...I'm running this NOIR Theme on XP and WA fits in well (I think you can use all of V2s skins outthere...
|
|
earthleakage
from tell the world you're winning on 2003-12-17 12:47 [#00995717]
Points: 27795 Status: Regular
|
|
how is it for performance? 3 was too processor intensive for me, i still use 2.91
|
|
giginger
from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2003-12-17 12:48 [#00995721]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
this is a great release of Winamp. Quickest loading one I've used. Even against 2.9x :)
|
|
BlatantEcho
from All over (United States) on 2003-12-17 12:53 [#00995733]
Points: 7210 Status: Lurker
|
|
winamp 5 can suck it.
2.9x for me!
|
|
epohs
from )C: on 2003-12-17 13:05 [#00995748]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker | Followup to earthleakage: #00995717
|
|
performance is almost exactly where 2.91 was
|
|
epohs
from )C: on 2003-12-17 13:07 [#00995749]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker | Followup to BlatantEcho: #00995733
|
|
i too was jaded by the steaming shitpile that was winamp 3.
but, five really is pretty good. no pressing reason to upgrade, but it's every bit as satisfying as 2.9x was... and it has some snazzy newness that makes it worth the 35 seconds it takes to upgrade.
|
|
Messageboard index
|