UK to rely on USA | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
big
...and 441 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614087
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
UK to rely on USA
 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2003-12-11 08:47 [#00986469]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



In future land battles... I know we've been long time
allies, but it now seems that we're going to just have a
small (comparatively) elite army/navy and rely on the USA to
make up the numbers. Its been going this way for a while and
wasn't exactly unexpected, but I didn't think it would
happen this soon.

The official reason for this is to have a series of "small,
quickly deployable forces aimed specifically for counter
terrorist operations". So, nothing to do with halving our
defense spending them?

Ho hum, looks like the next time there's a Saddam to give a
kicking to, we won't even have the option of disagreeing to
any extent with America :/


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2003-12-11 08:49 [#00986472]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



how much is this going to cost you?


 

offline The_Funkmaster from St. John's (Canada) on 2003-12-11 08:51 [#00986474]
Points: 16280 Status: Lurker



Canada relies on the US as far as military is concerned
too... it's a nice set-up! :)


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2003-12-11 08:52 [#00986476]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



haha, this will help getting bush a bigger military
budget...wont he be one happy boy? :)


 

offline Peloton from London (United Kingdom) on 2003-12-11 08:56 [#00986480]
Points: 651 Status: Lurker



Smaller army? Bet our annual £30billion defence budget
don't get any smaller as a consequence. The US are already
criticising NATO and European governments for not spending
enough on defence. Mind you, with their defence spending now
topping $400billion a year you can see the disparity.

Fucking 400 Billion A YEAR!!!

Still don't stop the cunts being picked off with $50 RPGs by
a few goat herders does it?


 

offline martinhm from York (United Kingdom) on 2003-12-11 08:57 [#00986481]
Points: 1657 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #00986469



what's your source on this?


 

offline martinhm from York (United Kingdom) on 2003-12-11 08:58 [#00986482]
Points: 1657 Status: Lurker



Never mind


 

offline Peloton from London (United Kingdom) on 2003-12-11 08:59 [#00986487]
Points: 651 Status: Lurker | Followup to martinhm: #00986481



Geoff (Baf)Hoon just announced it in parliament.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2003-12-11 09:01 [#00986493]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to martinhm: #00986481 | Show recordbag



BBC...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/3308629.stm

Peloton: The uk forces have already had defence cuts year on
year for the past 20 odd years... down from just over 5% to
just under 2.5% of the GNP. I know you might see that as a
good thing, but the reality of it is that there will be
greater amounts of conflict if we have a smaller military.



 

offline Peloton from London (United Kingdom) on 2003-12-11 09:06 [#00986503]
Points: 651 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #00986493



"... the reality of it is that there will be
greater amounts of conflict if we have a smaller military."

How so? Are there leaders of other nations sitting there
thinking 'damn, if the didn't UK have such a big army I'd
invade'?

I don't think our army is a deterrant to other nations doing
what they want either. Like Zimbabwe




 

offline promo from United Kingdom on 2003-12-11 09:08 [#00986506]
Points: 4227 Status: Addict



Quite frankly our alliance with the States is a clever one.
Bush has fucked up badly post Iraq conflict. I totally
supporting the war though but the way its been handle post
end war has been amaterish by both Bush and Blair. Quite
frankly with an ally such as the States we don't need a big
army. We use to rule the seas and so use to control the
world but times have moved on. Britain can be a force for
good and change in the future by having a strong foreign
policy coupled with economic change in poor and war torn
countries. Our alliance with the States is the right one.
Fact is we are the weaker partner but who cares. France and
Germany stick together, the French have had their arses
whipped for the last 1000 years by us so they're never going
to be on side period, Germany well they're workable. Blair
is wasting his time with the French, his efforts should be
geared towards Russia and the States end of story.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2003-12-11 09:10 [#00986507]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Peloton: #00986503 | Show recordbag



A smaller army presence on our part would mean more friendly
fire (sorry America, but your troops are ever so trigger
happy compared to ours...), greater civilian casualties
(same reason) not to mention our forces being stretched
thinly in many places...

I think the best way to avoid groundwar is to have an army
so immense and powerful (like America's) that even the most
deluded crackpot dictator would never even attempt to go
against them.


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2003-12-11 09:12 [#00986511]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to promo: #00986506



good god, what are we joining in...eu is nothing but hatred
i'll have some joy till may '04 now


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2003-12-11 09:14 [#00986515]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to promo: #00986506 | Show recordbag



For years we've been used primarily for our special forces
by the USA, this just seems a lot less overt than that and
makes me uneasy.

If we ever did decide to side with "The United States of
Europe" (talking about 20-50 years from now) if it came down
to a EU vs. American war (I doubt it will) we would be
"stuck" with America if we had no large force of our own.
Also, we're an island- it makes sense to have a half decent
navy.


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2003-12-11 09:18 [#00986517]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



EU vs. American war

its been said this couldnt happen in democratic
countries...cos usually sane people get elected

that says it all really...

im going to retire to my shelter now



 

offline Peloton from London (United Kingdom) on 2003-12-11 09:21 [#00986522]
Points: 651 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #00986507



"A smaller army presence on our part would mean more
friendly fire casualties "

That don't add up. Surely a larger army would create a
bigger target? More casualties? Same goes with respect to
more civilian casualties. Can't see how having a samller
army would increase these figures.

"I think the best way to avoid groundwar is to have an army
so immense and powerful (like America's) that even the most

deluded crackpot dictator would never even attempt to go
against them."

Yeah, but that just leads to an arms race. Every nation and
his grandmother trying to precure
nuclear/chemical/biological weapons to deter an attack from
the greater powers.




 

offline roygbivcore from Joyrex.com, of course! on 2003-12-11 09:25 [#00986523]
Points: 22557 Status: Lurker



hahaha you guys are fucked


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2003-12-11 09:27 [#00986525]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Peloton: #00986522 | Show recordbag



I'll get some flack from the american for this (ho ho, what
a pun), but the yanks have a real problem with friendly fire
and generally blowing the shit out of anything that moves...
I'm not just saying this based on news reports- several of
my friends who've served with the Americans state the same
thing- the vast majority of the grunts have a gung ho, shoot
'em up attitude unbecoming of a professional soldier.

Less highly trained UK troops (yes, we have the longest and
most intense basic training in the world) = more american
troops in that place to do the job = less tact and diplomacy
and more wanton shooting.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2003-12-11 09:28 [#00986527]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Peloton: #00986522 | Show recordbag



As to the arms race, I think we all know america is mcdaddy,
even if their troops leave a bit to be desired.


 

offline TonyFish from the realm of our dreams on 2003-12-11 09:32 [#00986530]
Points: 3349 Status: Lurker



the UK is so totally becoming the 51st state. Not just in
terms of political alliances but also culturally. It's quite
sad.


 

offline promo from United Kingdom on 2003-12-11 09:32 [#00986531]
Points: 4227 Status: Addict



We live in civilised times. It takes a lot for a Western
country to go to war.

The French have been at odds with the British since time
began. I just think we have to be selfish about things and
see whats in our interest and that means allying with the
States. The EU is only a means for Germany and France to run
a European empire by stealth. That is the undercurrent of
it, has been and always will be. The French feel inferior
and like to imagine their top gun, they ain't. They don't
amount to a row of beans. They've got an inferiority complex
and thats why they're at odds with the States and Britain.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2003-12-11 09:35 [#00986532]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to promo: #00986531 | Show recordbag



Yes, I'd rather we were airstrip one as opposed to part of
the "United States of Europe" as well. I'd just prefer to
have the option to switch sides if we ever needed to...


 

offline promo from United Kingdom on 2003-12-11 09:36 [#00986533]
Points: 4227 Status: Addict



TonyFish,

Thats where it all begins by developing an inferiority
complex. The States is number 1 and its very straight
forward we need to be their allies. I mean come on are you
serious you wanna be allies with France? Perlease! They've
been throwing mud in our faces for the last fifty years,
you'd have to be mad to cow tow to them. They're completely
unreliable, thats the background, thats the reality.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2003-12-11 09:38 [#00986535]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to promo: #00986533 | Show recordbag



Yes, as much as I like the french as a people, politically
their one of the most selfish countries around...


 

offline TonyFish from the realm of our dreams on 2003-12-11 09:50 [#00986553]
Points: 3349 Status: Lurker



The French have been at odds with the British since time
began


Ahem. Vice versa. Having lived in both countries I can
assure you that in the UK anti french feeling is rapant
everywhere including the media whereas in all my time living
over here I have never heard anything along these lines I
assure you. But hey this isn't exclusive to France. The
english love to tear pretty much any other nation apart. I
suppose it's some kind of reaction to the tip you live in.

Maybe it's time you guys stopped putting all your energies
into petty racism and military alliances and did something
about the shit hole you live in. You know, small things like
public transport (I'm sure funkmaster will agree!),
education and health. Things that *really* mater.

ah why do I bother. forget it.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2003-12-11 09:52 [#00986557]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to TonyFish: #00986553 | Show recordbag



I like the french public transport system. The Paris Metro
is an examplary service.


 

offline TonyFish from the realm of our dreams on 2003-12-11 09:55 [#00986561]
Points: 3349 Status: Lurker



well it's probably not as clean as London (following some
terrorist attacks a while back when all the bins were
sealed) but anyway it's way more efficient (even during
massive strikes)


 

offline aphextriplet from your mothers bedroom (United Kingdom) on 2003-12-11 09:56 [#00986564]
Points: 4731 Status: Lurker



someone release cannon fodder 3 already.


 

offline rockenjohnny from champagne socialism (Australia) on 2003-12-11 10:25 [#00986609]
Points: 7983 Status: Lurker



were allies, and thats it


 

offline promo from United Kingdom on 2003-12-11 11:31 [#00986763]
Points: 4227 Status: Addict



Exactly. Lol.

Tonyfish, we owe the French nothing, they owe us everything.
Remember that next time you criticise yours trully.


 

offline TonyFish from the realm of our dreams on 2003-12-11 11:34 [#00986768]
Points: 3349 Status: Lurker | Followup to promo: #00986763



care to elaborate on that?


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2003-12-11 11:40 [#00986777]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to TonyFish: #00986768 | Show recordbag



WW2 ring any bells?!


 

offline TonyFish from the realm of our dreams on 2003-12-11 11:45 [#00986781]
Points: 3349 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #00986777



Yes extremely handy being a island isn't it? *rolls eyes*



 

offline JivverDicker from my house on 2003-12-11 11:50 [#00986788]
Points: 12102 Status: Regular | Followup to TonyFish: #00986781



Yes


 

offline promo from United Kingdom on 2003-12-11 12:22 [#00986858]
Points: 4227 Status: Addict



How much to advertise on your avatar then?


 

offline JivverDicker from my house on 2003-12-11 12:23 [#00986864]
Points: 12102 Status: Regular | Followup to promo: #00986858



A white feather and a big bag of garlic


 

offline promo from United Kingdom on 2003-12-11 12:50 [#00986932]
Points: 4227 Status: Addict



No on Tony Fish's avatar.


 

offline JivverDicker from my house on 2003-12-11 12:52 [#00986936]
Points: 12102 Status: Regular | Followup to promo: #00986932



I know.....

I don't want a cowardly white feather, or a big bag of
garlic.


 

offline promo from United Kingdom on 2003-12-11 12:54 [#00986941]
Points: 4227 Status: Addict



I like garlic, love the smell of it. Drives me mad!


 

offline bogala from NYC (United States) on 2003-12-11 13:00 [#00986956]
Points: 5125 Status: Regular



I think you mean the French have a Napoleon complex.
BadumTish. Actually, As with Australia, the US is British in
it's roots. The alliance runs deep hundreds of years.


 

offline promo from United Kingdom on 2003-12-11 13:01 [#00986960]
Points: 4227 Status: Addict



Yeah I'd agree with that.


 

offline GIR from Easton on 2003-12-11 13:29 [#00987004]
Points: 828 Status: Addict



by that logic I could say Britain owes the US because we
saved their asses in WWII all the same....and i dont dig
that.


 

offline TonyFish from the realm of our dreams on 2003-12-11 13:33 [#00987011]
Points: 3349 Status: Lurker



And the US owes france because of our contribution to the
american war of independence which was a decisive factor in
the american victory. And who were the americans and french
fighting? The british. This 'owing' this is lame. Enough
looking into past...


 

offline promo from United Kingdom on 2003-12-11 13:40 [#00987025]
Points: 4227 Status: Addict



We owe the meteor 'cause it wiped out the Dinosaurs and we
came in in their place.


 

offline bogala from NYC (United States) on 2003-12-11 13:42 [#00987031]
Points: 5125 Status: Regular



That's a good point. Thank you France., btw.., but once the
revolution was over we got on with our british lifestyle.


 

offline Cfern from Sacto (United States) on 2003-12-11 13:42 [#00987032]
Points: 1384 Status: Lurker



haven't you guys read 1984? in it britain is part of the
u.s. while europe and asia are the other too forces

tonyfish: oweing france for the war of independance? how
'bout D-day..jesus


 

offline bogala from NYC (United States) on 2003-12-11 13:43 [#00987035]
Points: 5125 Status: Regular



who said owe?


 

offline oxygenfad from www.oxygenfad.com (Canada) on 2003-12-11 13:47 [#00987045]
Points: 4442 Status: Regular



I hate politicians so much.


 

offline promo from United Kingdom on 2003-12-11 13:48 [#00987046]
Points: 4227 Status: Addict



There was no American war of independance. It was simply the
English over there at war with the English over here.


 

offline Cfern from Sacto (United States) on 2003-12-11 13:50 [#00987050]
Points: 1384 Status: Lurker | Followup to promo: #00987046





no there was a shit load of germans too..

and they was plentty of intermarrige with indians


 


Messageboard index