UK to rely on USA | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
big
...and 488 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614087
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
UK to rely on USA
 

offline bogala from NYC (United States) on 2003-12-11 13:50 [#00987051]
Points: 5125 Status: Regular



that's true, actually.


 

offline Oddioblender from Fort Worth, TX (United States) on 2003-12-11 13:51 [#00987055]
Points: 9601 Status: Lurker



I never liked this war personally, but really, i'm starting
not to care.

if everyone begins to rely on our army, that's fine by me.
that's what we get for spending so damn much on
self-defense.


 

offline TonyFish from the realm of our dreams on 2003-12-11 13:51 [#00987056]
Points: 3349 Status: Lurker



My point is that all this 'owing' bullshit is extremely
childish.


 

offline bogala from NYC (United States) on 2003-12-11 13:52 [#00987059]
Points: 5125 Status: Regular



I'd say we becam Americans when we decided to throw out
protocol and formailty in warfare and start hiding behind
rocks and trees.


 

offline promo from United Kingdom on 2003-12-11 13:55 [#00987063]
Points: 4227 Status: Addict



The only reason the war occurred was because all the taxes
hadn't stopped. Almost everything that the colonists were
taxed for had been stopped except for tea and that was only
a matter of time too. So really were it not for that there
probably wouldn't have been any War at all.


 

offline promo from United Kingdom on 2003-12-11 13:57 [#00987067]
Points: 4227 Status: Addict



TonyFish,

Its not really a question of oweing. Its a question of trust
and past relationships and the fact is you just can't piss
in someone's face when they've been good to you and really
thats what France did post WW2 with England and America.


 

offline TonyFish from the realm of our dreams on 2003-12-11 14:00 [#00987072]
Points: 3349 Status: Lurker



what rot.
Anyway I'm not going recieve any history lessons from
someone with your totally biased and blind opinions on such
things (see previous promo-bullshit about colonisation).


 

offline promo from United Kingdom on 2003-12-11 14:12 [#00987091]
Points: 4227 Status: Addict



Why is it rot? Thats how relationships are built through
past alliances and good experiences. Britain has its enemies
and it has its friends. The fact is some countries you just
can't please no matter what. I feel the important thing is
Britain always tries to do the right thing. I feel our
partners are the right ones but sometimes bad partners and
relationships have been formed a prime example of this is
the Saudi/American relationship but I'm glad that this is
coming to an end because it makes my gut churn.


 

offline bogala from NYC (United States) on 2003-12-11 20:22 [#00987629]
Points: 5125 Status: Regular



The french did help the Americans in the revolution, but
blood is thicker than water. Gimmie a hug promo.


 

offline The_Funkmaster from St. John's (Canada) on 2003-12-12 02:43 [#00987731]
Points: 16280 Status: Lurker



don't talk about the Americans and WWII... they only entered
that because Pearl Harbour was bombed... if it wasn't
bombed, they probably would never have entered, well until
Hitler took over all of Europe and then finally decided to
move across the ocean...


 

offline danbrusca from Derbyshire (United Kingdom) on 2003-12-12 03:06 [#00987743]
Points: 4570 Status: Lurker | Followup to Peloton: #00986487



Geoff Hoon lives down the road from me.


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2003-12-12 03:09 [#00987746]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker



The privatisation of war

click here



 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2003-12-12 03:10 [#00987748]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker | Followup to jonesy: #00987746



http://www.guardian.co.uk/military/story/0,11816,1103649,00
Shit! .html


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2003-12-12 05:33 [#00987867]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to The_Funkmaster: #00987731 | Show recordbag



Yup... once the uk was conquered, they probably would of
made a truce with the USA, waited a couple of years and then
tried invading there.

Jonesy: On the subject of privitisation of warfare, you'd be
suprised how long that's been happening... even the UN has
used mercenaries. Mercenaries are good because- people don't
car so much if they get killed, they aren't neccessarily
from your country, the experienced ones are really good
soldiers, if you want to do anything covert but don't want
to risk you special forces, you can send a load of
mercenaries and even they won't know which country hired
them if you do it properly.


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2003-12-12 05:37 [#00987869]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #00987867



But as the article says, they can kill at will and most
likely get away with it.


 

offline GIR from Easton on 2003-12-12 09:26 [#00988098]
Points: 828 Status: Addict



yeah,they probably wouldnt have invaded, but the point
was...they DID.

and in the defense of the US, you really expect us to play
fair against the Brit armies when they outnumbered ours
almost 4 to 1? Not considering you had economic support, and
superior weaponry. Playing by the rules in war is a stupid
thing to do if you ask me.


 

offline GIR from Easton on 2003-12-12 09:27 [#00988099]
Points: 828 Status: Addict



anyway,this is a silly argument. if teh uk has a problem,
protest, because by all means, it should work in your
country.


 

offline promo from United Kingdom on 2003-12-13 12:11 [#00989625]
Points: 4227 Status: Addict



I think at a push Britain probably could have won the war in
Europe without America. We had already made decisive
victories in North Africa. However America certainly made a
huge impact and my personal alliance will always be with
America whatever its real or supposed faults.


 

offline X-tomatic from ze war room on 2003-12-13 12:22 [#00989630]
Points: 2901 Status: Lurker



"We live in civilised times. It takes a lot for a
Western
country to go to war.
"

pardon the expression, but:
"LMFAO!"


 

offline kochlear from aud-stim.com on 2003-12-13 12:22 [#00989631]
Points: 2311 Status: Addict



lets face it, any country where the people can BE ignorant
as we are without it spiraling into anarchy has to be doing
something right.


 

offline promo from United Kingdom on 2003-12-13 12:27 [#00989633]
Points: 4227 Status: Addict



I certainly don't want to attack the States. I think America
can be histeric at times but I believe Bush was 100% right
on Iraq. I have no doubts about it, in my mind Sadman Insane
couldn't go on. The war was over pretty quickly, casualties
were small but could have been a lot smaller. However as
wars goes it was handled in an extremely PC way. Post War
the whole thing has been handled extremely amateurishly and
badly.


 

offline bogala from NYC (United States) on 2003-12-13 12:49 [#00989649]
Points: 5125 Status: Regular



This war has given me mixed feelings. I think it's very
optimistic, but I just don't know. I don't see things
working out. I think my country does meddle a little too
much, but, then again, I do support Israel. So, I'm torn.


 

offline danbrusca from Derbyshire (United Kingdom) on 2003-12-13 14:00 [#00989731]
Points: 4570 Status: Lurker | Followup to promo: #00989633



I don't think there's a black and white answer to whether or
not the war in Iraq was justified. On the one hand the claim
that Iraq had WMD has now been shown to be bullshit, on the
other it was a good thing to depose Saddam Hussein and only
some kind of armed conflict had a realistic chance of
achieving that.

I think Blair went along with the war because when it comes
to things like this the UK always supports the USA. From
there Blair set about justifying it to himself, both as the
right thing to do from a moral point of view and from a
political one in believing that if the USA was going to war
anyway, he may as well put the UK in a place to intercede
between it and the rest of the world.

I'm not altogether sure of what Bush's motivations were, but
to simply say he was after oil is overly simplistic. I think
the issues were more complex.

I think both Bush and Blair both believed that they would
find WMD in Iraq, even if they didn't have the evidence for
it, but I don't think WMD were ever the real reason for the
war, more a kind of reverse justification to sell the
public.


 

offline promo from United Kingdom on 2003-12-13 18:17 [#00990081]
Points: 4227 Status: Addict



WMD was always the wrong argument. I was always clear that
it was the moral case. I wasn't interested in WMD and still
aren't. Blair fucked up over WMD, he was pussy and should
have from the start pushed the moral case. It came little to
late.


 

offline JivverDicker from my house on 2003-12-13 18:22 [#00990088]
Points: 12102 Status: Regular | Followup to promo: #00990081



Promo, why aren't you in the running to be elected. Instead
of argueing student politics here, make a stand. I'm
available if you can sort things out.


 

offline acrid milk hall from United Kingdom on 2003-12-13 18:22 [#00990089]
Points: 2916 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #00986525



re. 'friendly fire' or 'blue on blue' (i love that one)

it isn't exactly confidence inspiring that US pilots
involved in the friendly fire incidents of the gulf war
tested positive for amphetamine. the american forces use it
so that they can fly longer missions.
no wonder they bombed anything that moved.


 

offline k_maty on 2003-12-13 18:25 [#00990091]
Points: 2362 Status: Regular



war is primitive


 

offline JivverDicker from my house on 2003-12-13 18:26 [#00990094]
Points: 12102 Status: Regular | Followup to k_maty: #00990091



you wouldn't fight for anything?


 

offline k_maty on 2003-12-13 18:30 [#00990100]
Points: 2362 Status: Regular | Followup to JivverDicker: #00990094



no i would rather die, its going to happen anyway, and id
rather die without fighting than fighting


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2003-12-13 18:36 [#00990105]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



Pussy...you need to fight...you fight for everything you
have to...there are so many things you have to be willing to
fight for.


 

offline JivverDicker from my house on 2003-12-13 18:37 [#00990109]
Points: 12102 Status: Regular | Followup to k_maty: #00990100



Do you think the world is getting worse? Are you going to do
anything about it?

if your answers are yes and no then give up ny all means.

Why are you living in these times? tell me one positive
thing that you are going to use your life for, otherwise
shut up and exist for a few more years without trace.


 

offline JivverDicker from my house on 2003-12-13 18:39 [#00990110]
Points: 12102 Status: Regular | Followup to JivverDicker: #00990109



Bloody hell! I'm tooooo harsh...


 

offline k_maty on 2003-12-13 18:41 [#00990115]
Points: 2362 Status: Regular | Followup to JivverDicker: #00990110



yes you are im crying in the corner


 

offline xceque on 2003-12-13 18:43 [#00990117]
Points: 5888 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



My fingers smell of garlic right now. I chopped some to go
with my dinner.


 

offline JivverDicker from my house on 2003-12-13 18:44 [#00990118]
Points: 12102 Status: Regular | Followup to k_maty: #00990115



maybe you are... I'm stopping now.


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2003-12-13 18:44 [#00990119]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to JivverDicker: #00990110 | Show recordbag



Fucking hell...you will be buying a bolt action rifle and
getting a job in a book depository next. :P


 

offline JivverDicker from my house on 2003-12-13 18:48 [#00990125]
Points: 12102 Status: Regular | Followup to ecnadniarb: #00990119



I don't even know what I was talking about!?


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2003-12-13 18:49 [#00990127]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to JivverDicker: #00990125 | Show recordbag



I sort of guessed that from the "Why are you living in these
times?" statement...I don't think he had much choice in the
matter. :D!


 

offline JivverDicker from my house on 2003-12-13 18:58 [#00990133]
Points: 12102 Status: Regular



Ho ho!!! I'm sleepy now. I just checked one of your songs
from a link on here. I really enjoyed it!

why are you living in these times you daft timelord/ or
something else...


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2003-12-13 19:10 [#00990140]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



haha

nice one for listening :P

Now the board is playing up I reckon it is pretty much about
time for me to retire for the evening...right after I eat
food.


 

offline X-tomatic from ze war room on 2003-12-13 19:22 [#00990155]
Points: 2901 Status: Lurker | Followup to promo: #00990081



"WMD was always the wrong argument. I was always clear
that
it was the moral case. I wasn't interested in WMD and still
aren't. Blair fucked up over WMD, he was pussy and should
have from the start pushed the moral case. It came little
to
late.
"

Is your set of blinkers for sale? Cos'
I have a horse and it needs a good pair.


 


Messageboard index