Snares VS Aphex | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
big
...and 330 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614087
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
Snares VS Aphex
 

offline bogala from NYC (United States) on 2003-12-11 13:03 [#00986963]
Points: 5125 Status: Regular



open up a snares track in Soundforge. Then open up an Aphex
track. Aphex wins.!! He has incredible skill and forsight
with sound.


 

offline corticalstim from Canada on 2003-12-11 13:05 [#00986966]
Points: 3885 Status: Regular | Followup to bogala: #00986963



haha wtf?

what exactly do you mean? that any random aphex track will
beat any random snares track? ok then - i choose you
Aegopolis! *enemy chooses All the Children are Dead*

HAH! i have defeated you with my superior 808 break skills!
and soundforge is crashing under my awesome power!


 

offline dariusgriffin from cool on 2003-12-11 13:09 [#00986969]
Points: 12423 Status: Regular | Followup to corticalstim: #00986966



A more complex beat isn't necessarily a more pleasant one.


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2003-12-11 13:10 [#00986973]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to dariusgriffin: #00986969 | Show recordbag



A more complex beat isn't necessarily well
programmed/sequenced/triggered one.


 

offline dariusgriffin from cool on 2003-12-11 13:13 [#00986983]
Points: 12423 Status: Regular | Followup to ecnadniarb: #00986973



Nice copy/paste work.

And I agree. Yes.


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2003-12-11 13:14 [#00986984]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to dariusgriffin: #00986983 | Show recordbag



I just wanted to be more like you for a minute. :(


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2003-12-11 13:15 [#00986987]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker



Go on, give us a snare rushrushrushrushsshhhurr

I think that says it all


 

offline giginger from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2003-12-11 13:15 [#00986989]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



A complex sounding beat isn't necessarily complex to create.


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2003-12-11 13:25 [#00986998]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker



But I will say this:
Venetian Snares hasn't been around very long, only like 3
years? I'd say if I heard only the stuff that Richard did in
his first 3 years that I wouldn't think much of him. So I
think VSnares could be set to do some great stuff.
Not to say that I dislike VSnares at all, I already quite
like stuff that I've heard, it's just not 'amazing' or
anything I guess, but good stuff none the less.


 

offline bogala from NYC (United States) on 2003-12-11 13:27 [#00987000]
Points: 5125 Status: Regular



yep, thats exactly what im saying


 

offline bogala from NYC (United States) on 2003-12-11 13:34 [#00987012]
Points: 5125 Status: Regular



but aphex started before there was an internet. Before there
was computers that could do anything more than sequence
midi. Aphex's beats are more complex than vs when it comes
to finesse, complexity in tone, shape, timber. Richards drum
rolls are flawless in timber. He has an incredible skill at
knowing how to bring sounds together.


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2003-12-11 13:35 [#00987016]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to bogala: #00987012 | Show recordbag



I think you mean timbre...you can't make electronic music
out of wood.


 

offline bogala from NYC (United States) on 2003-12-11 13:37 [#00987019]
Points: 5125 Status: Regular



right. one typo. oh, well.


 

offline bogala from NYC (United States) on 2003-12-11 13:38 [#00987022]
Points: 5125 Status: Regular



electronic music
out of wood.
Hey, I have an idea.


 

offline DeadEight from vancouver (Canada) on 2003-12-11 13:46 [#00987043]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular



first of all, i;d like to say that Mu-Ziq's album is just as
worthy a drill album (when it drills) as the Chocolate
Wheelchair Album(with regards to Xammax's comment), and i'm
not saying this out of a bias for Mike P... as much as i
liked him, i hardly saw what all the fuss was about until i
heard bilious paths... whereas i've listened to virtually
every Snares recording that exists and own more Snares vinyl
than any other artist in my collection.... as far as the afx
vs. snares debate goes i'd side with afx... but listening to
his most recent tracks (Mangle 11, and the bug remix)... if
he doesn't come up with something new fast, he's going to
start sounding very repetitive... whereas snares is managing
to diversify his sound from album to album quite nicely
these days, which is an achievement, considering the amount
of output in the amount of time he has been around... i
won't deny that he falls into loops that are similar from
album to album, but overall... he has managed to cultivate a
progression (not necessarily forward, but different)...

and when squarepusher is on point... he knocks the fuck out
of both of them... (unfortunately, his melodies are not up
to snuff with afx...)

.... here's hoping we can expect great new releases from
Snares and Pusher... and hopefully a lovely forward sounding
release from Afx...


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2003-12-11 13:48 [#00987048]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



Yep Bilious Paths is second to only Dirquals Tolerable
Cruelty.


 

offline DeadEight from vancouver (Canada) on 2003-12-11 13:51 [#00987054]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular



i get the feeling i should hear dirqual... i realize it is
someone on the board and is being shared at some sight or
another... does anyone have it on slsk?
...

and while we're on the subject of skull-fuckery... who has
heard the new Eight Frozen Modules album?


 

offline oxygenfad from www.oxygenfad.com (Canada) on 2003-12-11 13:58 [#00987068]
Points: 4442 Status: Regular



Squarepusher.



 

offline ecnadniarb on 2003-12-11 14:00 [#00987073]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



I should be marketing manager for Mikro12 records.



 

offline DeadEight from vancouver (Canada) on 2003-12-11 14:03 [#00987077]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular



only if you do your job and tell me where i can find the
music--even though i know that you have already done this at
least once in another post devoted to it... that's what a
good promo-person would do...


 

offline APeSHiTZ from ¤BANgbANG¤ on 2003-12-11 14:12 [#00987092]
Points: 641 Status: Addict



VSNARES


 

offline DJ Xammax from not America on 2003-12-11 14:24 [#00987110]
Points: 11512 Status: Lurker



Heh... to be fair I'm not really the one to judge on drill
albums this year since most drill has bored me fucking
senseless since Drukqs!

What makes Snares interesting to me is just that: he's
interesting. He stands out. His work is so varied
that I can just keep listening and listening and never get
bored, and the way he throws seemingly random sounds into a
track and manages to keep it altogether... don't get me
started! Unmistakable style too.. I mean, who else was going
to put out a track like Einsten Rosen-Bridge?


 

offline DeadEight from vancouver (Canada) on 2003-12-11 14:26 [#00987115]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular



no one... there's no argument there... frankly, i'm most
partial to Ghetto Body Buddy


 

offline APeSHiTZ from ¤BANgbANG¤ on 2003-12-11 14:28 [#00987118]
Points: 641 Status: Addict



Skelechairs was the first to get me into snares and it just
struck me as friggin insane,
and the Find Candace Video got me in too..
skelechairs is pretty damn catchy too


 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2003-12-11 15:45 [#00987259]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



Aphex by a huge margin.

But the Funk is winning me over. The album coming in 2004
sounds like it should be his best yet and the most
compatible with my tastes. Can't wait.

But currently, none of his albums are good enough to be on
my regular rotation. Good, but not THAT good. I respect him
more than I enjoy him.


 

offline Atli from Reykjavík (Iceland) on 2003-12-12 09:30 [#00988103]
Points: 1309 Status: Lurker



i'm downloading the dirqual album from site. couldn't do
else after hearing so good things about it. still i hope
it's worth it since i'm on an isdn (in iceland nota bene,
expensive as hell).

deadeight: here's the url if you're interested:
http://www.barnofhell.com/tolerablecruelty.htm


 

offline Atli from Reykjavík (Iceland) on 2003-12-12 09:32 [#00988104]
Points: 1309 Status: Lurker



i haven't heard much snares so i can't decide on which one
is better though i've always liked squarepusher drills a bit
more than afx's. afx has got better melodies though, that's
true.


 

offline GIR from Easton on 2003-12-12 09:33 [#00988105]
Points: 828 Status: Addict



i would say now, afx, but snares is becoming bigger and
better.

plus imo, the way you make the sounds doesnt matter. A 4/4
beat still sounds the same in principle whether it was made
with a 50 piece band played by retarded llamas, or a drum
machine.


 

offline redrum from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2003-12-12 09:40 [#00988109]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict



aphex of course.

one word: vordhosbn.

and mt st michael.


 

offline Skink from A cesspool in eden on 2003-12-12 09:58 [#00988125]
Points: 7483 Status: Lurker



I think they are both very different but i like them both
alot, i think i preferaphex but i am still relativel new to
snares soi will give him a chance.

On the squarepusher issue i think alot of the breaks he uses
are from old jungle tracks or that's what it sounds like to
me but everything on hard normal daddy sounds like he
created it.

For an example,Listen to intelligent woman but dj rap then
listen to come on my selector and you will see what i mean.


 

offline dave_g from United Kingdom on 2003-12-13 08:18 [#00989435]
Points: 3372 Status: Lurker



verdict:aphex
evidence: cock/ver10, mangle11(circuit bent VIP),omgyja
switch7,taking control,hangable auto bulb,logon rock witch.

Nuff said.


 

offline scup_bucket from bloated exploding piss pockets on 2003-12-13 09:18 [#00989469]
Points: 4540 Status: Regular



i vote for Ovuca.


 

offline bogala from NYC (United States) on 2003-12-13 14:14 [#00989740]
Points: 5125 Status: Regular



How can you tell what time signature someone uses? How much
it changes? Pattern repition?


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2003-12-13 14:34 [#00989763]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to bogala: #00989740 | Show recordbag



You just think of a time signature that's not 4/4 and assume
that is what he is using because it is cool not to use 4/4
apparently.


 

offline scup_bucket from bloated exploding piss pockets on 2003-12-13 14:58 [#00989780]
Points: 4540 Status: Regular



i used 3/4 once therefore i am cool.


 

offline roygbivcore from Joyrex.com, of course! on 2003-12-13 16:32 [#00989895]
Points: 22557 Status: Lurker



it's because 4/4 is boring


 


Messageboard index