copyrights and remixes | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 483 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614114
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
copyrights and remixes
 

offline sadist from the dark side of the moon on 2003-09-18 00:11 [#00868030]
Points: 8670 Status: Lurker



if i remix a song, lets say "the day the world went away"
from nine inch nails, and i remix it, can i put it on a cd
and sell it ?

of course the song name will look like this:

nine inch nails - the world went away(sadist remix)

is this o.k. so ? or don't i even have to write this all
above ??

what about using samples from a song in my songs ??

thanks


 

offline disasemble from United States on 2003-09-18 00:12 [#00868032]
Points: 1448 Status: Regular



no, because you are benefitting off of someone elses name to
get your cd sold. even if thats not the intention.


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-09-18 00:13 [#00868033]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker



you can do it but if it sells enough copies you can get in
serious legal trouble for not clearing it

but no one will notice unless you sell some 10+ thousand
copies, so knock yourself out


 

offline disasemble from United States on 2003-09-18 00:14 [#00868034]
Points: 1448 Status: Regular



titsworth is right and said it a million times better than i
did, so listen to him.

you CAN do it, but yeah. there is risk if you are getting
into high numbers.


 

offline sadist from the dark side of the moon on 2003-09-18 00:23 [#00868038]
Points: 8670 Status: Lurker | Followup to titsworth: #00868033



hey, i mean i don't want to get trouble... and if i SHOULD
ask creator if i can make then i WILL do it.

okay okay, i will not sell the 10 thousand copies or what,
but i don't think they wouldn't let me do it unless the
remix would be really crap...

oh and who do i have to ask ? the musician or the label or
who ?? what if the musician died... or the label doesn't
exist ?


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-09-18 00:38 [#00868048]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to sadist: #00868038



don't bother.. neither trent nor nothing will ever get back
to you, and if you contacted interscope (parent company of
trent's nothing records) they'd just say no. if you really
believe in the remix, just put it on there. you're in poland
anyway so even less people who might disapprove will notice.
but yes, ideally you should get the artist's blessing, but
in reality you'll never get it because they don't answer
emails, letters, or calls.


 

offline sadist from the dark side of the moon on 2003-09-18 00:57 [#00868063]
Points: 8670 Status: Lurker | Followup to titsworth: #00868048



the nine inch remix was jsut an example...

what about samples ?? using samples ??


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-09-18 01:06 [#00868066]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to sadist: #00868063



same thing applies, except if you're just using a sample
it's a lot more likely you'll get away with it than if the
whole song is just a remix of someone else. in electronic
music people just expect to hear samples so it's not a big
deal. it's only after you start making a real profit that
the original artists try to get a piece of it.


 

offline od_step_cloak from Pleth (Australia) on 2003-09-18 01:06 [#00868067]
Points: 3803 Status: Regular



If I made a song and some kid did a remix of it with my
artist name in it, like you're doing, and I sued the kid for
it, I'd never be able to live with myself.


 

offline sadist from the dark side of the moon on 2003-09-18 01:18 [#00868074]
Points: 8670 Status: Lurker | Followup to od_step_cloak: #00868067



i hope many artists thin your way...

tit: what do you think then? should i write the name of the
song i remixed or make everything secret ?


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-09-18 01:36 [#00868083]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to sadist: #00868074



it's up to you. if it's a big name it might be really
obvious and you won't have to do it. if it's someone people
don't know it'd be polite and nice of you to credit the
original artist.


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2003-09-18 02:01 [#00868094]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator



well just look at the Criminal series on Planet Mu.

they make no secret of the tracks being remixes of pop
songs, yet they don't get any flack because of the small
numbers its pressed in.


 

offline sadist from the dark side of the moon on 2003-09-18 10:01 [#00868662]
Points: 8670 Status: Lurker | Followup to titsworth: #00868083



thanks all for the advice. i think i will choose the right
way to do... :)

qrter: that's a very interesting fact ! how do you know ?


 

offline nacmat on 2003-09-18 10:21 [#00868693]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker



interesting thread

but I got a related question:

you all make music, imagine you make a great track, or a
great album... and you put it online...
what if I take it and go to a label saying its mine? and
what if they release "my" album?
how can you fight that?


 

offline sadist from the dark side of the moon on 2003-09-18 10:25 [#00868696]
Points: 8670 Status: Lurker



nothing. that's the same with patent's. it has to be
official.

or at least i'm sure it is like this...


 

offline Portland from San Diego (United States) on 2003-09-18 10:25 [#00868697]
Points: 695 Status: Regular



one way is in court, having the source files for the songs.
if you cant reproduce the song from the source files then
youre assed out and the actual writer will win.



 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2003-09-18 10:27 [#00868699]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to nacmat: #00868693



i dont think you could do that, as the record label would
probably ask you to send them particular song in program
files (not mp3 or audio file) before releasing (at least
bigger labels i think)


 

offline sadist from the dark side of the moon on 2003-09-18 10:28 [#00868700]
Points: 8670 Status: Lurker | Followup to nacmat: #00868693



but it's nearly impossible. with "putting it online" you
sure mean services like zebox.com or other. there is always
a special point in a faq where's written, that you aren't
allowed to sell or duplicate the downloaded songs.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2003-09-18 10:29 [#00868702]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Portland: #00868697 | Show recordbag



Portland is right. For this reason you should keep the
masters in a sealed post dated (IE signed by the post office
as sent on a particular date) jiffy bag forever. Even before
mailing demo cds out it's worth doing. Everything of mine
that has gone to record companies sits in a couple of jiffy
bags upstairs as well as some "usable" masters for making
duplicates etc.

You can even get a bank to keep your jiffy bagged masters
for a small fee if you're serious about it.


 

offline sadist from the dark side of the moon on 2003-09-18 10:29 [#00868705]
Points: 8670 Status: Lurker | Followup to tolstoyed: #00868699



what if YOU are the label ?? :)


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2003-09-18 10:30 [#00868707]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



dont know how that works, but surely there are some laws
about it

hehe, but that could be a temporary solution


 

offline Portland from San Diego (United States) on 2003-09-18 10:59 [#00868770]
Points: 695 Status: Regular



NO label should ask you for source files. a master is
completely different from the source files that created the
song.

the only time source files are needed are for actual
remixes. in that case you should be under contract anyway
and once that is taken care of there is not much to worry
about.


 

offline earthleakage from tell the world you're winning on 2003-09-18 11:01 [#00868773]
Points: 27795 Status: Regular



violence and intimidation usally does the trick


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2003-09-18 11:05 [#00868778]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to sadist: #00868662



from the Planet Mu phorum, so indirectly from Mike P.. :P

both Criminal 12"s had a run of 2000 I think.

on nacmat's question: yup, it's all source files.

I would be able to reproduce all the individual samples and
the "song files" for Cubase - showing the exact build
up/structuring of samples and effects used in that program.


 

offline Portland from San Diego (United States) on 2003-09-18 11:14 [#00868798]
Points: 695 Status: Regular



sure you could. but you could not reproduce a track
completely with only cut up samples from a track. there will
be fragments and artifacts in the samples.

a better way to explain it is this, if there is a pad being
played in a track that is under the drum track, you could
not sample out the pad from the drums. the original creator
of the song could isolate that entire pad sequence without
the drums. therefore proving that he in fact created the
sound and song.

its not a catch all for law suits but holds up well when you
need to show that you created the song.


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2003-09-18 11:15 [#00868801]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to earthleakage: #00868773



HAHAHA


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2003-09-18 11:18 [#00868808]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to Portland: #00868798



isn't that the same?

the person who would steal your music just couldn't
reproduce all the clean samples used..?


 

offline evolume from seattle (United States) on 2003-09-18 12:55 [#00869020]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular | Followup to Ceri JC: #00868702



Ceri JC gives good advice. this is called the "poor man's
copywright"

i just number all my releases by hand and keep the 1st 10.

i doubt anyone would steal it. and if they did, who cares, i
give them away for free anyway, i'd be flattered if somebody
tried to steal it.


 

offline sadist from the dark side of the moon on 2003-09-18 13:09 [#00869041]
Points: 8670 Status: Lurker | Followup to evolume: #00869020



i want to start a label. cost of a cd will be about 2
dollars... so i don't think that will be to much huh ?


 

offline morguean from Calgary (Canada) on 2003-09-18 14:14 [#00869109]
Points: 1328 Status: Regular



sadist i was going to start the exact same topic with the
exact same question..... i recently did a remix of mindless
self indulgence

i actually emailed them and asked though because i have got
personal responses back a couple times before.


 

offline sadist from the dark side of the moon on 2003-09-18 14:43 [#00869147]
Points: 8670 Status: Lurker | Followup to morguean: #00869109



heh... i hoped i wouldn't be the onlyone the topic would be
useful for...

so, i got a biiig problem... the remix i made is from a
label which doesn't exist since 10 years... shit


 

offline sadist from the dark side of the moon on 2003-10-15 12:33 [#00903099]
Points: 8670 Status: Lurker



on "chocolate wheelchair album" there are so many samples...
did aron ask for everyone ??
how bout mu-ziq and "bilious paths" ??


 

offline Paco from Gothenburg (Sweden) on 2003-10-15 12:43 [#00903106]
Points: 2659 Status: Lurker



You can't do it without permission from the publisher. You
can't even give it away free on the Internet.

I thought about this when the Xltronic remix competition was
done. I'm curious how Phobia can sell CDRs with those
remixes. Have they been cleared or what? Maybe it's just one
of those things they let slip through..



 

offline sadist from the dark side of the moon on 2003-10-16 00:30 [#00903796]
Points: 8670 Status: Lurker | Followup to Paco: #00903106



sure they have !
mate autechre gave the permisson to make the remix contest
!!


 

offline Skink from A cesspool in eden on 2003-10-16 01:09 [#00903817]
Points: 7483 Status: Lurker



Actually the sealed dated jiffybag is a myth it has no
baring whatsoever on the copyright but on the plus side you
have copyright as soon as you write a track.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2003-10-16 01:28 [#00903829]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Skink: #00903817 | Show recordbag



No, it doesn't affect copyright- you're right, you have that
anyway (in this country, but it's best to put the copyright
sign for international reasons...), but it does work
in court. If you can prove (and this doesn't even have to be
"Beyond Reasonable Doubt"- just "more likely than not" as
it'd be civil rather than criminal court) that you had a
copy before the label the court would recognise you as the
owner of the copyright.


 

offline Skink from A cesspool in eden on 2003-10-16 02:17 [#00903860]
Points: 7483 Status: Lurker



I'll do it then.


 

offline Phobiazero from the next Xltronic (Sweden) on 2003-10-16 02:24 [#00903865]
Points: 10507 Status: Webmaster | Followup to Paco: #00903106 | Show recordbag



paco:

#1)
you're not paying for the remixes when you buy the aermx2003
compilation. only media+shipping

#2)
autechre themselves told me to go on and sell them in a more
commercial way - but i didn't.


 

offline sadist from the dark side of the moon on 2003-10-17 11:51 [#00905792]
Points: 8670 Status: Lurker



so what with chocolate wheelchair ??


 


Messageboard index