religion | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
DADONCK
...and 200 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614128
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
religion
 

offline atgmartin from DeathMallMegaComplexville (United States) on 2003-08-21 13:26 [#00831514]
Points: 873 Status: Lurker | Followup to catharsis: #00831498



4) humans created the concept of God.

There.


 

offline catharsis from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-08-21 13:32 [#00831523]
Points: 836 Status: Regular | Followup to atgmartin: #00831511



If light, mass and energy = God, I wouldn't be inclined to
disagree. It's certainly more accurate than our traditional
depiction of God. Props on your interpretation.


 

offline catharsis from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-08-21 13:36 [#00831529]
Points: 836 Status: Regular | Followup to atgmartin: #00831514



There are some that argue that the very fact that we have a
conception of God proves its existence.
I don't disagree with your suggestion; like I stated before,
the details of God vary from culture to culture, and the
concept of what we define as God / Tao / Universal Energy is
of human origin and culture specific.
The question remains however, if the Universe did not always
exist, it must have been created?


 

offline atgmartin from DeathMallMegaComplexville (United States) on 2003-08-21 13:37 [#00831535]
Points: 873 Status: Lurker | Followup to catharsis: #00831529



We have a concept of dragons, ogres and those walking tree
dudes from Lord of the Rings, too.


 

offline glass_eater from a blind nerves area (Switzerland) on 2003-08-21 13:38 [#00831537]
Points: 4904 Status: Regular



thatz pretty bullshits for the last part ,energy, light and
all, thats not a proof at all...either you feel it either
not..
you cannot really prove or deny, thats it


 

offline catharsis from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-08-21 13:40 [#00831541]
Points: 836 Status: Regular | Followup to atgmartin: #00831535



That was my arguement too. I wish Lord of the Rings was
real though. It would be so cool to take out some orcs with
a kick-ass bow.


 

offline atgmartin from DeathMallMegaComplexville (United States) on 2003-08-21 13:40 [#00831542]
Points: 873 Status: Lurker | Followup to catharsis: #00831529



Maybe the universe always did exist, though in a different
configuration. The concept of linear time here will fuck
with both points of view. What about god? was he born,
because what was going on before god. was the universe
created, if so when, and what was going on before that?
It's literally a mind-fuck for either of us.


 

offline glass_eater from a blind nerves area (Switzerland) on 2003-08-21 13:40 [#00831543]
Points: 4904 Status: Regular



haha from LOTR not really, i just went to iceland and theyve
got elfian stories and its 280 years old dude :)
even in other places, we have elfs in switzerland too...


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2003-08-21 13:41 [#00831546]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to atgmartin: #00831542



Jesus was bornded. It was like when the Bantha ate Brent
Sienna in PvP.

"I guess there's only one way out of a virgin..."


 

offline atgmartin from DeathMallMegaComplexville (United States) on 2003-08-21 13:42 [#00831551]
Points: 873 Status: Lurker | Followup to glass_eater: #00831537



You can deny it. I do. I think it takes a stronger person
to stand up for something that can't be proven though, and
do it without rehashing the same preprogrammed shit. I have
to applaude you guys. And I am being totally serious here.


 

offline catharsis from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-08-21 13:42 [#00831553]
Points: 836 Status: Regular | Followup to glass_eater: #00831537



You can't prove it in the tangible sense of a photo or
letter from God. But, you could make an excellent case
using reason.
I took a philosophy course in Unversity that wrestled with
the ideas of determinism (free will), creation etc. Some of
those philosophers present quite the case - hard to dispute.


 

offline atgmartin from DeathMallMegaComplexville (United States) on 2003-08-21 13:45 [#00831561]
Points: 873 Status: Lurker | Followup to catharsis: #00831553



Some lawyers get guilty people set free and innocent people
thrown into jail.


 

offline catharsis from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-08-21 13:45 [#00831564]
Points: 836 Status: Regular



Contemplating on the beginning and end of time is actually a
meditative technique in zen buddhism. Because there is no
logical answer, only with the destruction of the intellect
can the truth be known. I'm working on it - I'll let you
know when I figure it out ;)


 

offline catharsis from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-08-21 13:46 [#00831570]
Points: 836 Status: Regular | Followup to atgmartin: #00831561



That line was inseretd with perfect style.


 

offline atgmartin from DeathMallMegaComplexville (United States) on 2003-08-21 13:49 [#00831578]
Points: 873 Status: Lurker | Followup to catharsis: #00831570



LOL!


 

offline catharsis from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-08-21 14:07 [#00831603]
Points: 836 Status: Regular



Atgmartin, I'm just curious. Where will you (your
consciousness) go when you die? I'm not looking for any
answer, I'm just interested in what you think, and it might
help me to better understand your perspective.


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2003-08-21 15:36 [#00831693]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker | Followup to catharsis: #00831603



What's it like when you pass out, or are anesthesized, put
to sleep, for a surgery or something? A whole lot of
nothing.
That's what happens.


 

offline atgmartin from DeathMallMegaComplexville (United States) on 2003-08-21 15:37 [#00831694]
Points: 873 Status: Lurker



Catharsis,
We are sentient beings, like all animals. Like my pet
snake, my pet cat, when I die, I believe I will be no more.
My body will be burned, or rot, whatever, my brain will have
been extinguished, my thoughts and memories gone. I believe
that when we die, we are no more. I've been through a death
in the family recently, where it would have been comforting
to believe something romantic like heaven, or reincarnation,
but I just don't. I cannot be anything other than true to
what I believe, even if it's not as comforting.


 

offline danbrusca from Derbyshire (United Kingdom) on 2003-08-21 15:40 [#00831701]
Points: 4570 Status: Lurker | Followup to catharsis: #00831603



Conciousness is just a convenient term for various
biological, chemical and electrical goings on in the brain,
When they cease, conciousness ceases.


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2003-08-21 15:40 [#00831702]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker | Followup to catharsis: #00831603



People like to hope that death
isn't the end.
They ask, how could that be?

The answer is so obvious, why don't they look at what
happened
before
they were alive?

What was it like before you were born?
Nothing. Because the person you call
'I', was grown in your mothers uterus,
assembled by the instructions in your DNA
that have
evolved
over what is it?
2.5 billion years
of life on earth?


 

offline catharsis from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-08-21 15:41 [#00831703]
Points: 836 Status: Regular



O.K.

So loss of consciousness, loss of memory....it's like you
never even existed. Correct? It's quite believable IMO.

Though your energy and your matter never truly die, I have
no argument against the cessation of consciousness. Even if
you believe in reincarnation, people can rarely recall
past-lives, so again......it's really not at all morbid.



 

offline catharsis from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-08-21 15:42 [#00831706]
Points: 836 Status: Regular | Followup to danbrusca: #00831701



Unproven.


 

offline danbrusca from Derbyshire (United Kingdom) on 2003-08-21 15:45 [#00831711]
Points: 4570 Status: Lurker | Followup to catharsis: #00831706



There's nothing to prove.


 

offline catharsis from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-08-21 15:45 [#00831712]
Points: 836 Status: Regular



I can affect my physiology through willfull thought, and my
physiology can affect my thoughts. The notion that I can
willfully change the rate and type of chemical reactions in
the body would suggest that there is an entity that
functions under our control that is not dependent on these
physical things.

No one has found the seed of conciousness - no one is even
certain that conciousness resides within the brain.


 

offline catharsis from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-08-21 15:48 [#00831717]
Points: 836 Status: Regular | Followup to mappatazee: #00831702



Valid point. Some people cannot accept the thought of
eternal sleep. If you have no memory of the past or
awareness of the present, you're essentially in a state of
non-being (as we would define it), and like mappatazee
suggested, no different than before we were born.


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2003-08-21 15:49 [#00831718]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker | Followup to catharsis: #00831712



Uhh, right...
It seems pretty clear yours doesn't reside in your
brain,
and i've got a pretty good idea where it does.


 

offline atgmartin from DeathMallMegaComplexville (United States) on 2003-08-21 15:51 [#00831720]
Points: 873 Status: Lurker | Followup to catharsis: #00831712



Maybe it's that we only use a small percentage of our
brain's potential. Some people have mastered the art of
slowing down and even stopping their heart but by the power
of thought. Maybe they have honed the part of their brain
that controls the parasympathetic nervous systems to a
degree greater than the average person. I mean, I can move
my ears. I can also move my toe next to the big toe on my
right foot, without moving any other toes, which most people
can't do.


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2003-08-21 15:52 [#00831721]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker | Followup to catharsis: #00831712



Willful thought, yes:
every part of your body is controlled directly, or
inderectly by your brain, and if you can train your mind to
stimulate the correct response, you can affect your
physiology whether it's through increased heart-rate,
endorphines released by the pituitary, etc. etc.
It seems that would prove further that the consciousness
resides in the brain, rather than the astral 15th dimension
cyber-soul-space.


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2003-08-21 15:55 [#00831726]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker | Followup to atgmartin: #00831720



being able to do things like that comes from having
different muscular structures. Like curling your tongue and
such,
some people lack the muscles that pull in a certain
direction because of what is coded for in their genes.


 

offline catharsis from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-08-21 15:57 [#00831728]
Points: 836 Status: Regular



Yes, thought releases specific chemicals that affect other
organs and glands. But if you are to suggest that even
thought and personality itself is goverened by chemicals of
which we have no control, I ask you what is controlling the
release of these chemicals.

IF your response is "nothing", then you've just demonstrated
that you feel that free-will is false, and we are merely
running on auto-pilot as a series of effects from an initial
cause that was started at the beginning of the universe.


 

offline danbrusca from Derbyshire (United Kingdom) on 2003-08-21 15:58 [#00831729]
Points: 4570 Status: Lurker



There's no such thing as 'willful thought'. Every thought
you have is the logical consequence of the myriad events
that immediately preceeded it.


 

offline Key_Secret from Sverige (Sweden) on 2003-08-21 16:02 [#00831734]
Points: 9325 Status: Regular | Followup to danbrusca: #00831729



I think everyone believes in cause and effect, but that's
not the issue here.


 

offline catharsis from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-08-21 16:03 [#00831735]
Points: 836 Status: Regular | Followup to danbrusca: #00831729



So essentially you believe in determinism. If I go out an
kill somebody with an axe right now, it would be because I
have no control. I would be operating on effect from an
initial cause.


 

offline catharsis from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-08-21 16:04 [#00831737]
Points: 836 Status: Regular



If everyone believes in cause and effect, then essentially
we don't believe in free will. I don't think you'll get
many supporters there.
It's a perfectly valid and accepted hypothesis - it's just
too scary to fathom by most people. Especially religious
nuts.


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2003-08-21 16:05 [#00831738]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker | Followup to danbrusca: #00831729



agreed with danbrusca.

In such a mind-boggling complex system of neurons and
synapses, neurotransmitters receiving and dealing with
chaotic stimuli all the time, the illusion of free-will is
very convincing. I don't feel too much like a machine
all the time.

But the point is,
there is nothing
'mystical'
or
'spiritual'
behind consciousness.

We can't even predict the weather hardly.


 

offline danbrusca from Derbyshire (United Kingdom) on 2003-08-21 16:05 [#00831739]
Points: 4570 Status: Lurker | Followup to Key_Secret: #00831734



It's the issue in the post I was replying to.


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2003-08-21 16:06 [#00831741]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker | Followup to catharsis: #00831735



And as an effect of you killing someone,
you
will be punished for your actions.


 

offline catharsis from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-08-21 16:11 [#00831744]
Points: 836 Status: Regular | Followup to mappatazee: #00831741



No shit sherlock.

Help, the determinists are ganging up on me! I guess now I
can just sit back and let the auto-pilot soar. OFF TO THE
XBOX!!! ;)


 

offline Key_Secret from Sverige (Sweden) on 2003-08-21 16:15 [#00831755]
Points: 9325 Status: Regular | Followup to catharsis: #00831744



hehe...


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2003-08-21 16:16 [#00831758]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker



Hey now,
there is the quantum uncertainty principal,
limiting our knowledge of what's going to happen by the
Heisenberg (i think that's it?) limit.
So, you've got some leeway to play around with there


 

offline glass_eater from a blind nerves area (Switzerland) on 2003-08-21 16:17 [#00831760]
Points: 4904 Status: Regular



oh you have an xbox... in a few minutes we'll reach the
point


 

offline J Swift from United Kingdom on 2003-08-21 18:57 [#00831909]
Points: 650 Status: Regular



Yeah, one thing I learnt from years of computer programming,
very blatantly, is that there's no way to ever create
awareness, which is the actual experience of consiousness...
There's also no way to measure it, so it's a tough one.
One argument is that it occurs at a certain level of
complexity - Which, if it were actually right, could mean
the universe itself was aware, being as space and time are
all relative, etc... and there are a similar number of stars
in the universe to brain cells in the brain (at least that's
what I've heard).
I believe it will be very possible to perfectly simulate
human consiousness in software, but that is a fundamentally
different thing from awareness, which is "true" consiousness
I guess...
I do believe that man's concept of God is created by man,
that is definetly true - But I don't believe it's created
out of rational thought or imagination, I believe it's a
good arguement for God's existance, as all animals have a
large amount of innate knowledge - Especially as pretty much
all religions agree that we are all part of God, it is quite
likely that the concept would be implanted deep within our
minds...
Union with God is actually characteristic of anyone (from
atheists to hindu's) who takes VERY large amounts of LSD -
My perspective is that consiousness isn't localised and you
are actually God, just a particular perspective... Afterall,
if you woke up with consious access to everyone's memories
you would sort of become everyone, but obviously there are
physical survival reasons for that not being the case.
You can see true consiousness as an entirely different level
of reality - You'd have to say it's fundamental to the
universe too, as it does seem like everything's in place for
it to evolve, all the constants of space/time...


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2003-08-21 19:37 [#00831944]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker | Followup to J Swift: #00831909



That last part there,
that's an 'anthropic' principal.
That would be an answer to the question:
"Why is the universe the way it is?"
"It is that way so that it could be observed by me and this
question could be asked"



 

offline catharsis from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-08-21 19:52 [#00831971]
Points: 836 Status: Regular



Similar to the anthropomorphic principal that suggests that
everything in this universe is created solely for human use
(like the Bible would suggest). I think this is utter
bullshit.


 

offline weatheredstoner from same shit babes. (United States) on 2003-08-21 19:54 [#00831974]
Points: 12585 Status: Lurker



i think the universe was created solely for itself.
Therefore the beings that learn to manipulate it, can do
whatever they damn well please with it. After all we ARE the
universe.


 

offline catharsis from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-08-21 19:56 [#00831980]
Points: 836 Status: Regular



I thought we were the WORLD and the CHILDREN.
Stupidity aside though, that was a splendid comment
weatheredstoner.


 

offline plaidzebra from so long, xlt on 2003-08-21 20:39 [#00832019]
Points: 5678 Status: Lurker



agreed, weatheredstoner hit the nail on the head.


 

offline J Swift from United Kingdom on 2003-08-21 21:26 [#00832072]
Points: 650 Status: Regular



You could say that consiousness is the end result of this
set of constants in reality though - We are proof of that -
We would have happened at some point, somewhere in the
universe if not here - I'm sure it's not such an unlikely
possibility... Which kind of suggests that this universe
(which we are an integral part of) was intended to
become/create consiousness.
One of the main arguments for the existance of God in
physics and philosophy has been that the universal consants
are so finely balanced - So maybe there's infinite universes
all with different constants and characteristics (very few
achieving physical matter atall), or that there is an
underlying intelligence running through the whole thing,
maybe an ability to create itself.
I think Jack Kerouac used to view the universe as a giant
womb of consiousness and life.

(I also saw an interesting documentary about consiousness
not too long ago on Brit TV - They believed the consious
element of the mind existed on the quantum level, in
micro-neurons, which are like mini-computers, following the
laws of quantum physics, evaporating into the cosmos, yet
staying together and formed when physical death of the body
occured. Were tryng to explain how near death experiences so
often involve floating perspectives and things...)


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2003-08-21 21:29 [#00832076]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker



Seeing shit like that is a common side effect of your brain
not receiving enough oxygen.

Kind of like native american's used to go on their little
treck in to the woods to see their guardian vision or
whatever. All it was was them starving and/or low blood
sugar.


 

offline atgmartin from DeathMallMegaComplexville (United States) on 2003-08-21 22:26 [#00832109]
Points: 873 Status: Lurker | Followup to J Swift: #00831909



"...I believe it's a good arguement for God's existance, as
all animals have a
large amount of innate knowledge"

All flying birds know that they have to fly when they are
little chickies. Not all humans know that they have to
believe in god. I cannot liken the two scenarios, unless
I'm defective.


 


Messageboard index