religion | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 598 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614128
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
religion
 

offline atgmartin from DeathMallMegaComplexville (United States) on 2003-08-20 11:34 [#00829748]
Points: 873 Status: Lurker | Followup to Key_Secret: #00829735



Brother (the typewriter company) has signed on to provide
continuous maintenance of the typewriters and ink refills.


 

offline Key_Secret from Sverige (Sweden) on 2003-08-20 11:39 [#00829765]
Points: 9325 Status: Regular | Followup to atgmartin: #00829743



If anything, single celled organisms are god: all life
came from them.


nah... why do you think that?



 

offline atgmartin from DeathMallMegaComplexville (United States) on 2003-08-20 11:43 [#00829770]
Points: 873 Status: Lurker



Cause I said so.


 

offline catharsis from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-08-20 11:47 [#00829777]
Points: 836 Status: Regular



Of course I believe in life on other planets.
I believe that God is not shaped like a human (why the fuck
would he need to be?)
I believe that the world was created in more than 7 billion
years, not 7 days.
I believe that there are many falsehoods in the Bible.
However, despite all of this, I still believe in the
teachings of Jesus, Buddha and Lao Tzu. If you have ever
spent a considerable amount of time with either of these
three (among others), you would reconsider your notions that
life is about more than fucking.
Religion / spirituality isn't about incence, bells, goats
blood, sacrifices, rituals and holy wars, it's about a truth
that is understood, and not known.


 

offline Key_Secret from Sverige (Sweden) on 2003-08-20 11:49 [#00829779]
Points: 9325 Status: Regular | Followup to catharsis: #00829777



hey... you believe in the theory of evolution?


 

offline catharsis from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-08-20 11:49 [#00829780]
Points: 836 Status: Regular



What about the atomic particles that are necessary for
single celled organisms to exist? I would reckon that God
is more like an electron.


 

offline catharsis from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-08-20 11:52 [#00829786]
Points: 836 Status: Regular



Yes...I believe in the theory of evolution. It's virtually
impossible to dispute it.
Although; are genetic mutations RANDOM, or is there a method
to this madness? Genetic mutations are necesssary for
evolution, but do you think these mutations are entirely
unguided or uninfluenced? If so, how would you prove your
case?


 

offline Key_Secret from Sverige (Sweden) on 2003-08-20 11:53 [#00829790]
Points: 9325 Status: Regular | Followup to catharsis: #00829786



so you don't believe in gradual evolution?


 

offline Key_Secret from Sverige (Sweden) on 2003-08-20 11:54 [#00829791]
Points: 9325 Status: Regular | Followup to Key_Secret: #00829790



I mean like through adaption


 

offline catharsis from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-08-20 11:55 [#00829792]
Points: 836 Status: Regular



Science can either be a threat or an asset to religion.
Personally, the more I understand this universe, the more I
find it difficult to deny the existence of a "God" or
consciousness beyond our own. There are more reasons to
believe than reasons not to.


 

offline J Swift from United Kingdom on 2003-08-20 11:55 [#00829793]
Points: 650 Status: Regular



"If you throw 1,000 monkeys onto typewriters, for an
infinite
amount of time, eventually, one of these monkeys will type
Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet verbatim"

So therefore, if you are a purely physical being,
constructed of atoms etc... then your body will one day
reform through sheer mathematical chance...
Some philosophers used to actually go along with that -
Think it's quite an old idea - But then, one day your body
would reform with a female sumo wrestler embedded in your
scrotum, a shopping centre coming out of your ear, etc...
Also, the only part that REALLY makes you "you" would be
your central cortex, which is only a square cm large (i
think!) - So that's even better chance of reforming - Maybe
you'd happen to reform in the body of a man with six arms...

I personally don't go along with that - But if the universe
was merely atoms, infinite time, and mathematical
probability then it would have to happen one day.


 

offline catharsis from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-08-20 11:58 [#00829798]
Points: 836 Status: Regular



Adaptation? Like one organism carries a trait that gives it
an advantage over other speices, and through it's survival,
it reproduces offspring that carry the new genetic trait?
Adaptation can also occur for a single being, in a single
lifetime. Each time I go to the gym, my muscles adapt to
weight they are exposed to, and my body adapts by retaining
and increasing muscle fibre density.


 

offline atgmartin from DeathMallMegaComplexville (United States) on 2003-08-20 11:58 [#00829801]
Points: 873 Status: Lurker



Catharsis, i think the bottom line is that you want/need
spiritual guidance and I do not. Which I respect you for,
don't get me wrong. I haven't read anything other than
parts of the bible due to my catholic upbringing, but nor do
I have any desire to, any more than I have a desire to read
a Harlequin romance.


 

offline Key_Secret from Sverige (Sweden) on 2003-08-20 11:59 [#00829802]
Points: 9325 Status: Regular | Followup to catharsis: #00829798



was that an answer to my question?


 

offline J Swift from United Kingdom on 2003-08-20 12:00 [#00829803]
Points: 650 Status: Regular | Followup to catharsis: #00829792



I am actually very rational, brought up being heavily into
computers, science, AI, etc... used to program AI when I was
19 quite seriously - almost went on to study it long-term
etc..
But through deconditioning myself I cannot possibly deny the
existance of God - (only my humble opinion of course) - But
feel as if I can see and feel God's presense every moment of
the day - I feel my own consious awareness is a small part
of God - I thoroghly go along with and admire "true"
christians and followers of many other religions - i respect
that open-mindedness more than just about anything else in
this world.


 

offline catharsis from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-08-20 12:00 [#00829805]
Points: 836 Status: Regular



It may look like chaos at first glance, but there is a
TREMENDOUS prevalence of order if you look carefully at the
universe. What you see out your window is more than random
coincidence of bouncing atoms and probabilities.


 

offline atgmartin from DeathMallMegaComplexville (United States) on 2003-08-20 12:04 [#00829810]
Points: 873 Status: Lurker | Followup to J Swift: #00829793



Hey, who knows what's down the pike in a few billion more
years. I highly doubt the scenario you brought up, but the
entropy in the universe changes at a rate that none of us
can discern. The sunis not infinite, therefore the world is
not infinite. As the sun collapses upon itself, life on
this planet will be reshaped one way or the other.


 

offline J Swift from United Kingdom on 2003-08-20 12:04 [#00829811]
Points: 650 Status: Regular



Paul Davies wrote an excellent book "The Mind of God" all
about the underlying beauty of cosmic order.


 

offline catharsis from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-08-20 12:04 [#00829812]
Points: 836 Status: Regular



I agree with your last statement J Swift, I feel the same
way.
Atgmartin, I respect your views and I'm glad that you've not
let me persuade you. I would be a hypocrite if I insisted
that you adopt my perspective.
Key_Secret, I'm not qutie sure what you're getting at, but
if my interpretation of adaptation is corret, than yes, I
believe in adaptation.



 

offline atgmartin from DeathMallMegaComplexville (United States) on 2003-08-20 12:06 [#00829813]
Points: 873 Status: Lurker | Followup to catharsis: #00829798



But your body does adapt genetically, only cosmetically.
Your genes are not going to be passed along with bigger
muscles (!) rather, your genes carry with them the
information that determines how your offspring's muscles
will respond to repeated stress and at what rate.


 

offline catharsis from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-08-20 12:07 [#00829816]
Points: 836 Status: Regular



Einstein is actually among my great spiritual teachers.
Mass, energy and light are constant - do these elements
comprise "God"? Our Sun will burn out, but nothing is lost,
merely transformed.


 

offline catharsis from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-08-20 12:09 [#00829819]
Points: 836 Status: Regular



I was referring to adaptation of a single lifetime and
single organism.
Ever heard of collective unconsciousness?


 

offline atgmartin from DeathMallMegaComplexville (United States) on 2003-08-20 12:09 [#00829820]
Points: 873 Status: Lurker



Nothing is lost except life as we know it.


 

offline Key_Secret from Sverige (Sweden) on 2003-08-20 12:10 [#00829821]
Points: 9325 Status: Regular | Followup to catharsis: #00829812



the reason I was asking is because I don't believe in the
adoption-thingy... And you and I are similar in some ways, I
feel... so I was just wondering...

Are there really such a thing as "coincidence"? I mean even
science try to prove there isn't (by making laws everywhere
possible).
I don't really believe in coincidence, it's just a thing you
can say when you don't understand something.


 

offline atgmartin from DeathMallMegaComplexville (United States) on 2003-08-20 12:10 [#00829824]
Points: 873 Status: Lurker | Followup to catharsis: #00829819



No


 

offline catharsis from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-08-20 12:11 [#00829825]
Points: 836 Status: Regular



But our energy and our mass will endure.


 

offline atgmartin from DeathMallMegaComplexville (United States) on 2003-08-20 12:15 [#00829829]
Points: 873 Status: Lurker



Sure, that's true. I think where we disagree is that I
don't belive our essence will endure.


 

offline catharsis from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-08-20 12:18 [#00829834]
Points: 836 Status: Regular



Its a theory that attempts to explain how things like fear
of a specific creature (e.g. a snake), can be passed through
offspring to offspring.
Carl Jung has described collective unconciousness and how
universal feelings / emotions, etc, can coincide with
exposure from anything to a specific animal, situation, or
even human symbols.



 

offline catharsis from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-08-20 12:19 [#00829836]
Points: 836 Status: Regular



If we suggest that our "essence" is "God" do you think that
God will endure?


 

offline atgmartin from DeathMallMegaComplexville (United States) on 2003-08-20 12:45 [#00829861]
Points: 873 Status: Lurker



I wouldn't suggest that our essence is god. I would suggest
that there is no god.


 

offline catharsis from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-08-20 12:57 [#00829874]
Points: 836 Status: Regular



OK then...one simple question. If you believe that our
universe was created by a tremendous explosion of mass, can
you tell me when this mass came together, and where the
ingredients for this mass could have been found before its
existence.
I realize that neither you nor I can answer this question,
I'm just curious as to what your ideas might be.


 

offline atgmartin from DeathMallMegaComplexville (United States) on 2003-08-20 13:01 [#00829877]
Points: 873 Status: Lurker



When did the universe begin? I the Milky Way the original
galaxy? I think not. Stars die, galaxies die with them,
energy and mass are concentrated, dispersed, concentrated
again, but differently.
You could ask yourself: what was god before it was god?


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2003-08-20 13:04 [#00829883]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker | Followup to catharsis: #00829874



Yes, I like it when theistic persons try to use that
argument, when it can equally be turned around to say "WHat
made God? WHat was there before there was God?"


 

offline catharsis from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-08-20 13:05 [#00829884]
Points: 836 Status: Regular



So when did this collection of stars and planets come into
being? Can you explain why the universe is continually
expanding? (the stars are moving farther and farther from
each other)
So you're suggesting that black holes will once again become
stars?


 

offline catharsis from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-08-20 13:06 [#00829885]
Points: 836 Status: Regular



It would seem more likely that one would have to be created
and one would not, unless they were one and the same.


 

offline catharsis from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-08-20 13:07 [#00829888]
Points: 836 Status: Regular



Unless you're suggesting that millions of galaxies gave
birth to God, I think we know the answer to your question.


 

offline Key_Secret from Sverige (Sweden) on 2003-08-20 13:08 [#00829891]
Points: 9325 Status: Regular | Followup to Key_Secret: #00829821



catharsis : you missed this post?

anyway, I'm off to eat some veggies, have a nice day :)


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2003-08-20 13:08 [#00829892]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker | Followup to catharsis: #00829884



There is a sort of 'negative pressure' associated with the
vaccuum of space, along with dark matter.

Black holes do eventually evaporate, for the details, I
don't remember, I think I read about it in "A Brief History
of Time".

Currently, it doesn't look like there is enough matter to
hold the universe together, thus our universe is a
"run-away" universe and will continue to expand at an
increasing rate. Eventually, matter and energy will be too
dilute to support any kind of life here.


 

offline evolume from seattle (United States) on 2003-08-20 13:11 [#00829896]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular



it is fascinating to speculate on the nature of life and of
the self awareness of man. for some people it brings great
comfort to know that we are here for a purpose and that our
spirits are immortal; that something greater awaits us after
life.

i can not deny that my existance is a remarkable occurance.
whether it is a product of coincidence or destiny does not
concern me. my only concern is that i take full advantage
of it because i believe it is extremely likely that i will
not get another life after this one.


 

offline catharsis from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-08-20 13:19 [#00829907]
Points: 836 Status: Regular | Followup to mappatazee: #00829892



Unless there is tremendous kinetic energy that is propelling
galaxies away from eachother. An enormous explosion of mass
and energy might be enough to send stars and planets
millions of lightyears away from eachother given enough
time.


 

offline catharsis from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-08-20 13:20 [#00829910]
Points: 836 Status: Regular



Definition of the word "I" requires an entirely different
thread.


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2003-08-20 13:21 [#00829912]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker | Followup to catharsis: #00829907



but it wouldn't be accelerating, like it is


 

offline J Swift from United Kingdom on 2003-08-20 13:23 [#00829914]
Points: 650 Status: Regular | Followup to atgmartin: #00829877



I think the big bang created time too didn't it...? Energy
created space/time right? (I'm not all that clued up on
physics so correct me if I'm slightly out!).
So there was no before - Your brain thinks in linear time
like that, but that's another thing that keeps you/us really
seeing things propelry..
Physics often points towards a God or some sort because
there are sets of universal constants that are finely
balanced throghout reality, and slight deviation in any of
them would result in either: the big bang would just shoot
energy out into infinity; or it would explode and gravity
would pull it all back together... apparently the balance of
all these constants (the mass of an electron, speed of
light, etc..) is so perfectly balanced, to the extent that
matter can form from light particles, chemicals and amino
acids can form from matter, live can form from chemicals,
then ultimately consiousness and awareness can form from
life - Everything being interconnected in a kind of fabric
of reality rather than a bunch of atoms floating in space -
the universe, like one giant 4dimensional organism has
attained consiousness and life - and many of us are
unknowing participants, only aware of our localised
consiousness...
Afterall, the only thing that tells you where you physically
are is your sensory organs, the only thing that makes you
"you" is your unique memories - I kind of think of the
consious element as being universal and possibly
omni-present, not really existing in the world/level of
physical matter in any way, just connected through certain
pathways..


 

offline catharsis from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-08-20 13:23 [#00829915]
Points: 836 Status: Regular



Is there something pushing or pulling?


 

offline catharsis from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-08-20 13:25 [#00829919]
Points: 836 Status: Regular



J Swift, there are some really dope psychology experiments
on Buddhist monks who have attained enlightenment. It's
quite freaky actually.


 

offline catharsis from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-08-20 13:31 [#00829925]
Points: 836 Status: Regular



Generally, they don't use the term "I", and don't adapt to
anything other than the present moment.
Phrases like "I am watering the lawn", are replaced with
"the lawn is being watered". It's as though the ego
dissolves.
Similarly, one study found that these monks could not adapt
to repeated gong rings. Even after several minutes, the
monks would still display signs of shock after every gong
ring, while "regular" control subjects soon learned to
anticipate the gong rings.


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2003-08-20 13:32 [#00829927]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker | Followup to J Swift: #00829914



Yeah, there was no time before the big bang, and there is no
time without space.


 

offline kurrrak from Bialystok (Poland) on 2003-08-20 13:33 [#00829928]
Points: 1264 Status: Lurker



we always like to talk about things which we know the less
about


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2003-08-20 13:34 [#00829929]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker | Followup to catharsis: #00829925



weird, interesting


 

offline uviol from United States on 2003-08-20 13:35 [#00829931]
Points: 2496 Status: Lurker | Followup to catharsis: #00829925



So what do you think is the significance of this? (genuine
curiosity)


 


Messageboard index