Richard´s way of working in an album | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 334 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614155
Today 0
Topics 127544
  
 
Messageboard index
Richard´s way of working in an album
 

offline nacmat on 2003-06-30 15:44 [#00762956]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker



ok... I ve been thinking about how many of richard´s
albums are really compilations of tracks he had done over
the years...
see:
saw 85-92

surfing on sine waves (his works from 86 to 89, except some
of the tracks, like quoth)

I care because you do (if we consider the dates he wrote in
the back artwork of the cd some tracks are from 1990 and the
release came out in 1995)

drukqs: we have all heard theories about how there are
tracks here he had done from the early nineties

so really most of richard´s albums are not really albums
but compilations... maybe the RDJ album is really an album,
but I am not even sure about this... as I am not sure either
with saw II

so, when has richard done an album in all its meaning, this
is, with each track thought to be for that album since the
first moment?


 

offline giginger from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2003-06-30 15:46 [#00762958]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



Good call nacmat. 26 mixes for Cash falls into that
catergory too :P


 

offline nacmat on 2003-06-30 15:48 [#00762961]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker | Followup to giginger: #00762958



well of course there are compilations that are of course
considered as compilations:
26 mixes, caustic window compilation, classics, singles
collection 51/13...


 

offline giginger from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2003-06-30 15:48 [#00762962]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



What about Caustic Window? What's the deal with that one?
The joyrex series were all released about the same time
yeah?

RDJ album was all one era too I think


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2003-06-30 15:51 [#00762969]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



saw2 perhaps?

drukqs sound like tracks are build in an album, no matter
what the theories


 

offline nacmat on 2003-06-30 15:52 [#00762973]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker | Followup to giginger: #00762962



but the caustic window is not an album... its a compilation
of the joyrex eps... its true that they were all created in
the same year (or nearly) but they were meant to be diferent
eps (as they are) that later in 1998 were compiled in this
compilation....

my point was about the albums... those albums meant to be
albums but that in my opinion are really compilations too


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2003-06-30 15:52 [#00762975]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



Analogue Bubblebath 3

and definitely mike & rich album :)


 

offline nacmat on 2003-06-30 15:56 [#00762983]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker



so:

saw II are all ambient tracks created to be in that album?

rdj album, mike & rich and abb3 really seem to be albums as
I understand an album


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2003-06-30 15:57 [#00762985]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



dont know why he called the selected :)


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2003-06-30 15:57 [#00762987]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



the=them


 

offline giginger from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2003-06-30 15:57 [#00762988]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Followup to nacmat: #00762973 | Show recordbag



Hmmmm, yes. I suppose in a way it is.


 

offline ijonspeches from 109P/Swift-Tuttle on 2003-06-30 17:09 [#00763083]
Points: 7846 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



well perhaps its kinda boring to do and album.
instead its quite fun doing tracks and its possible to do
one track with these kind of progs and stuff, have a change
and do that kind of stuff and later go back to the old
ones.
maybe he uses this kind of stuff, gets bored with it makes
some tunes in a nother way with other equipment and has a
listen to the year old song, somehow gets a idea how to make
something new with that old machine...

maybe i say crap, maybe he even "inspired" himself
considering that as a development of means, which he thought
he had used until they were spent but then has a new idea or
way to combinate with newer softs or synths...

ajsfbaufbabfjkwbfiuwebfwaefb


 

offline ijonspeches from 109P/Swift-Tuttle on 2003-06-30 17:12 [#00763087]
Points: 7846 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



anyway its quite smart not rushing things and wait until you
think its riped out.
or the right cimbination of tracks is there.
its like doing a unlimited number of albums at the same time
and sometimes one finishes...


 

offline WeaklingChild from Glasgow (United Kingdom) on 2003-06-30 17:16 [#00763093]
Points: 3354 Status: Lurker



yeah...its better to do tracks when u feel like it rather
than to sit and feel pressured to make tracks to complete an
album that has to be delivered to the record company.


 

offline nacmat on 2003-06-30 18:32 [#00763148]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker | Followup to WeaklingChild: #00763093



interesting point...

but have autechre been slaves of their record label?... they
really did lots of albums (real albums)...


 

offline MrGerbik from United States on 2003-06-30 18:46 [#00763158]
Points: 392 Status: Lurker



I would assume that SAW2 was also a compilation of ambient
stuff he made over a couple of years. Blue Calx appears on
The Philosophy of Sound and Machine, which was out about 3
years prior to SAW2 I believe.


 

offline nacmat on 2003-06-30 18:51 [#00763162]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker | Followup to MrGerbik: #00763158



so that leaves us with just with 3 albums so far :
rdj album, mike & rich and abb3

abb3 isnt even considered an album (as it was released as an
ep)


 

offline wayout from the street of crocodiles on 2003-06-30 22:18 [#00763256]
Points: 2849 Status: Lurker



i think come to daddy was made in the way you describe as
making an album, because i remember in an interview he
mentioned staying up for a long time to finish it by a
certain time.

but i think most artists make albums in a similar way of
just making tracks and then compiling them.. usually tracks
made within the same general time period will be similar
enough thematically and stylistically that it seems they
were made with the idea of an album in mind.



 

offline hevquip from megagram dusk sect (United States) on 2003-06-30 22:35 [#00763268]
Points: 3381 Status: Regular



rdj album actually an album...well when we think about it
the way you do nacmat, it could possibly not be an album
because 2 tracks off of it also appear on his unreleased
melodies from mars.


 

offline OK on 2003-06-30 23:24 [#00763289]
Points: 4791 Status: Lurker



i think you give much importance to the concept of an
'album'

and i blame radiohead for this.


 

offline nobsmuggler from silly mid-off on 2003-07-01 00:26 [#00763307]
Points: 6265 Status: Addict | Followup to OK: #00763289



the concept of album

albums are good things e.g. mellon collie and the infinite
sadness by the smashing pumpkins is like a sine wave in its
rapid changes from fall asleep music to head beaters and it
was made that way


 

offline Dael from the low end (Australia) on 2003-07-01 01:12 [#00763318]
Points: 968 Status: Lurker



OMG!!!!! don't tell me that I've been buying compilations
all these years :(,
I can't stand them, I only dare buy albums,

*runs to his lp/cd collection and starts destroying all his
afx "compilations" yelling "damm compilations, how dare you
try and fool us with this imitation music",

jk, I couldn't really care less, :)


 

offline nacmat on 2003-07-01 02:32 [#00763327]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker



sorry.... I was maybe being too anal

but I just wanted to give some thought to the matter... its
not important really if they are compiled tracks or concept
albums... for me i care because you do is the perfect
album... no matter if it was made out of compilling tracks
over the years...



 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2003-07-01 02:36 [#00763328]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



I think if you "force" an album by intentionally making all
the tracks have a similair sound/theme intentionally, it
might get boring. If you make 30-40 tracks over a couple of
years, then pick the best/ones that fit together you could
still get an album that sounds a cohesive whole, same
instruments/equipment/software, similair atmosphere etc.
without having to force 12 tracks that are all linked. Even
non electronic bands do this, I'm sure Radiohead have done
it as a lot of their tracks off EPs are recognisable as of a
certain era, and are probably the tracks that didn't make it
onto the album.


 

offline surrounded from it won't be hard anymore to li on 2003-07-01 02:37 [#00763330]
Points: 3787 Status: Regular



I think probably a whole lot of idm "albums" are made in the
same way, only richard is being honest about it.

Because... for traditional albums you need a recordingstudio
to create an album. So a band rents a studio for a couple of
weeks, and in that time they create an album.

But all these laptop-artists... they make all their music at
home, all the time. I imagine ALOT of their albums are just
the best tracks from the last couple of months thrown
together.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2003-07-01 03:24 [#00763334]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to surrounded: #00763330 | Show recordbag



Yeah, with a traditional band they'd practice the songs
first and probably pick most of the ones for the album
before recording them... just record a few extra in case one
or more of the others aren't quite up to scratch.


 

offline nacmat on 2003-07-01 03:31 [#00763337]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker | Followup to surrounded: #00763330



so aphex doesnt need to go to a studio to end a release...
like for the final producing or so?


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2003-07-01 03:37 [#00763340]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to nacmat: #00763337



im pretty sure his home studio is much better equiped than
many other profesional studios


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2003-07-01 03:52 [#00763356]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to nacmat: #00763337 | Show recordbag



In IDM more than other genres, artists seem to have more of
a say in the final mastering/production... I read in one
interview that Richard was "off to EQ some tracks" which
would suggest he does all the mastering himself.

There's no reason he couldn't just supply the DAT with the
final tracks on it to the label for pressing.


 

offline alnuit on 2003-07-01 03:53 [#00763358]
Points: 1113 Status: Lurker



I guess variety has been the hallmark of most AFX
releases...and sitting and making the whole thing in one go
might make it a little bland...I dunno...I guess it is
better to make tracks...and if after a little while you can
still listen to them, that is the true mark of a great
track. Some tracks that you make, you can't bear to hear
after a while...and those would be the shite ones that can
be thrown out...

I am guessing Aphex lets his tracks cure for a while...like
good wine..before releasing...ar atleast used to at any
rate, back in the day when he still cared about making music
and not just making our ears bleed.


 

offline nacmat on 2003-07-01 04:59 [#00763390]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker



so it can be said aphex never did a concept album?


 

offline surrounded from it won't be hard anymore to li on 2003-07-01 05:15 [#00763394]
Points: 3787 Status: Regular | Followup to nacmat: #00763390



well it's a tricky question. I really do think most of his
albums contain tracks recorded over several months or
years.

But perhaps when he was putting all of those together, he
made some extra tracks specifically to make the whole thing
flow better as an album.

Like: "it'd be great to put a nice mellow track here" or
"now all i need is a good song to end the album." Some of
his albums flow so well, that some thought must have been
put behind that.

I think they are compilations, but the tracks are not just
randomly thrown together.

But i'll suppose we'll never know for sure a 100% :-)


 

offline ijonspeches from 109P/Swift-Tuttle on 2003-07-01 06:59 [#00763491]
Points: 7846 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



i remember having him said that albums take a long way
because of mastering which is very timeconsuming.
(i dont wanna say this makes him take so long until he
releases new stuff)

i dont really understand this, because when he does a song
at home he tries to make it sound perfect, doesnt he?
so wheres the dealio?
does it sound different in our homes?


 

offline pomme de terre from obscure body in the SK System on 2003-07-01 07:06 [#00763500]
Points: 11941 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



i wouldnt consider rdj album an "album" - like what you are
talking about.

the tracks on the album were done at different times... i.e.
the tracks that appeared on melodies from mars (the
precursor to rdjalbum) then appeared on rdj album.

but even with that said i have to disagree with your
definition a little.. i mean, lots of artists collect tracks
from different time periodss to put on an album.. especially
artists who pump out new tracks almost daily..



 

offline pomme de terre from obscure body in the SK System on 2003-07-01 07:10 [#00763504]
Points: 11941 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



oops.

lobster man already said that.

~

anyhow, richards tracks are like hot beer shits. he just
needs to get them out of his body. we're lucky he records
them and let us hear the really good ones...


 


Messageboard index