Matrix Reloaded | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
Tony Danza
...and 424 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614153
Today 5
Topics 127544
  
 
Messageboard index
Matrix Reloaded
 

offline bill_hicks from my city is amazing it is calle on 2003-06-05 04:56 [#00727725]
Points: 4286 Status: Lurker



I really enjoyed the Matrix. I thought it was an
intelligent film that raised lots of important questions. I
went to see the matrix reloaded last night with a certain
amount of trepidation. Surely the story had ended. There was
no more story to tell. Any way I thought i might be
pleasantly surprised. But what i witnessed was an abortion
of a movie which has tainted any admiration i had for the
first film. What a fucking piece of money making marketing
shite that film was. I have read people's previous posts
claiming it had some deep meaning and pontificating about
what certain aspects mean. IT WAS FUCKING SHITE. They've
turned an intelligent storyline which encompasses religion,
fate, detiny etc into some piece of Star Trek wank. I can't
put into words how much i hated that film. Special effects?
So fucking what? It's just one big fucking money making
whoring piece of trash. Avoid it at all costs. It made me
feel sick to my stomach that i contributed money to that
piece of crap. AVOID AT ALL COSTS.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2003-06-05 05:03 [#00727730]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



For you, Bill.


 

offline nacmat on 2003-06-05 05:06 [#00727731]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker



totally agree!!!!!!

at least I didnt pay as I went with an invitation of
yahoo.com


 

offline mortsto-x from Trondheim/Bodø (Norway) on 2003-06-05 05:18 [#00727736]
Points: 8062 Status: Lurker



Agreed. There is just too much of everyting when it comes to
special effects, and nothing when it comes to acting and
story.


 

offline aquagak from Berlin (Germany) on 2003-06-05 05:21 [#00727738]
Points: 4397 Status: Regular



i love that crazy maddox pirate, flux capacitor,
hahaha..total "back to the future" cash in


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2003-06-05 05:27 [#00727744]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator



ha ha

"Replacing Keanu Reeves with a wooden plank with a mean
face on it."


great pic.


Attached picture

 

offline KEYFUMBLER from DUBLIN (Ireland) on 2003-06-05 05:29 [#00727746]
Points: 5696 Status: Lurker



i think its soooo fucking bad, its possibly a satire on big,
vacuous, overhyped, epic hollywood films.... and despite me
being bearly able to take any of its nonsence in, that
Architect character practically tells us how false it all
is.. somehwere in the gibberish he spits out.

It could be fucking genious (but i doubt it)



 

offline Sido Dyas from a computer on 2003-06-05 05:36 [#00727750]
Points: 8876 Status: Lurker | Followup to qrter: #00727744



LOL!!

Ewan McGregor was the Wachowskis first hand choice but they
would never admit it today.
I hope in future DVD releases Keanu gets digitaly replaced
by that wooden plank.


 

offline bill_hicks from my city is amazing it is calle on 2003-06-05 05:49 [#00727763]
Points: 4286 Status: Lurker



Aren't the Wachowski brothers conjoined twin hermaphrodites
or something?


 

offline Skeptopotamus from Home (United Kingdom) on 2003-06-05 06:10 [#00727791]
Points: 625 Status: Regular



Gee, I guess i'm in the minority that enjoyed the film.
Sucks to be me then.


 

offline neetta from Finland on 2003-06-05 08:14 [#00727904]
Points: 5924 Status: Regular



i think it was entertaining. not a waste of 6 euros.


 

offline bill_hicks from my city is amazing it is calle on 2003-06-05 08:29 [#00727922]
Points: 4286 Status: Lurker



I left the cinema and went up to the ticket office and
demanded my money back. When the bitch refused with some
excuse like "It's not my fault. I only work here" i got so
mad I spat a big phlegmy grogger at the screen divider,
kicked over a bin and left. I sure some of it got through
the grid and hit her on the face. Bitch. She deserves all
she got. "Oh, you'll like the film. it's great." LIAR!!!
Cost me £5.50 for that shit.


 

offline neetta from Finland on 2003-06-05 08:33 [#00727928]
Points: 5924 Status: Regular | Followup to bill_hicks: #00727922



i DID have a heavy meal before the movie, that might have
made it more enjoyable


 

offline Cfern from Sacto (United States) on 2003-06-05 10:30 [#00728178]
Points: 1384 Status: Lurker



i wasn't that bad....

haha no it's not a satire...

but i love maddox

ps. do you realize you could call anything a satire and
justify.... which is why you can't call things a satire....
for example... you could say "this hate speech by gerbeels
hilter or whoever would really work better if read as a
satire" but that doesn't work because it's a racist
hateful horrible speech...

similar the matrix reloaded is a pile of shit not a satire
of a pile of shit....

man how did they fuck up such a good moive...


 

offline Cfern from Sacto (United States) on 2003-06-05 10:32 [#00728184]
Points: 1384 Status: Lurker



i mean really.... i'm sure a couple of us could have got
together and wrote a better script in an all nite beer
session

and the dialog!!!omfg


 

offline KEYFUMBLER from DUBLIN (Ireland) on 2003-06-05 10:37 [#00728195]
Points: 5696 Status: Lurker



an example of the satire i mean>

- didn't the Architect have the fuckig Matrix 1 playing on
DVD behind him? reminded me of "Spaceballs"

- Neos speech with the councelor chap on their little stroll
through midnight Zion was all, like "Whats your point?" "i
dunno. Is there a point?"

A false movie about a false world. The wool is being pulled
over our eyes alright, Agent Smith(s)

Fucking hell!



 

offline Cfern from Sacto (United States) on 2003-06-05 10:41 [#00728204]
Points: 1384 Status: Lurker



some valid points i suppose

but do you really think that the directors were like "lets
spend 200 million on movie thats purposely shitty but it's
really a satire on shitty moives" like a press release
"If you actually liked the movie you were dumb because we
meant it to be a piece" no


 

offline Jedi Chris on 2003-06-05 10:51 [#00728225]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker



I really enjoyed it. I thought it was a very worthy sequel
to the first film, and I'm really looking forward to the
final film in the Autumn.


 

offline KEYFUMBLER from DUBLIN (Ireland) on 2003-06-05 11:01 [#00728249]
Points: 5696 Status: Lurker



Cfern. In truth...... no i don't. I'm giving em way to much
fucking credit really. But what an idea - generate
incredible hype (and dollars) over nothing and then end it
all with the final film launching a crashing blow on the
viewers.

"There was no story. We sucked you right in. Try paying
attention next time, you fucking herds"


 

offline X-tomatic from ze war room on 2003-06-05 11:09 [#00728266]
Points: 2901 Status: Lurker



I read up about how it's all just leeching for money over
the succes of the first film, but that's where you're wrong,
because it was meant to be a trilogy from the start. And of
course it could never be anything like the first movie,
because that movie was about the discovery of the matrix,
and showing it's capabilities.
In the second, logically, it goes more into what's behind
the curtains. Also, it could never have the same impact as
the first because it was never a surprise it was coming.
Alot of slagging for Keanu too. Blehlblelblebleh. They all
bleat on about how he can't act; well here's the apparent
big surprise:he's not required to act for this part, as the
character of Neo is meant to be rigid and focused and have
composure, never at all about showing emotion or talking his
ass off. That's why without keanu the movie wouldn't have
been as big a hit because there's just nobody else who
possesses this natural kind of coolness that is required for
the part. Funny how this movie gets so much heated
criticism, as alot already thought the first was cheap and
stolen and wannabee intelligent. But still they went to the
second installment of it. If i wouldn't have liked the first
one I'd make damn sure I'd avoid the second one, and not
waste my time on spouting my bile over it, just copying what
the sheeple say about it.


 

offline Donutman from Perth (Australia) on 2003-06-05 11:39 [#00728313]
Points: 234 Status: Lurker | Followup to X-tomatic: #00728266



Maybe it didn't live up to most peoples expectations, maybe
even including myself. But I really liked this movie.

I disagree with most of maddox's points (and yes, there were
some ways to make it better). But I really loved those fight
scenes, and I like Keanu.

I guess this isn't one of those films that appeals to the
masses, as the original was, but I'm looking forward to the
third installment.


 

offline KEYFUMBLER from DUBLIN (Ireland) on 2003-06-05 11:45 [#00728325]
Points: 5696 Status: Lurker



I hated those fight scenes.
Just watch...
"Legend of Sun fa Yu"
Any Kurasawa Samrai film
The Bourne identity
Bridget Jones Diary (!!)
Lone Wolf and Cub
They live

now..... they have fight scenes.

Whats the point of watching 15 minutes of 1-2 fighting
between entities that can "do anything"? Surely the lack of
falability makes it fucking pointless? Its farting in the
wind



 

offline Flipered from London (United Kingdom) on 2003-06-05 11:51 [#00728332]
Points: 297 Status: Lurker | Followup to X-tomatic: #00728266



Here here, but has anyone consider that the matrix was very
similar to"Dark city"? Almost too similar?!?

So please don't say reloaded isn't a good film because it
didn't live up to the orginality that the first film
brought. Personally this was a good film, that still poses
some very interesting arguements over a lot of different
contexts


 

offline Donutman from Perth (Australia) on 2003-06-05 12:02 [#00728342]
Points: 234 Status: Lurker



I hope the third Matrix follows up on a number of themes
that I felt were rather ambiguous.

I've most of those other movies, and apart from Kurasawa, I
wasn't impressed. I'm more of a fan of Jackie Chan movies.

But I can see what you mean about the lack of falability.
Maybe that's why they kept going on about that "only human"
stuff. But I just enjoyed it for what it was.


 

offline Flipered from London (United Kingdom) on 2003-06-05 12:07 [#00728349]
Points: 297 Status: Lurker | Followup to Donutman: #00728342



Did you stay to the watch the trailer for the third film at
the end of the credits?


 

offline neetta from Finland on 2003-06-05 12:10 [#00728353]
Points: 5924 Status: Regular



dark city is very good


 

offline danbrusca from Derbyshire (United Kingdom) on 2003-06-05 12:12 [#00728355]
Points: 4570 Status: Lurker



I can see all kinds of faults with this movie, but I still
enjoyed it. In fact, I somehow managed to enjoy it more than
I should have, logically.

Hmm, maybe it's because I had a whole different angle on it
from most people.


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2003-06-05 12:13 [#00728359]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker | Followup to danbrusca: #00728355



did you sit way off to the side or something?


 

offline danbrusca from Derbyshire (United Kingdom) on 2003-06-05 12:17 [#00728369]
Points: 4570 Status: Lurker | Followup to epohs: #00728359



Ha, wit.


 

offline Flipered from London (United Kingdom) on 2003-06-05 12:17 [#00728371]
Points: 297 Status: Lurker | Followup to danbrusca: #00728355



what sort of faults?


 

offline Donutman from Perth (Australia) on 2003-06-05 12:20 [#00728375]
Points: 234 Status: Lurker | Followup to Flipered: #00728349



I waited for the 3rd trailer, then I downloaded one from
kazaa.

Once again it looks like they're going to spend too much
time out of the Matrix, in the future. But I'm definitely
lokking foward to it.


 

offline Flipered from London (United Kingdom) on 2003-06-05 12:22 [#00728378]
Points: 297 Status: Lurker | Followup to Donutman: #00728375



I'm concerned about them not being in the matrix enough too,
but the smith fight looks even nicer in this one


 

offline Donutman from Perth (Australia) on 2003-06-05 12:30 [#00728388]
Points: 234 Status: Lurker



I read a preview that said that Neo is going to realise all
of his abilities in the third. Don't know how true that was,
but that's something I did felt lacked from 2, where we
don't get to be with Neo as he progresses in his abilities.


 

offline corngrower from the fertile grounds of Iowa, w (United States) on 2003-06-05 12:37 [#00728391]
Points: 4404 Status: Lurker



I tried so hard to like it, but I just can't. I don't care
if it isn't meant to live up to the first one, is supposed
to take you behind the scenes, it has "deep" themes, or
great action sequences, it still pretty much fucking blew!
I got it all, and though it was an interesting twist, I was
still very disappointed, and felt relieved when it was
finally over. Too bad, it could have been so much more...


 

offline corngrower from the fertile grounds of Iowa, w (United States) on 2003-06-05 12:41 [#00728396]
Points: 4404 Status: Lurker | Followup to corngrower: #00728391



And the fight scenes all just drug on and went no where.
Like someone said, they all climaxed the same way, with Neo
running away... that's alright I guess, but after a 20
minute fight scene, I want a fucking climax. I felt like
sleeping.


 

offline pomme de terre from obscure body in the SK System on 2003-06-05 12:44 [#00728398]
Points: 11941 Status: Moderator | Followup to bill_hicks: #00727922 | Show recordbag



That wasn't very nice to spit at the girl and kick over the
trashcan. It really wasn't her fault that it was so bad..

You should have done something a little more constructive
like write an angry letter to the people that made the
movie.


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2003-06-05 12:50 [#00728405]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker



it didn't have anything like the first movie where the plot
switches up on you all at once. people that were expecting
and waiting for that will be disapointed.

but, i think they did a good job of providing a great deal
of information and background that keeps you thinking and,
asking questions until the next one is released, which
hopefully will answer some of those questions.

of course you can understand what was said in reloaded, but,
it had implications that were pretty far reaching... as far
as that particular story goes.

it seems like some people were wanting the exact same
experience as the first, they were disapointed. and, some
seemed to be expecting someting that would be some
revolutionary philosophicaly enlightening experience, mixed
with the best special effects to ever hit the silver screen,
oscar winning performances by all, mind blowing action
sequences paralleled by none, and absolutely no dead
moments... they were dissapointed as well.

what it was is a pretty good movie that borrows themes from
many, many different genres of movies, stories, and
religions, and combines them in a creative way to create a
moderately accesible movie.


 

offline pantalaimon from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2003-06-05 13:13 [#00728434]
Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



well i just expected a half-decent film with good action and
a "interesting" story... it failed on the latter and the
action was boring after a while


 

offline Cfern from Sacto (United States) on 2003-06-05 13:18 [#00728440]
Points: 1384 Status: Lurker



i have to say that i enjoyed the movie despite it's
faults.... after the 1st half hour....


 

offline X-tomatic from ze war room on 2003-06-05 15:44 [#00728621]
Points: 2901 Status: Lurker



Cfern:
agreed, the start, apart from the awesome dreamsequence, was
a rather dull talk'o'rama boring us with councils and
generals and the like, more or less similar to star wars:the
phantom menace where we got bored with politics.
flipered:
I know dark city was there before the matrix, but still the
two are just different enough to both be remarkable.
In Dark city, they are physically present on a slab of earth
with a city on it floating in space, whereas in the matrix
it's a virtual world. Similarities would be the awakening of
"the one", and normally unseen manipulative forces.
I guess you can go on and on about originality and in the
end find out that there's really only a small amount of
truly original things and they probably date back a
long long time. The rest is just "variations on".
danbrusca:
I totally feel the same as you on this movie. I guess i had
a different angle of viewing the movie, and I don't mean
having watch it awkwardly seated.


 

offline WeaklingChild from Glasgow (United Kingdom) on 2003-06-05 16:02 [#00728652]
Points: 3354 Status: Lurker



just got back from it.
i agree with bill.
avoid.


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2003-06-05 16:03 [#00728655]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker



That movie was too slow. I thought the second half was okay
after I first saw it, but this has quickly faded from my
memory and I think overall, it sucked.


 

offline danbrusca from Derbyshire (United Kingdom) on 2003-06-05 16:32 [#00728718]
Points: 4570 Status: Lurker | Followup to X-tomatic: #00728621



Big difference between Dark City and The Matrix - Dark City
was fucking crap.

Anyway, to elaborate on my different angle. As many people
know, Larry has left his wife for a Dominatrix by the name
of Ilsa Strix (she used to advertise on my website) and
publically declared himself to be her slave. Given that, I
was interested in seeing how Larry's kinkiness may have
influenced the film.

It wasn't a pervasive influence, but it's there and most of
it is bundled up with Trinity's catsuit. She's got the
fetish look, and she arguably does more ass-kicking than
anyone. There's other strong female characters, such as Zee
and Niobe, the council is headed by a Priestess, the Oracle
has a servant (Seraph, an Angel no less) to protect her. The
Merovingian's goons address Persephone as 'Mistress' and the
Merovingian himself seems to be under her spell, more than
he perhaps cares to admit. We also learn from the Architect
of a possible 'mother' of the Matrix, the inference being
that her 'fix' was effectively keeping humans under it's
control.


 

offline X-tomatic from ze war room on 2003-06-05 16:53 [#00728750]
Points: 2901 Status: Lurker



Danbrusca:
interesting angle, however I obviously cannot share that
angle of viewing it.
I have to disagree with your opinion of Dark City though, I
think it's bloody marvellous.

keyfumbler:
Whats the point of watching 15 minutes of 1-2 fighting
between entities that can "do anything"? Surely the lack of

falability makes it fucking pointless? Its farting in the
wind

which is one of it's flaws, better yet when Neo becomes one
with, or sees through that which is the matrix, any fighting
becomes totally unneccesary because he should then be able
to totally manipulate anything inside the matrix. A good
strategy was to include a new form of coding the matrix as
they encountered in reloaded to negate his all encompassing
abilities inside the matrix. Very interesting yet hardly
talked about is how Neo at the end of reloaded is able to
destroy the seekers in the real world, more or less
confirming he is still the one.



 

offline danbrusca from Derbyshire (United Kingdom) on 2003-06-05 16:57 [#00728763]
Points: 4570 Status: Lurker | Followup to danbrusca: #00728718



Oh, there's also the little issue that Neo condemns humanity
to save his favourite fetish queen ;)


 

offline evolume from seattle (United States) on 2003-06-05 19:03 [#00728905]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular



well i liked it.
the only fight scene i thought was kinda lame was against
sereph but i think the freeway chase scene more than made up
for that.

i didn't think the acting was so bad.
keanu played the part he was supposed to: a pawn. a "not to
bright" piece who only goes where he is told. I'm not sure
how he could have acted it any other way and remained true
to the character neo

Lawarence Fishburn was also good. It becomes more apparent
in this film that Morpheus is a little excentric/mello
dramatic. the other characters showing lack of faith in him
is indicative of this.

For a movie that starts in the middle of a story, and ends
in the middle of a story it was quite good. rarely is a
film able to do this and be sucessful. the only other ones i
can think of are Two Towers and Empire Strikes back. Other
than that, studios avoid stories like this because it is
difficult to deliver the climax that mainstream audiences
are so accustomed to.

i liked it. i liked it even more the second time. and i plan
on watching it at least one more time before i purchase it
on DVD.

I ain't saying it was no Apocalypse Now, but it was easily
(in my opinion of course) a 4 of 5 stars kind of movie.

you also have to admit, that when a movie prompts this kind
of rage and contraversy, it was at the very least, uniquely
provocative.


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2003-06-06 07:05 [#00729618]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker | Followup to evolume: #00728905



i agree with everything you said. especially that being the
middle of the story, it's hard to deliver a satisfying
climax.

is there anyone on this board who saw it a second time and
didn't like it more?

just currious, because from everyone i know who's seen it
more than once, they liked it better the second time.


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2003-06-06 08:01 [#00729671]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



i saw it for the second time last night

liked it alot better...

i mean i loved it the first time too... but this time I
really appriciated how well done it is, and how great the
story really is.

I dont see how anyone can knock the story... its so great!

*spoilers*

I mean, we learn that neo is an anomyly made by the
computors, and the oracle is a matrix made programme.... all
just a system of control. The seen with the architect is
fucking great. hes just like *bam* heres the hard ugly
truth.

And the end with the sentinels... well, im pretty confident
that the real world is just another level of the matrix...
all designed to control man.

but yeah

i like


 

offline aquagak from Berlin (Germany) on 2003-06-06 08:09 [#00729674]
Points: 4397 Status: Regular



the problem with the build up before films is that peoples
expectations become too high. example "star wars 1"

so this time i tried my hardest to ignore the adverts,
reviews and opinions and went to see it not expecting
anything just like the first one, and 138 mins later i came
out of the cinema a happy customer.


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2003-06-06 08:12 [#00729675]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



same here

I saw 1 commerical for it, and thats IT.



 


Messageboard index