Should fishing be banned? | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
recycle
...and 239 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614218
Today 0
Topics 127549
  
 
Messageboard index
Should fishing be banned?
 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2003-05-01 03:12 [#00679300]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker



In the UK our government have promised to ban fox hunting.
I'm against fox hunting but wondered where my standpoint
should be on fishing. What do you think? Are they moral
equivalents?


 

offline Jarworski from The Grove (United Kingdom) on 2003-05-01 03:12 [#00679301]
Points: 10836 Status: Lurker



Just as cruel, but we don't eat foxes do we?


 

offline Bob Mcbob on 2003-05-01 03:13 [#00679302]
Points: 9939 Status: Regular



fishing is soo bad, they dont even give fish a quick death,
they are ripped out of the water by their lips and left to
suffocate to death, hopefully *before* they are cut into
sushi...


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2003-05-01 03:21 [#00679309]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



Ban fishing and watch domestic violence rates soar. Fishing
is for a lot of men, a from of escape from their wives.


 

offline Bob Mcbob on 2003-05-01 03:24 [#00679313]
Points: 9939 Status: Regular



"Ban fishing and watch domestic violence rates soar"

Ok! *sits up a tree outside someones house with binoculors,
waiting for the fun to begin*


 

offline bill_hicks from my city is amazing it is calle on 2003-05-01 03:25 [#00679314]
Points: 4286 Status: Lurker



Fish aren't cute. Kill them all.


 

offline Morton from out (Netherlands, The) on 2003-05-01 03:25 [#00679315]
Points: 10000 Status: Addict | Followup to bill_hicks: #00679314



...but people aren't cute either...


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2003-05-01 03:26 [#00679318]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker | Followup to Jarworski: #00679301



That's not what I've heard about people from Abertawe.


 

offline Jaser from Castle Greyskull (United Kingdom) on 2003-05-01 03:26 [#00679319]
Points: 2101 Status: Regular



If you work on the same premise that they are banning fox
hunting yes, fishing should be banned too. As far as I am
concerned until human rights issues are sorted and all
peoples attitudes to all people is corrected f**k the
animals. You have got to work from the top down. I respect
vegans not self obsessed neurotic vegetarians.


 

offline Quernstone from Padova (Italy) on 2003-05-01 03:26 [#00679320]
Points: 1826 Status: Regular



What, people actually catch fish. Why don't they just buy it
from Safeway?


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2003-05-01 03:28 [#00679322]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #00679309



Ha, ha. Your faith in the goodness of humanity never fails
to amaze me Ceri :)


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2003-05-01 03:29 [#00679325]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Jaser: #00679319 | Show recordbag



That's my attitude, sort the human issues out first. By all
means, protect wildlife if it's to our benefit (IE to
prevent disruption of the food chain), but I don't see why
we should spend money on "unneccesary conservation" whilst
there are people in poverty in this country.


 

offline Laserbeak from Netherlands, The on 2003-05-01 03:31 [#00679328]
Points: 2670 Status: Lurker



yes, fishing should be banned, especially when you don't
even eat them


 

offline bill_hicks from my city is amazing it is calle on 2003-05-01 03:32 [#00679330]
Points: 4286 Status: Lurker



This is such an old hackneyed argument that I don't have the
strength to muster up an outrageous statement. We all know
the answer to the question. The further removed creatures
are from the likeness of human beings, the more easy it is
to inflict pain on them. If fish screamed in pain and looked
more human we would not touch them with a bargepole. Or
maybe it's because they taste good.


 

offline Jarworski from The Grove (United Kingdom) on 2003-05-01 03:33 [#00679331]
Points: 10836 Status: Lurker | Followup to jonesy: #00679318



If fox was on the menu I'd probably try it. Just cause it
looks cute in a picture doesn't mean the little cunts make
good pets.

At the end of the day, who really gives a fuck about a fish
dying?


 

offline bill_hicks from my city is amazing it is calle on 2003-05-01 03:37 [#00679337]
Points: 4286 Status: Lurker



Although i have heard that longpig is the most exquisite
meat that you could ever eat.


 

offline Bob Mcbob on 2003-05-01 03:38 [#00679338]
Points: 9939 Status: Regular



you cant ban fishing, its pointless, its all to easy to make
your own rod and sneak out to the pond without the
authorities knowing


 

offline Laserbeak from Netherlands, The on 2003-05-01 03:41 [#00679342]
Points: 2670 Status: Lurker | Followup to Jarworski: #00679331



"At the end of the day, who really gives a fuck about a fish
dying?"

I can understand that people catch fish for food in poor
countries. But to catch them for sport is not ethically
acceptable to me.


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2003-05-01 03:43 [#00679343]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker | Followup to bill_hicks: #00679330



"The further removed creatures
are from the likeness of human beings, the more easy it is
to inflict pain on them."

You obviously haven't seen Leslie Ash of late.


 

offline Morgoth from Stella-town (Belgium) on 2003-05-01 03:44 [#00679344]
Points: 1264 Status: Regular | Followup to Jaser: #00679319



What do you mean with self obsessed neurotic vegetarians?

I'm a vegetarian for 6 years now, and I don't eat fish
either. I do drink milk every now and then, I do eat cheese
(vegetarian cheese, not made with rennet from calf stomach)
and I do eat eggs of free chicken. I know vegetarianism
isn't perfect, but at least it's something.

I do believe fishing should be banned. I don't think it is
necessary that the government should spend money on
controlling the ban, because there are worse things
happening. But it's not so that because worse things are
happening we should ignore this cruelty.


 

offline Jarworski from The Grove (United Kingdom) on 2003-05-01 03:48 [#00679347]
Points: 10836 Status: Lurker | Followup to Laserbeak: #00679342



I'm just waiting for The Running Man to be fully realised
and brought to BBC1


 

offline joakimlinden from Skövde (Sweden) on 2003-05-01 03:48 [#00679348]
Points: 462 Status: Regular



What about flies? What about ants? What about... plankton?
What...about... bacteria?

Äh, nevermind.


 

offline bill_hicks from my city is amazing it is calle on 2003-05-01 03:49 [#00679349]
Points: 4286 Status: Lurker | Followup to Morgoth: #00679344



Get some fucking meat down yer neck.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2003-05-01 03:52 [#00679352]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Morgoth: #00679344 | Show recordbag



Even though fishing isn't banned, a huge amount is spent of
"fishery protection" every year. Naval ship patrol, and
personnel are helicoptered over the horizon to a fisheries
boat and abseil to the deck. Such drastic, fast action is
neccesary as boats using illegal nets just dump them
overside if they see naval boats approaching. As a result it
is a very expensive operation to run. If there were a
fishing ban I imagine you'd need to increase fishery
protection patrols by at least 300% not to mention all the
additional park rangers/coast guard patrols to catch small
scale fishers.

I blame the French and their trawler-pair fishing for the
depletion of fish in the channel.


 

offline princo from Shitty City (Geelong) (Australia) on 2003-05-01 03:56 [#00679356]
Points: 13411 Status: Lurker



Who is this "fishing" member?

Temp or Perm ban may I ask?


 

offline Morgoth from Stella-town (Belgium) on 2003-05-01 03:58 [#00679357]
Points: 1264 Status: Regular | Followup to Ceri JC: #00679352



A ban of fishing would only be useful if all countries would
ban fishing of course. If not, it would only mean that one
country has to import fish and that others have more export
and will fish more.

I didn't know the UK spends a great deal of money on
controlling yet. But I think that the key issue might be
that those against fishing should think about giving up
eating fish. The fish is only caught for consumption, so if
we stop consuming...

This would of course mean unemploymency, so the matter is
quite complicated. I am not naïve though, a change like
this (all people giving up fish consumption) will not come.
But in the end: if you're against something, the only
effective thing one can do, is stop the consumption of it,
and trying to make others aware of why you stopped
consuming. Giving up the consumption of something is an easy
step, and it doesn't mean you can't focus (or let your
government focus) on other, indeed more important, things.


 

offline bob from Nottingham (United Kingdom) on 2003-05-01 04:02 [#00679359]
Points: 4669 Status: Lurker



who gives a fuck about fish? i go fishing, i love it. sort
out the rapists and murderers first, when you've don that,
sort out fishermen. fuck off.


 

offline Morgoth from Stella-town (Belgium) on 2003-05-01 04:04 [#00679360]
Points: 1264 Status: Regular | Followup to bob: #00679359



you can of course give up fishing as a personal choice, and
this will not stop anyone from going after murderers and
rapers first!


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2003-05-01 04:06 [#00679361]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Morgoth: #00679357 | Show recordbag



Yes, fishery protection isn't covered much in the news as
it's seen by some as the naval equivalent of being on
traffic duty in the police, but there's always at least one
UK naval vessel doing it when we're not at war. I know a lot
of people who've done it and it's meant to be quite fun.
They effectively sieze the fisherman's boats, search them
then leave. Most (law abiding) captains really like it as it
protects their interests if they catch people using illegal
nets.


 

offline joakimlinden from Skövde (Sweden) on 2003-05-01 04:08 [#00679364]
Points: 462 Status: Regular



We in Sweden tried to ban "torsk"-fishing - I think it's
called Cod - but the EU doesn't prevent other countries to
go in and take our quota in case we stop so it was really a
question of setting an example and cutting the swedish
fishermen out of bussiness or continue as before and claim
that the problem is not that big anyways... Gotta love the
EU, it's nice to know that the taxmoney is going to a good
cause.


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2003-05-01 04:14 [#00679369]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker



I blame those cunts in Brussels for the depletion of fish.


 

offline Peloton from London (United Kingdom) on 2003-05-01 04:24 [#00679376]
Points: 651 Status: Lurker



"sort out the rapists and murderers first, when you've don
that, sort out fishermen."

There are many studies, including a extensive 20 year FBI
one, that show a direct correllation between the abuse of
animals to the abuse of people. A high percentage of
murderers subjected animals to abuse -- particularly as
children.

I think the argument that we should look after the human
species first is putting the cart before the horse. If we
can't treat animals with respect what chance is there of
treating each other that way?


 

offline Quernstone from Padova (Italy) on 2003-05-01 04:27 [#00679377]
Points: 1826 Status: Regular



If we can agree that most golfers are cunts and that most
golfers like fishing we can therfore conclude that fishing
is for cunts.


 

offline Jarworski from The Grove (United Kingdom) on 2003-05-01 04:28 [#00679379]
Points: 10836 Status: Lurker | Followup to Peloton: #00679376



That just proves what a useless bunch of cunts the FBI
really are.


 

offline Peloton from London (United Kingdom) on 2003-05-01 04:30 [#00679380]
Points: 651 Status: Lurker



"That just proves what a useless bunch of cunts the FBI
really are."

How does it prove that?


 

offline Morgoth from Stella-town (Belgium) on 2003-05-01 04:32 [#00679383]
Points: 1264 Status: Regular | Followup to Peloton: #00679380



They should go to the lakes where people are fishing, and
take fishers under arrest :).


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2003-05-01 04:33 [#00679384]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Peloton: #00679376 | Show recordbag



Yes, but that's animal abuse- that means torturing
animals for fun. The main point of fishing (at least for the
majority of people) isn't to inflict pain on fish or
demonstrate your power over them, that's just a
bi-product...

As an aside, the RSPCA are concerned that there are growing
numbers of teenagers torturing animals.


 

offline Quernstone from Padova (Italy) on 2003-05-01 04:35 [#00679385]
Points: 1826 Status: Regular



only becuase the animals didn't do as they were asked.


 

offline faaip_de_oiad from Sirius (United States) on 2003-05-01 04:36 [#00679386]
Points: 764 Status: Lurker



Fish feel pain......supposedly


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2003-05-01 04:40 [#00679388]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to faaip_de_oiad: #00679386 | Show recordbag



Amusingly, a lot of "pro choice" people who are keen to
point out that even though it has been discovered foetuses
feel pain from abortions, it is unlikely to be as
distressing for them as they are not sentient don't apply
this argument when concerning inflicting pain on animals.


 

offline Peloton from London (United Kingdom) on 2003-05-01 04:42 [#00679392]
Points: 651 Status: Lurker



"The main point of fishing... isn't to inflict pain on fish
or demonstrate your power over them, that's just a
bi-product... "

Exactly what is the point of fishing then? I mean, if you're
gonna eat your catch fair enough. But what is the main
purpose of angling?

You may not set out to inflict pain on fish but, if this new
research is to be believed, they do feel pain surely that's
a reason not to fish?



 

offline Bob Mcbob on 2003-05-01 04:43 [#00679394]
Points: 9939 Status: Regular



all animals in the wild that are eaten, are eaten alive and
it must be very painful...being consumed by a bear might be
more painful then a hook in the lip and suffocating...


 

offline danbrusca from Derbyshire (United Kingdom) on 2003-05-01 04:47 [#00679397]
Points: 4570 Status: Lurker



Seriously, they're fish, who gives a fuck?


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2003-05-01 04:49 [#00679398]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Peloton: #00679392 | Show recordbag



I know some people fish for the fun of it, however, as cruel
as this is, a lot of people that do this use "humane hooks"
that dissolve in time and that cause no lasting damage to
the fish. They also release them afterwards. Very few people
nowadays catch fish and just leave them on the beach. The
few sports fishermen I know who don't eat the fish they
catch (they're too pussy to gut them themselves) sell them
to fishmongers.

I don't fish myself, but I used to crab fish. That is
completely humane when done properly and only once have I
injured a crab doing it.


 

offline Morgoth from Stella-town (Belgium) on 2003-05-01 04:51 [#00679400]
Points: 1264 Status: Regular | Followup to Bob Mcbob: #00679394



There is a difference. I mean, a bear has to eat fish to
survive, and won't kill more fish than necessary. Men kill
fish for fun, and also, it's not really so natural, and
definately not necessary for survival.

Maybe in a tribal situation, that's different. I have
nothing against fishing for surviving. I mean, if I was to
leave for a deserted Island, one of the things I would take
with me would be a knife to kill animals while I'm a
vegetarian. I would bring an angle, to be able to eat fish
if the fruits on that Island wouldn't be enough to live
healthy.


 

offline Loopz from Brum Land on 2003-05-01 09:06 [#00679658]
Points: 526 Status: Regular



The RSPCA need more money and staff. I caught a gypsy horse
that was running scared on the estate where i used to live
on. While my friend held on to the freaked out neddy, i rang
the RSPCA who told me to keep it in my back garden for the
night. They said they couldnt do anything to help me for a
few days.

Most stupid advise i had ever heard! I let the horse go and
went fishing!

the people who go hunting for foxes are toffy nose posh
knobs who have way too much money and time. At least the
majority of fishermen are down2earth working class type :)


 

offline LeCoeur from the outer edge of the universe (United States) on 2003-05-01 09:37 [#00679690]
Points: 8249 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #00679309



since when do only MEN!!! fish.......eh???

i fly fish, i have for years and i even can make my OWN
flies. most fly fisherman (not all) catch and
release.....the hooks used are BARBLESS and thus the fish is
not hurt or tortured and once the hook is removed it swims
away to be caught ANOTHER day.

i have to admit i've never looked at fishing as animal
abuse, and truth be told it certainly is. making an
arguement FOR fishing seems cruel in a way because to some
FISH are not FOOD but harmless lil creatures swimming around
enjoying their lives.

i enjoy fishing and i think if it's for FOOD (which in some
cases it is) it's something that will sustain human life,
and if you catch and release and don't harm the fish it's OK
too.....i don't agree banning is in order.

FOX HUNTING is nother matter entirely......that UPPER class
torture fest is just inhumane any way you look at it, it's
for a bunch of bored peepz who need something to chase in
order to feel alive........bahhhhh


 

offline Jarworski from The Grove (United Kingdom) on 2003-05-01 09:39 [#00679694]
Points: 10836 Status: Lurker



kill all the animals. KILL THEM ALL! THEY'RE TRYING TO TAKE
OVER!


 

offline plaidzebra from so long, xlt on 2003-05-01 10:57 [#00679738]
Points: 5678 Status: Lurker



Until he extends the circle of his compassion to all living
things, man will not himself find peace. -Albert Schweitzer,
French philosopher, physician, and musician (Nobel 1952)

As often as Herman had witnessed the slaughter of animals
and fish, he always had the same thought: in their behaviour
toward creatures, all men were Nazis. -Isaac Bashevis
Singer, writer, Nobel laureate, (1904-1991)

Non-violence leads to the highest ethics, which is the goal
of all evolution. Until we stop harming all other living
beings, we are still savages. -Thomas Edison, inventor
(1847-1931)

I'm sometimes asked "Why do you spend so much of your time
and money talking about kindness to animals when there is so
much cruelty to men?" I answer: "I am working at the roots."
-George T. Angell, reformer (1823-1909)


 

offline Peloton from London (United Kingdom) on 2003-05-01 11:06 [#00679755]
Points: 651 Status: Lurker



Fox hunting and angling. Hmmm, is there really a difference?
Sure, fox hunting sets out to kill the quarry but how many
of the UK's estimated 4 million fishermen have caused the
death of a fish -- intentionally or otherwise?

If the end result is that you inflict pain on an animal in
pursuit of your chosen leisure actitvity then any
distinction between hunting and fishing is bogus.

Can't people just enjoy nature/widlife for it's intrinsic
value?

"As long as man continues to be the ruthless destroyer of
lower living beings, he will never know health or peace. For
long as men massacre animals, they will kill each other.
Indeed, he who sows the seeds of murder and pain cannot reap
joy and love"

Pythagoras



 


Messageboard index