 |
|
You are not logged in! F.A.Q Log in Register |
 |
|
 |
 Now online (1)recycle ...and 340 guests Last 5 registered Oplandisks nothingstar N_loop yipe foxtrotromeo Browse members... |
 |
Members 8025Messages 2614130 Today 2 Topics 127542 |
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Or you could say new vs. old style ae. I just choose between buying one of the two,I choose Confeild I prefer their more medolic stuff.... You? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
dont wanna compare really......theyr different thats it...eventualy you ll have both if you carry on liking them......=D |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
They're both different albums. I can' t really choose which one I like best. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Yes but if you had to choose like me today,which would you have got? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
I would probably cry over the fact that I can only get one. I'd probably go for Draft because it's the newer one. You have lived for a long time without confield and can get that one afterwards so I would go for the newer one. But who am I to say? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
give me a couple months... then i'll get back to this thread. :) |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
id go with draft, because its newer and more unfamiliar... to some |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
old vs new? that doesnt make sense, confield is not old style |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Confield is far superior in my humble opinion. More emmotional, and feels less random and "self-destructive" compared to Draft 7.30. Still, Draft is great fun, but doesn't touch me in the same way Confield does. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i may need more time with draft, but confield i don't think they'll ever equal, or at least they haven't done it yet. it seems they've taken a big step back with draft. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
draft will take just as long as confield did to really "sink in"... but if i had to choose today, i'd go with confield... |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i'm more down with draft |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
confield |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
DAMMIT!! that rabbit is just SO cute!!! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
hehe :) |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
I mean since ive only had draft 7.30 for a few days i cant give a completely reliable answer but so far id definately still say confield. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
draft is the contonuation of confield |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
It may be a continuation, but it isn't a good one. Confield was clever and atmospheric....Draft is more clever from a technical perspective maybe, but lacks certain elements from Confield that made Confield so enjoyable (I think Confield had superior melodies....tracks 1,2,3,7,8 had amazing melodies, and the other tracks were still great..) |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Confield sounds to me like a moist organic alien world perpetually shrouded in a deep twilight blue. Draft sounds like the interaction between an alien being's central nervous system and the entheogenic fungi growng in that planet's soil. I love it all mang. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i love the descriptions there, nice comparisons, draft seems much more "fun" as far as autechre goes. track 9 especially. i has all the clicks and noises but i disagree thats a continuation of confield and rather a regression style wise (this doesnt mean its not good, it is) |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
I don't see it as being very similar to Confield outside of the complexity of both albums. Cranked through a loud stereo, Draft is damn funky! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
These music papers are beginning to piss me off with this "not as ballsy as Confield" stuff -- these are the fuckers who never even liked Confield to begin with, and they feel thats the only justification they have against anything. I prefer Confield, for reasons i cannot explain. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
I'm digging Draft more than Confield right now personally. (Though I could not do without either) God I love Ae! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
gantz graf (while being made at the same time) is a continuation of confield, and draft 7.30 is a continuation of gantz, only far more complex. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
What do you mean by "continuation"? They sound quite distinct to me. Obviously what they have done before is going to influence how they approach the new stuff, but do you hear a definite musical progression that is based on a linkage? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
the sounds used in gantz graf, really grating sounds, small bits of melody popping up here and there, constant evolution. that's draft. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Right then, I'll give that a comparative listen. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
cool beans. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
CONFEDELSD!! NO DRAFTS!! NO, WAIT I BHO-CHOOSE "NeeTHER-BOTH" |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
OMG YOU SO TOTALLY CHOSE BY NOT CHOOSING :o |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Draft does not have the enormous replay value of Confield.... It gets boring to listen to constantly much much faster then Confield. IMO Confield sets the bar so incredibly high that I dont AE will ever top themselves.... Draft is an excellent record and an excellent follow up though. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
draft |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
confield good thread |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
both good thread |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Confield. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
confield |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
WHY THIS VS |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
confield |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
confield |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
after having draft for a while, my opinion of it really hasnt changed, i still like confield much more, i see gantz graf as somewhat of a continuation of confield but draft is not the next step musicwise. i still like draft but theres just a few minor things missing, maybe major things, i cant tell, but it doesnt have the atmosphere that confield has--not even close actually. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
confield |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
eh...get em all I'll say...though I'd hardly call Confield old style Ae :)...IMO it is pretty much new style Ae with more abstract beats and melodies than the pre-chiastic slide era stuff. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
draft is good, but id go with confield. feels deeper. the only song i really listen to on draft consistantly is surripere. its one of my autechre favorites. rest seems kinda light to me. well done, but not something id listen to lots. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
no you guys draft is the old style one cause people think it's more like lp5 for some reason |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
conf...is better |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
confield |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i dont know if i can decide..... to me, draft definitely sounds like it was made after confield.. its like it has a more developed sound or something so draft sort of has this edge because it sounds "fresher" to me... but ive also listened to confield a LOT more so i dont know |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i agree that draft is funkier, confield more melodic |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
confield i would say that sim gishel / parhelic opens the door to draft :) |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
so... the winner is... confield? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
Messageboard index
|
|||||||||
