MAC or PC? | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
nanotech
...and 217 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614367
Today 13
Topics 127560
  
 
Messageboard index
MAC or PC?
 

offline slint on 2003-01-21 05:48 [#00522218]
Points: 777 Status: Regular



i think i'm going to buy a laptop.what do you suggest?mac
or pc?
my budget is 1600 euro
i would use it mainly for music



 

offline Dolleater from Afrika Bambaataa on 2003-01-21 05:53 [#00522225]
Points: 4819 Status: Addict



im going to have to say mac. if you can afford it, I dont
know the currency rates.


 

offline diablo on 2003-01-21 05:55 [#00522226]
Points: 3242 Status: Lurker



macs are pretty sweet but pcs are more widely used so you
get software more easily


 

offline uzim on 2003-01-21 05:56 [#00522227]
Points: 17716 Status: Lurker



i definitely prefer macs but it's a matter of taste... well,
not only taste though...


 

offline uzim on 2003-01-21 05:57 [#00522228]
Points: 17716 Status: Lurker



if you want to use soulseek, fruityloops etc. i don't think
mac is a good choice.


 

offline uzim on 2003-01-21 05:58 [#00522229]
Points: 17716 Status: Lurker



though i'm not sure whether fruityloops works on mac or
not..


 

offline slint on 2003-01-21 06:01 [#00522231]
Points: 777 Status: Regular



mhh ok
so the pc has a lot more software but the mac is better.
it's a difficult choice.


 

offline Dolleater from Afrika Bambaataa on 2003-01-21 06:01 [#00522232]
Points: 4819 Status: Addict | Followup to uzim: #00522229



no it doesnt, but there is a mac equivelent, sorta. ISYNTH.


www.cycling74.com

btw, i dont use a mac, I just have mac envy.


 

offline slint on 2003-01-21 06:02 [#00522234]
Points: 777 Status: Regular



the fact is that every artist i saw use mac.....


 

offline Quatch from ROFLOMGOMGOMG on 2003-01-21 06:18 [#00522241]
Points: 189 Status: Addict



I use the Macintosh, and it's really cool!
It cost it's money


 

offline thethirdball from Polly Pisspot (Canada) on 2003-01-21 06:29 [#00522246]
Points: 1629 Status: Lurker



Aphex and Snares use PCs from what I've seen. My point:
for music PC or Mac will do. The software won't do all the
work anyway. :)

So what else do you want to do with this new computer? I
lean towards PCs because they have a huge market share (>
than 90%) on the desktop - this translates into:

a. more software (esp. games)
b. more choice of hardware

So there's my 2 cents.


 

offline Quatch from ROFLOMGOMGOMG on 2003-01-21 06:31 [#00522248]
Points: 189 Status: Addict | Followup to diablo: #00522226



Soft for macs is more safe!
Were viruses breaking your computer?
Viruses for macintohs are more difficult to write


 

offline oscillik from the fires of orc on 2003-01-21 06:32 [#00522250]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular | Followup to thethirdball: #00522246



apparently he did the whole Richard D. James album on a mac


 

offline Quatch from ROFLOMGOMGOMG on 2003-01-21 06:36 [#00522252]
Points: 189 Status: Addict | Followup to oscillik: #00522250



Really?
RicardDJ Album is most ridiculous album


 

offline thethirdball from Polly Pisspot (Canada) on 2003-01-21 06:37 [#00522256]
Points: 1629 Status: Lurker



I saw pictures of him working on a Sony Vaio. I have an
interview with Squarepusher where he talks about playing
around with Pure Data (on PC only as far as I know).

Furthermore, that whole Virus stuff is nonsense. I have no
virus software and have never had a virus. That's because I
know not to click on .exe or .vbs files sent via email.


 

offline Quatch from ROFLOMGOMGOMG on 2003-01-21 06:37 [#00522258]
Points: 189 Status: Addict



Read my info


 

offline slint on 2003-01-21 06:37 [#00522259]
Points: 777 Status: Regular



well i'd use it for music,internet,maybe something for my
university......for the games i got playstation 2 whic is
the best.
i'm a little bit oriented in mac but i don't know......oooo
futurama on tv!


 

offline Spikee Dragon from Newcastle (United Kingdom) on 2003-01-21 06:39 [#00522261]
Points: 4176 Status: Regular



You need a BBC Micro, It's the only way to go. Mine has 32k
of ram but my friend has 64k and more roms *fume* At least I
have a 5 inch floppy drive.


 

offline oscillik from the fires of orc on 2003-01-21 06:42 [#00522269]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular | Followup to Spikee Dragon: #00522261



or an Atari!!!!

don't forget the Atari!!!


 

offline slint on 2003-01-21 07:07 [#00522301]
Points: 777 Status: Regular



hey quatch
tell me 5 reasons why i should buy a mac.


 

offline thethirdball from Polly Pisspot (Canada) on 2003-01-21 07:28 [#00522325]
Points: 1629 Status: Lurker



CLICK HERE FOR APPLE SWITCH PARODY

I honestly don't care - PC/Mac? They're both good - but
this is funny.


 

offline danbrusca from Derbyshire (United Kingdom) on 2003-01-21 07:30 [#00522329]
Points: 4570 Status: Lurker



Mac laptops are very expensive, you get a lot more for your
money with a PC laptop.


 

offline AMinal from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-01-21 07:56 [#00522377]
Points: 3476 Status: Regular



macs are much more expensive to buy, to upgrade and to buy
software for (and much harder to find pirated software too),
and the choice of software you CAN use is extremely limited
compared to PC

...and they aren't much better anyway these days in terms of
performance.... especially when you consider how much you
could spend on all kinds of extra features with the money u
save going with a pc

but then again...... the apple powerbooks are very very nice
laptops, and are very powerful for music production
(radiohead, afx, and many others use them to produce music
on the road.. radiohead made a few tracks on amnesiac using
only their powerbooks)

but powerbooks are probably over your price range...
...the g3 iBooks aren't as good, in their price range a PC
would get you more power, more feeatures and more
compatability for the price
imo anyway


 

offline ijonspeches from 109P/Swift-Tuttle on 2003-01-21 08:08 [#00522400]
Points: 7853 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



pc pluspoints:
more software,
more hardware,
more users, (more support?)
better format (more than 8+3 signs per name) like
"aphex twin - to cure a weakling child - contour regard
(divx).avi"
would be "aphextwi.mov"

and who wants to use a compi with ONE MOUSE BUTTON ONLY
anyway??!!?!?

and have u seen the "file-manager",
looks so ugly...

the only way a mac would come to my home was, if there was
AVID cut system gratis to it...

the only plus point to mac is, that they dont throw too much
hardware out on the market which nobody can afford.
but since there ARE pc´s, this ideology wont work anyway...


 

offline ijonspeches from 109P/Swift-Tuttle on 2003-01-21 08:11 [#00522403]
Points: 7853 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



for music these points listed may not be the most important,
but still you can get a faster machine for your money on pc
sector...


 

offline Inverted Whale from United States Minor Outlying Islands on 2003-01-21 08:23 [#00522421]
Points: 3301 Status: Lurker



There are fewer and fewer reasons to buy a Macintosh these
days, unless you want to look like you have money to burn.


 

offline Desdemona from Lake Mendota on 2003-01-21 08:37 [#00522457]
Points: 630 Status: Lurker



I have an adorable mac powerbook, I love how it runs, and
and its style, but the whole mac experience is just too
expensive. Parts are expensive, any peripherals are usually
twice the cost of their pc counterparts, worse because
everything has to be external already since it's a laptop,
software downloads are hard to find, software in the store
is a pain to hunt down, and the university tech support guys
never know what's wrong when it has a problem ("So, what's
the file extension on that? " "It's a mac, there is no file
extension on that." "Oh... um.....".) So yeah, macs are
great, but after 10 years of macs, my patience is gone, and
I can't take it anymore. Buy a mac if you have a lot of
patience.


 

offline uzim on 2003-01-21 09:04 [#00522505]
Points: 17716 Status: Lurker



ijonspeches > "better format (more than 8+3 signs per
name) like
"aphex twin - to cure a weakling child - contour regard
(divx).avi"
would be "aphextwi.mov"
"

lol
where did you see this?! ^^

there is no need of an extension
and on os9 you could put 32 characters only, but on osX you
can! i have a file named
Nurse With Wound - Two Shaves And A Shine (concerto for
bouzouki and 3 piece rock group in 93 six second segments)
.mp3

.


 

offline steve mcqueen from caerdydd (United Kingdom) on 2003-01-21 09:08 [#00522512]
Points: 6574 Status: Addict



it's dead tough getting hardcore with stuff on pcs i find
(unless you run linux or summat, which macs can do as
well)... all the decent software is mac only - metasynth,
supercollider, max/msp, soundhack, peak, etc. etc.

oh and i think ijonspeeches has swollowed a bit to much
microsoft bullshit, the poor boy is ill.


 

offline forck_02lynix from brooklyn on 2003-01-21 09:12 [#00522521]
Points: 4000 Status: Regular



i use an imac and it's great. yes, they are expensive, but
it's a very comfortable computer. i've never had any serious
problems (only one minor infact) and since then it has been
running beautifully. but pc's are more affordable, i have no
money but a great computer! yay!


 

offline forck_02lynix from brooklyn on 2003-01-21 09:13 [#00522524]
Points: 4000 Status: Regular



oh and that mac gamer commercial was great...so true


 

offline slint on 2003-01-21 11:31 [#00522686]
Points: 777 Status: Regular



i've almost made up my decision.maybe a pc would be better.
but my only doubt is that there IS a reason why all the best
use mac.
well thank you very much


 

offline AMinal from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-01-21 12:47 [#00522767]
Points: 3476 Status: Regular | Followup to slint: #00522686



keep in mind that (and i think most ppl will agree with me
here) Apple still holds its own better when it comes to
laptops then desktops..


 

offline Mickey Mouse from The Moon on 2003-01-21 13:07 [#00522786]
Points: 4130 Status: Addict



Apple laptops are wonderfull indeed. My dad has a new
titanium G4 he got for work, man, what an awesome computer.
And for all you unix/linux fans.. OS X is really just like a
unix machine really, I love the terminal!

I would have to agree with steve. There are a lot of quality
programs available on mac that you wouldnt find on a pc. But
these are usually more advanced programs, and you need a
basic knowledge of c or c++ or software engineering in
general (or if you plan to work with these kinda apps: c
sound, supercollider, Max/MSP, sound hack...). Higher end
and more advanced applications are apples specialty I think,
and ease of use. I love fact that when I got my G4, I could
hook up my hardware via my 8X8 midisport and be ready to
sequence in Cubase, within a hour or so. And now with OS X
its even easier because any midi device is automatically
recognized. When everything gets ported to OS X it will be
the strongest multimeadia workstation ever I think. On the
other hand, you have apps that work only on the pc, but
usually there is a mac equivilant somewhere. I have done
audio on a pc (its been a while though, maybe at least a
year ago), and let me tell you, setting it all up can be a
pain hardware wise (things might be better now, I dont
really know as I havent been on a pc for a while). If your
working with audio, youll need a powerfull machine if you
want to get things done quickly. So a higher end machine
would benefit you best. If your just starting up I say maybe
go for an iBook and get yourself some audio apps. But if you
have some experience then maybe go for something a little
more powerfull.

Pc's can do a very good job at audio, essentially both
machines wiether apple or pc, can do the same job. For me
though, its all about custimization, ease of use, scripting,
and multimeadia, and I find apple is doing a great job at
this. I am soo happy they kept apple script with the new OS!



 

offline Mickey Mouse from The Moon on 2003-01-21 13:11 [#00522790]
Points: 4130 Status: Addict



With OS X, Apple machines can do a fantastic job with
networking and dealing with the internet apps too because of
its unix BSD core, so I really believe that both machines,
Apple products, or pc products can do the same thing. I
think OS X is going to continue to evolve and become an
incredible os and even better then it is now, so I am
sticking with Apple at the moment

sorry for the typo's

w00t!


 

offline Inverted Whale from United States Minor Outlying Islands on 2003-01-21 13:18 [#00522794]
Points: 3301 Status: Lurker | Followup to Mickey Mouse: #00522790



Off topic, but did you know that there is quite a lot of BSD
networking code in modern versions of Windows as well?

Personally, I would like to see OS X ported to Intel
hardware, and the old proprietary Apple hardware dropped in
favor of common PC components (but maybe with a custom paint
job or translucent bits to make it look cool.)


 

offline Alliat from Kópavogur (Iceland) on 2003-01-21 14:23 [#00522856]
Points: 403 Status: Regular



I have both Mac and PC and in my oppinion the Mac is better
when it comest to any artistic activity. But it's wery
expensive (add $1300 to get the icelandic price (!) ). The
PC is better for games, programing and all sorts of online
stuff.


 

offline Alliat from Kópavogur (Iceland) on 2003-01-21 14:24 [#00522858]
Points: 403 Status: Regular



"(add $1300 to get the icelandic price (!) )"
-add it to apple.com's price.


 

offline slint on 2003-01-21 14:50 [#00522905]
Points: 777 Status: Regular



and what do you think should be the configuration?
1600?
1800?1400?
128 mb of ram?256?


 

offline Alliat from Kópavogur (Iceland) on 2003-01-21 14:53 [#00522916]
Points: 403 Status: Regular | Followup to slint: #00522905



PC: 1600-1800MHz with at least 256 RAM
Mac: 800-1000MHz with at least 2356 RAM (128 is way to
little)


 

offline Alliat from Kópavogur (Iceland) on 2003-01-21 14:56 [#00522925]
Points: 403 Status: Regular



Oops!! typo - i meant 256 ram for mac :P


 

offline slint on 2003-01-21 14:57 [#00522930]
Points: 777 Status: Regular



ok
pentium or amd?


 

offline Mickey Mouse from The Moon on 2003-01-21 14:57 [#00522931]
Points: 4130 Status: Addict



Yea, I know Inverted Whale I also think its very funny that
Micro$oft went with a more unix based os almost a few months
later after the beta version of os x was introduced. I dont
think Apple will ever do that as far as porting os x to
different machinery, especially since OS X is programmed
especially for apple hardware, the g3, and g4 processor
chips, because that is their claim to fame, and that way
they have complete controll as to what gets put out on the
market. I just want them to tone down the price tag and make
their prices more compeditive.

Macs have got games and compilers for programming (maybe not
as many in OS 9, but with more programmers porting their
products to the new os, there are more and more every day)
and can handle online stuff well too, especially with the
new os. I think what it comes down to is what you are more
comfortable/familiar with. As much as people want to say
they are soo different, they can really do quite a lot of
the same things IMO


 

offline slint on 2003-01-21 14:58 [#00522933]
Points: 777 Status: Regular



heheheheh i thought you really wrote 2356 eheehehehhehe


 

offline Alliat from Kópavogur (Iceland) on 2003-01-21 15:02 [#00522943]
Points: 403 Status: Regular



Nah, I think that if you buy that sort of ram you won't be
able to buy the computer for the rest of those 1600 euros!
:P


 

offline slint on 2003-01-21 15:04 [#00522952]
Points: 777 Status: Regular



ehehehehe i gotta go to sleep.i gotta study tomorrow for the
exam of social systems compared.byeeeeeeeee
BONAAAAAAA


 

offline Mickey Mouse from The Moon on 2003-01-21 15:13 [#00522971]
Points: 4130 Status: Addict



It should be:

Dual 1.25GHz PowerPC G4

1800 MHz PC (sorry I dont know that much about pc specs but
I would imagine they could be dual processors)

And the intel processor works much different from the g3 and
g4 processor, some info here.

If your going to go for a pc machine, you might wanna get
someone to build custom one for you. There are people who
specialize in that and can build a fast machine for a
reasonable price. Some really L337 people can build some
beastly pc machines! As long as they have a big enough tower
shell and a large enough fan... they can modify it to
overclock. w00t!


 

offline Alliat from Kópavogur (Iceland) on 2003-01-21 15:21 [#00522988]
Points: 403 Status: Regular | Followup to Mickey Mouse: #00522971



mmmm.... Dual 1.25 GHz... that's about $6.500 just for the
computer without a screen, keyboard and mouse. They charge
$1.000 for the smallest screen.


 

offline danbrusca from Derbyshire (United Kingdom) on 2003-01-21 15:26 [#00522995]
Points: 4570 Status: Lurker | Followup to Mickey Mouse: #00522971



I've always found that people who have PCs built for them
find things go wrong with them more often. That maybe
nonsense, but it is my perception from the people I know.
Also, people who constantly fiddle with their machines
always eem to have more things go wrong too.

My Dell PC is solid as a rock, I've had it 2.5 years,
powered up continuously and I only had my first problem with
it last week, when I had to replace the PSU fan. That's the
first time I've even opened the case, they're very well
built inside.


 

offline Inverted Whale from United States Minor Outlying Islands on 2003-01-21 15:28 [#00522997]
Points: 3301 Status: Lurker | Followup to Mickey Mouse: #00522931



Which Microsoft OS are you talking about? XP? It's not
really unix-based at all. They might have tried to mimic the
look and feel, but it's very different under the hood.

The BSD core of Mac OS X, Darwin, is not tied to any
particular processor or platform - just the applications are
optimized for PowerPC.

But I agree with you when you say porting the Mac OS to PCs
will not happen - except maybe as a last resort when Apple
finds no one willing to buy their hardware any more.


 


Messageboard index