God doesn't exist | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 124 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614121
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
God doesn't exist
 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2002-12-09 17:17 [#00475340]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to earthleakage: #00475320



I've never believed. When I was little it just confused me.
When I was older I wondered if grownups really believed it;
it seemed so patently absurd to me.

I remember one time we were visiting some friends in
Vancouver and we went to a Pentecostal service with people
speaking in tongues and shit, and I was thinking "these
people are insane. I am going to sit here quietly and soon
it will be over and I can leave".

I flirted with Taoism briefly in my late teens but then came
across other translations of the Tao Te Ching and realized
that no one knew what the heck Lao Tzu was really talking
about.


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-12-09 17:29 [#00475355]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to earthleakage: #00475320



all cultures, even the most isolated peoples, have a concept
of gods (the one god came much after the many). what are
people's thoughts on this?


 

offline Cfern from Sacto (United States) on 2002-12-09 17:33 [#00475356]
Points: 1384 Status: Lurker



God is used as crutch to explain things we don't know.

The world is so big it must have be created by someone.

Science has caught up with the myths now, we can explain
everything without appeal to God. we don't know
everything..for sure...but nothing leds us to think there
MUST be a God


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-12-09 17:38 [#00475361]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to Cfern: #00475356



but god is not the creator for all people. in some
religions there was no initial creation. for some, god is
just what they call a very real feeling they have, a feeling
experienced by people from all cultures. it's a universal
experience. the christian white patriarch sky god seems
abusrd to me, but that is something that has developed over
time from something very different.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2002-12-09 17:40 [#00475363]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to Cfern: #00475356



I dunno if crutch is the right word, but it's interesting
that God's domain retreats as Science's expands. That is, as
we find scientific reasons for phenomena, God ceases to be
the actor behind them.



 

offline Laserbeak from Netherlands, The on 2002-12-09 17:41 [#00475364]
Points: 2670 Status: Lurker | Followup to fleetmouse: #00475340



"service with people speaking in tongues and shit"

I've grown up in one of these. It was called the "full
evangelic community" and what they preached was way beyond
the standard things. I'm still a bit abnormal because of all
this eventhough I'm out of it for years now... And my family
was almost torn apart by this :(


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2002-12-09 17:42 [#00475366]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to jupitah: #00475361



Well, personification basically. In the absence of a better
explanation, people see intelligent forces at play in
nature, the weather, the sky. Sometimes these ideas take
human or anthropomorphic forms, sometimes animal forms.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2002-12-09 17:47 [#00475371]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to Laserbeak: #00475364



EEK! I'm sorry. :-(

It must not have been very pleasant to grow up in that
milieu or to leave it...

There's a site dedicated to people who have left
fundamentalist religion, it's called Walk Away.

Some of the stories are pretty interesting...


 

offline Laserbeak from Netherlands, The on 2002-12-09 18:02 [#00475384]
Points: 2670 Status: Lurker | Followup to fleetmouse: #00475371



thanks for the link, maybe it'll help with certain subjects


 

offline Iroel from Pisa (Italy) on 2002-12-09 18:22 [#00475400]
Points: 1129 Status: Regular



god is
just what they call a very real feeling they have, a feeling

experienced by people from all cultures.


Neurology explained similar mystical feelings as the one you
refer too, as a flow ia a certain area of the brain.

The so called astral projection for example, used as an
argument for the existence of a soul, is nothing else than a
heavy flow of blood into the region that controls the
perception of our self.
The result is a sense of 'expanded awareness', a new
'reality', a feeling of your soul leaving your body.

The field of neurology right now is doing many reaserches in
the field of religious experiences...


 

offline od_step_cloak from Pleth (Australia) on 2002-12-09 18:24 [#00475403]
Points: 3803 Status: Regular



I don't know whether god exists or not.
I don't know whether someone by the name of Jeremy Bonbon
Akislov exists either.


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-12-09 18:26 [#00475405]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to fleetmouse: #00475363



but the exact opposite is true. the findings of quantum
mechanics have completely blown away the idea that science
will answer all and god will cease to exist. the physicists
who take science seroius, as a means not just to advance
technology but a means to truly unerstand reality, they run
into information that completely blows them away and they
most often go one of two routes: they ignore the
information and the profound implications, or they take on a
mystical understanding of the universe. quantum physicists
have been meeting with hindu yogis because they find that
the quantum model of reality, the deeper they go, more
resembles the brahman (roughly translated, "the ground of
all being," the god from which all their gods spin off
of/are a part of). and i repeat, this god as "actor behind
them [phenomena]" is not the god of peoples across the
world, and it is not the god of indigenous peoples whose
spiritual lives very likely resemble those of all of our
ancestors.


 

offline pachi from yo momma (United States) on 2002-12-09 18:28 [#00475409]
Points: 8984 Status: Lurker



n1ETZ5CH3 wuz H3re!


 

offline Iroel from Pisa (Italy) on 2002-12-09 18:29 [#00475412]
Points: 1129 Status: Regular



I have no knoweledge on quantum physics so I can not comment
on that...


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-12-09 18:32 [#00475415]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to Iroel: #00475400



well, there's a bit more to it than increased bloodflow, but
of course religious experience is reflected in the brain.
every single phenomenon of consciousness is reflected in the
brain. there is no seperation between consciousness and
physical reality. but that doesn't make the experience an
"illusion." by your reasoning when you feel pain, you don't
really feel pain, it's nothing more than a function of the
brain. you aren't even conscious. it's an illusion:)


 

offline Iroel from Pisa (Italy) on 2002-12-09 18:43 [#00475426]
Points: 1129 Status: Regular



Well what is the difference between a schizophrenic person
hearing voices and sufering of hallucinations, and a person
experiencing a mystical experience?

None, since they are both only present at a psychological
level.

But this is not my point anyway...
What I intended more to point out is that such events can be
explained, and their cause does not have necessary to be a
deity, it could be diet, personal beliefs, health
conditions...

Saying Goddidit, or only implying that it could be a proof
for the existence of a deity is definetely premature...


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2002-12-09 18:46 [#00475430]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to jupitah: #00475405



In a hundred years or a thousand today's best science will
seem like the babbling of infants, especially if the
singularity happens.


 

offline Iroel from Pisa (Italy) on 2002-12-09 18:47 [#00475431]
Points: 1129 Status: Regular



Anyway, your previous post about Quantum physicists, is a
phallacy called "argument from authority"


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2002-12-09 18:50 [#00475434]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to Iroel: #00475431



Anyway, your previous post about Quantum physicists, is a
phallacy called "argument from authority"


No, it's officially "The Fallacy from Reading Fritjof
Capra." :-)


 

offline Iroel from Pisa (Italy) on 2002-12-09 18:50 [#00475435]
Points: 1129 Status: Regular



fallacy*


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-12-09 18:54 [#00475439]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker



i say that god did it. i'm simply saying that there is more
to god than "the one who is responsible for everything" like
everyone is making it out to be. that version of god is the
one that people who have never experienced god yet want
something to believe in adopt.

i think schizophrenics might be tormented by a unique view
of reality, one that happens to not be suitable for day to
day living in society. i have a relative who's
schizophrenic and i had a friend who's schizophrenic. both
have said some profound things, but i've never had the
feeling that what they experience is the same as any
mystical experience i've had. never know though.


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-12-09 18:57 [#00475441]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to Iroel: #00475431



oh please, you just said you didn't know enough about
quantum mechanics to speak on it. david bohm is a major
source of what i speak of and i don't think you could
consider him a false scientist.


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-12-09 19:00 [#00475442]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to fleetmouse: #00475430



what is your point? science will always be "the babbling of
infants" because science is not an explanation of reality,
it is the simplest model of reality that gives results
accurate enough for whatever the purposes may be. i was
simply stating that current science is not the science of no
god.


 

offline Iroel from Pisa (Italy) on 2002-12-09 19:00 [#00475443]
Points: 1129 Status: Regular



"i say that god did it."

What makes you presume so, except our ignorance of the
causes?

"i'm simply saying that there is more
to god than "the one who is responsible for everything" like

everyone is making it out to be. "

I'm curious to hear your definition of God. =)

"but i've never had the
feeling that what they experience is the same as any
mystical experience i've had."

I'm not saying that they are the same feeling, but that at a
conceptual level they are very similar.

They both exist only at a psychological level but not at a
physical one.

And till now it hasn`t been found, as far as I know, any
external factor that causes such experiences...


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-12-09 19:02 [#00475444]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker



hehe, that was a typo. "i didn't say that god did it"


 

offline Iroel from Pisa (Italy) on 2002-12-09 19:04 [#00475445]
Points: 1129 Status: Regular



oh please, you just said you didn't know enough about
quantum mechanics to speak on it.


While sometimes it may be appropriate to cite an authority
to support a point, often it is not. In particular, an
appeal to authority is inappropriate if:
the person is not qualified to have an expert opinion on the
subject,
experts in the field disagree on this issue.
the authority was making a joke, drunk, or otherwise not
being serious
A variation of the fallacious appeal to authority is
hearsay. An argument from hearsay is an argument which
depends on second or third hand sources.


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-12-09 19:06 [#00475446]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to Iroel: #00475443



what do you mean "my" definition of god? i'm not talking
about my definition of god. i'm talking about the god of
mystics from many cultures. a common definition is that god
is earth, or the universe, or the fabric of reality.


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-12-09 19:10 [#00475449]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker



this isn't an offical article for the journal of such and
such, i'm just having a discussion. but anyhow, david bohm
speaks much of the quantum model that resembles various
mystics' descriptions of the universe. i don't have a book
off hand to give you page numbers or anything, sorry.


 

offline Iroel from Pisa (Italy) on 2002-12-09 19:10 [#00475450]
Points: 1129 Status: Regular



Oh ok...I got what you are saying...

Anyway in my opinion those mystic experiences are nothing
more than disfunctions in the brain no different than
epilepsy and schizophrenia...

But obviously this is just my ignorant opinion...

" a common definition is that god
is earth, or the universe, or the fabric of reality. "

i thought that the definition of a God implied that it is
sentient...


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-12-09 19:12 [#00475455]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker



what do you mean by definition of god?! i'm not talking
about dictionaries, i'm talking about the people who hold
these beliefs.


 

offline Iroel from Pisa (Italy) on 2002-12-09 19:13 [#00475457]
Points: 1129 Status: Regular



i don't have a book
off hand to give you page numbers or anything, sorry.


It's ok I really would not be able to sustain that topic...
And sorry if I sounded agressive...


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2002-12-09 19:15 [#00475460]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to jupitah: #00475442



the simplest model of reality that gives results accurate
enough for whatever the purposes may be.


This penchant for combining a little hand waving with
physics and some Eastern philosophy doesn't seem to me to
have anything to do with science or creating a useful model.
It just seems to be proof that even physicists are not
immune to the effects of tetrahydrocannabinol.

With the passage of time our current models of the universe
and the superstitious mythologies we graft onto them will
seem as wrongheaded as alchemy.


 

offline Iroel from Pisa (Italy) on 2002-12-09 19:17 [#00475464]
Points: 1129 Status: Regular



what do you mean by definition of god?!

I'm just saying that usually, the entity to which we refer
as god is a sentient being, but by your description doesn`t
seem so...

Please explain further...



 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2002-12-09 19:18 [#00475465]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



Also, it's hard to discuss things with faceless people.

1) put a santa hat on a picture

2) upload it as an avatar

3) Smiles, everybody, smiles! Welcome to Fantasy Island!


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-12-09 19:18 [#00475466]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to Iroel: #00475457



no problem. and no offense but i do think your opinion on
mystical experience could be somewhat ignorant.


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-12-09 19:18 [#00475468]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker



i want to put a pic of me up, no cam though.


 

offline Iroel from Pisa (Italy) on 2002-12-09 19:21 [#00475471]
Points: 1129 Status: Regular



and no offense but i do think your opinion on
mystical experience could be somewhat ignorant.


please explain where my ideas are incorect...

Would you like me to link those neurology papers?


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2002-12-09 19:22 [#00475475]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to jupitah: #00475468



Doesn't have to be you. A picture of a sweet potato will do.
Makes it easier to see who's saying what.


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-12-09 19:26 [#00475480]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to Iroel: #00475471



i'll bring it back up tomorrow. now i've got to finish
homework. i was only coming for a moment to avoid writing
my lab report (the real science, the stuff makes $), but i
got sucked into this topic and... talk to yall tomorrow.

i wouldn't mind the neurology papers.


 

offline MachineofGod from the land of halo's (United States) on 2002-12-09 19:36 [#00475489]
Points: 3088 Status: Lurker



wow this is becoming a big discussion, anyways thanks cfern
for liking what i had to say. I agree with what was said
about how most christians dont exactly follow what has been
said by jesus and this is part of the problem. too many
claim to be christian instead of acting on it. also yeah,
funkmaster I do agree no one is perfect but when people call
themselves christian or any other religion and they
completely disregard or cant follow what the religion is
about then what's the point of even saying you belong to
this so and so religion.

another thing is if theyre is a so called god it (its not
gonna gender based obviously) it will be beyond anyones
imagine and theres many questions that pondering on will
never create answers. too many times have we(humans) tried
to answer questions that we simply dont have the answers to.
if we dont have answers we shouldnt try to cover them up or
make up stories either. that idea is pertaining to whether
or not bible stories and so forth are actually true or for
that matter if jesus himself was real. alas no religion
question can be answered until...well...later and definately
not now.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2002-12-09 19:36 [#00475492]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to jupitah: #00475480



Yay real science!

Where are the flying cars? I want my flying car!


 

offline Iroel from Pisa (Italy) on 2002-12-09 19:42 [#00475503]
Points: 1129 Status: Regular



Here

Some information that I found with a fast search on
google...you may find something interesting...

I'll find more stuff maybe tomorrow...


 

offline LeCoeur from the outer edge of the universe (United States) on 2002-12-09 19:50 [#00475515]
Points: 8249 Status: Lurker



not to add fuel to the FIRE

*poof watches the flames*

however science PROVES God's existance, and the Bible has
scientific facts in it BEFORE men could prove them to be
true. ie....that the earth was round, and that it spins on
an axis upon 'nothing.'

also......when MAN can made a human being from
SCRATCH.....just using the elements that make us......i'll
believe that NO divine intervention occured.

it's pretty convienent that we have TWO sexes.....and that
our parts match up to create OTHER beings like
us......amazing how that happened in the proverbial soup!



 

offline MachineofGod from the land of halo's (United States) on 2002-12-09 20:00 [#00475539]
Points: 3088 Status: Lurker | Followup to LeCoeur: #00475515



well most species have two sexes or theyre asexual. i think
everything in the world is related in ways we dont know and
not that I can prove either.


 

offline MachineofGod from the land of halo's (United States) on 2002-12-09 20:01 [#00475542]
Points: 3088 Status: Lurker



i gotta go now, gotta finish some history homework,

have fun FIGHTING(stupid joke referring to my post earlier
talking about religious conflicts, i know its dumb but so
what)


 

offline Iroel from Pisa (Italy) on 2002-12-09 20:05 [#00475550]
Points: 1129 Status: Regular



that the earth was round, and that it spins on
an axis upon 'nothing.'


Actually the bible states that the earth stands on pilars.

Says that bats are birds.

And offers ridicolous ways to cure leprosy.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2002-12-09 20:06 [#00475555]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to LeCoeur: #00475515



also......when MAN can made a human being from
SCRATCH.....just using the elements that make us......i'll
believe that NO divine intervention occured.


I'll show you how it's done but you'll have to buy me
dinner. :->


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2002-12-09 20:08 [#00475560]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to Iroel: #00475550



Jesus apparently thought that blindness, epilepsy and
various other afflictions were cause by demons. In this, he
seems to be no different from any other ignorant sod of his
times.

Say, you don't suppose...?


 

offline Iroel from Pisa (Italy) on 2002-12-09 20:09 [#00475561]
Points: 1129 Status: Regular



here

A list of scientific contradictions...


 

offline Cfern from Sacto (United States) on 2002-12-09 20:09 [#00475563]
Points: 1384 Status: Lurker | Followup to LeCoeur: #00475515



"however science PROVES God's existance," - no, no it
doesn't. you had some funky science teachers.


"and the Bible has
scientific facts in it BEFORE men could prove them to be
true. ie....that the earth was round, and that it spins on
an axis upon 'nothing.' " - this knowledge was hardly
exclusive to the bible. Aristole knew the world was round
and could prove by watching ships sink below the ocean line
as they go out to sea. I believe the Mayas knew that the
world was round also.



 


Messageboard index