So who's a terrorist now? | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
recycle
...and 189 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2613475
Today 1
Topics 127502
  
 
Messageboard index
So who's a terrorist now?
 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-08-08 11:12 [#00341339]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict



And I never did like cassandra.... That Rodders, he could
have found something better, he had the looks and the
charm... But no, he got stuck with that little spoilt, upper
middle class, petite-bourgoise bitch...


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2002-08-08 11:14 [#00341341]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker | Followup to Meho Krljic: #00341339



...and she was minging.


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-08-08 11:20 [#00341347]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict



What does that mean? Minging? Are you just making words up
so you confuse me and have me feeling inferior?


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2002-08-08 11:26 [#00341354]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker | Followup to Meho Krljic: #00341347



Its a UK slang word meaning gross, horrible, ugly,
disgusting etc. In this instance its a tad misogynistic but
fuck it.


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-08-08 11:31 [#00341359]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict | Followup to jonesy: #00341354



misogynistic? Saying that someone is an ugly bitch is just
an opinion, surely? You don't hate someone for being ugly do
you?


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2002-08-08 11:34 [#00341366]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker | Followup to Meho Krljic: #00341359



It is in the sense that only women can be minging. All men
are beautiful.

Nah, in the sense that women are referred to as either
minging or fit. to many men women are to be judged on their
physical appearance and not on their personality or
contribution. So its not misogynistic in itself, but in the
current cultural climate it is.


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-08-08 11:39 [#00341370]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict



er, you got me a little confused here, this per...sonality
you talk of, how is it related to women?


 

offline flea from depths of your mind (New Zealand) on 2002-08-08 11:41 [#00341373]
Points: 9083 Status: Regular



Steve equating "Computers" with capitalism is truly
hilareous..The internet even in its sliced, diced,
ecommerced, venture capitalised form..is the closest thing
to an arnarchic state that this world has to offer....the
collective subconsious so to speak or the village meeting
place..

the dotcomm collapses just prove that most of the people
using the interent arent using it for "capitalistc"persuits
as the executives in the board rooms envisaged..sure there's
people like Meho who's every pronographic need is being met
by the net(just kidding, sorry,okay Meho..just kidding..you
are coolest!!)..or free music which all of us indulge in..

but there's a good portion of the users..who are using it to
plainly and simply communicate..hear what others have to
say..compare notes, exchange ideas all things that are
detrimental to a capitalistic system..where unless you are a
prone consumer..open and willingly submitting to their
prompts and prods and suggestions (ads) leading to
consumption of their products..you are non desireable...well
down here you can simply scroll past the banner..and after a
while you can just blank them out or make a consumer decison
and dwnload a freeware that skips all the banners and
ads...and still have a continous experience unlike TV where
you have to resort to channel surfing to avoid ads...

a most basic example is the the most expensive product short
of War machines that the populus comes in contact with...The
Hollywood blockbuster..no amount of test audience directed
tweaking and tuning..is going to shut up a dissatisfied
punter getting on a message board very much like this one
and say that the movie he just spent his hard earned cash on
blew razor chunks...and the bad word about a bad product
spreading is exactly what capitalism wants to avoid......


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2002-08-08 11:46 [#00341380]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker | Followup to Meho Krljic: #00341370



Erm...


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-08-08 11:50 [#00341384]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict



No offense taken, mate. The bad thing with the internet is
that it drowns us in information we don't need. It's just
there so we take it. The easiness with which we can get the
information makes it all the more insignificant to us...
Hmm, I'm rambling here and am too lazy to explain better.
Let's do some more women-bashing instead.


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-08-08 11:52 [#00341386]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict



BTW, that porn thing that you mention is a good example: the
fact that it's mere clicks away from me is what makes me go
for it. I am lucky I don't have a credit card because I
don't know if I could be disciplined enough not to spend
money for that crap...


 

offline flea from depths of your mind (New Zealand) on 2002-08-08 12:00 [#00341398]
Points: 9083 Status: Regular | Followup to Meho Krljic: #00341384



So true..at least this is not the old days about 12 years
ago when I was accessing USENET on the campus mainframe..my
room didnt have room to live because It was covered in
stacks and stacks of printouts of previously inaccessible
information I just had to have...and honestly I read most of
it..hence my current deranged state %-p

What you are talking about porn is me on mp3.com making
inroads into amazing music being created in bedrooms that
will never ever get released due to hundreds of financial
considerations..


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-08-08 12:03 [#00341399]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict



Which is only OK, but I find that more of it is accessible,
more I start to question it's significance to my life. Which
is probably a good thing actually...


 

offline Laserbeak from Netherlands, The on 2002-08-08 12:04 [#00341401]
Points: 2670 Status: Lurker



What I don't get from Steve is this:

"I prefer blind patriotism and loyalty"
"I don't care if we're the most evil group of people ever to
exist, I live here and i'm going to back it up"

This suggests active support

"I'm know i'm a pawn, i'm a sheep"
...and this suggests total passive attitude

Strange...


 

offline Spikee Dragon from Newcastle (United Kingdom) on 2002-08-08 12:07 [#00341407]
Points: 4176 Status: Regular | Followup to Laserbeak: #00341401



Maybe his 'perfect life' is so dull he has to try and rile
us. I have no idea. I forgot about him.


 

offline flea from depths of your mind (New Zealand) on 2002-08-08 12:08 [#00341408]
Points: 9083 Status: Regular | Followup to Laserbeak: #00341401



It's so glib..it almost as if he's got his tongue's jammed
against his cheek..atleast I do so hope to all the gods
above and below...


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-08-08 12:17 [#00341410]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict



Steve said: "I'm know i'm a pawn,
i'm a sheep, i'm a whatever you want to call it. I know this

and i'm fine with it. I'll let people like you continue your

futile efforts trying to change the world to suit you. The
main difference between us is I know i'm a sheep, you
don't."

Now the thing is: if it's people like steve accepting the
status quo because they are content with their lives and
can't be bothered with crimes done in their name worldwide
(thus supporting the system passively), isn't it only
natural that there are other people who think that hitting a
building full of steves with an airplane is a legitimate
tactique in a battle for survival.


 

offline teknoterrorist from United States on 2002-08-08 12:20 [#00341415]
Points: 95 Status: Regular



Lay off us Americans. Don't you think we've gotten enough
shit already?


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-08-08 12:23 [#00341420]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict | Followup to teknoterrorist: #00341415



I'm sorry, who are you talking to? I never once slagged
americans in this thread.


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2002-08-08 12:28 [#00341424]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker | Followup to teknoterrorist: #00341415



Well, not quite as much shit as the Viatnamese, the
Cambodians, Iraqis, Aghans, south Americans, Somalians,
native Americans, people in Yugoslavia, east Timorese...I
could go on.


 

offline teknoterrorist from United States on 2002-08-08 12:28 [#00341425]
Points: 95 Status: Regular



I'm talking to anyone who did, guess that's not you then.


 

offline teknoterrorist from United States on 2002-08-08 12:33 [#00341431]
Points: 95 Status: Regular



And that justifies it, jonesy?


 

offline Spikee Dragon from Newcastle (United Kingdom) on 2002-08-08 12:34 [#00341433]
Points: 4176 Status: Regular | Followup to teknoterrorist: #00341431



Did you read the first 6 posts on this topic? We where
discussing those issues.

Not telling americans to fuck off because thay are american,
just discussing.


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-08-08 12:36 [#00341435]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict | Followup to teknoterrorist: #00341431



what kind of shit are we talking about anyway? I mean,
saying that americans in general suck ass is one thing. But
condemning the obviously violent, imperialistic foreign
policies is another. I see a clear difference between the
two. Coming from someone who spent 10 years in a country run
by Milosevic (often compared with Hitler etc.) I think I
know what I'm talking about.


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2002-08-08 12:37 [#00341436]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker | Followup to teknoterrorist: #00341431



Justifies what, the WTC 9/11 thang? Well of course not, but
don't be naive enough to think we're not going to criticise
US foreign policy. The events of 9/11 were a minor incident
compared to the untold suffering of those around the world
who have been bombed by the US.

And for the one millionth time, we are talking about the US
govt & multinationals, and NOT its citizens such as
yourself.


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-08-08 12:40 [#00341438]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict



that's my man jonesy in his full-on polemic mode.


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2002-08-08 12:40 [#00341440]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker | Followup to Meho Krljic: #00341438



You know me. Why beat around the Bush? - geddit!


 

offline flea from depths of your mind (New Zealand) on 2002-08-08 12:41 [#00341442]
Points: 9083 Status: Regular | Followup to teknoterrorist: #00341425



That would be me..but I explained somewhere by Americans I
mean the powers that be and not you and me...

teknoterroist..is a funny name to go all patriotric with by
the way..

are you like identifying with terrorists and equating your
musical tastes and persuits with those of disruption of the
status quo...

or you just thought it would be a cool and scary name in
view of the state of affairs..

or you just couldnt be arsed and strung two words starting
with t together and see where it takes you?


 

offline teknoterrorist from United States on 2002-08-08 12:42 [#00341443]
Points: 95 Status: Regular



Yeah, I read the first 6 posts. But do you seriously think
that what the US Gov. is doing is worse than Killing
thousands of people in a few minutes because you belive that
they are infidels. If you're going to talk about the actions
the US has taken, don't forget to talk about the positive
things too.


 

offline manicminer from Paris (France) on 2002-08-08 12:43 [#00341445]
Points: 1423 Status: Lurker



I've been reading these posts with interest. Jonesy and
Meho know a hell of a lot on this subject, so it's quite
educating.

I checked out that Pilger link - I saw his documentary on
Iraq. He really is quite fantastic. I think I'm going to
try to read more of his stuff.

Frankly though, this whole situation that we find ourselves
in at the moment terrifies me. I can envisage WWIII or
nuclear armageddon. And it has all been precipitated by the
greed of Western nations, in particular the US and to a
lesser extent the UK.

But what CAN we do about it? I feel helpless.


 

offline flea from depths of your mind (New Zealand) on 2002-08-08 12:45 [#00341447]
Points: 9083 Status: Regular | Followup to teknoterrorist: #00341443



+But do you seriously think
that what the US Gov. is doing is worse than Killing
thousands of people in a few minutes because you belive that

they are infidels+

yes oh god yes that IS what we are saying...wake up and
smell the Starbucks man..


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2002-08-08 12:46 [#00341450]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker | Followup to teknoterrorist: #00341443



Which are...? Bombing the hell out of Afghanistan? Ripping
up the Kyoto agreement? The Star Wars nuclear programme?

And anyhowz, many more Afghans died as a result of US
bombing than did civilians on 9/11. Is an American life
worth more than an Afghan?


 

offline teknoterrorist from United States on 2002-08-08 12:47 [#00341451]
Points: 95 Status: Regular



Do they even have starbucks in Korea?


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-08-08 12:48 [#00341452]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict | Followup to teknoterrorist: #00341443



Tekno: what? Killing few thousand people in few minutes is
bad, OK. Killing a whole planet with pollution because you
make money on it is , er, worse? What do you think?


 

offline manicminer from Paris (France) on 2002-08-08 12:48 [#00341453]
Points: 1423 Status: Lurker



Of COURSE what the US is doing is FAR worse! They kill
fucking LOADS more people, produce massive amounts of
pollution, oppress 3rd world nations, make their own rules,
act like bullies, etc.

They have quite obviously committed much greater crimes than
AL Qaeda.

Fuck the US, and fuck the UK


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2002-08-08 12:49 [#00341455]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker | Followup to teknoterrorist: #00341451



I'd have thought so, backed by the barrel of the US gun.


 

offline teknoterrorist from United States on 2002-08-08 12:50 [#00341457]
Points: 95 Status: Regular



Hey jonesy I never compared the value of lives, you guys
just keep trying to interpret what i'm saying into something
that is totaly not what I mean. Bottom line....Bin laden is
fucking evil, and the US Gov is ignorant, simple as that.


 

offline flea from depths of your mind (New Zealand) on 2002-08-08 12:50 [#00341458]
Points: 9083 Status: Regular | Followup to manicminer: #00341445



New Zealand people have been proactive in creating a Nuclear
Free country..despite all the pressure US, France and even
Australia has been exerting on it..we just recently dumped
our Air Strike force in favour of planes that would be more
suitable for rescue operations....

Consensus can work..complacency is what keeps the regimes
like Bush deluding and confusing and scaring the population
further and further down a slipery slope which can only
produce the end result of a paraniod nationalistc fascist
state...


 

offline teknoterrorist from United States on 2002-08-08 12:51 [#00341459]
Points: 95 Status: Regular



Lol, teknoterrorist means hacker, lol.


 

offline flea from depths of your mind (New Zealand) on 2002-08-08 12:53 [#00341460]
Points: 9083 Status: Regular | Followup to teknoterrorist: #00341457



Bin Laden is the evil harversted reared groomed nurtured and
launched by the US..or didnt you know that..


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-08-08 12:53 [#00341461]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict



Teknoterrorist: I don't think we will fall for that.
"Ignorant"? As in "they are not aware of the consequences of
their actions"? You really believe that?


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2002-08-08 12:54 [#00341463]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker | Followup to teknoterrorist: #00341457



Though I don't subscribe to notions of good and evil (that
is the discourse of the US propagandists) I'd say the US is
even more evil. What's the difference between the two?


 

offline flea from depths of your mind (New Zealand) on 2002-08-08 12:54 [#00341464]
Points: 9083 Status: Regular | Followup to teknoterrorist: #00341459



The original hackers were not the partriots you are coming
off as...


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-08-08 12:54 [#00341465]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict



Heh, another american poster that we'll effectively put off
from this board by our hostile attitude.


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-08-08 12:57 [#00341466]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict



Hey, teknoterrorist: I just want to asure you that nobody
here hates you, nor am I going to hold anything of what you
say against you personally. We're just talking, OK?


 

offline mccabe from fuck knows .......I`m lost !!! on 2002-08-08 13:00 [#00341467]
Points: 908 Status: Lurker



vice president agnews once said "the united states,for all
its faults,is still the greatest nation in the country"


 

offline teknoterrorist from United States on 2002-08-08 13:00 [#00341468]
Points: 95 Status: Regular



lol, there you go putting words in my mouth again. Of course
they are aware of their actions, but when innocents die,
it's an accident, the US military didn't go "hey, there's a
8 year old afgan boy, lets drop a fucking bomb on his head!"
It's more like "Good god, we killed a 8 year old boy due to
bad scouting by the cia or ground forces."


 

offline flea from depths of your mind (New Zealand) on 2002-08-08 13:01 [#00341469]
Points: 9083 Status: Regular



And I suggest that following a thread before jumping and
postulating will go a long way towards avoiding
misunderstandings


 

offline flea from depths of your mind (New Zealand) on 2002-08-08 13:04 [#00341471]
Points: 9083 Status: Regular | Followup to teknoterrorist: #00341468



Actually they do:

March 2002
When U.S. warplanes strafed [with AC-130 gunships] the
farming village of Chowkar-Karez, 25 miles north of Kandahar
on October 22-23rd,killing at least 93 civilians, a Pentagon
official said, "the people there are dead because we wanted
them dead." The reason? They sympathized with the Taliban1.
When asked about the Chowkar incident, Rumsfeld replied, "I
cannot deal with that particular village."



 

offline teknoterrorist from United States on 2002-08-08 13:05 [#00341473]
Points: 95 Status: Regular



I did follow the thread, quit assuming things.


 


Messageboard index