am i a child pornographer? | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (2)
DADONCK
belb
...and 151 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2613457
Today 3
Topics 127500
  
 
Messageboard index
am i a child pornographer?
 

offline john is fast from sacramento (United States) on 2002-05-10 22:29 [#00214499]
Points: 638 Status: Regular



lets say im talking to this minor and she sends me some
nude pics of herself. then all the sudden this hacker finds
out about it and tells aol about it. what the hell am i
going to jail or something? or is aol gonna cancel my
account? or nothing?


 

offline Jedi Chris on 2002-05-10 22:31 [#00214502]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker



You are going to jail!
Do not pass 'go' and do not collect $200!

:(


 

offline Peter File from the future!!! Ooooh chase me! on 2002-05-10 22:36 [#00214505]
Points: 2020 Status: Lurker | Followup to john is fast: #00214499



JESUS HECK TO CHRIST MAN!

I hope this is a hypothetical situation.


 

offline john is fast from sacramento (United States) on 2002-05-10 22:38 [#00214508]
Points: 638 Status: Regular



actually no, but what the heck its not like she was a child
she just wasnt 18. i cant believe someone would get in that
big of trouble over something like that. its not even
someone ive ever met.


 

offline REFLEX from Edmonton, Alberta (Canada) on 2002-05-10 22:54 [#00214517]
Points: 8864 Status: Regular



john is fast: I doubt youd get into trouble, and what hacker
is gonna tell on ya? thats like a drug dealer rattin on the
cops to you because y ou stole his drugs... hed get in
trouble too.


 

offline Jedi Chris on 2002-05-10 23:05 [#00214525]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker | Followup to john is fast: #00214508



What is the age of consent where you are?


 

offline john is fast from sacramento (United States) on 2002-05-10 23:21 [#00214538]
Points: 638 Status: Regular



i dont know what the age of concent is, i think it may be
16. which would probably put me in the clear(probably...)

at first i totally thought she was just some crazy girl
trying to stress me out but then she dug up some info on me
that she couldnt have possibly known so i knew then you had
at least a little power. then she says "im going to check
the last 500 ims youve had and see if youve done anything
bad. if you have ill report you"
so then im sitting there going "oh my God have i done
anything bad in the last 500 ims? i dont remember"
then she says "ive reported you, you know what youve done"
for the life of me i couldnt get her to say what it is she
reported me for. so still it could all be a hoax just to
get me to sweet but still it does make me nervous.


 

offline john is fast from sacramento (United States) on 2002-05-10 23:23 [#00214539]
Points: 638 Status: Regular



haha, ok so i admit to the nude pic thing and i have spoken
sexually to minors maybe. but is it a crime to speak
sexually to a minor? as far as i know it isnt. maybe
harassment charges if the minor was the one pressing charges
but other than that.


 

offline zetre from United States Minor Outlying Islands on 2002-05-10 23:40 [#00214549]
Points: 239 Status: Lurker



That´s hilarious!!
I don´t think you have anything to worry about (as long as
you keep yourself from dropping the soap :) )


 

offline B3n from Manchester (United Kingdom) on 2002-05-10 23:47 [#00214553]
Points: 4700 Status: Lurker



Its probably a person just trying to give you a scare and by
the looks of it it worked

did you know they were a minor beforehand?


 

offline Jedi Chris on 2002-05-10 23:57 [#00214563]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker | Followup to john is fast: #00214538



"she dug up some info on me
that she couldnt have possibly known "

.....such as? Is this not just a friend playing a trick on
you?


 

offline afxNUMB from So.Flo on 2002-05-11 00:10 [#00214567]
Points: 7099 Status: Regular



youre a sick fuck.


 

offline REFLEX from Edmonton, Alberta (Canada) on 2002-05-11 00:35 [#00214587]
Points: 8864 Status: Regular



thats not sick at all. its nothing. is it so wrong to have a
picture of a lets say 17 year old girl on there? where do
you draw the line? I do somewhere, but thats no tthe point,
what about 17 and 364 days? this is stupid.

girls under the age of 18 still have sex and take nude
photos. if i had a naked picture of my girlfriend before she
turned 18.. ohhh im a suck fuck! how retarded, its not even
child porn, becuase im not soliciting it, and she was 100%
willing.

not that that stuff is true, hell sex is the issue, I lost
my virginity when i was 13.


 

offline B3n from Manchester (United Kingdom) on 2002-05-11 00:48 [#00214601]
Points: 4700 Status: Lurker | Followup to REFLEX: #00214587



I agree with you reflex....


 

offline B3n from Manchester (United Kingdom) on 2002-05-11 00:51 [#00214604]
Points: 4700 Status: Lurker



I'd say more but I think i'd end up saying something that
would be contreversial and misconstrued.


 

offline urb from Trondheim (Norway) on 2002-05-11 00:58 [#00214610]
Points: 568 Status: Regular | Followup to B3n: #00214604



come on.. spit it out


 

offline Duble0Syx from Columbus, OH (United States) on 2002-05-11 01:16 [#00214622]
Points: 3436 Status: Lurker



I'll be 20 in few months but I see nothing wrong with
sleeping with a 16 yr old. The legal age for consent is 16.
I'd rather have someone who is 18 or older...Eithor way I
don't think anyone is going to jail unless you start sellng
those pictures, which you should do...


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-05-11 01:18 [#00214625]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to Duble0Syx: #00214622



gross


 

offline smokehammer from Saigon (Vietnam) on 2002-05-11 01:35 [#00214633]
Points: 1463 Status: Lurker



nothing gross about nakedness...

oh, i see..." selling it " . OK , i think that was a joke.

I agree with B3n..., its a dodgy area but the current
law-enforcement feeding frenzy is a sign of a neurotic
confused society which needs a folk-devil to keep the
fear-machine running.


 

offline corngrower from the fertile grounds of Iowa, w (United States) on 2002-05-11 01:41 [#00214634]
Points: 4404 Status: Lurker



this type of thing really says something about the direction
are society has been heading... I'm not sure what it is,
but it's definetly not good.


 

offline Inverted Whale from United States Minor Outlying Islands on 2002-05-11 01:45 [#00214637]
Points: 3301 Status: Lurker



Why don't you just delete the pics? Or am I missing
something?


 

offline corngrower from the fertile grounds of Iowa, w (United States) on 2002-05-11 01:46 [#00214638]
Points: 4404 Status: Lurker



This is a stupid topic. Keep your stupid kiddy-porn
problems to yourself you fucking loser!


 

offline xceque on 2002-05-11 02:48 [#00214651]
Points: 5888 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



You'll be ok. As long as you don't confess on a public forum
or anything.

:)



 

offline earthleakage from tell the world you're winning on 2002-05-11 02:54 [#00214652]
Points: 27790 Status: Regular



oh dear, who's been a naughty boy then
probably a wind up though


 

offline earthleakage from tell the world you're winning on 2002-05-11 02:55 [#00214653]
Points: 27790 Status: Regular



you hope


 

offline princo from Shitty City (Geelong) (Australia) on 2002-05-11 04:34 [#00214676]
Points: 13411 Status: Lurker



jonh is fast: hmmmm... your status on this mb is 'lurker' ya
know. ;)


 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2002-05-11 04:45 [#00214687]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



''You'll be ok. As long as you don't confess on a public
forum
or anything.''

Haha, sucker...

That's quite a sticky situation, though. Heh.



 

offline earthleakage from tell the world you're winning on 2002-05-11 04:50 [#00214694]
Points: 27790 Status: Regular



its 16 in sunny england (thank god)


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2002-05-11 05:06 [#00214711]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker



The age of consent in Canada is 14. I know this doesn't
affect you, since you not in Canada.

John is Fast, perhaps abstaining from the wunderfull world
of online smutswappery might be a good idea for you? Is it
worth the risk to possibly go to prison?

When I lived down in florida, I had sex with a seventeen
year old. What I did was illegal. There is no statutory rape
in florida. If you are over the age of consent, and the girl
is under the age of consent (18), then you can be charged
for child molestation.


 

offline princo from Shitty City (Geelong) (Australia) on 2002-05-11 05:40 [#00214726]
Points: 13411 Status: Lurker



john is fast: just how fast are you? you might have some
large men chasing you!

run john, run!


 

offline nanotech from Sukavasti Amitaba Pureland (United States) on 2002-05-11 05:46 [#00214737]
Points: 3727 Status: Regular



ok, even having pics of children under the age of 18 is an
arrestable offence...there was a bust here in WA where a
person had thousands of pics...and remember that kidnapping
in CA not to long ago w/ that trailer? the guy had a few
pics on his comp, and that's what let the police keep him
untill they found that blood stain. i think that even
talking to under 18er's about sex over state phone lines is
a federal offence...ppl don't take things like this
lightly... especially if you live in a conserative state,
and you're much older that the girl was...personally, i
wouldn't be worried about your situation in
particular..because the hacking part seems to phoney...but
in the future be very carful about your child porn...infact
the whole under ground nature and secresy of child porn
makes it just that much more yummy...

yes, i'm a sick-o...can't deny who/what i am...


 

offline Zombiekev from Ardmore (United States) on 2002-05-11 06:31 [#00214766]
Points: 2857 Status: Lurker



the coppers look for bigger busts like violent folks that
seek pleasure off of kids.



 

offline zguru from Lindale (Texas) (United States) on 2002-05-11 06:36 [#00214768]
Points: 1562 Status: Regular



why do you turn the music down when you are banging a 12
year old?

so you can hear her pelvic bone crack.

that's about the worst joke I know.


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2002-05-11 07:16 [#00214790]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker



What is the worst part about fucking a 5 year old?

Taking the blood out of the clown suit.


 

offline princo from Shitty City (Geelong) (Australia) on 2002-05-11 07:34 [#00214796]
Points: 13411 Status: Lurker



music has the right to children.
not grown men.



 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-05-11 08:42 [#00214842]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker



the thing is, if a year under the age of consent is ok then
that creates a slippery slope (heh). soon it's 2 years under
the age of consent, then 3, 4, till eventually you're
hanging out in middle school parking lots. what do you all
see in young pussy anyway? personally i've never gone out
with a girl younger than me, though i do find younger girls
attractive. it's just not my steez. i hope none of you are
on that father/daughter tip :P


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2002-05-11 08:47 [#00214850]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker



Well, I don't really like to look at age too much when it
comes to this kind of shit... I have passed by plenty of
women just because they be too immature, even tho they be at
proper ages to me. Not saying I am perfect or anything. Its
just if I get involved with a girl... there definately has
to be some substance up there, and the ability to partition
responsibility accordingly.


 

offline john is fast from sacramento (United States) on 2002-05-11 08:49 [#00214854]
Points: 638 Status: Regular



dont get me wrong people im not really into child porn.
there have just been one or two underaged girls i got
aquanted with and saw a pic or two. i dont even still have
these pics. i dont even talk to them anymore i dont think.
and really im thinking nothing will come of this as aol
hasnt contacted me in the last 24 hours.

on a slightly related note. did you know every email you
ever sent is saved in a database and can be used in court
for various reasons such as devorce cases, molestation, or
just proving you knew someone? its fact. scarey.


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-05-11 08:49 [#00214857]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to Taxidermist: #00214850



that's just it, 15 and even 16 year old girls aren't as
independent as 19 year olds, it's not right to target them.
it's predator behavior. they may look good but emotionally
they're not ready to decide to have sex with someone years
older.


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-05-11 08:50 [#00214858]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to john is fast: #00214854



who saves these emails? sounds like bs to me


 

offline john is fast from sacramento (United States) on 2002-05-11 08:50 [#00214859]
Points: 638 Status: Regular



hehe, that confess on a public message board comment was
funny though :)

ill be sure not to do that one ;)


 

offline john is fast from sacramento (United States) on 2002-05-11 08:52 [#00214861]
Points: 638 Status: Regular



no no, i learned that in college. if a lady is going
through a divorce she has the right to summon aol to check
old emails of his to see if he was cheating. or so on.
its been done i know for sure.


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2002-05-11 08:52 [#00214862]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker



Who said I was targeting them? I never said I prefered
younger girls... or that I looked for that kind of
relationship.

Every girl I have ever been with other than the 15 year old
has been no less than two years younger than I, and usualy
were a year or two older.


 

offline john is fast from sacramento (United States) on 2002-05-11 08:54 [#00214865]
Points: 638 Status: Regular



most my girlfriends have been my age pretty much. never
more than 3 years less at any point.


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-05-11 08:56 [#00214868]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to Taxidermist: #00214862



well as to the minor(s), they're mentally and emotionally
underprepared to deal with some of the grim responsibilities
of intercourse (pregnancy, std's, and even serious
relationships) so i don't think they should be allowed.
usually i'd throw in "but that's just my opinion" but it's
also the law. one or two years younger is one thing, but
more than that i think is a definite problem.


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2002-05-11 08:58 [#00214872]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker



Yeah... pretty much the same here.

I also haven't had a relationship in over a year because of
how picky I am with parteners.


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2002-05-11 09:00 [#00214875]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker | Followup to titsworth: #00214868



What are you talking about? I haven't had sex with any
minors???

Except down in florida, but she was seventeen, just over two
years younger than I.


 

offline john is fast from sacramento (United States) on 2002-05-11 09:02 [#00214879]
Points: 638 Status: Regular



oh i do agree man
i wouldnt date a girl this young but if im talking online to
a 16 or 17 year old and she wants to send me this kind of
thing or speak in that way with me i might not have a
problem with it (im 21 by the way)
although i do think its in very bad taste.
and from now on i dont think ill be doing this simply for
the fact that i dont know whos watching and what the
rules/laws on are on this.


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-05-11 09:05 [#00214882]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker



taxi: you said 15, that's what i was talking about really.

john: whenever i get im's from 13-16/f (as they say) i just
have fun with it, it's not worthwhile to be serious with
them but it's not nice to just ignore them either.. usually
i'll say i'm 10 or 50 or something, see where things go from
there


 

offline john is fast from sacramento (United States) on 2002-05-11 09:08 [#00214886]
Points: 638 Status: Regular



seeing where things go from there is what got me in this
possition of possible "trouble" of some kind.


 


Messageboard index