 |
|
You are not logged in! F.A.Q Log in Register |
 |
|
 |
 Now online (1)dariusgriffin ...and 105 guests Last 5 registered Oplandisks nothingstar N_loop yipe foxtrotromeo Browse members... |
 |
Members 8025Messages 2613457 Today 3 Topics 127500 |
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
yes. yes, i believe it was. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
awesome, cant wait to see it |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
anyone see a new triple X trailor?? if so, was rammstein in it? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
rammstein was not in it, and that movie looks kick ass! XXX |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
tripple x trailor? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
yes |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
a tripple x porn trailer for spidey? uhhhhhh, i think i'll pass.... |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
They mean that gay action movie |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
gay action movie???? it looks kick ass. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
yeah spiderman is sweet. I liked the preview for MIB 2. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
I just think XXX is airheaded and for dumb people |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
what? that triple X movie was the stupidest trailer in the whole bunch. looked like The Fast and the Furious II (not suprisingly produced by the same poeple). what a load of (pardon the term) horse shit. that'll sell to every mocho ass meathead on the streets. can't imagine liking that sort of thing. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
its probably marketed for those who use the term "kick ass" without irony, while Spiderman was marketed towards those who use the term "fucking dope"... Hollywood knows what it is doing.... |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
word. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
was it fu---------- |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
its an easy movie to sit through. fun stuff. could've been better :/ |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
yes and no. yes: macho man randy savage was cool, bruce campbell's cameo, stan lee's cameo, william dafoe and the jonah jameson part (i think that's his name, i'm not big into the comic). and the small part parker posey had was cool, though she's COMPLETELY "sold out." bad: tobey mccguire and kirsten dunst (though it was fun staring at her). there was this real light sam raimi feel to it, but unfortunately, the majority of it was hollywood formula summer blockbuster stuff. the stuff with william dafoe's son was cool too ... i think i would have loved it if it was a total sam raimi film. had some really good shots too, like when he's starting to crawl up walls but the bruce campbell cameo was GREAT! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
its WAS very good....some of the dialog was kinda weak, but whats newe in Hollywood...All in all a 7 or 8 outta ten...HULK preview was dope=) |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i didn't like the hulk preview. i know it was a teaser, but i didn't want to see the house cracking open. i wanted to see a bit more. it's not like it had to be a lot, just something |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
true. I just got excited cause the other previews REALLY sucked.... |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
I thought it was great! Spiderman was always my boyhood idle -- I coudn't even begin to count how many times I've fantasized about saving Mary Jane from danger; whisking her away above the city streets tight in my arms.. Tobey Mccguire and Kirsten Dunst were both very good. Mccguire has sort of a shy demeaner that fits the part of Peter Parker... As the movie unfolds he starts to transform into the wise-cracking spidey that we all...well, some of us..--er, a couple of us here know and love so well. Anyway, as far as bringing the comic book characters to life, they get an 'A' in my book. The way they captured Spiderman's webswinging was especially impressive.. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
hehehe ... the web slinging stuff was great, like him going through the city. it looked cgi, but they're getting pretty damn good at it. some of the actual web shooting looked bad (in my opinion). i doooo want to see it again, cause there were some great parts. but the thing that bugged me was the relationship between mj and peter parker. two things, one: it might as well been any other movie (pathetic guy likes popular girl, popular girl secretly likes guy, but has jerk boyfriend ...), and two, my spider-man suave friend was saying the story wasn't like that in the actual comic. it just bugs me that they would replace, what apparently a fine story to begin with, with a hollywood summer blockbuster formula. it's like they wanted it to be risk free |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
it was very comic bookesk yes. my spiderfreak buddy said yes there were a few elements changed about (like anyone would expect for a film, and not just a fomula one) but he was very impressed w/ it. example: an original radioactive spider becoming a genetically engineered spider for the film. a few insignificant updates for a story thats now 40 years old. i happen to catch this one. Uncle Ben's car (the yellow one) was the Ash's car from Evil Dead. Stan Lee wasn't even on the screen for half a second. what the dillyo? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
when the green gomblin first attacks the building where his son and mary jane are up on the balcony. when you see people running on the street, you see stan lee right in front of the camera for about half a second |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
heh, yes, half a second ;-) |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Spidy was pretty bad. I wanted to like it, and I was rooting for him in the end, but the CGI was pretty fucking bad. The shots they set up were lame-o. Dunno, just didn't do it for me. Even $5 felt like a waste...... |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
Messageboard index
|
|||||||||
