 |
|
You are not logged in! F.A.Q Log in Register |
 |
|
 |
 Now online (2)EpicMegatrax Hyperflake ...and 74 guests Last 5 registered Oplandisks nothingstar N_loop yipe foxtrotromeo Browse members... |
 |
Members 8025Messages 2609007 Today 5 Topics 127236 |
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Post 100: has to be future, right? Well -- I can feed LLM a list of Cool Band Names I've come up with; it dutifully then begins grinding out its own Cool Band Names.... ......for an arbitrary period of time.... then something goes wrong. differently, every time I present to you: Crossfading¹ from Cool Band Names into Jaron Lanier's wikipedia entry!! ~ ~ followed by a hard tangent into virtual pharmacies² ¹ kind of impressive, in a strange way ² 60% of the scraped web content used to build the model |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
LL Cool Bandname |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Phatney is boring. Mega zzzzz content LL Cool Bandname fucks though |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
anything would be boring though if the prompts are snooki and chris christie |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
actually vic berger made a hilarious video tho, I almost forgot. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
this run until it turns into donald trump's ghostwritten books |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Pacific Northwest Dangerous Ass Band i nearly choked when that scrolled by |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
very much doubt you're actually interested but the latest video from the guys was just them making fun of actual death metal band names. my favorite was "Mortuary Drape" |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Klampai Rap-u-Lips Rhodes & Crosby A.I. Sharpton Floppy Duck Untitled Lettuce Projects Mike the Tank The Cryptic Clones Microcosmic Pizza Hip-hopper Hackers PacManiacs The Pixelated Bozos Dark Star System Snoopy N' Wookiee Wolfe & Vine Gluteus Maximus Little Brother Vinyls Mike & The Machine A.I. Librarian Augmented Reality Project The Drunken Zebras DJ Sparks Freddie's Friendly Taxis The Funky Monkeys Gluten Free Meth Hippie Creepers Love and theft Microscopic Pizza Natural High One Hundred Ninety-three Point One Million Hours of Joy! Philly's Finest Shopping Bag Head Slouchy Pants The Vibrational Plumbers The Bubble Wrap Boys Water Balloon Fury |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
give me a text list of them and i'll feed them in and let it churn out more. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
hahaha that's very good. most of them are meh but the concept of "dangerous ass" is... pleasing |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
The Spread Shit-ters Crackheads The Flip Side of the Flip Side Dr. Strangelove Little Miss Techno Skinny Pillow Rhubarb Dysentery Gary Kroeker Mike Gates Zenith, Alaska Forty-One Fishsticks Buddy Buddy DJ Taco Supreme The Fucking Hackers Brian Gets a Name Change Lil' Peeps Gary Dot-com The Nasty Wailers The Spellman Brothers Ronnie Rush Kurtis Blow Melvin J. Snuffy McDonald The Beefcake Boyz Skinny Pillow Betty LaFoote Orange Crusty Doug Fresh & Sneak The Kroes Ramadan & the Dysentery Boys Mike Gates and his Wide Ass Crazy Town Gary Dot-com's Cool Band Name Honkey Donkey Airborne Toxic Event Fuckin' A! Drunk Moms Penelope & the Chipmunks Eyeball Bros. Shit and Shine The Kroes |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
yeahhh... took me a moment... The Kroes... oh! caw Ronnie Rush -- is that a real one? Ramadan & the Dysentery Boys ...good run Eyeball Bros. Shit and Shine The Kroes Ramadan & the Dysentery Boys # PARKING LOTS I live in a nice section of town, but still have to park on the street. If I don't, there is no telling what might happen. One day I was coming home and all of a sudden my car just took off without me! There it went barreling down our quiet residential neighborhood streets, narrowly missing pedest |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
no fluff here Hannah Barber Airport Ranger Six Million Dollar Mouthpiece The Stab-It Floating Points Jesus Christ Supercomputer Kitti Kats Witches Brew Creamery Grammatical Tornadoes Thomas Pynchon Electricity is a waveform. —Robert A. Heinlein, Stranger in a Strange Land (1961) I never expected to see the day when robots would be used for anything but factory work, because that's all they were good for. Even if they could learn faster than humans and better, they just didn |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
one still hasn't been topped i'll stop posting them now |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
wolfslice: Hamster Rapture |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
connected it to my database of scraped xltronic posts. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
eventually everyone realizes these companies with their giant models have scraped the internet, stolen everyone's shit, and... the AI image generator does things like hallucinate the gettyimages watermark, all the writers start complaining they're not getting royalties from their work being thrown into a blender --EpicMegatrax, May 3rd, 2023 and then here is wired, with an article from TODAY ~ AI’s rise has caused a revaluation of what people put on the internet. Artists who feel their work was scraped by AI without credit or compensation are seeking recourse. Fan fiction writers who shared their work freely to entertain fellow fans now find their niche sex tropes on AI-assisted writing tools. Hollywood screenwriters are currently on strike to make sure AI systems aren’t enlisted to do their work for them. No, TV and film writers don’t write for the internet, but so much of what they create ends up online anyway, ready to be plucked. i also screamed about what reddit's IPO would bring and no one listened to me on that either, obviously. however, i failed to see how my being right about reddit's IPO intersected with my being right about people waking up and realizing AI stole their fanfiction, and, sorry, i'll try to do better next round. [really, the issue was that i hadn't considered: what if i take two things i am sure i am right about, and put them together?] but in a cycling sense, i should probably stop posting anything good publicly |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i get it that no one cares i'm playing out the thred 1) eventually everyone realizes these companies with their giant models have scraped the internet, stolen everyone's shit, and... the AI image generator does things like hallucinate the gettyimages watermark, all the writers start complaining they're not getting royalties from their work being thrown into a blender 2) a lawsuit here, a lawsuit there, eventually a reliable pattern for how to sue AI for IP infringement and then the lawyers move in like the visigoths 3) AI is shut down and the only people who can use it are, like, fucking jimmy iovine, because if you spend a few million and build your own model out of pirated stuff and keep it in-house then you can effectively get away with it because to do that you're already rich enough that you'll be very hard to sue. microsoft is probably already using it to quietly rip off who knows what we're at early #2, obvs ~ but then 3b, 3 -- the bolded parted -- meanwhile: between you and me, i strongly suspect musk cut off public twitter access in order to strongarm an AI data licensing deal for twitter. that, hey, reddit did it? if i starve them too, i can... ...and, boom, he's opened it up; he must have gotten a deal. for twitter's increasingly irrelevant data |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
the llama.cpp spits out all sorts of fragments of message board convos with peoples' actual message board nicks, and it's pretty impressive how much of that shit it packs into a dozen or two gigs |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i actually haven't dug in to see what it has of xltronic. i'll leave that to someone else |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
well, interesting. so there is this here internal google document which does make me feel a bit better, because it's like "epic was right" except this was written in march or something and, okay, so long as someone is ahead of me being ahead of everyone else i'm not mad any more. especially because their conclusion is "small models will kick the ass of these giant models in the long run, and anyone can do those on their own with open source, and, um, we have no value to add as a large corporation?" ...and it's basically a memo about how they're fucked, why, and... yes, it looks like this was leaked MAY 4TH and i started going on about this on the 3rd... hmmm..... anyone on zilty posting from the googleplex? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
While our models still hold a slight edge in terms of quality, the gap is closing astonishingly quickly. Open-source models are faster, more customizable, more private, and pound-for-pound more capable. They are doing things with $100 and 13B params that we struggle with at $10M and 540B. And they are doing so in weeks, not months. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Sarah Silverman is suing OpenAI and Meta for copyright infringement. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
"The scary truth about AI copyright is nobody knows what will happen next" first reply to this thread, may 3rd, but the verge has no lunch to eat anyways |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
a string of text that might look like gobbledygook to you or me but which carries subtle significance to an AI model trained on huge quantities of web data—can defy all of these defenses in several popular chatbots at once. i flat-out missed this one. it's so obvious retrospect too |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
U.S. copyright law, she underscored, “protects only works of human creation” and is “designed to adapt with the times.” There’s been a consistent understanding that human creativity is “at the core of copyrightability, even as that human creativity is channeled through new tools or into new media,” the ruling stated. While cameras generated a mechanical reproduction of a scene, she explained that they do so only after a human develops a “mental conception” of the photo, which is a product of decisions like where the subject stands, arrangements and lighting, among other choices. “Human involvement in, and ultimate creative control over, the work at issue was key to the conclusion that the new type of work fell within the bounds of copyright,” Howell wrote. In another case, the a federal appeals court said that a photo captured by a monkey can’t be granted a copyright since animals don’t qualify for protection ...and, do me, that's really what settles it. if the monkey can't own a copyright, neither can an |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
Messageboard index
|
|||||||||
