 |
|
You are not logged in! F.A.Q Log in Register |
 |
|
 |
 Now online (2)dariusgriffin big ...and 125 guests Last 5 registered Oplandisks nothingstar N_loop yipe foxtrotromeo Browse members... |
 |
Members 8025Messages 2613613 Today 0 Topics 127510 |
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
* |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
* |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Press press # to speak with Dr. Octothorpe |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Please please % to speak to the evil Dr. Modulus, who, when we last left off, was about to write a loop that would make the world spin backwards |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
<=> |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
a long long time before xltronic and and before phobiazero there was epicmegatrax... and a long long time after xltronic's demise there will be... you guessed it right, epicmegatrax. and ALL OF YOU will keep witnessing it whatever you do |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i'll survive WWIII along the the cockroaches and the lawyers maybe i should go to law school to hedge my bets. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
>>>maybe i should go to law school to hedge my bets. is this a mixed metaphor |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Steve+ |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i *69'ed this thread, that's how i knew who made it |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Max Hardcore 69'ing Osama Bin Ladens Corpse on the whitehouse lawn |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
there is no start and end it comes from infinity it goes to infinity FOREVER |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
berp |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
>>>is this a mixed metaphor as i am contractually unable to acknowledge language exists, and acknowledging metaphor would be tantamount to acknowledging that language exists, i am afraid i cannot answer your question p. much ~ A) it makes me gleeful to construct language like this B) the same part of me that, when working on music, is like, "we need to sample this bit of dialogue from this episode of the wire we last saw three years ago" would be like that with case history and legal code. C) when i was a child, four perhaps, i would find holes in the house rules my parents set down and use them to essentially not follow the rules, even though i was technically following the rules, and i knew exactly. what. i. was. doing |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
yes, that was the one -- four years old. house rules are: no food in the TV room. so i stand in the hallway, toes wedged against the threshold of the TV room doorway, eating... crisps, i think. and when the hammer dropped -- as i knew it would -- i astutely pointed out that i was not in the TV room, and thus, was not violating the rules. the rules were shortly amended to "no food outside of the kitchen." drat |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i mean, this is where it's clear i was clearly just four. i was so smug with myself for finding this hole in the rules and confidently walked right up and did it without really thinking about how it would play out after why, no, technically, i am not breaking the rules... obviously, this is not a democracy; mum and dad can change the rules at their whim. that i was burning a perfectly good legal vulnerability because i was full of myself. i got better at it |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
90% sure i was watching reading rainbow with the "crisps are not technically in the TV room incident" like. stood in the hall and watched TV. i can still see it. i'm not in there, though, so i can still eat crisps |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i've heard this thing where people who have really good memories also tend to be people who habitually go back and catalogue things; and let's give it a go. that, for reasons i can't quite put my finger on, i am absolutely certain this happened before i got my Nintendo Entertainment System, which i got when i was six, and kindergarten was also six, and this just didn't feel in my brain when this memory was written -- no, i hadn't been to kindergarten yet. i can also dredge up that i'm 2/3 sure it was summer. four. at max five. but not outside of that range i know accuracy matters here on zilty. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
now i'm just off on a tangent, but... oh my gosh, this is so incredibly weird: i've just noticed that pretty much all of my early memories feel like summer. this does not mean they necessarily all are, but a lot of the ones i can effectively verify are. i mean, i have the christmas where i got "my first sony" -- which i still actually have -- and this is the line where i am sitting on the stairway and santa and it dawns on me that santa is not real; i can hear my parents prepping things in santa's name. i went back to bed and they never knew but yeah. i suspect i do have winter memories, i just can't tag them with winter because i was indoors. but lawyering crisps watching reading rainbow, yeah, that was summer, i remember the smell and feel of the window AC unit in the TV room. and plenty of memories just in the house that are probably winter with no cue to tag it as such |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
sorry now i'm just deep up my bum. but not so sorry as to not continue is it really that out there to shift to the idea that memory is not just an innate ability, but... a skill that can be developed? a discipline that can be honed? like, i am deeply arguing with myself now: i just have very strong memories of that window AC unit and watching reading rainbow... and while that crisp incident definitely happened, am i just filling most of it in with the stonger sensual memories of summer, in particular that AC tied to reading rainbow strong in my brain spending some time doing such archeology; might explain how brain size -- physical mass of the grey matter -- doesn't terribly seem to terribly correlate with how good one's memory is |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
your only option is death only if you die it’ll be over (or so i think i’m not sure) |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
otherwise EPICMEGATRAX in the morning EPICMEGATRAX even when you’re looking elsewhere you’ll get EPICMEGATRAX |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i've tried like three times but you're genuinely incoherent over your last two posts. the general tone sounds like your standard sneering takedown, but the words don't parse into anything less than stop overdosing on ambien |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i accept your greatness i bow down before you what else do you want me to do?? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Oh, EpicMegaTrax, remember that time that Aphex turned up and you were a twat to him until he disappeared again?! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
also if your talking about being a force multiplier i'd start with doing more than fucking talking. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
what, where, when? on xlt? on watmm? i was researching quite a few chemicals and will freely admit to sporadic bursts of being a jerk in the early 2010's. if i've spoken with him on here, i don't remember doing so knowingly. which alias? panflet? cnut? but someone told me he was "chunky" on watmm and we spent quite a bit chatting on windows live messenger or whatever that crap was with hold F97 to spam someone with a voice clip and i still have a giant folder of josso and i spamming each other live off the mixer repeatedly but if chunky was aphex, that would be lovely, i had a great time chatting with whoever that was. but someone just said it's aphex and that could be utter horseshit. i don't know i just work here |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
>>>is this a mixed metaphor as i am contractually unable to acknowledge language exists, and acknowledging metaphor would be tantamount to acknowledging that language exists, i am afraid i cannot answer your question p. much ~ A) it makes me gleeful to construct language like this B) the same part of me that, when working on music, is like, "we need to sample this bit of dialogue from this episode of the wire we last saw three years ago" would be like that with case history and legal code. i suddenly came back to this thought just now, for various raisins. that i'm saying, like, you ask the lawyer, "what are all those books you have" and the lawyer replies "case studies" and if i put in two or three years i think i'd rather show off with empty shelves, and i take such delight in twisting words, and finding ways around rules... and now, i had a revelation: that might not matter if i couldn't hold my wad. especially in some courtroom trial, for example ~ that you have to know the case studies, the case, the people [other side, judge, witnesses, whatev], and it's a chess game where you very carefully hold back and deploy bit by bit. obviously i'd have some problems with this i was more thinking the sort of lawyer that mines through legal documents to find the zero-day gems, which would have less of that... but still... i dunno, i can do that. but it has to be... very deliberate. like, unless i construct my reactions every step of the way, i'll just exponentially accelerate into a wall. if i plan it in advance, the weasels run it on autopilot. without a course; they run amok |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
Messageboard index
|
|||||||||
