|  | 
        
         |  | 
        
         |  RussellDust
             on 2018-08-06 19:55 [#02557784] Points: 16155 Status: Lurker
 | 
| 
     
 
 | ... and going blind. Would you have it put down once it’s eyesight got too bad?
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  belb
             from mmmmmmhhhhzzzz!!! on 2018-08-06 20:23 [#02557801] Points: 6495 Status: Lurker | Followup to RussellDust: #02557784
 | 
| 
     
 
 | i think i would tbh, yeah. i mean the alternative would be to lead him around a lot and i'm sure he'd enjoy being
 petted etc but i dont think it's much quality of life. if i
 was blind and deaf (knowing what i'd lost, maybe it'd be
 different if i was deafblind from birth) i'd want to die
 too. is this about albert man?
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  EpicMegatrax
             from Greatest Hits on 2018-08-06 20:29 [#02557806] Points: 25604 Status: Regular
 | 
| 
     
 
 | quality of life. i figure a pet rat would do alright blind, but a dog, less so.
 
 my aunt's dog was going blind. one eye totally gone, the
 other not so good. he'd walk around the kitchen, and bonk
 into things for a bit. then he'd realize his strategy was
 not working; carefully walked a perimeter around the whole
 kitchen with his good eye to map it out more thoroughly
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  RussellDust
             on 2018-08-06 20:37 [#02557811] Points: 16155 Status: Lurker
 | 
| 
     
 
 | Thanks for your input fellas! 
 What makes it hard is that when he started having heart
 problems: adapted and is happy. He went deaf: adapted and
 happy. He can only see shadows now: adapted and happy.
 
 A big factor would be how happy he is still going around
 places he knows really well: home and the close by walking
 area. He seems to adapt no ,after what comes at him. Of
 course if he stops eating and just lies there, hopelessly
 unhappy, then of course I’ll do the right thing.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  Zephyr Twin
             from ΔΔΔ on 2018-08-06 20:40 [#02557814] Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Show recordbag
 | 
| 
     
 
 | "He can only see shadows now"? How does that even work? 
 Sorry about your Pupp, Russ. I hope he's doing okay
 (relatively).
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  RussellDust
             on 2018-08-06 20:50 [#02557819] Points: 16155 Status: Lurker | Followup to Zephyr Twin: #02557814
 | 
| 
     
 
 | He’s not a pup, he’s 14, and yeah regarding what he can see it means he can walk outside without bumping into
 things. People from afar and up until very close (in fact m
 not sure he can faces at all now) appear as shadows now,
 which makes him weary of anyone who’s smell he doesn’t
 recognise. Yet he can avoid these objects he sees which
 means walks are still fine.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  mohamed
             from the turtle business on 2018-08-06 20:54 [#02557821] Points: 31593 Status: Regular | Show recordbag
 | 
| 
     
 
 | maya seems to have problem with the medium-long distance view, she doesnt see me anymore if i walk too far away from
 her, should i buy her a pair of glass?
 
 jokes apart of course you would put and end to it if you had
 a far-too rational mind, but you dont do it because its
 albert. bear in mind that animals consideration is what
 differences us from arabs for example.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  mohamed
             from the turtle business on 2018-08-06 20:55 [#02557822] Points: 31593 Status: Regular | Show recordbag
 | 
| 
     
 
 | *problems 
 *glasses
 
 the plural is not strong on me tonight
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  Zephyr Twin
             from ΔΔΔ on 2018-08-06 20:55 [#02557823] Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Followup to RussellDust: #02557819 | Show recordbag
 | 
| 
     
 
 | 1) I figured he was old. "Pupp" was a reference to PuppellDust, which is my headcanon for your dog's name.
 
 2) Ah, I see. I was genuinely confused and thought you meant
 he could only see the shadows cast by objects on the ground
 but not the objects themselves.
 
 3) Sorry for making you explain things that to you probably
 seemed like common sense.
 
 4) High five?
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         | Messageboard index
 
 
        
 |